Cost Estimating for Cavities & Cryomodules – Info needed from contracts for these industrial studies Peter H. Garbincius Fermilab IWLC2010 – Geneve October.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cavity Yield-Cost Models Peter H. Garbincius Fermilab IWLC2010 – Geneve October 2010 filename: PHG cavity yield-cost models oct2010.ppt.
Advertisements

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary1 Global Group 5 Summary Tetsuo Shidara Co-conveners: Bob Kephart, Wilhelm Bialowons.
Question 27: Outline the key steps for industrialization of machine components and the likely remaining vulnerabilities in achieving them. Achieving industrialization.
D.Proch, Thin film Workshop, Legnaro, Oct SC RF cavity technology: the possibility of mass scale production, a global review Remarkable production.
October 24, 2000Milestones, Funding of USCMS S&C Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Milestones and Funding Profiles Matthias Kasemann Fermilab.
Report from ILC GlobalGroup 5: Cost and Engineering (Updates since Snowmass) Wilhelm Bialowons, Peter Garbincius and Tetsuo Shidara · GDE December 8, 2005.
Industrial Studies of ILC Cavities & Component Production in the Americas IPAC 11 – Kyoto, Japan May 23, 2010 Science Projects Homeland Security Medical.
1 CAPACITY BUILDING AND TRAINING ON PROCUREMENT Session 9 – The World Bank Procedures for IT Procurement September 21, 2005 by Arif Hassan.
Akira Yamamoto Project Manager, SCRF To be presented, April 19, 2009 AAP Review – SCRF Introduction AAP-SCRF-Introduction.
High Level RF Technical System Review GDE Cost Review July Vancouver Canada Shigeki Fukuda & Ray Larsen For the HLRF Cost Team C. Adolphsen,
Global Design Effort U.S. ILC Cost Translation R. Stanek, et al. Vic Kuchler 1/26/07.
Report from GG5, Dec. 20, 2005 Report from ILC GG 5: Cost and Engineering (Updates since Snowmass) Wilhelm Bialowons, Peter Garbincius and Tetsuo Shidara.
U.S. MICE Schedule, Cost, & Risks Peter H. Garbincius Mark Palmer, Alan Bross, Rich Krull Fermilab Presented at RAL – November 13, 2013.
Cavity Yield Re-Evaluation Plan C.M. Ginsburg (Fermilab) July 10, 2009 (Essentially a copy of presentation June 24, 2009 to SCRF-ML WebEx meeting with.
CLIC-ILC Cost & Schedule Agenda – 8feb08 John Carwardine = secretary & rapporteur this file: & Schedule Sub-Group.
SCRF Monthly WebEx Meeting June 30, 2010 Agenda 1.Report from PMs (5 min.) 2.General Report from Group Leaders(15 min.) 3.Special Discussions 1.TDP R&D.
Nick Walker, Brian Foster LAL, Orsay WP2: Coordination with the GDE.
S. Prat SCRF meeting Fermilab April 21-25, 2008 Status report on “Industrialization studies” at LAL on power couplers for XFEL _____ SCRF Meeting Fermi.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
Cryomodule Design and R&D during the EDR phase Robert Kephart With input from the T4 CM Collaboration.
M. Ross, N. Walker, A. Yamamoto ILC Cost Review, (updated for TB) and Cost Drivers  Future R & D ILC Cost Review (M. Ross,
Global Design Effort1 September 20-22, 2006 MAC Review - Costs Toward a Cost Estimate for the ILC Tetsuo Shidara, Wilhelm Bialowons, and Peter H. Garbincius.
1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison.
Cavity Gradient for the R&D and ILC Operation Akira Yamamoto ILC-GDE SCRF Presented at the AD&I meeting held at DESY, Dec. 2-3, 2009 A, Yamamoto,
D.Proch, DESY; GDE meeting Vancouver 06 Technical systems: Cavity Report Overview on costing activities for ILC –European costing method Overview industrial.
24-Aug-11 ILCSC -Mumbai Global Design Effort 1 ILC: Future after 2012 preserving GDE assets post-TDR pre-construction program.
CLIC cost estimate Hans-H. Braun, CLIC-GDE meeting, February 8, 2008  Cost model goals  Methodology  Cost distribution  Future improvements.
AAP Review on SCRF to be prepared Akira Yamamoto, Marc Ross, and Nick Walker ILC-GDE Project Managers To be presented at ILC-10, Beijing, March 26, 2010.
WBS x.11 Conventional Facilities Americas Region ILC Fermilab ART Meeting1 Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group Americas Region FY.
1 ILC Internal Cost Review Major Points from External Reviewers T. Elioff, J. Marx, V. Soergel, M. Yoshioka, and A. Yamamoto, (C. Wyss, absent) To be presented.
ML Planning for ILC08 First Pass + SCRF agenda Chris Adolphsen Hitoshi Hayano.
Summary of TDR Cost Reviews at KILC-12 G. Dugan KILC-12 4/26/12.
Status Report on ILC Project in Japan Seiichi SHIMASAKI Director, Office for Particle and Nuclear Research Promotion June 19, 2015.
Fermilab 2 Dec 2009CM Ginsburg Global Cavity Database Report C.M. Ginsburg (Fermilab) On behalf of the database group (as part of S0 effort):
Harry Carter – LCFOA Meeting 5/1/06 1 LCFOA Technical Briefings: Cryomodules H. Carter Fermilab Technical Division.
Status of the International Linear Collider and Importance of Industrialization B Barish Fermilab 21-Sept-05.
October 23, 2007 GDE EDR Meeting 1 EDR Strategy and Timeline Cavities and Cryomodules Rich Stanek October 23, 2007.
A Satellite Meeting at IPAC-2010 SCRF Cavity Technology and Industrialization Date : May 23, 2010, a full-day meeting, prior to IPAC-2010 Place: Int. Conf.
Rolf Lange DESY ILC Workshop 1-June-07 XFEL The European X-Ray Laser Project X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Module Industrialisation for XFEL How to proceed.
Global Design Effort - CFS DESY Accelerator Design and Integration Meeting 1 ACCELERATOR INTEGRATION AND DESIGN MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
Industrial Participation & SRF Infrastructure at Fermilab Phil Pfund with input from Harry Carter, Rich Stanek, Mike Foley, Dan Olis, and others.
SCRF Cavity WebEx Meeting May 17, 2010 Reports from PM (10 min.) – Brief report from ILC-PAC – Industrialization workshop as IPAC satellite meeting, Kyoto,
PHG - AD&I DESY - May 29, 2009 ILC - Global Design Effort 1 Cost Estimating for the AD&I Studies X Differential Estimates What we need from you! Peter.
U.S. Plan for Cavity Production Bob Kephart ALCPG09/GDE Sep 30, 2009.
Date Event Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Technical System Review N. Ohuchi, H. Carter, C.Pagani.
Global Design Effort Main Linac Technology System Kick-off Meeting Cavity Summary 20 Sept 2007 DESY Marc Ross.
ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.
PM Report AS ILC PAC (19-20 May) Agenda: –Akira, Rongli, Hitoshi H, Marc, Nick, Toshiaki, Mark P., Peter G. –Nick will report on Design –Marc.
Main Linac Issues for RDR 1/20/2006 Area group H. Hayano From Linac Area discussion posted on the web:
ILC Gradient R&D Rongli Geng Jefferson Lab ILC Main Linac WebEx Meeting July 28, 2010.
CFS / Global – 09 June, 2010 PM Report: SB2009: –4 two-day workshops form the core of ‘TOP LEVEL CHANGE CONTROL’ –  as advised by AAP, PAC and etc –Written.
ILC Cryomodule Industrialization in the U.S. R. Kephart (+ H Padamsee )
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
Saclay / Orsay visit – (GDE Project Managers) 1 R&D Plan: ‘Engineering Design’ Phase - presentation to Saclay / Orsay Marc Ross, Akira Yamamoto,
Thurs., January 5, 2006PHG for DCB to EC1 PHG for DCB to EC – 5jan06 with notes from meeting added 10jan06 DCB plans and activities –proposed plans sent.
Global Design Effort Close-Out Points EDR time-scale (2010) –No demonstrations to ILC-like RF unit –3(?) CMs constructed at FNAL – not RDR baseline –2(?)
Start of S2 Milestone Work H. Padamsee. Intro At KEK S2 meeting we decided to make a list of milestones and eventually cost S2 activities I tried to start.
Tests on production cryomodules Bob Kephart Sept 30, 2006.
19july06 - Vancouver L.C. Workshop - DCB (PHG) Global Design Effort 1 Report from the Design & Cost Board Peter H. Garbincius* on behalf of: Wilhelm Bialowons*,
PM Report CFS /Gbl ILC PAC (19-20 May) Agenda: –Akira, Rongli, Hitoshi H, Marc, Nick, Toshiaki, Mark P., Peter G. –Nick will report on Design.
Rongli Geng ILC Cavity Group Meeting October 25, 2011
Value Estimate for the ILC Superconducting Modules and High Level RF
Americas KlyCluster Cost Analysis Overview
Evolving an ILC focused SCRF Facility from the XFEL Infrastructure
EDR HLRF Work Packages Draft Summary
Yamamoto WG3: ML-SCRF Parallel Session,
Industrialization of previous projects
2. SCRF General Preparation for the AD&I Preparation for AAP Review
ILC Cryogenics -- Technical Design Report Planning
ILC - Global Design Effort
Presentation transcript:

Cost Estimating for Cavities & Cryomodules – Info needed from contracts for these industrial studies Peter H. Garbincius Fermilab IWLC2010 – Geneve October 20, 2010 similar to presentation at Paris EC Meeting, July 2010 filename: Cost-Estimating-20oct2010.ppt ILC - Global Design Effort

what are the issues? What is the cost? But that depends on the production model How do you minimize cost vs. risk vs. production rate? Is a 5 year production period realistic? How can we realistically qualify enough vendors and undertake a pre-series production run within funding and timescale? How does cost of ~ 18,000 cavities depend on # vendors? How do Learning Curves L.C. s apply? How do infrastructure, raw materials, purchased parts, touch-labor, quality assurance, management, profit factor, and administration factor into cost to be paid by ILC? How do we define cost estimate under the assumption of a three-region, in-kind contribution model? PHG - Industrial Cavities Paris - July 23, 2010 ILC - Global Design Effort 2

PHG - Schedule for PIP CFS - Geneve - 20oct2010 ILC - Global Design Effort 3 Wilhelm TESLA 5 yrs

ILC RDR PHG - Schedule for PIP CFS - Geneve - 20oct2010 ILC - Global Design Effort 4

my thoughts, Akira’s thoughts Need so much infrastructure and so many production lines to meet production rate =>a major driving term – is RDR too optimistic? What are economies of scale for larger purchase of infrastructure, size of plant, management, admin? Are the Learning Curves for parallel production lines in the same plant independent, or do they benefit from common shared experience? What if you saturate # qualified vendors? => loss of free-market competition and always, “When do learning curves saturate?” PHG - Industrial Cavities Paris - July 23, 2010 ILC - Global Design Effort 5

What was in RDR estimate? See Wilhelm Bialowons – Orsay Review – May 2007 Based on TESLA Industrial Studies (most mature): not based on Asia or Americas’ R&D estimates technical basis is TTF-FLASH experience assumed a single vendor model. Zanon: production of 2500 cryostats 8-cavites ea Noell: 20,000 cavities w BCP & CM assembly detailed WBS, time-motion, optimized plant Thompson-Thales studied RF power couplers Re-evaluated 250 CM for XFEL Supplement 2001 relative values of TESLA & XFEL estimates were consistent with a Learning Curve of 87% PHG - Cost Estimating for Cavities & CMs - 20oct2010 ILC - Global Design Effort 6

RDR estimate (continued) XFEL TDR (2006) => in-house estimate for electro-polishing (no cost difference) plus increased steel and copper costs This led to ILC RDR estimate (2006) including escalation to 2007 & scaling to quantities After much debate and non-convergence, we assumed cavity Yield (> 35 MV/m) = 80% but no reprocessing (throw-away if fail 1 st test) => cavity cost factor = total paid/# good = 1/Y also assumed G(CM) ≥ 90% G(vertical test) – no losses between vert test => CM PHG - Cost Estimating for Cavities & CMs - 20oct2010 ILC - Global Design Effort 7

so is there a problem here? XFEL experience for cavity fabrication tenders: more expensive w/o performance guarantee XFEL had to assume the performance risk! Why are the tenders different from expectations? How do they impact/improve ILC TDR estimates? cavities are ~X% of RDR estimate, so if cavity cost increases by factor f, (what’s included?) ILC estimate increases by ~ f * X% RDR model and estimate doesn’t take into account multiple vendors over multiple regions to reduce production risk or to allow development of this SCRF technology in all regions PHG - Cost Estimating for Cavities & CMs - 20oct2010 ILC - Global Design Effort 8

what information will we be getting? Cavity yield experience with electro-polishing: from ILC TDP R&D (cavity performance DB) – not enuf statistics quickly enuf for TDR est and from European XFEL – RI/ACCEL half will have final electro-polish – too late for TDR important for overall cost and whether allowing spread of cavity operating gradients is economic Experience and guidance from Asian pilot plant for cavities at KEK with industrial participants Industrial Studies from Asian (and US) vendors being discussed here today! PHG - Cost Estimating for Cavities & CMs - 20oct2010 ILC - Global Design Effort 9

what do we need for TDR estimate? Not only a more realistic cost estimate for production in all three global regions! We also need guidance in optimizing: # vendors vs. risk vs. cost vs. production time vs. governance model vs. management Are we willing to show a cost estimate for which production of 1/3 of components in one region is substantially higher than in the other regions? How does one weigh those “intangibles” listed above, along with political realities? From whose experience can we get such guidance? PHG - Cost Estimating for Cavities & CMs - 20oct2010 ILC - Global Design Effort 10

some quick indications from Learning Curves Remember: TESLA/XFEL industrial estimates were bottom-up estimates for which L.C. was calculated, rather than using L.C. to scale few costs to large quantity costs (dangerous) Wright Learning Curve: (average over integral) = L.C.% * Babcock-Noell industrial study for Cryomodules / => L.C.% = 87% Northrop-Grumman RHIC magnets- L.C.% = 85% LHC Dipoles (3 vendors) - L.C.% = 80-85% (mutual cooperation after all LHC contracts let) PHG - Cost Estimating for Cavities & CMs - 20oct2010 ILC - Global Design Effort 11

LHC dipole experience PHG - Industrial Cavities Paris - July 23, 2010 ILC - Global Design Effort 12

extrapolating from the few to the many PHG - Cost Estimating for Cavities & CMs - 20oct2010 ILC - Global Design Effort 13 distrib. over # vendors

interpreting & projecting XFEL cavity bid Based on incomplete knowledge of XFEL bids, what’s included in common, imperfect TESLA PHG - Industrial Cavities Paris - July 23, 2010 ILC - Global Design Effort 14

Learning Curves ≤ 18K cavities (11% of RDR) PHG - Chicago/Booth June 30, 2010 ILC - Global Design Effort 15 Different # vendors, saturation

Learning Curves - continued PHG - Chicago/Booth June 30, 2010 ILC - Global Design Effort 16

how does integrated cost depend on where saturation of L.C. occurs? PHG - Chicago/Booth June 30, 2010 ILC - Global Design Effort 17 RDR estimate

How does this apply to ILC? What are we scientists & engineers supposed to do? We have no high volume industrial experience Dan Adelman (Chicago/Business) reminds us of the obvious: Ask someone who is experienced! e.g. –Babcock-Noell – they do this & did TESLA/XFEL study –ACCEL/RI & Zanon – what did their XFEL bids say? They will have lots of experience from XFEL, will they share it with ILC? (proprietary?) –Mitsubishi “industrial layout research section” optimize plants & processes to maximize MHI profit Akira should ask them for C(18K,1) vs. 6*C(3K,1) –Boeing 787 & Airbus for internationalization PHG - Industrial Cavities Paris - July 23, 2010 ILC - Global Design Effort 18

added after Peter’s Paris presentation Feedback from Peter G’s presentation on Cost Estimating for Industrial Production of Cavities we need to understand cost and advantages/disadvantages of 1 or 6 vendors we need new or updated industrial studies both by top-down (from integrators like Noell-Babcock, General Dynamics) and bottom-up (by component manufacturers like ACCEL, ZANON, AES) these studies are needed in 2011, but where are the resources (costs & ILC manpower)? we also must update RDR estimates based on XFEL experience and plans if we do not present these models and their impacts, we will not be taken seriously Akira: make sure same production timescale is required for each C(18K,1) & C(3K,1) estimate What is the optimal production timescale? likely to be at the longest time limit in order to minimize cost of infrastructure. ILC will have to determine this constraint. Can we ask for Cost vs. Time and then ILC optimizes, considering both cost & time impact? Similarly, how do learning curves depend on timescale for production? Babcock-Noell TESLA study had 20,000 cavities 6.5 years total & production over 3.5 years PHG - Industrial Cavities Paris - July 23, 2010 ILC - Global Design Effort 19

PHG - Cost Estimating for Cavities & CMs - 20oct2010 ILC - Global Design Effort 20 Wilhelm

discussion PHG - Cost Estimating for Cavities & CMs - 20oct2010 ILC - Global Design Effort 21