MICE Hydrogen System Tom Bradshaw Yury Ivanyushenkov Elwyn Baynham Meeting October 2004 – Coseners House.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Ann Van Lysebetten CO 2 cooling experience in the LHCb Vertex Locator Vertex 2007 Lake Placid 24/09/2007.
Advertisements

1 AFSWG Mtg 15 Aug 2003 Elwyn Baynham RAL Safety Overview Work done by RAL Group Contributors Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov.
Hydrogen R&D system HAZOP
Hydrogen Pre-Operation Safety Review 4 th October 2011 Hydrogen R&D System Operational Procedures and Test Plan M Courthold.
MICE hydrogen review Commissioning, testing and operations.
1 MICE Hydrogen System Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Iouri Ivaniouchenkov RAL MICE / RAL Safety RAL, 30 October 2003.
Hydrogen Hazard Summary and Preliminary FMECA and HAZOP Yury Ivanyushenkov Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw.
1 Status of Hydrogen System Development MICE Collaboration Meeting, Frascati, June 26-29, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov, Tom Bradshaw, Elwyn Baynham, Mike Courthold,
1 MICE at RAL MICE Collaboration RAL, 2 November 2003 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Iouri Ivaniouchenkov, Tony Jones, Jim Rochford Engineering.
MICE Hazard Overview and Analysis Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw Yury Ivanyushenkov.
MICE Safety Review Process and Schedule Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Columbia Meeting June 2003.
CM26 – 26 th March 2010 Step IV: Liquid Hydrogen Infrastructure M Hills M Courthold T Bradshaw I Mullacrane P Warburton.
1 MICE Absorber working group Columbia, 13 June 2003 MICE Hydrogen System. Preliminary HAZOP. Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw and Iouri Ivaniouchenkov,
MICE Safety System DE Baynham TW Bradshaw MJD Courthold Y Ivanyushenkov.
1 Hydrogen Safety System Summary MICE Collaboration Meeting, Osaka, August 1-3, 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division,
MICE AFCSWG Safety Review Summary Mary Anne Cummings Dec. 17, 2003 MICE Video Conference.
MICE Hydrogen System Implementation Tom Bradshaw Elwyn Baynham Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Jim Rochford.
A presentation at the MICE Video Conference on Wednesday the 5 th of May 2004 Response to the Safety review comments by Wing Lau -- Oxford.
March 14, 2003 MICE Absorber/Coil Integration MICE LH2 Absorber 1.Assembly 2.Safety 3.Staging 4.Instrumentation.
MICE collaboration meeting RAL 28 October 2004 Absorber R & D Plan by Wing Lau – Oxford University.
1 Infrastructure at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov, RAL MICE Collaboration CERN, 29 March 2003.
Matthew Hills Hydrogen System – Piping and Instrumentation Diagram.
Hydrogen R&D system HAZOP and failure analysis Yury Ivanyushenkov, Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold, Matthew Hills and Tony Jones.
Hydrogen Delivery System – R&D Activities T W Bradshaw M Courthold M Hills J Rochford Daresbury Controls Group etc…
Hydrogen system status Yury Ivanyushenkov for Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold, Matthew Hills and Tony Jones.
Mucool cryo-design Christine Darve Fermilab/Beams Division/ Cryogenic Department 8/12/02.
MICE Hydrogen System Design Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Elwyn Baynham Columbia Meeting June 2003.
MICE Hydrogen System MICE Collaboration Meeting, CERN, 29 March-2 April 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division,
MICE hydrogen review Summary of system hardware. System function To provide 22 litres of liquid hydrogen for use as a muon absorber within a superconducting.
Mechanical Safety Systems and DSEAR Compliance
MICE hydrogen review System modifications. Relief circuit repair During leak testing of R&D tests, the insulating vacuum would not go lower than
MICE Hydrogen Control System MICE H2 Review Meeting RAL 15 th Jan 2015 PJ Warburton – STFC Daresbury Lab.
The MICE Hydrogen System Summary Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov, Elwyn Baynham, Tony Jones, Mike Courthold and Matthew Hills Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
23 Jan 2007 LASA Cryogenics Global Group 1 ILC Cryomodule piping L. Tavian for the cryogenics global group.
MICE Hydrogen Safety Functions IEC61508 Compliance & Emergency Procedures MICE Safety Review Meeting 4 th Oct 2011 PJ Warburton - Daresbury Lab.
1 Liquid Hydrogen R&D test report Video Conference – 23/08/12 S Watson P Warburton M Courthold.
Refrigeration Basics 101.
MICE Hydrogen Control System MICE Collaboration Meeting CM33 27 th July 2012 PJ Warburton – STFC Daresbury Lab.
NA62 – GTK Cooling Station 1 Main characteristics Fluid: C 6 F 14 (fluorocarbon) Operating temperature: -30 °C ÷ -10°C Temperature precision: ±1 K Temperature.
Hydrogen system R&D. R&D programme – general points Hydrogen absorber system incorporates 2 novel aspects Hydrogen storage using a hydride bed Hydrogen.
Presentation on Feed and Expansion Cistern. Central Heating At the end of this part you should be able to: Identify general system methods of feed and.
Conceptual Design Review of the NPDGamma Experiment in Beam Line 13 Seppo Penttila NPDGamma project manager September 25, 2007 at SNS.
Hydrogen Pre-Operation Safety Review 4 th October 2011 Results from Helium Commissioning M Hills.
The MICE Hydrogen System Safety Review Introduction Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov, Elwyn Baynham, Tony Jones, Mike Courthold and Matthew Hills Rutherford.
MICE Hydrogen System Tom Bradshaw Yury Ivanyushenkov Elwyn Baynham Collaboration Meeting RAL October 2004.
MICE Hydrogen Control System MICE Safety Review Meeting 4 th Oct 2011 PJ Warburton - Daresbury Lab.
IBL cooling thermal chock incident 15 October The IBL cooling team.
LHCb-VELO Microchannel fracture safety system and evaporator concept 26 June 2015 Bart Verlaat 1.
CM 28 – 6 th October 2010 LH2 Infrastructure M Hills M Courthold T Bradshaw I Mullacrane P Warburton.
Hydrogen Pre-Operation Safety Review 4 th October 2011 The Hydrogen Delivery System – An Introduction M Hills.
CM27 – 8 th July 2010 LH2 System Progress and Future Plans M Hills T Bradshaw M Courthold I Mullacrane P Warburton.
Progress on Hydrogen R&D System
Hydrogen Control System MJD Courthold TW Bradshaw Y Ivanyushenkov D Baynham.
Progress on Hydrogen R&D System Yury Ivanyushenkov on behalf of Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold Matthew Hills, Tony Jones MICE Collaboration.
1 Liquid Hydrogen R&D test report CM34 – 17/10/12 S Watson P Warburton M Courthold.
1 Liquid Hydrogen update CM33 S Watson P Warburton M Courthold.
Vacuum tank relief for Super-FRS long multiplet cryostat CrYogenic Department in Common System (CSCY) GSI, Darmstadt Yu Xiang.
1 MICE Hydrogen system Working group mtg – 01/09/14.
Replacing hydride bed with bottle Advantages No risk of diminished bed capacity Following jobs no longer necessary – Move pressure gauge – Replace cracked.
Working group meeting 07/05/15. Agenda Overview of review and current action list Relief system – Summary of problem – Details of analysis, testing and.
NPDG Liquid Hydrogen Target: Design and Safety Features
Magnet cryogenic system update.
Design of the thermosiphon Test Facilities 2nd Thermosiphon Workshop
Absorber progress MICE-ISIS review of the liquid hydrogen system will be held in early January; guidance from Nominated Engineers on the imported absorber.
Proximity Cryogenics P&IDs meeting
MICE Safety Review Meeting 4th Oct 2011 PJ Warburton - Daresbury Lab
Status of Hydrogen System Development
ESS elliptical cryomodule
Presentation transcript:

MICE Hydrogen System Tom Bradshaw Yury Ivanyushenkov Elwyn Baynham Meeting October 2004 – Coseners House

Baseline layout Pressure gauge Non-return valve - PP VP Vacuum pump Bursting disk Pressure relief valve Valve Pressure Coolant Out In Metal Hydride storage unit (20m 3 capacity) Purge valve 0.5 bar 0.9 bar H 2 Detector P P VP1 VP2 Purge valve Chiller/He ater Unit 1 bar P P 0.5 bar 0.9 bar Helium supply Hydrogen supply High level vent Buffer vessel Vent outside flame arrester Extract hood H 2 Detector P P Nitrogen supply P P P P 1 m 3 Hydrogen zone 2 Vent manifold P1 PV1 PV7 PV8 PV2 PV3 PV4 HV1 Fill valve Tbed HV2 HV3 P3 P P2 PV6 High level vent Non return valve 0.1 bar - PP VP Vacuum pump Bursting disk Pressure relief valve Valve Pressure regulator Coolant Out In Absorber window Metal Hydride storage unit (20m 3 capacity) Purge valve 0.5 bar 0.9 bar H 2 DetectorH 2 P P VP1 VP2 Purge valve Chiller/He ater Unit 1 bar P P 0.5 bar 0.9 bar Helium supply Hydrogen supply High level vent Buffer vessel Vent outside flame arrester Extract hood H 2 DetectorH 2 P P Nitrogen supply P P P P 1 m 3 Hydrogen zone 2 Vent manifold P1 PV1 PV7 PV8 PV2 PV3 PV4 HV1 Fill valve Tbed HV2 HV3 P3 P P2 PV6 High level vent Non return valve 0.1 bar Safety window

Hydride bed Checked that there are no safety issues if there is a catastrophic ingress of air. Activation procedure: a)Pump out absorber b)Heat to 60-80C c)Add H2 to about 1.2 bar d)Leave to soak for 8 hours Tanks need to be horizontal Air ingress reduces capacity and oxidises material – oxidation rate is low. Alloy will become flammable after activation but it needs an ignition source.

Hydride Bed Black lines absorbtion Dotted lines desorbtion 20l liquid = 16,000 normal litres gas – will absorb this in under 4 hours Hydride Characteristics

Specification for the Hydride Bed Hydrogen Storage Capacity 20 Nm 3 Tank number/system 1 Tank Description: Heat Transfer Medium Water MH Weight 155kg Tank Structure Shell & Tube type Dimensions φ216.3×L1600 ( mm ) ( not include attachments ) Tank Total Weight 220 Kg Operating Condition: Charging Gas Component Hydrogen of 99.99% purity Charging Gas Pressure 1.2 barA Hydrogen Charging Rate 70NL/min (up to 90% of Storage Capacity) Discharging Gas Pressure 1.2 barA Hydrogen Discharging Rate 70NL/min (up to 90% of Storage Capacity) Utility Requirements: Cooling Medium Water Below -10 ℃ ( At 20L/min ) Heating Medium Above 20 ℃ ( At 20L/min ) Design Code AD Merkblaetter Certification Declaration of Conformity to Pressure Equipment Directive 97/23/EC Certified by a Notified Body )

Effectiveness of Buffer Volume Assumes mixing of gas - cold from absorber + buffer volume Temp in buffer calc on basis of constant Cv - this is optimistic for Tgas ~50K but pretty good for Tgas >100K For large outflow through relief valve the algorithm is not correct because the valve essentially shuts Buffer volume gives a huge safety margin over just the pipe system with vol ~ 0.1m^3 for 50m of 50mm dia pipe The buffer vessel will keep the gas warmer due to its thermal mass - this is not included - it will increase the pressure rise Typically with 1m^3 Tgas ~100K pressure rise rate is 0.1 bar/sec valve opening time of sec would be OK Expected boil-off rate Latent heat446000J/kg Power into liquid10179W Hydrogen boiled off (kg/s) kg/s Start mass of liquid1.544kg Liquid density Start pressure (bar)0.5 Rgas4157 dt0.2 Buffer vol1m^3 density 300K0.08 kg/m^ 3 relief valve pressure 1.60E+ 05Pa outlet mass flow 1.20E- 02kg/s

Pressure relief valves They also manufacture bursting discs and flame arrestors Feel confident that we have a solution for this. Tyco (Crosby) valves – key points: Pilot valves – quick acting 3% tolerance on set pressure Closes at 95% of set pressure Response time is <0.5s Valves re-seat on elastomers 91&94 valves usable to 20K (although situated at RT)

R&D Process Main issue is what will the funding profile allow ?…… We will be using a cryocooler and perform tests on the control system,condensation rate etc… Next steps are to design layouts in the hall, pipework – test area Installation of venting system Design and order cryostat and cryocooler Order hydride bed Pressure relief valves Control system Issue of the test area is still not finalised – is it sensible to test while other work is going on ? May have to make a safety case or find somewhere else.

Safety Review Process

END SourceD:\MICE\Cryogenics\HydrogenSystem\[Pressure rise buffer.xls]press buffer-2