Making choices Rules of war - walking debate. 2 Slide 5 > Look at each image scenario in turn and decide whether you think it is acceptable/unacceptable.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Human Rights Grave Violations
Advertisements

Just War: Along side Pacifism and Realism, Just War theory represents one of the three main moral responses to the issue of war. Just War theory has developed.
Just War Theory.
The Red Cross Red Crescent Movement
Human Rights Violations During Israel's Attack on the Gaza Strip: December January 2009 Dr. Ruchama Marton Founder & President, PHR-IL APHA 137.
ATHA Specialized Training on International Humanitarian Law
1 Survey on International Humanitarian Law QUESTIONNAIRE.
Methods in armed conflict – legal framework
The Geneva Conventions and Human Rights
1 Unlawful Targets NONCOMBATANTS PROTECTED PROPERTY –Civilian –Medical –Cultural.
The International Law of Armed Conflict: An Overview
Memories of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. A flash in the sky.
17th March Just War Aims: To look at the conditions of a just war and to explore the idea that some wars may be justified.
Core Principles Related to Conduct of Hostilities ATHA Specialized Training on International Humanitarian Law May 31, 2010 Stockholm, Sweden.
Internal Armed Conflict and the Law
The Law of Armed Conflict in Practice: Prima-facie Charges & New Defenses The charging of Iraqi insurgents with war crimes and the defense theories that.
The Geneva Conventions and Human Rights during Wartime
The Privatisation of War The Law of Armed Conflict and Private Military Firms Dr Regina Rauxloh School of Law, University of Surrey, UK Surrey International.
Human Rights The rights possessed by all individuals by virtue of being human Indivisible, inalienable, and universal May be restricted in times of disturbance.
Law of Armed Conflict MIDN 1/C Hagness. Overview HistoryReadingLaws –Ethical conflicts Case study.
Vocabulary World War I. 1. Militarism A policy of glorifying military power and keeping a standing army prepared for war. Before WWI, Germany built up.
International Humanitarian Law: History and Main Principles Gentian Zyberi, Associate Professor Norwegian Centre for Human Rights University of Oslo.
I nternational Humanitarian Law Legal FoundationsLegal Foundations Historical DevelopmentsHistorical Developments Current IssuesCurrent Issues.
Established countries 100 million members and volunteers worldwide.
CMAST 1 International Humanitarian Law and the Geneva Conventions.
© 2006 Human Rights in Armed Conflict Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Austria.
Civil-Military Forum Protection of Civilians Kelisiana Thynne Research Manager Australian Civil-Military Centre.
MSL 401, Lesson 6a : The Law of Land Warfare The Law of Land Warfare.
International Law Law of Armed Conflict. Armed force may be legally used in only three instances: In self-defense (individually & collectively) When authorized.
The law of war: Humanitarian law THE STORY BEHIND THE STORY.
EXPLORING HUMANITARIAN LAW Introductory Questions PPT produced by A. Ripley ssrsb.
Situating International Humanitarian Law (IHL) ATHA Specialized Training on International Humanitarian Law May 31, 2010 Stockholm, Sweden.
Conduct of hostilities Protection of civilians against the effects of hostilities Dr. Elżbieta Mikos-Skuza Seminar „Introduction to International Humanitarian.
International Humanitarian Law and New Technologies of Warfare Lou Maresca Legal Adviser ICRC.
International Humanitarian Law Geneva Conventions.
Dr. Steve Hays BKHS Leadership and Ethics Spring 2014.
1) THE ROLE OF STATUS IN IHL 2) QUALIFICATION OF ARMED CONFLICT 3) REPERCUSSIONS OF STATUS ON 3 LEVELS : ON THE BATTLEFIELD : 1. CONDUCT OF HOSTILITIES.
Battle for Russia. June 22, 1941 Germany breaks treaty with Soviet Union by attacking German Blitzkrieg technique was devastating in Russia One week into.
The law of war: Humanitarian law THE STORY BEHIND THE STORY.
1. 2
Basic Principles of IHL Dr. Hilly Moodrick-Even Khen, Alma course 2011.
Leiden University, 16/11/2015 The Internet as a Field of War Anne Plouy Claerwen O’Hara Louis Léonet Lucy Turner Leiden University, The Netherlands.
The use of force against energy installations at sea under international law Kiara Neri Maître de conférences Université Jean Moulin Lyon 3.
"Health Care in Danger" Protecting health care personnel and infrastructure in armed conflict and other situations of violence Robin Coupland International.
Justice in Action: Just War Theory Just War Theory   Jus ad bellum: proposals to justify the use of force in a particular type of situation   Jus.
Justice in Action: Just War Theory PHI 2604 January 25, 2016.
World War One. The World Celebrated Men in uniform.
Before formal intro, hand out hit/myth sheet as students get settled and ask them to fill it out. Encourage them to discuss with others and not worry if.
SOLDIERS OF STEEL Geneva Convention. SOLDIERS OF STEEL Geneva Convention.
International Humanitarian Law Oral Presentation Module Name: UJGT8E-15-M Student No:
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW. Ahmed T. Ghandour.. CHAPTER 9. HUMANITARIAN LAW.
LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT. HISTORY AND OVERVIEW BACKGROUND n Definition (JCS Pub 1-02): u The part of international law that regulates the conduct of armed.
War Crimes in Contemporary Armed Conflict
International Humanitarian Law (IHL). What is IHL? >A large body of law >Rules for behaviour in armed conflict situations >Protects victims and vulnerable.
International Humanitarian Law Oral Presentation
This is Why you can’t just blow stuff up.
Geneva Convention.
Law of Armed Conflict.
East Africa facing hunger Sounds of conflict
Protection under international humanitarian law
Key Principles: A few preliminaries
Who needs rules? Discuss
Means and Methods of Warfare in Armed Conflict
Just War Theory. Just War Theory JWT is not Pacifism Pacifism says that war is always unjust, and therefore always wrong. This is an absolute statement.
Justice in Action: Just War Theory
The International Legal Rules on the Use of Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials Model Presentation.
From the Perspective of Combatants
Presentation transcript:

Making choices Rules of war - walking debate

2 Slide 5 > Look at each image scenario in turn and decide whether you think it is acceptable/unacceptable within the rules of war. > …apply the principles of humane treatment, proportionality and distinction to each scenario where possible. > …decide whether the actions are either legal or illegal in each case and move to the relevant part of the room.

Source: ICRC Shooting enemy soldiers during a conflict.

Shooting enemy soldiers who have surrended. Source: Photo © Robert Capa/Magnum Photos from War is Brutal

Shelling a hospital. Source: BRCS © info

Shelling a hospital from which snipers are killing your soldiers. Source: BRCS © info

Bombing military targets in a city – knowing that lots of civilians will be killed as well. Source: Listening Eye Images

Destroying the drinking water supply to a city. Source: photobucket.com/images/waterfall

Shelling a Red Cross ambulance which is helping wounded enemy soldiers. Source: ICRC © info

Torturing prisoners of war to obtain military information which will save many of your soldiers’ lives.

Source: ICRC © info Destroying a dam to gain military advantage.

Source: ICRC © info Making prisoners of war clear landmines that they laid.

Shooting at enemy soldiers who appear to be children Source: JFP/Getty from Justice and Fairness

14 Slide 5 ANSWERS (1) > Shooting enemy soldiers during a conflict – legal > Shooting enemy soldiers that have surrendered – Illegal (humane treatment and distinction) > Shelling a hospital – Illegal (distinction) > Shelling a hospital from which snipers are killing your soldiers – (proportionality) Dependent on circumstances: a hospital loses its protected status if used to commit acts harmful to the enemy, but an attack must be proportionate, i.e. the losses amongst protected people (the patients) must not be excessive compared to the importance of the military gain. The hospital must not be shelled if the sniper can be stopped with less destructive weapons. A warning must be given if possible. Source: Humanitarian Education Pack - Module 4: Conflict

15 Slide 5 ANSWERS (2) Source: Humanitarian Education Pack - Module 4: Conflict > Bombing military targets in a city – knowing that lots of civilians will be killed as well – Illegal (proportionality) if the attack is indiscriminate, i.e. if the incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians and or damage to civilian objects would be in excessive relation to the expected military advantage. > Destroying the drinking water supply to a city – Illegal (distinction) > Shelling a Red Cross ambulance which is helping wounded enemy soldiers – Illegal (distinction) > Torturing prisoners of war to obtain military information which will save many of your soldiers’ lives – Illegal (humane treatment) > Destroying a dam to gain military advantage – Illegal (distinction)

16 Slide 5 ANSWERS (3) Source: Humanitarian Education Pack - Module 4: Conflict > Bombing military targets in a city – knowing that lots of civilians will be killed as well – Illegal (proportionality) if the attack is indiscriminate, i.e. if the incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians and or damage to civilian objects would be in excessive relation to the expected military advantage. > Making prisoners of war clear landmines that they laid – Illegal (humane treatment) It would be legal if they volunteer. > Shooting at enemy soldiers who appear to be children – legal (But children under 15 should not be recruited into the armed forces.)