Evaluation of portfolio performance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BUILDING SHARPE OPTIMIZATION STOCK PORTFOLIOS AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
Advertisements

Measuring Portfolio Performance With Asset Pricing Models (Chapter 11) Risk-Adjusted Performance Measures Jensen Index Treynor Index Sharpe Index CAPM.
Performance Evaluation and Active Portfolio Management
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Investment Companies.
6 Efficient Diversification Bodie, Kane, and Marcus
The Capital Asset Pricing Model. Review Review of portfolio diversification Capital Asset Pricing Model  Capital Market Line (CML)  Security Market.
Return, Risk, and the Security Market Line Return, Risk, and the Security Market Line.
Performance Evaluation and Active Portfolio Management
Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Return and Risk: The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) Chapter.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Portfolio Performance Evaluation 18 Bodie, Kane, and Marcus.
Stern School of Business
Chapter 9 Capital Market Theory.
Risk and Rates of Return
1 Fin 2802, Spring 10 - Tang Chapter 24: Performance Evaluation Fin2802: Investments Spring, 2010 Dragon Tang Lectures 21&22 Performance Evaluation April.
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 15 Performance Measurement.
Objectives Understand the meaning and fundamentals of risk, return, and risk preferences. Describe procedures for assessing and measuring the risk of a.
Chapter 8 Risk and Return—Capital Market Theory
Version 1.2 Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. Requests for permission to make copies of any part of the work should be mailed to:
Diversification and Portfolio Management (Ch. 8)
CHAPTER TWENTY-FOUR PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE EVALUATION.
Equity portfolio management strategies
Portfolio Analysis and Theory
Chapter 5 Risk and Rates of Return © 2005 Thomson/South-Western.
Defining and Measuring Risk
Asset Management Lecture 11.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Chapter.
© 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Return, Risk, and the Security Market Line Chapter Thirteen.
Unit V: Portfolio Performance Measurement
Portfolio Evaluation Outline Investment return measurement conventional measurement theory Evaluation with changing portfolio composition Evaluation with.
Chapter 20 EVALUATION OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT. Chapter 20 Questions What are some methods used to evaluate portfolio performance? What are the differences.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 5-1 Chapter 5 Risk and Return.
Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Eighth Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown Chapter 25.
Chapter McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 13 Performance Evaluation and Risk Management.
© 2009 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Chapter 13 Performance Evaluation and Risk Management Active and Passive Portfolio Management Active and Passive.
13-1. Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin 13 Performance Evaluation and Risk Management.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Fundamentals of Investment Management Hirt Block 1 1 Portfolio Management and Capital Market Theory- Learning Objectives 1. Understand.
Chapter 12 Global Performance Evaluation Introduction In this chapter we look at: –The principles and objectives of global performance evaluation.
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
Chapter 13 CAPM and APT Investments
Portfolio Performance Evaluation
Risks and Rates of Return
Requests for permission to make copies of any part of the work should be mailed to: Thomson/South-Western 5191 Natorp Blvd. Mason, OH Chapter 11.
Performance Evaluation
Chapter 4 Risk and Rates of Return © 2005 Thomson/South-Western.
0 Portfolio Management Albert Lee Chun Evaluation of Portfolio Performance Lecture 11 2 Dec 2008.
Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk.
Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Seventh Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown Chapter 26.
The Portfolio Management Process 1. Policy statement –specifies investment goals and acceptable risk levels –should be reviewed periodically –guides all.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Performance Evaluation and Active Portfolio Management CHAPTER 18.
Version 1.2 Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. Requests for permission to make copies of any part of the work should be mailed to:
Evaluation of Portfolio Performance Chapter 25. Composite Portfolio Performance Measures Portfolio evaluation before 1960 Portfolio evaluation before.
Measuring Portfolio Performance
Portfolio Performance Evaluation 03/09/09. 2 Evaluation of Portfolio Performance What are the components of portfolio performance evaluation? What are.
Evaluation of Investment Performance Chapter 22 Jones, Investments: Analysis and Management.
Risk and Return: Portfolio Theory and Assets Pricing Models
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved. Chapter 8 Investment Companies.
© K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche Chapter 29 Performance of Mutual Funds Investments.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Performance Evaluation and Active Portfolio Management CHAPTER 17.
Chapter 18 Portfolio Performance Evaluation. Types of management revisited Passive management 1.Capital allocation between cash and the risky portfolio.
12-1. Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin 12 Return, Risk, and the Security Market Line.
Lecture 10 Cost of Capital Analysis (cont’d …) Investment Analysis.
CHAPTER TWENTY-TWO Evaluation of Investment Performance CHAPTER TWENTY-TWO Evaluation of Investment Performance Cleary / Jones Investments: Analysis and.
Portfolio risk and return
Central Bank of Egypt Performance Measurement Tools.
Chapter 26 - Evaluation of Portfolio Performance What is the Jensen portfolio performance measure, and how does it relate to the Treynor measure? What.
INVESTMENTS: Analysis and Management Third Canadian Edition INVESTMENTS: Analysis and Management Third Canadian Edition W. Sean Cleary Charles P. Jones.
Portfolio Management Portfolio Evaluation March 19, 2015 Slide Set 2 1.
1 CAPM & APT. 2 Capital Market Theory: An Overview u Capital market theory extends portfolio theory and develops a model for pricing all risky assets.
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
Chapter 4: Portfolio Management Performance
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of portfolio performance

What is required of a portfolio manager? 1. Ability to derive above average returns for a given risk class. Superior timing Superior security selection

Market timing Predict the peaks or troughs in the market and adjust portfolio composition to anticipate these trends Hold diversified high-beta stocks through rising markets – Bigger gains in rising market Low-beta stocks and money market instruments in declining markets – smaller losses in losing market

Security selection Select undervalued stocks or bonds for a given risk class. Even without superior market timing, produce above-average risk-adjusted returns.

What is required of a portfolio manager? 2. Ability to diversify the portfolio completely to eliminate all unsystematic risk, relative to the portfolio’s benchmark. Market rewards only systematic risk.

What is required of a portfolio manager? Both requirements of the portfolio manager are important because Some portfolio evaluation techniques take into account one requirement but not the other. Other techniques implicitly consider both factors but do not differentiate between them.

Early performance measurement techniques Portfolio evaluation before 1960 rate of return within risk classes Peer group comparisons no explicit adjustment for risk difficult to form comparable peer group

Composite Portfolio Performance Measures Combine risk and return performance into a single value. 1. Treynor portfolio performance measure 2. Sharpe portfolio performance measure 3. Jensen portfolio performance measure 4. Information ratio performance measure

Treynor Portfolio Performance Measure Treynor recognized two components of risk Risk from general market fluctuations Risk from unique fluctuations in the securities in the portfolio His measure of risk-adjusted performance focuses on the portfolio’s undiversifiable risk: market or systematic risk

Treynor Portfolio Performance Measure To identify risk due to market fluctuations, he introduced characteristic line Measures the relationship between the returns to a managed portfolio and the market portfolio Slope of this line is the portfolio’s beta coefficient A higher slope (beta) characterizes a portfolio that is more sensitive to market returns and has greater market risk.

Treynor Portfolio Performance Measure The numerator is the risk premium The denominator is a measure of risk The expression is the risk premium return per unit of risk

Treynor Portfolio Performance Measure The expression is the risk premium return per unit of risk Risk averse investors prefer to maximize this value Later T value indicates a better portfolio for all investors, regardless of their risk preference. This assumes a completely diversified portfolio leaving systematic risk as the relevant risk

Treynor Portfolio Performance Measure Comparing a portfolio’s T value to a similar measure for the market portfolio indicates whether the portfolio would plot above the SML Calculate the T value for the aggregate market as follows:

Treynor Portfolio Performance Measure Comparison to see whether actual return of portfolio G was above or below expectations can be made using:

Sharpe Portfolio Performance Measure Risk premium earned per unit of risk

Treynor versus Sharpe Measure Sharpe uses standard deviation of returns as the measure of risk Risk premium earned per unit of total risk. Treynor measure uses beta (systematic risk) Sharpe therefore evaluates the portfolio manager on the basis of both rate of return performance and diversification

Treynor versus Sharpe Measure Treynor’s performance measure uses SML Sharpe’s performance measure uses CML The methods agree on rankings of completely diversified portfolios Produce relative not absolute rankings of performance

Jensen Portfolio Performance Measure Also based on CAPM Expected return on any security or portfolio is Where: E(Rj) = the expected return on security RFR = the one-period risk-free interest rate j= the systematic risk for security or portfolio j E(Rm) = the expected return on the market portfolio of risky assets

Jensen Portfolio Performance Measure Rjt-RFRt = αj+βj[Rmt-RFRt]+ejt Alpha indicates the portfolio’s superior or inferior in her investment ability. A superior manager has a significant positive alpha A inferior manager has a significant negative alpha Performance of a portfolio manager with no forecasting ability but not clearly inferior equals that of a naïve buy and hold strategy.

The Information Ratio Performance Measure Appraisal ratio measures average return in excess of benchmark portfolio divided by the standard deviation of this excess return Rb = Average return for the benchmark portfolio during the period σER = Standard deviation of the excess return during the period

Numerator can be considered as the investor’s average alpha if the average return to the benchmark is taken to be the expected return for the actively managed portfolio. Denominator is the tracking error of the portfolio and it is the cost of active management

The Information Ratio Performance Measure To interpret IR, the mean return differential in the numerator represents the investor’s ability to use her talent and information to generate a portfolio return that differs from that of the benchmark against which the performance is being measured.

Potential Bias of One-Parameter Measures positive relationship between the composite performance measures and the risk involved alpha can be biased downward for those portfolios designed to limit downside risk

Components of Investment Performance Fama suggested overall performance, which is its return in excess of the risk-free rate Portfolio Risk + Selectivity Further, if there is a difference between the risk level specified by the investor and the actual risk level adopted by the portfolio manager, this can be further refined Investor’s Risk + Manager’s Risk + Selectivity

Components of Investment Performance The selectivity measure is used to assess the manager’s investment prowess

Components of Investment Performance The market line then becomes a benchmark for the manager’s performance Ra = Actual return on the portfolio being evaluated Rx(βa) = Return on the combination of the riskless asset and the market portfolio M that has risk βx. Equal to βa, the risk of the portfolio being evaluated.

Components of Investment Performance The selectivity component can be broken into two parts gross selectivity is made up of net selectivity plus diversification

Components of Investment Performance Assuming the investor has a target level of risk for the portfolio equal to bT, the portion of overall performance due to risk can be assessed as follows:

Relationship Among Performance Measures Treynor Sharpe Jensen Information Ratio Fama net selectivity measures Highly correlated, but not perfectly so

Performance Attribution Analysis Allocation effect Selection effect Wai, Wbi = investment proportions of the ith market segment (e.g. asset class, industry group) in the active manager’s portfolio and the benchmark policy portfolio Rai, Rbi = Investment return to the ith market segment in the active manager’s portfolio and the benchmark portfolio, respectively. Rb = total return to the benchmark portfolio

Measuring Market Timing Skills Tactical asset allocation (TAA) Attribution analysis is inappropriate indexes make selection effect not relevant multiple changes to asset class weightings during an investment period Regression-based measurement

Factors That Affect Use of Performance Measures Market portfolio difficult to approximate Benchmark error can effect slope of SML can effect calculation of Beta greater concern with global investing problem is one of measurement Sharpe measure not as dependent on market portfolio

Benchmark Portfolios Performance evaluation standard Usually a passive index or portfolio May need benchmark for entire portfolio and separate benchmarks for segments to evaluate individual managers

Characteristics of Benchmarks Unambiguous Investable Measurable Appropriate Reflective of current investment opinions Specified in advance

Building a Benchmark Specialize as appropriate Provide value weightings Provide constraints to portfolio manager