Dosimetric evaluation of a new design MOSFET detector Per H. Halvorsen* & Stephanie Parker University of North Carolina.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cirrone G. A. P. , Cuttone G. , Raffaele L. , Sabini M. G
Advertisements

Chapter 4 Radiation Dosimeters
Estimation of TLD dose measurement uncertainties and thresholds at the Radiation Protection Service Du Toit Volschenk SABS.
LECTURE- 5 CONTENTS  PHOTOCONDUCTING MATERIALS  CONSTRUCTION OF PHOTOCONDUCTING MATERIALS  APPLICATIONS OF PHOTOCONDUCTING MATERIALS.
RapidArc plan verification using ArcCHECK™
Photon Beam Monitor-Unit Calculations
Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland 8th ECMP, Athens, Dosimetry audits in radiotherapy.
Evaluation of the characteristics of TLD LiF:Mg.Ti-100 Powder: A Measure of Consistency Between Multiple Batches of Powder Paola Alvarez,Jose Francisco.
Lic. Pedro Antonio Pérez.  To develop a simple and versatile dosimetric method capable of determining changes in matter (Xylenol Orange added Fricke.
Measurement of Absorbed Dose (6)
DOSIMETRY PROTOCOLS.
Kilovoltage X-ray Dosimetry
Planar X-ray Imaging Measure the integeral of the linear attenuation coefficient over the beam path through the object. has two main contributions 1.Photoelectric.
Introduction The effect of air-cavities within the human body, for example in the head and neck regions, present possible sources of error when calculating.
At the position d max of maximum energy loss of radiation, the number of secondary ionizations products peaks which in turn maximizes the dose at that.
Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry
Lens ALens B Avg. Angular Resolution Best Angular Resolution (deg) Worst Angular Resolution (deg) Image Surface Area (mm 2 )
Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Dose Distribution and Scatter Analysis
RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.
Results The measured-to-predicted dose ratio criteria used by the RPC to credential institutions is , however for this work, a criteria of
TWO FIELD BREAST PLAN VS. OPTIMIZED CONFORMAL BREAST PLAN: COMPARISON OF PLAN PARAMETERS Authors: Borko Basarić, Ozren Čudić, Milan Teodorović, Borislava.
Introduction Ion recombination is approximately corrected for in the Task-Group-51 protocol by P ion, which is calculated by a two-voltage measurement.
Measurement of Dose to Critical Structures Surrounding the Prostate from Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Three Dimensional Conformal Radiation.
Test of the proposed method Introduction CCD Controller CCD Illuminator gel Filter 585nm Assembling the phantom before its irradiation. The phantom, ready.
In vivo dosimetry Eirik Malinen Eva Stabell Bergstrand Dag Rune Olsen.
MONTE CARLO BASED ADAPTIVE EPID DOSE KERNEL ACCOUNTING FOR DIFFERENT FIELD SIZE RESPONSES OF IMAGERS S. Wang, J. Gardner, J. Gordon W. Li, L. Clews, P.
Surface dose prediction and verification for IMRT plans using line dose profiles † Ronald E. Berg, † Michael S. Gossman and ‡ Stephen J. Klash † Erlanger.
OSL Albedo Neutron Dosimeter
GERMANIUM GAMMA -RAY DETECTORS BY BAYAN YOUSEF JARADAT Phys.641 Nuclear Physics 1 First Semester 2010/2011 PROF. NIDAL ERSHAIDAT.
Application of a 2-D ionization chamber array for dose verification of dynamic IMRT with a micro-MLC Fujio ARAKI, PhD 1, S. TAJIRI 2, H. TOMINAGA 2, K.
Energy-Dispersive X-ray Microanalysis in the TEM Anthony J. Garratt-Reed Neil Rowlands.
Commissioning of an Optically-Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) system for remote dosimetry audits J.F. Aguirre, P. Alvarez, C. Amador, A. Tailor, D. Followill,
Final Presentation By Matthew Lewis 17 th March 2006 “To Determine the Accuracy that GOES True Numbers can Reproduce the Full X-ray Spectrum of the Sun”
Araki F. Ikegami T. and Ishidoya T.
1 EFFECTS OF MOLECULAR ORIENTATION AND ANNEALING ON OPTICAL ABSORBTION OF ORIENTED PET POLYMER By Montaser Daraghmeh.
AIR CORE SCINTILLATION DOSIMETER SUMMARY We have shown that Cerenkov light can be reduced to a negligible level in scintillation dosimetry by using an.
Introduction The Radiological Physics Center (RPC) anthropomorphic quality assurance (QA) phantom program is one tool the RPC uses to remotely audit institutions.
The HESSI Imaging Process. How HESSI Images HESSI will make observations of the X-rays and gamma-rays emitted by solar flares in such a way that pictures.
Study of Background Noise in the DVCS Experiment Hall A - JLab Florian ITARD Monastir – December 15th 2008.
Cumulative dose and skin damage
P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade, L.Peralta, J. Varela GEANT4 Medical Applications at LIP GEANT4 Workshop, September – 4 October LIP – Lisbon.
TLD POSTAL DOSE QUALITY AUDIT FOR 6MV AND 15MV PHOTON BEAMS IN RADIOTHERAPY CLINICAL PRACTICE Sonja Petkovska 1, Margarita Ginovska 2, Hristina Spasevska.
24 th ICNTS Design and test of an albedo personal neutron dosemeter based on PADC detectors R. Bedogni a, A. Esposito a, G. Gualdrini b, R. Mishra c, S.
Qing Liang, PhD Medical Physicist Mercy Health System, Janesville, WI
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. (a) Photograph of a single detector module. X-rays are incident from the top of.
The 14 MeV Frascati Neutron Generator (FNG)
1 A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high energy photon and electron beams AAPM TG-21 Protocol (Med Phys 10: , 1983) 和信治癌中心醫院.
Dosimetry measurements with an intra-operative x-ray device Eaton, D. J., & Duck, S. (2010). Dosimetry measurements with an intra- operative x-ray device.
Commissioning of a commercial treatment planning system for IMAT and Dose Painting treatment delivery. G. Pittomvils 1,,L. Paelinck 1, F. Crop 2, W. De.
1 3rd oPAC Topical Workshop on Beam Diagnostics, CIVIDEC, Vienna, 8th-9th May 2014.
The Effects of Small Field Dosimetry on the Biological Models Used In Evaluating IMRT Dose Distributions Gene Cardarelli,PhD, MPH.
Rapid Arc Treatment Verification: post evaluation on Delta-4 and proposal of a new verification protocol G. Pittomvils 1,,L. Paelinck 1, T. Boterberg 1,
AAPM TG-51 Protocol (Med Phys 26: , 1999)
Slide 1Fig 24-CO, p.737 Chapter 24: Gauss’s Law. Slide 2 INTRODUCTION: In the preceding chapter we showed how to use Coulomb’s law to calculate the electric.
CHAPTER 3 DOSE DETERMINATION FOR EXTERNAL BEAMS
6th European ALARA Network Workshop Madrid, oct. 23rd 2002
Electron Beam Therapy.
Dr: Mohamed Afifi By Lecturer Radiological Science
Absolute Dose Measurement
A system of dosimetric calculations
Development and characterization of the Detectorized Phantom for research in the field of spatial fractionated radiation therapy. D. Ramazanov, V. Pugatch,
Radiation Detectors : Detection actually means measurement of the radiation with its energy content and other related properties. The detection system.
Ch 10. A System of Dosimetric Calculations
Chapter 8 (Part 1) Measurement of Absorbed Dose
P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade, L.Peralta, J. Varela
Xoft Manufacturing Procedures
Hot and cold spots are common problems associated with planning:
Principles and Practice of Radiation Therapy
Presentation transcript:

Dosimetric evaluation of a new design MOSFET detector Per H. Halvorsen* & Stephanie Parker University of North Carolina

Other authors 1-4 have noted the following characteristics of the Thomson&Nielsen MOSFET detectors (TN-RD-502 detectors with TN-RD-50 dosimetry system) Small modality dependence (< 5%) Small energy dependence (< 5%). { At very low energies (e.g. 33KeV), a pronounced over-response is evident; its magnitude (factor of 4.2) is greater than TLD (1.2) but less than diodes (7.7). } High reproducibility (< 3%) No angular dependence for electron beams Very small angular dependence for photon beams at angles of  135 , but an over-response beyond these angles, reaching a maximum of approximately 18% and 13% at 180  to the normal, for 6MV and 18MV photon beams respectively. Introduction 2

The manufacturer (Thomson&Nielsen) has recently introduced a redesigned MOSFET detector, called the “Isotropic MOSFET”. When used with the TN-RD-50 dosimetry system, the manufacturer claims a significant reduction in the photon anisotropy described above. We have measured the dosimetric characteristics of this new detector, and compared the characteristics with those of the current design (TN-RD-502). Initially, the detectors’ energy dependence and inherent buildup were evaluated, to ensure that the beneficial aspects of the current design have not been compromised in order to reduce the anisotropy. Next, a series of measurements were conducted to evaluate the angular dependence of the new design. The same measurements were performed for the current design, and the results compared. Introduction cont. 3

Energy & modality dependence 4 For a 100 cGy irradiation at the calibration condition (10x10 field, isocenter at depth 5.0 cm for photons, d max with 100 SSD for electrons), we obtained the following signal (in mV) with the new MOSFETs: X 18 X 6 E 8 E 10 E 12 E 15 E 21 E Average + 3% - 3% Our measured calibration factors show a total range of 3.6% for all energies and both modalities; an average value would give a ±2% uncertainty, nearly identical to that of the current design. Repeated measurements with different detectors have shown a ±1.5% level of reproducibility.

Reproducibility 5 For a 100 cGy irradiation at the calibration condition (10x10 field, isocenter at depth 5.0 cm for photons), we obtained the following signal (in mV) with the new MOSFETs, using a high-sensitivity bias: Average + 2% - 2% These measurements (repeated with different detectors) show a ±1.5% level of reproducibility, consistent with the current design detectors and high- sensitivity bias Std MOSFET ---- New MOSFET

Inherent buildup As a reference, the buildup characteristics of our Primus accelerator’s 6 and 18 MV photon beams were measured with an Exradin A-11 parallel-plate ionization chamber, in a virtual-water phantom. Measurements were made with the following thicknesses of virtual water above the detector: 0.0, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1.0, 1.5, and 5.0. The effective depth of measurement (proximal electrode surface, at 0.05 g/cm 2 depth) was accounted for when plotting the buildup curve, and a curve-fit was used to extrapolate to depth 0.00 cm. Our calibration geometry for the MOSFET detectors is identical to that used for the dose calibration of the accelerator (at isocenter, depth 5.0 cm, 10*10 cm field). All readings were, therefore, expressed as a percentage of the dose at the calibration condition. 6

Buildup 6MV photon P-P chamber ---- Std MOSFET ---- New MOSFET Depth dose Depth Dose

Buildup 18MV photon 8 Depth dose Depth Dose P-P chamber ---- Std MOSFET ---- New MOSFET

Angular dependence 9 The MOSFET detectors were placed, flat side “up”, in a virtual water phantom with a 0.5 cm thick sheet of bolus material under the detector. This eliminated the slight air-gap which would otherwise result from placing the detector directly between two slabs of virtual water. The detectors were placed such that the depth to the center of the detector was 5.0 cm from the front, side and rear. Both detector designs were irradiated in this geometry. The detectors were irradiated with a fixed field size and distance (detector at isocenter), and at angles of 0°, 90 ° and 180 ° relative to the normal to the detector’s flat surface. For an intermediate, 45 ° measurement, the measured dose was normalized back to 5.0 cm depth by the measured isocentric fractional dose (TRR). Sample data are shown below.

Angular dependence - results 10 6MV photon: ---- Standard MOSFET ---- New MOSFET °45°90°180° Angle relative to normal D angle /D normal

Angular dependence - results 11 18MV photon: ---- Standard MOSFET ---- New MOSFET °45°90°180° Angle relative to normal D angle /D normal

Conclusion 12 Our evaluations have confirmed the findings of other investigators regarding the standard MOSFET detector system (see page 2). Our analysis of the new detector design shows no change in many important characteristics (energy & field size dependence, reproducibility). We have found the new MOSFET detector design to have an angular dependence of 3% or less over the full 360° range. With this detector redesign, resulting in minimal angular dependence, we conclude that this system is a reliable and efficient in-vivo dosimetry system, and well suited for quality assurance in our IMRT program.

13 References 1. Ramani, R., et.al., “Clinical dosimetry using MOSFETs”, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997 Mar:37(4), Francsescon, P., et.al., “Use of a new type of radiochromic film, a new parallel- plate micro-chamber, MOSFETs, and TLD800 microcubes in the dosimetry of small beams”, Med Phys (4), Edwards, C.R., et.al., “The response of a MOSFET, p-type semiconductor and LiF TLD to quasi-monoenergetic X-Rays”, Phys Med Biol (12), Scalchi, P., and Francescon, P., “Calibration of a MOSFET detection system for 6MV in-vivo dosimetry”, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998 Mar:40(4),