ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF-01-09.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,
Advertisements

OICA/CLEPA Homework Part I HMI, Driver in/out of the Loop Submitted by the experts of OICA/CLEPA Tokyo, June 2015 Informal Document ACSF
Comparison between TOR of IG-ITS/AD and SAE Levels*1
OICA HCV industry input to ACSF informal Group #1 Meeting & 30 in Bonn Informal Document ACSF
Evaluation of ACSF during periodic technical inspection Informal group ACSF # / 17 in Tokyo Informal Document ACSF
Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad- hoc group on LKAS/RCP Submitted by the Chair of the Special Interest Group on Lane Keeping Assist Systems (LKAS)
Automatically Commanded Steering Function
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - September 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT.
Definition for Levels of Automation
1 Different use cases for ACSF Prepared from the experts of OICA and CLEPA Informal Document ACSF
3rd ACSF meeting Munich, September 2-3 Industry proposals for ACSF status definition and HMI Informal Document: ACSF Submitted by the experts from.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Damage Mitigation Braking System
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - February 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT Japan.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Possible Example of Split of Regulation ~ Split of R79 and The New Regulation of Driving Assistance.
Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System " Informal Document: ACSF
Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan  Data of Traffic Accidents around Japan Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRRF
Remote Control Parking (RCP)
Identification of regulatory needs for ACSF Oliver Kloeckner 16-17th June nd meeting of the IG ASCF Tokyo – Jasic Office Informal Document.
Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Document No. ITS/AD (6th ITS/AD, 03 November 2015, agenda item 3-2) INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MOTOR VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS Automated Driving Submitted.
Minimum Risk Manoeuvres (MRM)
Safety Distances and Object Classifications for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Results of the Study on ACSF Transition Time Informal Document: ACSF National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory, Japan 4th Meeting of ACSF.
5 th ACSF meeting French views Bonn January 2016 Informal Document - ACSF Submitted by the expert of France.
CLEPA Position Special GRRF Session on Automatic Emergency Braking and Lane Departure Warning Systems Brainstorming Meeting 9 Dec UN Palais des.
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles Excerpts from the relevant sections of the ToR: II. Working items to be covered (details.
ACSF - Traffic Jam Assist on all roads OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
OICA „Certification of automated Vehicles“
Regulatory strategy when voluntary systems become mandated
Informal document GRRF-84-32
Informal Document: ACSF-06-16
Discussion paper – Major Issues
Lane Change Test for ACSF
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
Presentation of ACSF C tests
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles
Informal Working Group on ACSF
Submitted by the expert form Japan Document No. ITS/AD-09-12
Initial project results: Annex 6 – 20 Sept 2016
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Timing to be activated the hazard lights
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Proposal for UN Regulation on AEBS for M1/N1
Informal document GRRF-86-36
Industry Homework from AEB 02
Submitted by the Expert of Sweden
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
ACSF C tests Prepared by JAPAN 15 November, 2017
Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
Safety considerations on Emergency Manoeuver
Maximum allowable Override Force
Emergency Steering Function
ACSF-17 – Industry Preparation
ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3
ACSF B2 and C2 Industry expectations from ACSF IG Tokyo meeting
Hands-off detection versus Start of Lane Change Manoeuvre
6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Regulation ECE R79-03 ACSF C 2-Step HMI
Automated Lane Keeping Systems
Presentation transcript:

ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF-01-09

2 Objectives / Guidelines Objective: define the regulatory approach and necessary amendments in Regulation 79 to permit the development of “Automatically Commanded Steering Function” related technologies: 1.Define requirements to permit development of new ACSF functions for lane changing and lane keeping operations above 10km/h, 2.the IG only deals with requirements applicable to the steering system (UN R79) 3.It is assumed that the targeted Lane keeping operations are going beyond existing LKAS corrective steering (e.g. the control may be continuous). 4.When “high speed” (>10kph) ACSF is active, the driver’s role is to remain attentive in order to be aware of the system’s/vehicle’s status. The status of the system shall be displayed in the direct view of the driver (e.g. by a tell-tale or a dedicated display concept). The driver shall remain in a position (i.e. in the driving seat) to be able to resume the dynamic driving task whenever required. The system has to provide means for the evaluation of the driver’s presence and vehicle related activities. 5.For “low speed” ACSF (e.g. manoeuvring operations), current text applies 6.Lane changing operations are targeting specific use cases like overtaking or avoiding obstacles. Depending on the situation, the lane change can be initiated by the system or the driver. In all cases the driver shall be able to override / abort a lane change. 7.It is the driver’s responsibility to use the system only in those areas it is designed for. When the system detects it is not in the use case it is designed for, the system shall stop operating.

Proposed approach in the ACSF group  Define high level scope and objectives Finalize Terms of reference, taking into account ITS/AD GRRF guidance  Review status of current systems / functions  Review the next functions aproaching the market Lane guidance in the lane, at cruise or low speed (e.g. in traffic jam) * Lane changing by the system after acknowledgment/request* Lane changing by the system after driver information* Lane changing by the system without driver information* Driving on other roads than highway  Define targeted functions  Capture the necessary amendments in Regulation 79 * Highway or similar roads only