Assessment Literacy Series

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Michigan Assessment Consortium Common Assessment Development Series Putting Together The Test Blueprint.
Value Added Assessment RAD Reading Assessment Teacher Moderation Greg Miller Supervisor of Assessment Lynda Gellner Literacy Consultant Juanita Redekopp.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO)
ALS Design, Build, Review: Using PDE’s Online Tools to Implement the SLO Process SAS Portal:
Assessment Literacy Series
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLOs) “Designing” © Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Assessment Literacy Series
. This video is the third in a series of five videos created to support the understanding of SLOs. The Identifying Performance Measures video will outline.
(B) FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYES AND TEMPORARY PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYES WHO SERVE AS CLASSROOM TEACHERS, THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY: (1) BEGINNING IN THE
Benchmark Assessment Item Bank Test Chairpersons Orientation Meeting October 8, 2007 Miami-Dade County Public Schools Best Practices When Constructing.
SLO Review Principal Meeting CLIU October Student Learning Objective REVIEW -Quality Assurance-
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLOs) 1 Orientation Module.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
DEEPENING ASSESSMENT LITERACY Fall Objective  Identify best practices for local assessment development  Provide a working knowledge of the WPSD.
Assessment Literacy Series 1 -Module 4- Scoring Keys and Rubrics.
Michigan Assessment Consortium Common Assessment Development Series Module 6 – The Test Blueprint.
Assessment Review and Design for Student Learning Outcomes.
INTRODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT DESIGN. INTRODUCTION & PURPOSE.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model
SLO’s and HPDP’s Best Practices in Education Setting rigorous and ambitious goals for student growth, combined with the purposeful use of data, leads to…
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLOs) Orientation Module © Pennsylvania Department of Education.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 2.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
The Oregon System for Teacher and Administrator Professional Growth and Support System Focus on Student Learning and Growth Goals October
Introduction to the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework
Criteria for Procuring and Evaluating High-Quality Assessments: A State Perspective National Conference on Student Assessment New Orleans, Louisiana June.
Planning Focus Workshop Facilitated by: Sandy Sanford.
Revisiting LDC, Day 2 Elementary Bowling Green, Kentucky – Reach Associates November 15,
Assessment Literacy Series 1 -Module 6- Quality Assurance & Form Reviews.
Clear Purpose: Assessment for and of Learning: A Balanced Assessment System “If we can do something with assessment information beyond using it to figure.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
Assessment Literacy Series 1 -Module 3- Item Specifications.
MAC Common Assessment Training Modules Session F3 Michigan School Testing Conference February 23, 2012.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Assessment Literacy Series 1 -Module 1- Design & Purpose Statement.
Assessing The Next Generation Science Standards on Multiple Scales Dr. Christyan Mitchell 2011 Council of State Science Supervisors (CSSS) Annual Conference.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Using Data to Inform Growth Targets and Submitting Your SLO 1.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
ALS Design, Build, Review: Using PDE’s Online Tools to Implement the SLO Process SAS Portal:
SHOW US YOUR RUBRICS A FACULTY DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP SERIES Material for this workshop comes from the Schreyer Institute for Innovation in Learning.
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume III Curriculum Prioritization and Mapping.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
Assessment My favorite topic (after grammar, of course)
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Assessment Literacy and the Common Core Shifts. Why Be Assessment Literate? ED Test and Measurement 101 was a long time ago Assure students are being.
Michigan Assessment Consortium Common Assessment Training Modules Session B5 Michigan School Testing Conference February 23, 2011.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Review of Assessment Toolkit
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
SLO Design, Build, Review: Using PDE’s Online Tools to Implement the SLO Process SAS Portal:
ALS Design, Build, Review: Using PDE’s Online Tools to Implement the SLO Process SAS Portal:
Assessment Literacy Series
SLO Design, Build, Review: Using PDE’s Online Tools to Implement the SLO Process SAS Portal:
Assessment Literacy Series
Framing Success with Effective Lesson Objectives and Demonstrations of Learning Introductions, logistics/housekeeping.
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
The EQuIP Rubric (Formerly the Tri-State Rubric) A Tool To Align Lesson Plans and Units to the Common Core State Standards Illinois State Board of Education.
Roadmap November 2011 Revised March 2012
Presentation transcript:

Assessment Literacy Series -Orientation Module- IMT Orientation Draft 02Sept11-CS

What is Assessment Literacy? A process of designing, building, and reviewing performance measures for use in evaluating student achievement.

Series Objectives Develop high-quality performance measures for use within the greater educator effectiveness system. Increase assessment literacy of participants. Gain a deeper understanding of academic content standards.

Assessment Life Cycle Examine Validity Evidence Establish Assessment Purpose(s) and Design Build Test Specifications & Blueprint Develop Items Develop Scoring Keys and Rubrics Create Operational Forms & Administrative Guidelines Review Forms Administer Test and Report Results Examine Validity Evidence

Overview of the Development Process The Assessment Literacy training contains six (6) modularized components within three (3) action strands: DESIGN M1-Design & Purpose Statement M2-Test Specifications & Blueprints BUILD M3-Item Specifications M4-Scoring Keys & Rubrics M5-Operational Forms & Administrative Guidelines REVIEW M6-Quality Assurance & Form Reviews

Development Process Purpose Statement Targeted Standards Explain why measures are made, what they will measure, and how the results will be used. Targeted Standards Select content standards associated with the performance measure.

Development Process (cont.) Test Specifications and Blueprints Outline the types of items being used, point values, and depth of knowledge (DoK) distribution. Guide item development by focusing items/tasks on discrete aspects of the content standards. Item/Tasks Specifications Articulate the type and characteristics of items/tasks that align to the test specifications and blueprints.

Development Process (cont.) Scoring Keys & Rubrics Provide answers for multiple choice items and detailed scoring rubrics for constructed response tasks. Operational Forms Organize and sequence items/tasks within an outlined format that includes item tags (to uniquely identify each item/task).

Development Process (cont.) Administrative Guidelines Provide detailed instructions for how to prepare, administer, and collect results. Quality Assurance & Form Reviews Review all operational forms, scoring keys/rubrics, and guidelines to ensure pre- established quality expectations have been met. Determine the overall rigor and alignment at the item/task-level and for the overall operational form.

Helpful Materials Guides Handout #1 – Purpose Statement Examples Handout #2 – Targeted Standards Example Handout #3 – Test Specifications & Blueprint Example Handout #4 – Depth of Knowledge (DoK) Chart Handout #5 – Item Examples Handout #6 – Scoring Key Example Handout #7 – Rubric Examples Handout #8 – Operational Form Example Handout #9 – Administrative Guidelines Example Handout #10 – Quality Assurance Checklist

Helpful Materials (cont.) Templates Template #1-Purpose Statement Template #2-Targeted Standards Template #3-Test Specifications & Blueprint Template #4-Scoring Key Template #5-Operational Form Template #6-Administrative Guidelines

Helpful Material (cont.) Stuff “Smart Book” Provides techniques and technical criteria for developing measures. Performance Rigor Checklist A quick screening tool used to examine item/task quality.

Principles of Well-developed Measures Measures must: Be built to achieve the designed purpose Produce results that are used for the intended purpose Align to targeted content standards Contain a balance between depth and breadth of targeted content Be standardized, rigorous, and fair Be sensitive to testing time and objectivity Be valid and reliable

Quality Assurance Rubrics Evaluating Measures Quality Assurance Rubrics Three (3) versions- Teacher District State or Vendor Comprehensive tools that evaluate the technical process used in developing performance measures. Organized into strands and provides an overall rating.

Decision-Making Approaches Build Consensus Approach All opinions expressed Ideas of all participants gathered and synthesized Group agreement reached Team Leader Approach Guiding questions Group discussion about the pros and cons Create a “best fit” course of action

Think-Pair-Share 5 minutes to think about the statement below and write down your thoughts 5 minutes to share your ideas with a partner 10 minutes to share with your group “The Assessment Literacy process will help me as an educator by _______________.”

Summary & Next Steps Summary Orientation Module Next Steps Introduced the Assessment Literacy process used to create high quality measures of student achievement. Next Steps Module 1: Design & Purpose Statement Designing performance measures, including creating purpose statements and selecting academic content standards.