Divide-And-Conquer Sorting Small instance.  n <= 1 elements.  n <= 10 elements.  We’ll use n <= 1 for now. Large instance.  Divide into k >= 2 smaller.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Algorithms Analysis Lecture 6 Quicksort. Quick Sort Divide and Conquer.
Advertisements

Divide And Conquer Distinguish between small and large instances. Small instances solved differently from large ones.
Divide and Conquer Sanghyun Park Fall 2002 CSE, POSTECH.
Rank Rank of an element is its position in ascending key order. [2,6,7,8,10,15,18,20,25,30,35,40] rank(2) = 0 rank(15) = 5 rank(20) = 7.
CS4413 Divide-and-Conquer
Divide And Conquer Distinguish between small and large instances. Small instances solved differently from large ones.
Chapter 4: Divide and Conquer Master Theorem, Mergesort, Quicksort, Binary Search, Binary Trees The Design and Analysis of Algorithms.
Quicksort Quicksort     29  9.
ISOM MIS 215 Module 7 – Sorting. ISOM Where are we? 2 Intro to Java, Course Java lang. basics Arrays Introduction NewbieProgrammersDevelopersProfessionalsDesigners.
Quicksort CS 3358 Data Structures. Sorting II/ Slide 2 Introduction Fastest known sorting algorithm in practice * Average case: O(N log N) * Worst case:
25 May Quick Sort (11.2) CSE 2011 Winter 2011.
Quicksort COMP171 Fall Sorting II/ Slide 2 Introduction * Fastest known sorting algorithm in practice * Average case: O(N log N) * Worst case: O(N.
Chapter 7: Sorting Algorithms
Quicksort, Mergesort, and Heapsort. Quicksort Fastest known sorting algorithm in practice  Caveats: not stable  Vulnerable to certain attacks Average.
CSC 2300 Data Structures & Algorithms March 23, 2007 Chapter 7. Sorting.
Sorting Chapter Sorting Consider list x 1, x 2, x 3, … x n We seek to arrange the elements of the list in order –Ascending or descending Some O(n.
Lecture 7COMPSCI.220.FS.T Algorithm MergeSort John von Neumann ( 1945 ! ): a recursive divide- and-conquer approach Three basic steps: –If the.
1 Sorting Problem: Given a sequence of elements, find a permutation such that the resulting sequence is sorted in some order. We have already seen: –Insertion.
Introduction to Algorithms Rabie A. Ramadan rabieramadan.org 4 Some of the sides are exported from different sources.
CS 171: Introduction to Computer Science II Quicksort.
Fundamentals of Algorithms MCS - 2 Lecture # 16. Quick Sort.
CS 206 Introduction to Computer Science II 04 / 27 / 2009 Instructor: Michael Eckmann.
CS 206 Introduction to Computer Science II 12 / 09 / 2009 Instructor: Michael Eckmann.
CSC 2300 Data Structures & Algorithms March 27, 2007 Chapter 7. Sorting.
CS 206 Introduction to Computer Science II 12 / 05 / 2008 Instructor: Michael Eckmann.
Chapter 4: Divide and Conquer The Design and Analysis of Algorithms.
Quicksort. 2 Introduction * Fastest known sorting algorithm in practice * Average case: O(N log N) * Worst case: O(N 2 ) n But, the worst case seldom.
CS 206 Introduction to Computer Science II 12 / 03 / 2008 Instructor: Michael Eckmann.
Sorting Chapter 10.
Quicksort.
Sorting Rearrange n elements into ascending order. 7, 3, 6, 2, 1  1, 2, 3, 6, 7.
Chapter 7 (Part 2) Sorting Algorithms Merge Sort.
Design and Analysis of Algorithms – Chapter 51 Divide and Conquer (I) Dr. Ying Lu RAIK 283: Data Structures & Algorithms.
Mergesort and Quicksort Chapter 8 Kruse and Ryba.
CS 206 Introduction to Computer Science II 12 / 08 / 2008 Instructor: Michael Eckmann.
Sorting II/ Slide 1 Lecture 24 May 15, 2011 l merge-sorting l quick-sorting.
Design and Analysis of Algorithms - Chapter 41 Divide and Conquer The most well known algorithm design strategy: 1. Divide instance of problem into two.
Sorting (Part II: Divide and Conquer) CSE 373 Data Structures Lecture 14.
1 Data Structures and Algorithms Sorting. 2  Sorting is the process of arranging a list of items into a particular order  There must be some value on.
Sorting HKOI Training Team (Advanced)
HKOI 2006 Intermediate Training Searching and Sorting 1/4/2006.
Merge Sort. What Is Sorting? To arrange a collection of items in some specified order. Numerical order Lexicographical order Input: sequence of numbers.
Quicksort, Mergesort, and Heapsort. Quicksort Fastest known sorting algorithm in practice  Caveats: not stable  Vulnerable to certain attacks Average.
The Selection Problem. 2 Median and Order Statistics In this section, we will study algorithms for finding the i th smallest element in a set of n elements.
Sorting. Pseudocode of Insertion Sort Insertion Sort To sort array A[0..n-1], sort A[0..n-2] recursively and then insert A[n-1] in its proper place among.
1 Sorting Algorithms Sections 7.1 to Comparison-Based Sorting Input – 2,3,1,15,11,23,1 Output – 1,1,2,3,11,15,23 Class ‘Animals’ – Sort Objects.
Survey of Sorting Ananda Gunawardena. Naïve sorting algorithms Bubble sort: scan for flips, until all are fixed Etc...
Divide and Conquer Applications Sanghyun Park Fall 2002 CSE, POSTECH.
CS 206 Introduction to Computer Science II 04 / 22 / 2009 Instructor: Michael Eckmann.
Sorting: Implementation Fundamental Data Structures and Algorithms Klaus Sutner February 24, 2004.
Review 1 Selection Sort Selection Sort Algorithm Time Complexity Best case Average case Worst case Examples.
Divide-and-Conquer The most-well known algorithm design strategy: 1. Divide instance of problem into two or more smaller instances 2.Solve smaller instances.
Divide And Conquer A large instance is solved as follows:  Divide the large instance into smaller instances.  Solve the smaller instances somehow. 
1 Heapsort, Mergesort, and Quicksort Sections 7.5 to 7.7.
1 Ch.19 Divide and Conquer. 2 BIRD’S-EYE VIEW Divide and conquer algorithms Decompose a problem instance into several smaller independent instances May.
Divide and Conquer Sorting Algorithms COMP s1 Sedgewick Chapters 7 and 8.
Sorting. Typically, most organizations spend large percentage of computing time (25% - 50%) on sorting Internal sorting the list is small enough to sort.
Week 13 - Wednesday.  What did we talk about last time?  NP-completeness.
Nothing is particularly hard if you divide it into small jobs. Henry Ford Nothing is particularly hard if you divide it into small jobs. Henry Ford.
CMPT 238 Data Structures More on Sorting: Merge Sort and Quicksort.
Divide and Conquer Sorting
Rank Rank of an element is its position in ascending key order.
Divide-And-Conquer-And-Combine
Chapter 4: Divide and Conquer
Rank Rank of an element is its position in ascending key order.
Quick Sort (11.2) CSE 2011 Winter November 2018.
Divide-And-Conquer-And-Combine
EE 312 Software Design and Implementation I
Design and Analysis of Algorithms
Chapter 7 : Sorting 교수 : 이상환 강의실 : 113,118호, 324호 연구실 : 과학관 204호
Presentation transcript:

Divide-And-Conquer Sorting Small instance.  n <= 1 elements.  n <= 10 elements.  We’ll use n <= 1 for now. Large instance.  Divide into k >= 2 smaller instances.  k = 2, 3, 4, … ?  What does each smaller instance look like?  Sort smaller instances recursively.  How do you combine the sorted smaller instances?

Insertion Sort k = 2 First n - 1 elements (a[0:n-2]) define one of the smaller instances; last element (a[n-1]) defines the second smaller instance. a[0:n-2] is sorted recursively. a[n-1] is a small instance.a[0]a[n-1] a[n-2]

Insertion Sort Combining is done by inserting a[n-1] into the sorted a[0:n-2]. Complexity is O(n 2 ). Usually implemented nonrecursively.a[0]a[n-1] a[n-2]

Selection Sort k = 2 To divide a large instance into two smaller instances, first find the largest element. The largest element defines one of the smaller instances; the remaining n-1 elements define the second smaller instance.a[0]a[n-1] a[n-2]

Selection Sort The second smaller instance is sorted recursively. Append the first smaller instance (largest element) to the right end of the sorted smaller instance. Complexity is O(n 2 ). Usually implemented nonrecursively.a[0]a[n-1] a[n-2]

Bubble Sort Bubble sort may also be viewed as a k = 2 divide- and-conquer sorting method. Insertion sort, selection sort and bubble sort divide a large instance into one smaller instance of size n - 1 and another one of size 1. All three sort methods take O(n 2 ) time.

Divide And Conquer Divide-and-conquer algorithms generally have best complexity when a large instance is divided into smaller instances of approximately the same size. When k = 2 and n = 24, divide into two smaller instances of size 12 each. When k = 2 and n = 25, divide into two smaller instances of size 13 and 12, respectively.

Merge Sort k = 2 First ceil(n/2) elements define one of the smaller instances; remaining floor(n/2) elements define the second smaller instance. Each of the two smaller instances is sorted recursively. The sorted smaller instances are combined using a process called merge. Complexity is O(n log n). Usually implemented nonrecursively.

Merge Two Sorted Lists A = (2, 5, 6) B = (1, 3, 8, 9, 10) C = () Compare smallest elements of A and B and merge smaller into C. A = (2, 5, 6) B = (3, 8, 9, 10) C = (1)

Merge Two Sorted Lists A = (5, 6) B = (3, 8, 9, 10) C = (1, 2) A = (5, 6) B = (8, 9, 10) C = (1, 2, 3) A = (6) B = (8, 9, 10) C = (1, 2, 3, 5)

Merge Two Sorted Lists A = () B = (8, 9, 10) C = (1, 2, 3, 5, 6) When one of A and B becomes empty, append the other list to C. O(1) time needed to move an element into C. Total time is O(n + m), where n and m are, respectively, the number of elements initially in A and B.

Merge Sort [8, 3, 13, 6, 2, 14, 5, 9, 10, 1, 7, 12, 4] [8, 3, 13, 6, 2, 14, 5][9, 10, 1, 7, 12, 4] [8, 3, 13, 6][2, 14, 5] [8, 3][13, 6] [8][3][13][6] [2, 14][5] [2][14] [9, 10, 1][7, 12, 4] [9, 10][1] [9][10] [7, 12][4] [7][12]

Merge Sort [3, 8][6, 13] [3, 6, 8, 13] [8][3][13][6] [2, 14] [2, 5, 14] [2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 13, 14] [5] [2][14] [9, 10] [1, 9, 10] [1] [9][10] [7, 12] [4, 7, 12] [1, 4, 7, 9, 10,12] [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13,14] [4] [7][12]

Time Complexity Let t(n) be the time required to sort n elements. t(0) = t(1) = c, where c is a constant. When n > 1, t(n) = t(ceil(n/2)) + t(floor(n/2)) + dn, where d is a constant. To solve the recurrence, assume n is a power of 2 and use repeated substitution. t(n) = O(n log n).

Merge Sort Downward pass over the recursion tree.  Divide large instances into small ones. Upward pass over the recursion tree.  Merge pairs of sorted lists. Number of leaf nodes is n. Number of nonleaf nodes is n-1.

Time Complexity Downward pass.  O(1) time at each node.  O(n) total time at all nodes. Upward pass.  O(n) time merging at each level that has a nonleaf node.  Number of levels is O(log n).  Total time is O(n log n).

Nonrecursive Version Eliminate downward pass. Start with sorted lists of size 1 and do pairwise merging of these sorted lists as in the upward pass.

Nonrecursive Merge Sort [8][3][13][6][2][14][5][9][10][1][7][12][4] [3, 8][6, 13][2, 14] [5, 9] [1, 10][7, 12] [4] [3, 6, 8, 13][2, 5, 9, 14][1, 7, 10, 12] [4] [2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13, 14][1, 4, 7, 10, 12] [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14]

Complexity Sorted segment size is 1, 2, 4, 8, … Number of merge passes is ceil(log 2 n). Each merge pass takes O(n) time. Total time is O(n log n). Need O(n) additional space for the merge. Merge sort is slower than insertion sort when n <= 15 (approximately). So define a small instance to be an instance with n <= 15. Sort small instances using insertion sort. Start with segment size = 15.

Natural Merge Sort Initial sorted segments are the naturally ocurring sorted segments in the input. Input = [8, 9, 10, 2, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 6, 12, 14]. Initial segments are: [8, 9, 10] [2, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15] [6, 12, 14] 2 (instead of 4) merge passes suffice. Segment boundaries have a[i] > a[i+1].

Quick Sort Small instance has n <= 1. Every small instance is a sorted instance. To sort a large instance, select a pivot element from out of the n elements. Partition the n elements into 3 groups left, middle and right. The middle group contains only the pivot element. All elements in the left group are <= pivot. All elements in the right group are >= pivot. Sort left and right groups recursively. Answer is sorted left group, followed by middle group followed by sorted right group.

Example Use 6 as the pivot Sort left and right groups recursively.

Choice Of Pivot Pivot is leftmost element in list that is to be sorted.  When sorting a[6:20], use a[6] as the pivot.  Text implementation does this. Randomly select one of the elements to be sorted as the pivot.  When sorting a[6:20], generate a random number r in the range [6, 20]. Use a[r] as the pivot.

Choice Of Pivot Median-of-Three rule. From the leftmost, middle, and rightmost elements of the list to be sorted, select the one with median key as the pivot.  When sorting a[6:20], examine a[6], a[13] ((6+20)/2), and a[20]. Select the element with median (i.e., middle) key.  If a[6].key = 30, a[13].key = 2, and a[20].key = 10, a[20] becomes the pivot.  If a[6].key = 3, a[13].key = 2, and a[20].key = 10, a[6] becomes the pivot.

Choice Of Pivot  If a[6].key = 30, a[13].key = 25, and a[20].key = 10, a[13] becomes the pivot. When the pivot is picked at random or when the median-of-three rule is used, we can use the quick sort code of the text provided we first swap the leftmost element and the chosen pivot. pivot swap

Partitioning Into Three Groups Sort a = [6, 2, 8, 5, 11, 10, 4, 1, 9, 7, 3]. Leftmost element (6) is the pivot. When another array b is available:  Scan a from left to right (omit the pivot in this scan), placing elements <= pivot at the left end of b and the remaining elements at the right end of b.  The pivot is placed at the remaining position of the b.

Partitioning Example Using Additional Array a b Sort left and right groups recursively.

In-place Partitioning Find leftmost element (bigElement) > pivot. Find rightmost element (smallElement) < pivot. Swap bigElement and smallElement provided bigElement is to the left of smallElement. Repeat.

In-Place Partitioning Example a a a a 6104 bigElement is not to left of smallElement, terminate process. Swap pivot and smallElement a 6106

Complexity O(n) time to partition an array of n elements. Let t(n) be the time needed to sort n elements. t(0) = t(1) = c, where c is a constant. When t > 1, t(n) = t(|left|) + t(|right|) + dn, where d is a constant. t(n) is maximum when either |left| = 0 or |right| = 0 following each partitioning.

Complexity This happens, for example, when the pivot is always the smallest element. For the worst-case time, t(n) = t(n-1) + dn, n > 1 Use repeated substitution to get t(n) = O(n 2 ). The best case arises when |left| and |right| are equal (or differ by 1) following each partitioning. For the best case, the recurrence is the same as for merge sort.

Complexity Of Quick Sort So the best-case complexity is O(n log n). Average complexity is also O(n log n). To help get partitions with almost equal size, change in-place swap rule to:  Find leftmost element (bigElement) >= pivot.  Find rightmost element (smallElement) <= pivot.  Swap bigElement and smallElement provided bigElement is to the left of smallElement. O(n) space is needed for the recursion stack. May be reduced to O(log n) (see Exercise 19.22).

Complexity Of Quick Sort To improve performance, define a small instance to be one with n <= 15 (say) and sort small instances using insertion sort.

java.util.arrays.sort Arrays of a primitive data type are sorted using quick sort.  n insertion sort  7 median of three  n > 40 => pseudo median of 9 equally spaced elements divide the 9 elements into 3 groups find the median of each group pivot is median of the 3 group medians

java.util.arrays.sort Arrays of a nonprimitive data type are sorted using merge sort.  n insertion sort  skip merge when last element of left segment is <= first element of right segment Merge sort is stable (relative order of elements with equal keys is not changed). Quick sort is not stable.