Helicity: where it comes from and what it tells us Dana Longcope, MSU Anna Malanushenko, MSU/LMSAL 8/11/10Canfield-fest Thanks: Graham Barnes, CoRA B.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPD June 16, 2003 Separators: Fault Lines in the Magnetic Field Dana Longcope Montana State University.
Advertisements

Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
Energy and Helicity Budget of Four Solar Flares and Associated Magnetic Clouds. Maria D. Kazachenko, Richard C. Canfield, Dana Longcope, Jiong Qiu Montana.
1. Helicity: basic properties, open geometries 2. Observations of helicity and helicity flux 3. Twist and Writhe Mitchell Berger Review of Magnetic Helicity.
Jan 13, 2009ISSI1 Modeling Coronal Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A Collaborators:
Coronal Mass Ejections - the exhaust of modern dynamos Examples: systematic swirl (helicity) Measuring it quantitatively Connection with the dynamo Axel.
Current sheets formation along magnetic separators in 3d Dana Longcope Montana State University Thanks: I Klapper, A.A. Van Ballegooijen NSF-ATM.
Magnetic Helicity and Energetics in Solar Active Regions: Can we calculate them – why do we need them? Manolis K. Georgoulis JHU/APL Whistler, CA, 08/01/07.
Inductive Flow Estimation for HMI Brian Welsch, Dave Bercik, and George Fisher, SSL UC-Berkeley.
Magnetic Tongues, Magnetic Helicity and Twist in Active Regions. É. Pariat & P. Démoulin LESIA, CNRS, Observatoire de Paris, France Flux Emergence Workshop.
Evolution of Magnetic Helicity in the Corona During Flux Emergence Anna Malanushenko, Humed Yusuf, Dana Longcope.
Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Pre-flare Energy Storage The possible role of equilibrium current sheets Dana Longcope Montana State University Work supported.
Using Photospheric Flows Estimated from Vector Magnetogram Sequences to Drive MHD Simulations B.T. Welsch, G.H. Fisher, W.P. Abbett, D.J. Bercik, Space.
Flux emergence: An overview of thin flux tube models George Fisher, SSL/UC Berkeley.
HMI & Photospheric Flows 1.Review of methods to determine surface plasma flow; 2.Comparisons between methods; 3.Data requirements; 4.Necessary computational.
Solar-B Science MeetingKyoto, Nov. 9, 2005 Quantifying Reconnection* Dana Longcope, Dave McKenzie Jonathan Cirtain, Jason Scott Montana State University.
MSU Team: R. C. Canfield, D. W. Longcope, P. C. H. Martens, S. Régnier Evolution on the photosphere: magnetic and velocity fields 3D coronal magnetic fields.
1 SDO/HMI Products From Vector Magnetograms Yang Liu – Stanford University
Aug 16, 2004 Coronal loops formed by separator reconnection: The birth & life of AR9574 Dana Longcope Montana State University.
Free Energies via Velocity Estimates B.T. Welsch & G.H. Fisher, Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley.
Magnetic Helicity • Magnetic helicity measures
Magnetic Helicity Generation Inside the Sun
Dec. 2, 2008 Bangalore, India Active region emergence and its effect on the solar corona Dana Longcope Montana State University, Bozeman, MT Isaac Klapper.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan Coupling of the Coronal and Subphotospheric Magnetic Field in Active Regions by Shear Flows Driven by The Lorentz.
Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Pre-flare Energy Storage Current sheets (YES) Reconnection (NO then YES) Dana Longcope Montana State University Work supported.
Flows in NOAA AR 8210: An overview of MURI progress to thru Feb.’04 Modelers prescribe fields and flows (B, v) to drive eruptions in MHD simulations MURI.
Dec 9, 2005AGU Fall 2005, San Francisco Reconnection in the Solar Corona Probing the fundamental scales Dana Longcope Montana State University Work supported.
Dr. Alexei A. Pevtsov Helicity on the Sun. If you worry about publicity Do not speak of Current Helicity Jan Stenflo.
Surface Flows From Magnetograms Brian Welsch, George Fisher, Bill Abbett, & Yan Li Space Sciences Laboratory, UC-Berkeley Marc DeRosa Lockheed-Martin Advanced.
Flows and the Photospheric Magnetic Field Dynamics at Interior – Corona Interface Brian Welsch, George Fisher, Yan Li, & the UCB/SSL MURI & CISM Teams.
Data-Driven Simulations of AR8210 W.P. Abbett Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley SHINE Workshop 2004.
Modeling Magnetic Reconnection in a Complex Solar Corona Dana Longcope Montana State University & Institute for Theoretical Physics.
Using Photospheric Flows Estimated from Vector Magnetogram Sequences to Drive MHD Simulations B.T. Welsch, G.H. Fisher, W.P. Abbett, D.J. Bercik, Space.
The Effect of Sub-surface Fields on the Dynamic Evolution of a Model Corona Goals :  To predict the onset of a CME based upon reliable measurements of.
Active Region Flux Transport Observational Techniques, Results, & Implications B. T. Welsch G. H. Fisher
B. T. Welsch Space Sciences Lab, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA J. M. McTiernan Space Sciences.
Sung-Hong Park Space Weather Research Laboratory New Jersey Institute of Technology Study of Magnetic Helicity and Its Relationship with Solar Activities:
Can the coronal field’s susceptibility to emergence-induced eruption be estimated? SSPVSE Discussion Group B, Wed., 19 Oct B. Welsch, Space Sciences.
Summary of UCB MURI workshop on vector magnetograms Have picked 2 observed events for targeted study and modeling: AR8210 (May 1, 1998), and AR8038 (May.
Twist & writhe of kink-unstable magnetic flux ropes I flux rope: helicity sum of twist and writhe: kink instability: twist  and writhe  (sum is constant)
The Occurrence and Speed of CMEs Related to Magnetic Helicity Injection in Their Source Regions Sung-Hong Park Solar and Space Weather Research Group Korea.
Coronal Heating of an Active Region Observed by XRT on May 5, 2010 A Look at Quasi-static vs Alfven Wave Heating of Coronal Loops Amanda Persichetti Aad.
Coronal Mass Ejection As a Result of Magnetic Helicity Accumulation
Helicity as a Constraint on the Solar Dynamo Alexei A. Pevtsov If you worry about publicity Do not speak of Current Helicity Jan Stenflo.
Calculating Magnetic Energy in Active Regions Using Coronal Loops for AR and AR Presentation by, Joseph B. Jensen.
Photospheric Flows & Flare Forecasting tentative plans for Welsch & Kazachenko.
Helicity Condensation: The Origin of Coronal/Heliospheric Structure S. K. Antiochos, C. R. DeVore, et al NASA/GSFC Key features of the corona and wind.
Practical Calculation of Magnetic Energy and Relative Magnetic Helicity Budgets in Solar Active Regions Manolis K. Georgoulis Research Center for Astronomy.
Evolution of Emerging Flux and Associated Active Phenomena Takehiro Miyagoshi (GUAS, Japan) Takaaki Yokoyama (NRO, Japan)
Three-Dimensional MHD Simulation of Astrophysical Jet by CIP-MOCCT Method Hiromitsu Kigure (Kyoto U.), Kazunari Shibata (Kyoto U.), Seiichi Kato (Osaka.
Evolutionary Characteristics of Magnetic Helicity Injection in Active Regions Hyewon Jeong and Jongchul Chae Seoul National University, Korea 2. Data and.
Thought in 2000: Magnetic helicity is an important theoretical concept Pascal Démoulin but there is no way to estimate it from observations.
Magnetic Helicity and Solar Eruptions Alexander Nindos Section of Astrogeophysics Physics Department University of Ioannina Ioannina GR Greece.
What we can learn from active region flux emergence David Alexander Rice University Collaborators: Lirong Tian (Rice) Yuhong Fan (HAO)
2. Method outline2. Method outline Equation of relative helicity (Berger 1985): - : the fourier transform of normal component of magnetic field on the.
Helicity Thinkshop 2009, Beijing Asymmetry of helicity injection in emerging active regions L. Tian, D. Alexander Rice University, USA Y. Liu Yunnan Astronomical.
Thought in 2000: Magnetic helicity is an important theoretical concept Pascal Démoulin but there is no way to estimate it from observations.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan
Magnetic Helicity in Emerging Active Regions
Solar magnetic fields: basic concepts and magnetic topology
Magnetic Helicity in Emerging Active Regions: A Statistical Study
Thought in 2000: Magnetic helicity is an important theoretical concept
Hyewon Jeong, Jongchul Chae Seoul National University
Magnetic Topology of the 29 October 2003 X10 Flare
Quantifying Reconnection*
Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.
Introduction to Helicity
Modelling the Effect of Magnetic Field Variation on Solar Flares
Sakai, J. I., Nishi, K., and Sokolov, I. V. ApJ, 2002, 576, 1018
Magnetic Helicity In Emerging Active Regions: A Statistical Study
Presentation transcript:

Helicity: where it comes from and what it tells us Dana Longcope, MSU Anna Malanushenko, MSU/LMSAL 8/11/10Canfield-fest Thanks: Graham Barnes, CoRA B. Ravindra, IIA and …

… advisor extraordinaire 8/11/10Canfield-fest

Relative helicity These curves are linked … … are these? 8/11/10Canfield-fest

Relative helicity Are these coronal field lines twisted about each other? Are they linked with one another? What about gauge-dependence? 8/11/10Canfield-fest

Relative helicity Need reference field B 0 (x) for comparison Relative helicity Berger & Field 1984 Finn & Antonsen 1985 Does H R depend on choice of B 0 ? So what can it tell us? 8/11/10Canfield-fest yes

Potential field reference One choice of reference: potential magnetic field Advantages: Potential field is unique (from normal) Potential field has minimum magnetic energy:  H R ≠0 =>  free magnetic energy minimizing magnetic energy subj. to H R : can be computed constant from Lagrange multiplier imposing constraint 8/11/10Canfield-fest

Helicity flux: observable Using LCT velocities (Demoulin & Berger 2003) Track features in LOS m-gram: Track features in LOS m-gram: Compare to Faraday’s Law Compare to Faraday’s Law (Berger & Field 1984) Helicity Flux: feature velocity: measured 8/11/10Canfield-fest Ideal induction: observed motion observed field reference field

Measured Velocity (Chae 2001) AR8011 AR8011 F = 1.7 X Mx 2 F = 1.7 X Mx 2 S6 o latitude S6 o latitude B z measured: LOS mg B z measured: LOS mg U measured: LCT of B z U measured: LCT of B z A 0 extrapolated A 0 extrapolated 8/11/10Canfield-fest

Measured Velocity (Chae 2001) Highly variable helicity flux Highly variable helicity flux Up to +3 X Mx 2 /day = F /day Up to +3 X Mx 2 /day = F /day 8/11/10Canfield-fest

8/11/10 Measuring Spin spin braiding 1 2 22  12 Canfield-fest dH/dt < 0 for clockwise spin (  <0) dH/dt < 0 for clockwise motion (if  a  b < 0 ) Internal motion: spin

8/11/10Canfield-fest

Source of braiding Braiding: deformation of flux tube axis

Source of spin Natural time scale For twist injection: (Longcope & Welsch 2000) propagation of current (twist) within flux tube: torsional Alfven wave Twist moves to balance torques

8/11/10 Measuring Spin Brown et al all contributions to dH/dt P01 Canfield-fest Longcope et al. 2007

8/11/10 separation d(t) Longcope & Welsch model H br H sp H Helicity dominated by braiding Northern AR: H > 0 H sp < 0 fit: q = x m -1 Canfield-fest

8/11/10 separation d(t) Longcope & Welsch model H br H sp H Helicity dominated by spin Southern AR: H > 0 H sp > 0 fit: q = +2.3 x m -1 Canfield-fest

8/11/10Canfield-fest

Can this work? 8/11/10Canfield-fest Malanushenko et al Different Low & Lou fields

Spin + braiding make twist 8/11/10Canfield-fest braiding spin+braid Photospheric flux Coronal twist Malanushenko et al. 2010

Twist over time 8/11/10Canfield-fest AR9004 AR9002 But what happens to free energy?  L/2 Reconnected flux

Twist over time 8/11/10Canfield-fest AR9004 AR9002  L/2 EUV loops

Helicity in the AR 8/11/10Canfield-fest EG How twisted is the field within the grey sub-volume? Ignoring these e.g. what is the helicity is in a flux rope?

Helicity in the AR 8/11/10Canfield-fest Which reference field to use? unconfinedadditive J J Longcope & Malanushenko 2008

Advantages of the additive self-helicity Constraint on self-helicity of D i Lagrange multiplier Mag. energy Constrained minimum: piece-wise constant-  8/11/10Canfield-fest D1D1 D2D2

Hierarchy of energies 8/11/10Canfield-fest NLFFF Piecewise const.-  Domains: flux shape self-helicity Every field line: footpoint connectivity Piecewise potential Domains: flux shape MCC Domains: flux Field: Constraint:* potential Ø ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ *other than p-spheric field BC B(x)B(x) B(x)B(x) P(x)P(x) B FCE (x) B0(x)B0(x)

8/11/10Canfield-fest Malanushenko et al Additive helicity drops during instability Simulations: Fan & Gibson 2003

Summary Relative helicity depends on reference field Choosing pot’l field: helicity is proxy for free magnetic energy Can observe injection of rel. helicity into corona: injection of free energy Additive rel. helicity leads to piece- wise constant-  field: bound on energy 8/11/10Canfield-fest