Topic Refinement Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study Objectives and Questions for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Advertisements

Protocol Development.
Writing an effective assignment in A-Level Leisure Studies.
Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence on Diagnostic Tests Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for.
Searching for Relevant Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews.
Exercise Swaps Community Emergency Response Team.
When To Select Observational Studies as Evidence for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 2: Asking Compelling, Clinical Questions.
Summarizing Community-Based Participatory Research: Background and Context for the Review Lucille Webb, MEd Eugenia Eng, DrPH Alice Ammerman, DrPH Meera.
NURS 505B Library Session Rachael Clemens Spring 2007.
Chapter 7. Getting Closer: Grading the Literature and Evaluating the Strength of the Evidence.
Introduction to Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice
ONC Policy and Program Update Health IT Standards Committee Meeting July 17, 2013 Jodi Daniel Director, Office of Policy and Planning, ONC 0.
Assessing Quality of Individual Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic.
Introduction to Standard 2: Partnering with consumers Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar October 2012.
Analytic Frameworks Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide
Time Tested Guideline Development and Implementation : The Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI) Collaborative Process © 2007 Institute for.
Strategy and Innovation Workgroup: Recommendations on the Federal Health IT Strategic Plan March 4, 2015 David Lansky, Chair Jennifer Covich,
Stakeholder Engagement and Transparency in The Effective Health Care Program Supriya Janakiraman MD MPH AHRQ.
AHRQ’s Role in Comparative Effectiveness Carolyn M. Clancy, MD Director Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Alliance for Health Reform Briefing.
What is a Master Plan? It will create a future vision for the campus.
‘Developing the appraisal process in the wider context of the Sport and Fitness sector of Higher Education’. Welcome & Introductions.
Engaging Stakeholders in the Effective Health Care Program Information and tools for researchers and investigators.
Northcentral University The Graduate School February 2014
Systematic Review Module 1: Refining Key Questions C. Michael White, PharmD, FCP, FCCP Professor and Director University of Connecticut / Hartford Hospital.
Why Use MONAHRQ for Health Care Reporting? May 2014 Note: This is one of seven slide sets outlining MONAHRQ and its value, available at
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
Searching for Relevant Studies Interactive Case Study Quiz: C. Michael White, Pharm.D., FCP, FCCP Professor and Director University of Connecticut / Hartford.
Systematic Reviews.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.2 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.2 How to develop national.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
Systematic Review Module 7: Rating the Quality of Individual Studies Meera Viswanathan, PhD RTI-UNC EPC.
Identifying the evidence Laura Macdonald Health Protection Scotland
Why Use MONAHRQ for Health Care Reporting? March 2015 Note: This is one of eight slide sets outlining MONAHRQ and its value, available at
Topic Refinement Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide
Systematic Review Module 2: Analytic Frameworks Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Associate Director for Methods, Vanderbilt University EPC Assistant Professor,
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
Refining Key Questions: Interactive Case Study Quiz C. Michael White, PharmD, FCP, FCCP Professor and Director University of Connecticut / Hartford Hospital.
Privacy Section 2.2 CptS 401 Adam Carter. Quiz Question 7 According to the book, the following is a provision of the Privacy Act of 1974: A.It requires.
Deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review What do we mean by confidence in a systematic review and in an estimate of effect? How should.
Reporting the Review Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
Presentation of Findings Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
Quantitative Synthesis I Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
Study Eligibility Criteria: Interactive Quiz Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Associate Director, Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice Center.
Analytic Frameworks: Interactive Quiz Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Associate Director for Methods, Vanderbilt University EPC Assistant Professor, Institute.
Three basic areas for consideration: 1.Searching, reading and critically evaluating your literature. 2.Managing your literature – organizing and documenting.
When To Select Observational Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic.
Analytic Frameworks Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 21 Evidence in Learning and Teaching.
Sifting through the evidence Sarah Fradsham. Types of Evidence Primary Literature Observational studies Case Report Case Series Case Control Study Cohort.
Systematic reviews as a tool to plan new studies and interpret their results Introducing the THEME GROUP.
Grading Strength of Evidence Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews.
Quantitative Synthesis II Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews.
 Ensure the title is in line with the requirements of the proposed funding agency if they have any specification for the titled page (some do have.
PHE portal update Anne Brice Mahesh Patel. PHE portal Progress so far Relationship between AKM and Online Services workstreams Engaging with content users.
THE CO-OPERATIVE “BEST” PRACTICES Vetting the contract Co-Operative Agency Compliance Philosophy Co-Operative Agency Experience Pricing Verification.
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences(RCRS) Riphah International University Islamabad.
Assessing Applicability Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
Chapter 3 of Your Research Project AED 615 Fall 2006 Dr. Franklin.
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE CENTER Melissa McPheeters, PhD Co-Director, Vanderbilt EPC Engaging Stakeholders in EPC Work.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework Improving Transparency, Consultation and Communication of RIAs March 2009.
Quiz About Your Topic Question 1 A question about your topic: A. [Insert incorrect answer] C. [Insert incorrect answer] B. [Insert incorrect answer]
Updates from The Early Years Area SENCO team October 2014.
Training Personnel Using Autism online ebp Modules
Module 4: Developing a Research Agenda
Data Extraction Interactive Quiz
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Study Eligibility Criteria Interactive Quiz
Presentation transcript:

Topic Refinement Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide

All but one of the following statements about key questions in a systematic review are true. Select the incorrect statement. A.They guide the literature search, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and types of data synthesized and reported. B.They must be clear, concise, and relevant to stakeholders. C.They are devised after the results of all relevant studies are known and pooled with other like studies. Key Questions

An understanding of PICOTS and the analytic framework is needed before clear, concise, and relevant key questions can be written. Which of the following terms is correctly defined? A.P= Prospective B.I= Intervention C.C= Cohort study PICOTS

Key informants are representatives of stakeholders who volunteer to provide input into a systematic review. Which of the following functions do they provide? A.Aid in formulating key questions that address real-world dilemmas B.Provide context to help discern content area and applicability C.Ensure transparency in the process D.All of the above Function of Key Informants

Which of the following groups are NOT considered to be key informants in the Effective Health Care Program? A.Clinicians B.Patients C.Industry representatives Types of Key Informants

Which of the following statements is true about how the public commentary process as it relates to the topic-refinement process? A.It allows all interested parties to comment on any topic-refinement project as they like. B.It is restricted to members of the public who are selected by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to provide feedback. C.It allows all interested parties to comment on a particular topic, but the number of topics they can respond to is restricted. The Public Commentary Process

Topics for refinement should have all of the following characteristics, except: A.High priority B.Feasible C.Confirmatory Characteristics of Refinement Topics

 Key questions are important to the systematic review process.  Key informants should reflect the interests of stakeholders in the topic to be refined to ensure relevance and transparency.  Public commentary on key questions is a final check of relevance and ensures transparency. Summary

Author  This quiz was prepared by C. Michael White, Pharm.D., FCP, FCCP, a member of the University of Connecticut/Hartford Hospital Evidence-based Practice Center.  The module is based on chapter 2 in version 1.0 of the Methods Reference Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews (available at: 007_10DraftMethodsGuide.pdf).