CHAPTER X HEARSAY EVIDENCE. Hearsay Evidence Evidence of a statement that was made other than by the witness while testifying that is offered to prove.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
McGraw-Hill © 2003, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Criminal Investigation Criminal Investigation Swanson Chamelin Territo eighth.
Advertisements

Prior Statements By Testifying Witnesses 801(d)(1)
CVLS Hearsay Refresher Who Cares About Hearsay? A Four-Step Hearsay Formula Hearsay Exceptions Questions.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Interviewing & Investigation Foundations of Investigating.
Chapter 8 Trial Procedures. The Players Judge Appointed by government Full control of courtroom Decides question of guilt (when there is no jury) and.
Chapter 7: Evidence and Procedure Evidence: Proves/Disproves fact in issue Procedure: Rules of Court.
+ Courtroom Participants. + 2 Fundamental Principles An accused person is innocent until proven guilty. Guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Participants in a Criminal Trial. Principles Canada’s criminal justice system has two fundamental principles: an accused person is innocent until proven.
Criminal Cases Chapter 16 Section 2.
Hearsay and Its Exceptions
Jail Call Analysis 4 th Amdt – Waiver because of Consent (Banargent, Scheinman, Poyck) 4 th Amdt. – Society not ready to recognize prisoner’s expectation.
PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS FRE 801(d) Non Hearsay by definition Rule 801(d)(1) Prior Statement by Witness is not hearsay If declarant testifies and.
Chapter 10 The Hearsay Rule.
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS: ADMISSIONS. STATEMENT OF A PARTY FRE 801(d)(2)(A) & Evid. Code sec. 122O.
The Roles of Judge and Jury Court controls legal rulings in the trial Court controls legal rulings in the trial Jury decides factual issues Jury decides.
Legal Issues Computer Forensics COEN 252 Drama in Soviet Court. Post-Stalin (1955). Painted by Solodovnikov. Oil on Canvas, 110 x 130 cm.
Criminal Evidence 7th Edition
Evidence and Argument Evidence – The asserted facts that the arbitrator will consider in making a decision – Information – What is presented at the hearing.
Hearsay Exceptions Steven Magnone.
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Elder Abuse Investigations Adapted from material presented June 30, 2004 by Sean Morgan.
1 Chapter 12 Obtaining Statements and Confessions for use as Evidence Obtaining Statements and Confessions for use as Evidence.
Hearsay Exceptions Declarant Unavailable. Unlike FRE 803, FRE 804 provides exceptions where the Declarant Must be Unavailable to testify.
AJ 104 Chapter 5 Witnesses. 5 Issues Related to a Trial Witness 1. Who is competent to testify 2. How the credibility of a witness is attacked 3. What.
THE HEARSAY RULE.
CHAPTER 3 (48) THE INVESTIGATIVE METHOD. STARTING POINTS 1. State the problem 2. Form the hypothesis 3. Observe and experiment 4. Interpret the data 5.
The Forensic Accounting Legal Environment McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Elder Abuse Prosecutions Adapted from material presented June 30, 2004 by Sean Morgan.
Basic Evidence and Trial Procedure. Opening Statement  Preview the evidence “The evidence will show”  Introduce theme  Briefly describe the issues,
The Trial Process and the Investigator as a Witness.
A statement by a person who is conscious and knows that death is imminent concerning what he or she believes to be the cause or circumstances of death.
EXCLUSIONS FROM HEARSAY Prior Inconsistent Statement, Prior Consistent Statements, Prior Identifications.
Evidence.
A Federal Defender’s Guide to Confrontation Jessica Smith School of Government, UNC-Chapel Hill.
CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2015.
Past Recollection Recorded. Basic Structure of a Simple Legal Rule A particular functional legal outcome results If certain facts (elements) are true.
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 3 RULES AND TYPES OF EVIDENCE LAW 12 MUNDY
Unit 6 The Trial: Players, Motions, Hearings, and Pleas Or I am getting my day in court.
Evidence in Court Holy Trinity Law Audrius Stonkus.
Objections Criminal law – unit #3.
Chapter 4 Criminal Law. Categories Business Related.
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Courts NYC Elder Abuse Training Project.
1 PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE Learning Domain PURPOSE FOR THE RULES OF EVIDENCE Protect the jury from seeing or hearing evidence that is: (w/b p. 1-3)
The Participants. Beyond a Reasonable Doubt Crown must prove case beyond a reasonable doubt: a reasonable person would have no choice but to conclude.
Unit 6  What needs to be done this week SeminarSeminar QuizQuiz Discussion boardDiscussion board Unit 9 Analysis and ApplicationUnit 9 Analysis and Application.
ACOS 1, 2 Legal Aspects of Investigation The investigator and the legal system.
PROCEDURES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 8 th ed. Roberson, Wallace, and Stuckey PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ
CJ305 Criminal Evidence Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 9 (Chapter 12 – Documents and the Right of Discovery) (Chapter.
EVIDENCE ACT Law of evidence lay rules for the production of evidence in the court of law.
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT ARE LESS RELIABLE: RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2011.
CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2014.
PROCEDURES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 8 th ed. Roberson, Wallace, and Stuckey PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ
CJ305 Criminal Evidence Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 3 (Chapter 5 – Witnesses -- Lay & Expert) (Chapter 6 – Credibility.
Mock Trial Team Strategies and Formalities. Opening Statements 3 minutes Objective – Acquaint court with the case and outline what you are going to prove.
HEARSAY! BY MICHAEL JOHNSON. COMMON LAW DEFINITION “ An out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted”
CJ227: Criminal Procedure Unit 6 Seminar Mary K Cronin.
Experts and Lay Witness
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT ARE LESS RELIABLE: RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2010.
CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2016.
Chapter Seven Interviewing and Investigation
WHAT IS EVIDENCE TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES DOCUMENTS
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT ARE LESS RELIABLE: RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2012.
Courtroom Participants
Criminal Evidence Marjie Britz Chapter Ten: Hearsay
Hearsay Hector Brolo Evidence, Law 16 Spring 2017.
Principles of Evidence
How Witnesses are Examined
CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2015.
The Investigator and The Legal System
Alison Chandler Hearsay Exceptions Continued Unavailability Former testimony Dying Declarations Declarations against.
Hearsay Exceptions - Rules 803 and 804
Presentation transcript:

CHAPTER X HEARSAY EVIDENCE

Hearsay Evidence Evidence of a statement that was made other than by the witness while testifying that is offered to prove the truth of the matter stated in court.

Hearsay Evidence General Rule: Is generally considered Inadmissible because it is Unreliable because: 1) No opportunity to assess competency or credibility of the original declarant. 2) No opportunity for cross-examination. 3) No guarantee of truthfulness.

Hearsay Evidence Hearsay Exception = admissible hearsay. Legal Foundation = elements that make up the hearsay exception. Test For Trustworthiness = legal reason which overcomes the general unreliability of the hearsay.

Hearsay Exception Admissions & Confessions: Peace officer or private citizen can testify to the content of an admission or confession made by the accused. Admission: statement from the accused acknowledging a fact of relevant evidence (not amounting to a confession) Confession: statement from the accused acknowledging guilt “I did it” Legal Foundation: statement must be legally obtained (“402 motion”). Test for Trustworthiness: a person would not make a statement adverse to one’s penal interests unless that statement were true.

Hearsay Exception Spontaneous Statement: Legal Foundation: 1)Excited Utterance - A statement made during or shortly after a crime or incident that was likely to arouse the emotions of a reasonable person. 2) Contemporaneous or close in time with the occurrence of the crime or incident (while the victim or witness is still “under the influence “ of the event). 3) About what the declarant saw or otherwise perceived.

Hearsay Exception Test For Trustworthiness: Statements made in the heat of excitement and close in time to a crime are considered reliable. The declarant did not have the time or opportunity to fabricate or contrive a falsehood (“comes from the heart”).

Hearsay Exception Dying Declaration: is evidence of a statement made by a dying person with respect to the cause and circumstances of death. Legal Foundation: 1)The declarant (victim) must be under an impending sense of death (reasonably believes that he/she is going to die). 2) The statement must concern personal knowledge about the cause and circumstances surrounding the stroke of death. 3) The victim must die!

Hearsay Exception What if the victim isn’t under an impending sense of death or survives the incident? Could be used as a: Spontaneous Statement Prior statements of witnesses But not a dying declaration!

Hearsay Exception Test For Trustworthiness : “Oh, but they say the tongues of dying men, enforce attention like deep harmony; where words are scarce they are seldom spent in vain; for they breathe truth that breathe their words in pain (William Shakespeare) A person would not lie on one’s deathbed - want to “meet the maker” with a clear conscience.

Dying Declaration?

Hearsay Exception Prior Statements Of Witnesses: Legal Foundation: After a person testifies in court, another person who received or overheard the statement by that witness may be called to repeat all or part of the prior utterance when: 2 Prong Test: 1.Impeachment (inconsistent with one’s present testimony) 2.Corroborate or Rehabilitation (to “fill in the blanks”) Note: See text for examples

Hearsay Exception Test For Trustworthiness: All due process and cross-examination rights are afforded during the testimony of both the original declarant and the follow- up witness who testifies.

Hearsay Exception: Former Testimony and Witness Unavailable: Legal foundation: 1.The former testimony was given under oath or affirmation with an opportunity for discovery and cross-examination of the witness. 2.There is an official transcript of the former testimony. 3.The original witness is unavailable to testify at the subsequent court hearing due to death, injury, sickness, incapacity, unable to locate for subpoena, refusal to appear in court, etc Note: See text for examples

Test for Trustworthiness: all due process and cross-examination rights were afforded at the prior court hearing.

Hearsay Exception Business Records: R ecords kept in the normal course and routine of a business or private enterprise. Bank of America Southern California Edison Verizon Visa Memorial Hospital Home Depot

Hearsay Exception Official Records: are public records kept in the normal course of events by a public agency. Examples: Department of Motor Vehicles Department of Justice County of Los Angeles City of Wilmington LAHC

OFFICIAL RECORDS What other hearsay exception could apply in this case? Spontaneous Statement

Hearsay Exception Business & Official Records: Legal Foundation: 1) Record was made in the normal course of business or public transaction. 2) The record was made at or near the time of the event or information recorded (contemporaneous). 3) The source of information and method of preparation are trustworthy.

Hearsay Exception Business & Official Records: Test For Trustworthiness: There is a high probability that records and documents prepared in the normal course of duties are accurate and reliable. Any person who is familiar with the record and how it is prepared may authenticate and testify to its contents. It is not necessary to have the original author testify about the record.

Hearsay Exception Hearsay Evidence At Preliminary Hearings (Prop. 115 Rule) An officer with five or more years experience or who has completed a POST training class may give hearsay evidence at preliminary hearings for the purpose of establishing probable cause the defendant committed the felony charged.

Hearsay Exception Hearsay evidence at preliminary hearings (prop. 115 rule) Only first level hearsay is permitted. Not “totem pole” hearsay. Example: witness tells officer - who tells a detective what the witness said. The detective could not give hearsay evidence in court because he/she didn’t personally interview the witness.