Structured Reporting - More Complex Examples David A. Clunie NEMA SR Workshop 29th-30th March 2000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Key Image Notes Evidence Documents Simple Image & Numeric Report Access to Radiology Information IHE Vendors Workshop.
Advertisements

RSNA 2003 The IHE Technical Approach Identify the transactions required to integrate information flow between information systems For each transaction,
Reporting Workflow Rita Noumeir, Ph.D. IHE Technical Committee.
Sept 13-15, 2004IHE Interoperability Workshop 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Post-Processing Workflow Sanjay Jain Co-Chair, Radiology Planning.
June 28-29, 2005IHE Interoperability Workshop 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Cross-enterprise Document Sharing for Imaging (XDS-I) Rita Noumeir.
DICOM Structured Reporting Workshop - March 2000 Structured Reporting and the IHE Year 2 Technical Framework Simon Wail, PhD Marconi Medical Systems.
SR workshop Intro slide 1 SR Workshop Copyright OTech Inc all rights reserved DICOM explained in the context of Structured Reporting Herman Oosterwijk,
IHE Radiology Integration Profiles: ▪ Post-Processing Workflow ▪ Reporting Workflow IHE Educational Workshop – June 11-13, 2007 Nikolaus Wirsz, PhD Manager.
DICOM SR: Evidence Documents Key Image Notes Simple Image and Numeric Reports Rita Noumeir, Ph.D. Professor, University of Quebec.
ECE 250 Algorithms and Data Structures Douglas Wilhelm Harder, M.Math. LEL Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Waterloo Waterloo,
RSNA Reporting Templates: Representation of Findings in CDA R2 Instances Helmut Koenig Co-Chair DICOM WG20.
Simple Image and Numeric Reports
THE DICOM 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE & SEMINAR March 14-16Bangalore, India Pediatric Echo Structured Reporting – An Experience Sharing Bindhu M Philips.
IHE Profiles for Enhanced DICOM (CT and MR) Kees Verduin Philips Healthcare Chair DICOM WG16.
Mpeg-21 and Medical data A strategy for Tomorrow ’ s EMR.
Using Objects and Properties
Planning Value of Planning What to consider when planning a lesson Learning Performance Structure of a Lesson Plan.
IMS1805 Systems Analysis Topic 3: Doing Analysis (continued from previous weeks)
Modules, Hierarchy Charts, and Documentation
Lesson 9: Managing Inventory
Chapter 13: Object-Oriented Programming
HIMSS/RSNAVendor Workshop, April 2003 Evidence Documents Techs Produce More Than Images Kevin O’Donnell, Toshiba Co-Chair, Planning Committee.
DICOM Conformance Statement (DCS) A Proven Power within DICOM
Distributing Images: Cross-enterprise Document Sharing for Imaging (XDS-I) Access to Radiology Information (ARI) Retrieve Information for Display (RID)
XP New Perspectives on XML Tutorial 4 1 XML Schema Tutorial – Carey ISBN Working with Namespaces and Schemas.
An Object-Oriented Approach to Programming Logic and Design
DICOM INTERNATIONAL DICOM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE & SEMINAR April 8-10, 2008 Chengdu, China Applications of DICOM SR Andrei Leontiev Dynamic Imaging Solutions,
Condition/Diagnosis/Health Issue/Problems/Findings Modeling Options.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Key Image Notes Evidence Documents Simple Image & Numeric Report Access to Radiology Information IHE Vendors Workshop.
In-Band Access Control Framework Group Name: WG4 SEC Source: Qualcomm Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
DICOM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE & SEMINAR Oct 9-11, 2010 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil DICOM Structured Reporting: Measurements, CAD, Radiation Dose and more Andrei.
Of 33 lecture 3: xml and xml schema. of 33 XML, RDF, RDF Schema overview XML – simple introduction and XML Schema RDF – basics, language RDF Schema –
New Perspectives on XML, 2nd Edition
Cardio - June Evidence Documents Profile Cardiology Uses and Options.
In-Band Access Control Framework Group Name: WG4 SEC Source: Qualcomm Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
The Dirichlet Labeling Process for Functional Data Analysis XuanLong Nguyen & Alan E. Gelfand Duke University Machine Learning Group Presented by Lu Ren.
IHE Workshop – June 2006What IHE Delivers 1 Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Systems Evidence Documents Profile.
XML 2nd EDITION Tutorial 4 Working With Schemas. XP Schemas A schema is an XML document that defines the content and structure of one or more XML documents.
1 Tutorial 14 Validating Documents with Schemas Exploring the XML Schema Vocabulary.
Tutorial 13 Validating Documents with Schemas
IHE Workshop – February 2007What IHE Delivers 1 Marco Eichelberg IHE-D Technical Manager NM Image.
DICOM Technical Concepts
Feb 7-8, 2007IHE Participant's Workshop 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Mammography Image – MAMMO Chris Lindop, GE Healthcare Co-Chair Radiology.
DICOM Structured Reporting Recent Standards Activity Doug Sluis SPIE, Feb 18, 2003.
SR Object Model (SR-OM) - Towards an API for toolkits David A. Clunie NEMA SR Workshop 29th-30th March 2000.
DICOM SR / CDA Rel.2 Mapping San Antonio WGM, May 2006 Helmut König Co-Chair II SIG / DICOM WG20 Siemens Medical Solutions.
DICOM INTERNATIONAL DICOM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE & SEMINAR April 8-10, 2008 Chengdu, China Exchanging Imaging Data Herman Oosterwijk Add logo if desired.
Application of DICOM Structured Report Andrei Leontiev Dynamic Imaging.
 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved Document Object Model (DOM): Objects and Collections.
Feb , 2005IHE Europe Workshop 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise – Radiology – Introduction to the New IHE Integration Profiles: Dr. Nikolaus.
1 Requirements for XA Object Definition (ordered by Priority, highest on top)  Make distinction between ready-to-display and not ready-to-display images.
Exchanging Imaging Data
Supplement 94xx: CT Radiation Dose Reporting (Dose SR) CT Dose Report DICOM WG21 24-Jan-2007 Bernhard.
ADN Framework Overview A Collaboration of ADEPT, DLESE and NASA (2002 Nov. 19)
Key Image Notes Integration Profile Charles Parisot GE Medical Systems IT Planning and Technical Radiology Committees.
Sept 13-15, 2004IHE Interoperability Workshop 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Reporting Workflow Key Image Notes Evidence Documents Rita Noumeir,
Combined Metamodel for UCM Contributed by Anthony B. Coates, Londata 17 February, 2008.
1 Representing and Reasoning on XML Documents: A Description Logic Approach D. Calvanese, G. D. Giacomo, M. Lenzerini Presented by Daisy Yutao Guo University.
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise
Understanding the DICOM SR Supplement
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise
DICOM SR Tools - dicom3tools ...
DICOM explained in the context of Structured Reporting
Matching Words with Pictures
Guide for writing a Software Testing Document
DICOM SR Meets XML - beyond the hype ...
Use and Transformation of DICOM SR and CDA Release 2 Diagnostic Imaging Reports Helmut Koenig, MD Siemens Healthcare Co-Chairman DICOM WG20 and HL7 Imaging.
New Perspectives on XML
Presentation transcript:

Structured Reporting - More Complex Examples David A. Clunie NEMA SR Workshop 29th-30th March 2000

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. Outline  Features of Sup 23 example  Features not in example  Textual equivalents of the example  Fully annotated illustration of the example l Encoding of components of the example  Inheritance of Observation Context  Post-coordination of Concept Name  Reference collection attributes up front

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. Features of Example  No plain text at all, everything coded  Post-coordinated document title  Inferences that lead to a conclusion are l documented l encoded by reference rather than by value  References to image and coordinates  Numeric measurement  Observation context

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. SR Features not in Example  Post-Coordination of other content items  Containers without Concept Name l i.e. containers that aren’t “headings”  Observation context extended in children  “Inferred from” relationship by-value  Temporal Coordinates

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved.

Report of Chest X-Ray (PA and LateralViews) Patient Jane Homer Study # Recorded by Dr. John Smith The finding is a mass measuring 1.3 cm in diameter with an infiltrative margination. The baseline image is shown at Conclusions The conclusion is a probable malignancy, inferred from the infiltrative margination of the mass and the appearance shown by the best illustration of findings. Specific Image Findings The best illustration of findings is (Click to view)

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. Chest X-Ray has concept modifier Views=PA and Lateral Recording Observer=Smith^John^^Dr^ Study Instance UID …= Patient-Data-Acquisition-Subject=Homer^Jane^^^ Finding=Mass has properties diameter=1.3 cm has properties margination=infiltrative (1.4.2) Baseline Image Conclusions conclusion=probable malignancy inferred from inferred from Specific Image Findings best illustration of findings(1.7.1).

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. Chest X-Ray has concept modifier Views=PA and Lateral Recording Observer=Smith^John^^Dr^ Study Instance UID …= Patient-Data-Acquisition-Subject=Homer^Jane^^^ Finding=Mass has properties diameter=1.3 cm has properties margination=infiltrative (1.4.2) Baseline Image Conclusions conclusion=probable malignancy inferred from inferred from Specific Image Findings best illustration of findings(1.7.1). “contains” relationship not shown

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. Chest X-Ray has concept modifier Views=PA and Lateral Recording Observer=Smith^John^^Dr^ Study Instance UID …= Patient-Data-Acquisition-Subject=Homer^Jane^^^ Finding=Mass has properties diameter=1.3 cm has properties margination=infiltrative (1.4.2) Baseline Image Conclusions conclusion=probable malignancy inferred from inferred from Specific Image Findings best illustration of findings(1.7.1). Concept Name /Value pairs used

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. Chest X-Ray has concept modifier Views=PA and Lateral Recording Observer=Smith^John^^Dr^ Study Instance UID …= Patient-Data-Acquisition-Subject=Homer^Jane^^^ Finding=Mass has properties diameter=1.3 cm has properties margination=infiltrative (1.4.2) Baseline Image Conclusions conclusion=probable malignancy inferred from inferred from Specific Image Findings best illustration of findings(1.7.1). Concept Name without a value used as a heading (container)

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. Chest X-Ray has concept modifier Views=PA and Lateral Recording Observer=Smith^John^^Dr^ Study Instance UID …= Patient-Data-Acquisition-Subject=Homer^Jane^^^ Finding=Mass has properties diameter=1.3 cm has properties margination=infiltrative (1.4.2) Baseline Image Conclusions conclusion=probable malignancy inferred from inferred from Specific Image Findings best illustration of findings(1.7.1). Concept Name without a value used as Purpose of Reference for IMAGE, SCOORD

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. Concept Name Conditions

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. CODE SCOORD CODE “Chest X-Ray” “Recording Observer”=“Smith^John^^Dr^” “Study Instance UID...”=“ ” Context “… Acquisition Subject”=“Homer^Jane^^^” “Finding”=“Mass” Contains “Baseline”= Contains “Conclusions” Contains “Specific Image Findings” Contains “Views”=“PA and Lateral” Modifier Context “diameter”=“1.3” “cm” Properties “margination”=“infiltrative” Properties “conclusion”=“probable malignancy” Contains “best illustration of findings”= Contains Sel d From Inf d From CONTAINER PNAME UIDREF PNAME CODE NUM IMAGE CODE

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Chest X-Ray” CONTAINER

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Chest X-Ray” CONTAINER

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Chest X-Ray” CONTAINER

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Chest X-Ray” CONTAINER The choice of code is defined by the combination of Value and Scheme Designator ! - Code Meaning is for convenience only !

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Chest X-Ray” CONTAINER

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Chest X-Ray” CONTAINER

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Chest X-Ray” “Views”=“PA and Lateral” Modifier CONTAINER CODE 1.8

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Chest X-Ray” “Views”=“PA and Lateral” Modifier CONTAINER CODE 1.8

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Chest X-Ray” “Views”=“PA and Lateral” Modifier CONTAINER CODE 1.8

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Chest X-Ray” “Views”=“PA and Lateral” Modifier CONTAINER CODE 1.8 The Relationship is always encoded inside the child Content Item !

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Chest X-Ray” “Views”=“PA and Lateral” Modifier CONTAINER CODE 1.8

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Chest X-Ray” “Views”=“PA and Lateral” Modifier CONTAINER CODE 1.8

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Chest X-Ray” “Views”=“PA and Lateral” Modifier CONTAINER CODE 1.8

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Chest X-Ray” “Views”=“PA and Lateral” Modifier CONTAINER CODE 1.8

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Chest X-Ray” “Finding”=“Mass” Contains “diameter”=“1.3” “cm” Properties CONTAINER CODE NUM

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “diameter”=“1.3” “cm” NUM

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Chest X-Ray” “Baseline”= Contains CONTAINER IMAGE 1.5

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Baseline”= Contains IMAGE Concept Name denotes the Purpose of Reference

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. SCOORD “Chest X-Ray” “Specific Image Findings” Contains “best illustration of findings”= Contains Sel d From CONTAINER IMAGE

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. SCOORD “best illustration of findings”= Contains Sel d From IMAGE Purpose of Reference specified for SCOORD

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. CODE SCOORD CODE “Chest X-Ray” “Finding”=“Mass” Contains “Conclusions” Contains “Specific Image Findings” Contains “margination”=“infiltrative” Properties “conclusion”=“probable malignancy” Contains “best illustration of findings”= Contains Inf d From CONTAINER CODE

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. CODE SCOORD CODE “Chest X-Ray” “Conclusions” Contains “margination”=“infiltrative” “conclusion”=“probable malignancy” Contains “best illustration of findings”= Inf d From CONTAINER

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. CODE “conclusion”=“probable malignancy” Inf d From Inf d From

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Chest X-Ray” “Recording Observer”=“Smith^John^^Dr^” “Study Instance UID...”=“ ” “… Acquisition Subject”=“Homer^Jane^^^” “Finding”=“Mass” “Baseline”= “Conclusions” “Specific Image Findings” “Views”=“PA and Lateral” “diameter”=“1.3” “cm” “margination”=“infiltrative” “conclusion”=“probable malignancy” “best illustration of findings”= The numbering of items is implicit !

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. Inheritance of Context  Observation Context l includes top-level attributes of Composite IOD l may be attached to root node CONTAINER l is inherited along by-value relationships l is not inherited along by-reference relationships l may be extended (but not replaced) in children l may be attached to any content item, not just CONTAINER

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Chest X-Ray” “Recording Observer”=“Smith^John^^Dr^” “Study Instance UID...”=“ ” Context “… Acquisition Subject”=“Homer^Jane^^^” “Finding”=“Mass” Contains Context General Patient Module: “Patient Name ”=“Homer^Jane^^^” “Patient ID ”=“234567” “Patient Sex”=“F” “Patient DOB”=“ ” General Study Module: “Accession Number ”=“123456” “Study ID ”=“345678” SR Comprehensive SOP Instance

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. Inheritance of Context  Observation Context l includes top-level attributes of Composite IOD l may be attached to root node CONTAINER l is inherited along by-value relationships l is not inherited along by-reference relationships l may be extended (but not replaced) in children l may be attached to any content item, not just CONTAINER

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Chest X-Ray” “Recording Observer”=“Smith^John^^Dr^” “Study Instance UID...”=“ ” Context “… Acquisition Subject”=“Homer^Jane^^^” “Finding”=“Mass” Contains “Baseline”= Contains “Conclusions” Contains “Specific Image Findings” Contains “Views”=“PA and Lateral” Modifier Context “diameter”=“1.3” “cm” Properties “margination”=“infiltrative” Properties “conclusion”=“probable malignancy” Contains “best illustration of findings”= Contains Sel d From Inf d From

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. Inheritance of Context  Observation Context l includes top-level attributes of Composite IOD l may be attached to root node CONTAINER l is inherited along by-value relationships l is not inherited along by-reference relationships l may be extended (but not replaced) in children l may be attached to any content item, not just CONTAINER

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Obstetric Ultrasound” “Mother of Fetus”=“Homer^Jane^^^” “Fetus Identifier”=“Fetus A” “BPD”=“27” “mm” “Findings for Fetus” Obs n Context Contains Obs n Context “Gestational Age”=“16” “weeks” Properties Inf d From “Fetus Identifier”=“Fetus B” “BPD”=“28” “mm” “Findings for Fetus” Contains Obs n Context “Gestational Age”=“16” “weeks” Properties Inf d From

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. Inferred From Relationships

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Obstetric Ultrasound” “Mother of Fetus”=“Homer^Jane^^^” “Fetus Identifier”=“Fetus A” “BPD”=“27” “mm” “Findings for Fetus” Obs n Context Contains Obs n Context “Gestational Age”=“16” “weeks” Properties Inf d From “Inferred from” relationships may be by-value as well as by-reference, and are often more appropriate then “has properties” or “contains.”

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. Post-Coordination: HAS CONCEPT MOD  Elaborates on meaning of Concept Name in l CONTAINER (headings) l CODE, TEXT, NUM …  May: l qualify meaning further l describe meaning l provide translations

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Chest X-Ray” “Views”=“PA and Lateral” Modifier CONTAINER CODE “Full Description”=“This is a report on a two-view (PA and lateral) Chest X-Ray examination.” Modifier TEXT “Equivalent Meaning in Italian”=“Radiografia del...” Modifier TEXT

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. “Finding”=“Mass” “diameter”=“1.3” “cm” Properties CODE NUM “method”=“Smith” Modifier CODE Modifier “threshold”=“75” “HU” NUM “Finding”=“Mass” “diameter by Smith 75HU threshold” = “1.3” “cm” Properties CODE NUM Post-coordinated... Pre-coordinated...

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. References to Images, etc.  At reference: l SOP Class and Instance UIDs (+/- Frame) l Optionally, Presentation State reference  What Study ? Series ? l Complete list up front: Current Requested Procedure Evidence Sequence Pertinent Other Evidence Sequence l UIDs, AETs, Media IDs

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. Current Requested Procedure Evidence Sequence  Everything (ALL images etc.) for the procedure the report is about  Even if they are not explicitly referenced !  Even if the report creator didn’t look at them !

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. Pertinent Other Evidence Sequence  Stuff from other studies  Priors that may (or may not) have been considered while generating this document  Other synchronous studies satisfying other requests l E.g. another modality l E.g. another department (lab, path)

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. Collected References...

Copyright 2000 David A. Clunie. All rights reserved. Summary  Features of Sup 23 example  Features not in example  Textual equivalents of the example  Fully annotated illustration of the example l Encoding of components of the example  Inheritance of Observation Context  Post-coordination of Concept Name  Reference collection attributes up front