Challenge 2: Spatial Aggregation Level Multi-tier Modeling in Ohio Attempts to Balance Run Time and Forecast Granularity Gregory Giaimo, PE The Ohio Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
Advertisements

ISTEA is Now 20 Years Old and We are Still Searching for the Land Use-Transportation Connection. Actually, Analysis of that Connection Has Been Sought.
The TRANSIMS Model: Combining Travel Demand and Microsimulation Operating Paradigms Presented to 2012 ITE District 6 Annual Meeting by John Kerenyi, P.E.,
Dynamic Traffic Assignment: Integrating Dynameq into Long Range Planning Studies Model City 2011 – Portland, Oregon Richard Walker - Portland Metro Scott.
Transportation leadership you can trust. FDOT Systems Planning White Paper A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis Zones in Florida.
Presented by: Pascal Volet, ing. October 11,2007 Application of Dynameq in Montréal: bridging the gap between regional models and microsimulation Application.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Agenda Overview Why TransCAD Challenges/tips Initiatives Applications.
TransCAD Network Settings 2017/4/17.
TRIP ASSIGNMENT.
Amar Sarvepalli. 500 projects in 6-8 weeks Need VMT, VHT and More.
Automatic loading of inputs for Real Time Evacuation Scenario Simulations: evaluation using mesoscopic models Josep M. Aymamí 15th TRB National Transportation.
Milton-Madison Bi-State Travel Demand Model Rob Bostrom Planning Application Conference Houston, Texas May 19, 2009.
Versatile Applications of EMME/2 and ENIF: Seattle Experience Madhavi Sanakkayala Heather Purdy & Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff, Seattle.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Project: Model Integration Options Greg Erhardt DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th,
The Impact of Convergence Criteria on Equilibrium Assignment Yongqiang Wu, Huiwei Shen, and Terry Corkery Florida Department of Transportation 11 th Conference.
©2009 Proprietary and Confidential DTA in practice: Modeling dynamic networks in the real world Michael Mahut, Ph.D. INRO Montreal, Canada.
TPB Models Development Status Report Presentation to the Travel Forecasting Subcommittee Ron Milone National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
What is Sure BDCs? BDC stands for Batch Data Communication and is also known as Batch Input. It is a technique for mass input of data into SAP by simulating.
Implementation Yaodong Bi. Introduction to Implementation Purposes of Implementation – Plan the system integrations required in each iteration – Distribute.
ARC ABM Visualization & Reporting ARC – Nov 12, 2010 Activity-Based Model (Java, Cube) Activity-Based Model (Java, Cube) Database (SQL Server) Visualization.
Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model Mobility Analysis November 7, 2003.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Application Concepts January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
Utilizing Multi-threading, Parallel Processing, and Memory Management Techniques to Improve Transportation Model Performance Jim Lam Andres Rabinowicz.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Update on Developing Evacuation Model using Dynamic Traffic Assignment ChiPing Lam, Houston-Galveston Area Council Matthew Martimo, Citilabs.
Scalable Analysis of Distributed Workflow Traces Daniel K. Gunter and Brian Tierney Distributed Systems Department Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
NTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION INTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION David Roden (AECOM)
Scalable Web Server on Heterogeneous Cluster CHEN Ge.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
+ Creating an Operations-Based Travel Forecast Tool for Small Oregon Communities TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 20, 2009.
DKS Associates. 2 Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP) Travel Demand vs. Simulation Models Micro vs. Meso Simulation Models US-101 Corridor Modeling.
EMME Users’ Group Meeting NSW Modelling Guidelines - Highway Assignment 27 May 2011.
Integrated Macro-Micro Highway Demand/Operational Analysis Case Study: Cross Bronx Expressway Corridor, Bronx, NY Presented at the 15 th TRB Transportation.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Model: Working Model Calibration Part 1: Process Greg Erhardt Dan Tischler Neema Nassir.
Transportation leadership you can trust. TRB Planning Applications Conference May 18, 2009 Houston, TX A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis.
S. Erdogan 1, K. Patnam 2, X. Zhou 3, F.D. Ducca 4, S. Mahapatra 5, Z. Deng 6, J. Liu 7 1, 4, 6 University of Maryland, National Center for Smart Growth.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Presented by: Pascal Volet, ing. City of Montreal TRB Technical Conference May 9, 2007 A Multi-resolution Modelling Framework in the Montréal Area A Multi-resolution.
MATRIX ADJUSTMENT MACRO (DEMADJ.MAC AND DEMADJT.MAC) APPLICATIONS: SEATTLE EXPERIENCE Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
Project Level Traffic Forecasting Summary of Practices from other States TNMUG March 6, 2008.
A Dynamic Traffic Simulation Model on Planning Networks Qi Yang Caliper Corporation TRB Planning Application Conference Houston, May 20, 2009.
Mtivity Client Support System Quick start guide. Mtivity Client Support System We are very pleased to announce the launch of a new Client Support System.
March 23 & 28, Csci 2111: Data and File Structures Week 10, Lectures 1 & 2 Hashing.
Tennessee Statewide Model Subarea Model Development and Analysis Tennessee Model Users Group Meeting October 24, 2007 Presented by: Dean Munn Senior Transportation.
Utilizing Databases to Manage Precision Ag Data Candice Johnson BAE 4213 Spring 2004.
TRB Planning Applications May 2009, Houston,TX Changing assignment algorithms: the price of better convergence Michael Florian and Shuguang He INRO.
U N I V E R S I T Y O F S O U T H F L O R I D A Hadoop Alternative The Hadoop Alternative Larry Moore 1, Zach Fadika 2, Dr. Madhusudhan Govindaraju 2 1.
Assignment Convergence: Big Model, Small Projects; Improving Assignment Convergence in Ohio for Estimating Project Impacts TRB Planning Applications Conference.
TSS Database Inventory. CIRA has… Received and imported the 2002 and 2018 modeling data Decided to initially store only IMPROVE site-specific data Decided.
SHRP2 Project C05: Final Report to TCC Understanding the Contribution of Operations, Technology, and Design to Meeting Highway Capacity Needs Wayne Kittelson.
Big traffic data processing framework for intelligent monitoring and recording systems 學生 : 賴弘偉 教授 : 許毅然 作者 : Yingjie Xia a, JinlongChen a,b,n, XindaiLu.
CE Urban Transportation Planning and Management Iowa State University Calibration and Adjustment Techniques, Part 1 Source: Calibration and Adjustment.
Semi-Automated Approach to Develop Focus Area Forecasts from a Statewide Model 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 17-21,
From Use Cases to Implementation 1. Structural and Behavioral Aspects of Collaborations  Two aspects of Collaborations Structural – specifies the static.
Applicability of Paths Derived in Regional Planning Models to Traffic Micro-Simulation Paul Ricotta, P.E., Caliper Corporation Jon Fricker, PhD, Purdue.
From Use Cases to Implementation 1. Mapping Requirements Directly to Design and Code  For many, if not most, of our requirements it is relatively easy.
METRO Dynamic Traffic Assignment in Action COST Presentation ODOT Region 4 April 1,
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
Mesoscopic Modeling Approach for Performance Based Planning
Network Attributes Calculator
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
Mastering Autodesk Revit MEP 2016 CHAPTER 11: Mechanical Piping
Jim Lam, Caliper Corporation Guoxiong Huang, SCAG Mark Bradley, BB&C
Ohio Traffic Forecasting Manual
Ohio Traffic Forecasting Manual
Presentation transcript:

Challenge 2: Spatial Aggregation Level Multi-tier Modeling in Ohio Attempts to Balance Run Time and Forecast Granularity Gregory Giaimo, PE The Ohio Department of Transportation Division of Planning Presented at The 14 th Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 5, 2013

Overview Motivation Focus Model Quick Run Model Comparisons

Motivation Statewide models are big Ohio has zones (3600+ state) Model takes about 14 hrs. on dedicated cluster (makes model difficult to update)

Motivation Spatial aggregation is still too great to get good volumes on arterial streets Good OK Bleah! Black=Count Blue=Model Ick! Good

Motivation Fictitious congestion near centroids makes assignment convergence unstable (challenge 7 presentation will address) Red=VC>1 Yellow=VC>0.9

Motivation Need closer to 20,000 zones to have the correct balance to achieve reasonable loadings on arterial system (similar to MPO model TAZ density)

Motivation Two Part Solution 1.Focus Model: provides finer spatial detail in a small area 2.Quick Run Model: less spatial detail to make model run quicker

Focus Model The key to the focus model is data ODOT maintains a master network for the statewide model containing far more detail than is used in a normal model run Focus Network Blue centroids=focus Red centroids=normal Focus Area Buffer Area

Focus Model Also maintain a set of more refined zones

Focus Model Focus model combines these data sets with static trip tables from a full model run Application has 5 steps 1.Add network detail 2.Split trip tables 3.Create Cube junctions in focus area 4.Select junctions 5.Assignment trip tables Optional 6 th step for performing ODME Check out focus.zip on your flash drive to see it in detail!

Focus Model Add network detail Links selected from master network Additional network detail is added in a buffer area as well as focus area to prevent discontinuities in area of interest Focus model centroid connectors were generated automatically (full model CC’s had much more human interaction

Focus Model Static trip tables (by user class, focus model has capability to deal with trips tables with various market segmentation) are split within the focus area Uses zonal data at the focus zone level to parse trip tables using simple generation intensity functions

Focus Model We prefers dynamic intersection delay modeling (aka Junction Modeling), however does not work for full model due to computer memory limitations Steps 3 and 4 of the focus model create the detailed intersection control information in the focus area (we codes the necessary information on the all state and MPO model links)

Focus Model Step 5 is simply the assign the trip tables to the network Recent updates to the tool include: 1.Ability to accept different market segmentations in trip tables (we use different types for different purposes such as user benefit analysis, tolling, HOV or standard highway projects) 2.Ability to bring in forecast networks (previously the master network was maintained for base conditions only, now code future projects to this as well)

Focus Model Even with focus model, it is often necessary to perform additional project level updates* For this we generally use built in software tools for subarea extraction and then refine the subarea Subarea Extracted *following ODOT guidelines for project level modeling, see file Guidelines for …...pdf on your flash drive to learn more!

Quick Run Model Quick Run Model is at the opposite end of the spectrum and solves a different problem: long run times Each Full Model scenario year takes 8 hours to run A full scenario runs from year t0 to t40 (total of 9 scenario years per full scenario) 9 scenario years * 8 hours per year = 72 hour run time per scenario for Full Model Quick Run Model runs much faster (1.5 hours per scenario year at 1 in 10 sampling, much faster for 1 in 1000)

Quick Run Model Achieved with 2 changes: Sampling in micro-simulation models reduced from 1 in 3 HH in a standard run to 1 in 1000 or less Zones aggregated (PUMA’s in state, larger out of state) Quick Run Zones

Quick Run Model No aggregation occurs at network level, rather quick run centroids are simply connected everywhere one of its child TAZ’s connects

Quick Run Model Application has 2 steps 1.Various SE/land use files are aggregated 2.Centroid connectors changed Once data is processed, the full model is run on these datasets with a quick run toggle switched Thus QRM is a simpler application than FM but must operate on many more files and then results in data for a full run of the model

Quick Run Model Results themselves are not suitable for analysis Large zone size causes problems in distribution (high intrazonal trips) resulting in less network traffic Thus need to be careful when calibrating model components related to congestion levels Some more detailed preliminary comparison results are contained in spreadsheet QuickRunValidation_t0.xlsx on your flash drive!

Comparisons You can find these maps on your flash drive to compare yourself! Regular Model Run 2015 daily volume

Comparisons You can find these maps on your flash drive to compare yourself! Raw Focus Model Run 2015 daily volume

Comparisons You can find these maps on your flash drive to compare yourself! Refined Focus Model Run 2015 daily volume

Comparisons You can find these maps on your flash drive to compare yourself! Quick Run Model Run 2000 daily volume