Use of Flight Simulation To Investigate Aviation Safety Concerns and Stability & Control Analysis of the Mooney Rocket 305 and Cessna 172 Douglas Wilson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modeling of Fuel Tank Inerting for FAA OBIGGS Research
Advertisements

Design Presentation Spring 2009 Andrew Erdman Chris Sande Taoran Li.
Maj Cody Allee / Tom Hanrahan Embedded Terrain Awareness Warning System (eTAWS) Adventures in testing a CFIT protection system Got Protection?
ORLANDO FLIGHT SRANDARDS DISTRICT OFFICE FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR SPECIAL EMPHASIS PROGRAM Downloaded from
PACE Emerging Market Vehicle Suspension Design University of Cincinnati.
Advanced Flight Display For General Aviation Aircraft: A Cost-Effective Means to Enhance Safety J. Dubinsky, M. Braasch, M. Uijt de Haag Ohio University.
Feedback Control Systems
1 STAC6  STAC6 Family  Overview  STAC6/BLUAC/BLUDC match up  STAC6/Si5580/PDO5580 match up  “Under the hood”  P7000 some +’s & -’s  CONFIGURATOR.
Office of Research and Engineering Safety Study Report: Introduction of Glass Cockpit Avionics into Light Aircraft Quantitative Analysis Results Loren.
LECTURE 3 WEIGHT CONTROL, EFFECT OF WEIGHT & WEIGHT CHANGE MASS (WEIGHT) & BALANCE 1 MBC SIR ARIFF AMC.
Technical department - boclair academy Computer Animation & Simulation Pentakis dodecahedron (60 faces)
Computer Simulations of Wind Tunnel Experiments
Tracking Migratory Birds Around Large Structures Presented by: Arik Brooks and Nicholas Patrick Advisors: Dr. Huggins, Dr. Schertz, and Dr. Stewart Senior.
Why does the temperature of the Sun’s atmosphere increase with height? Evidence strongly suggests that magnetic waves carry energy into the chromosphere.
March 10, Dynamics & Controls 2 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
Aero Engineering 315 Lesson 39 Dynamic Stability.
Airplane Flight: X-Plane in the Classroom Engineering Design Process.
Modeling of Single Bay Fuel Tank Inerting for FAA OBIGGS Research
Wavelet Analysis of Cockpit Voice Recorder Data.
The Use of Flight Simulation to Analyze Aircraft Design and Performance Douglas L.Wilson – Chief Test Pilot Abraham Gutierrez – Chief Systems Engineer.
Design Development of the General Aviation eHUD Flight Display For the Quarterly Review of the NASA/FAA Joint University Program for Air Transportation.
Warm-Up – 8/28 – 10 minutes Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: What flight control surface is used to pitch the.
GPS Carrier-Phase Multipath Model Validation Quarterly Review of the NASA/FAA Joint University Program for Air Transportation Research Friday, June 20,
Intercollegiate Rocket Engineering Competition Spring 2015 EML Ethics and Design Project Organization.
The Use of Flight Simulation to Analyze Aircraft Design and Performance Douglas L.Wilson – Chief Test Pilot Abraham Gutierrez – Chief Systems Engineer.
Students: Nadia Goshmir, Yulia Koretsky Supervisor: Shai Rozenrauch Industrial Project Advanced Tool for Automatic Testing Final Presentation.
Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos, Cairo Lúcio Nascimento Júnior,
Dr. Mark Askelson | 4149 University Avenue Stop 9006, Grand Forks, ND phone | fax Ganged Phased Array Radar – Risk Mitigation.
Office of Research and Engineering Safety Study Report: Introduction of Glass Cockpit Avionics into Light Aircraft Qualitative Analysis Results Loren Groff.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 FTFAM – Version 11 Update May 19 th, Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Version 11 Update Steve Summer.
(MEP) Safety Forum in Riga Essential Elements: Thorough flight preparation, including: Training lesson / examination session planning (Flight Plan, sequence.
General Aviation Synthetic Vision Display For the Quarterly Review of the NASA/FAA Joint University Program for Air Transportation Research Friday,
Aviation Weather: Opportunities for Implementation Training Robert A. Wright Manager, Flight Technologies and Procedures Division, AFS-400 Federal Aviation.
Toward the Development of an Interactive Modeling, Simulation, Animation, and Real- Time Control (MoSART) Hardware/Software Testbed for a Tilt-Wing Rotorcraft.
Airplane Speed Sensor Fregis Effayong Rowan University Mechatronic.
CASE STUDY Disturbance event comparing PMU and SE voltage angle difference in ERCOT Prakash Shrestha Operations Engineer Advanced Network Application.
Julie Haggerty National Center for Atmospheric Research Friends and Partners of Aviation Weather October July 2014.
COBXXXX EXPERIMENTAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATION OF GUIDANCE AND CONTROL ALGORITHMS FOR UAVS Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos,
National Transportation Safety Board Airplane Performance Daniel R. Bower, Ph.D. Airplane Performance Specialist Daniel R. Bower, Ph.D. Airplane Performance.
Head-Up Synthetic Vision Display System For The Joint University Program Friday, June 20 th 2003 Jahnavi Chakrabarty Douglas Burch Michael Braasch.
November 29, Hypothesis The hypothesis of this GIS Project is that airplane accidents happen within 25 NM of an airport. General Aviation and.
Office of Aviation Safety Airspeed Selection and Stall Training Procedures Operations presentation.
Vehicle Crash Test Dong-Un Sul Dr. Granda ME 270.
Lab Team Jobs Why have specific jobs? Can one person do all the jobs well?
Office of Aviation Safety Maintenance and Airworthiness Presentation.
NATIONAL AVIATION UNIVERSITY Air navigation Systems Department Theme: Unmanned Aerial Vehicle motion modeling in Matlab/Simulink Supervisor: Done by: Pavlova.
The flutter analysis of the JS1 glider
X-Pilot: Autopilot Solutions C. Edwards, J. Lasseigne, W. Overstreet, B. Penland Project Description: The X-Pilot: Autopilot Solutions project is developing.
12/22/2015 Matthew Rockwood 1 AEE 427 Lab Overview and Lab 1: Straight Level Unaccelerated Flight (SLUF) September 4, 2015 AEE 427: Aircraft.
February 24, Dynamics & Controls 1 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
In-flight Fire and Crash
USING MODEL CHECKING TO DISCOVER AUTOMATION SURPRISES Java class User: - getExpectation() - checkExpectation() FAULTY EXECUTION start incrMCPAlt pullAltKnob.
Mid Semester 2 Presentation: February 27, Joshua Lasseigne: Team Lead and Autopilot Programming Christopher Edwards: AGL Subsystem and Website Maintenance.
“The Role of Experience in Software Testing Practice” A Review of the Article by Armin Beer and Rudolf Ramler By Jason Gero COMP 587 Prof. Lingard Spring.
Quad Rat Vitals Monitor Robert Bjerregaard 1, Matthew Bollom 1, Caitlyn Collins 1, Derek Klavas 1 Advisor: Paul Thompson 1, PhD. Client: Alex Converse.
X-Pilot: Autopilot Solutions C. Edwards, J. Lasseigne, W. Overstreet, B. Penland X-pilot flight testing X-pilot groundstation demonstrating waypoint navigation.
WORKSHOP 1 CO-SIMULATION.
Advanced Aero Vehicle Group
PSCAD models.
Forces on an Aircraft Four forces on an aircraft in flight:
DYNAMICS & CONTROL PDR 1 TEAM 4
PP380F Figure 1 – Artists Impression of a VLA PrandtlPlane Aircraft (Frediani, et al., 2003)
Team One Dynamics and Control PDR 2 10 March, 2005
ORLANDO FLIGHT SRANDARDS DISTRICT OFFICE
Progress in Weather Observations
DYNAMICS & CONTROL QDR 3 TEAM 4
Runway Excursions.
SPDA-1-3-OBS Software Upgrade
PROPRIETARY © 2018 Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association.
What is the Data Telling Us?
Presentation transcript:

Use of Flight Simulation To Investigate Aviation Safety Concerns and Stability & Control Analysis of the Mooney Rocket 305 and Cessna 172 Douglas Wilson – Chief Test Pilot Abraham Gutierrez – Chief Systems Engineer Anh Huy Nguyen – Chief Flight Engineer Basil Philip – Advisor Dr. Stearman –Class instructor ASE 463Q Spring 2004

Mooney and Cessna Flight Simulation Investigation Background of the Project Objectives Software Data Comparison Phugoid Mode Phugoid Analysis Summary

Background Mooney Rocket Engine modification to the Mooney M20K - Accident in Bakersfield, CA -Modified engine caused the aircraft to enter a phugoid mode Cessna 172 -Focus is on the Cessna 172H model -Produced in the 1960s -Questions regarding engine power capabilities  Background Objectives Software Data Comparison Phugoid Mode Phugoid Analysis Summary

Objectives Look into the background of the two flights in question -Mooney 305 -Cessna 172H Load Accurate versions of flight models onto simulators -X-Plane -Microsoft Flight Simulator Perform test runs at several conditions -Weather Conditions -Plane configurations Compare Radar and Actual Data to determine if Phugoid Mode can be demonstrated Background  Objectives Software Data Comparison Phugoid Mode Phugoid Analysis Summary

Software Research - Make sure that the Mooney M20K and the Cessna 172 can be tested in the flight simulator -Make sure the X-Plane software can be modified to wanted characteristic Setup - Adjust the X-Plane software to wanted weather conditions -Connect programs to extract data Tests - Conduct several test to obtain sufficient data for analysis - Verify that the data is obtain is accurate and useful Background Objectives  Software Data Comparison Phugoid Mode Phugoid Analysis Summary

Data Comparison Code - Use a Matlab program to analyze our data - Compare our data obtain from our code to the data obtain from previous code Airplane Modifications - Adjust the airplane tail -Compare data obtain from the adjust airplane to the airplane of interest Data Analysis - Analyze velocity versus time of the Mooney M20K at different altitudes & weather - Look for the Phugoid Mode for different conditions Background Objectives Software  Data Comparison Phugoid Mode Phugoid Analysis Summary

Phugoid Mode Motivation -Low-frequency, lightly damped oscillation -Aircraft becomes dynamically unstable - Reproduce data to see where phugoid mode occurs to verify if this contributed to the crashes Background Objectives Software Data Comparison  Phugoid Mode Phugoid Analysis Summary

Analysis Phugoid Analysis Method -Extract data from simulator and compare with previous results - Use Wavelet and Fourier Transform to see Phugoid mode Background Objectives Software Data Comparison Phugoid Mode  Phugoid Analysis Summary Slide taken from ASE 463Q Prospective Presentation

Summary Background Load Models into Flight Simulator and Run Tests Analyze Data and Plot to Compare with Previous Results Background Objectives Software Data Comparison Phugoid Mode Phugoid Analysis  Summary