Leveraging Collaborative Technologies for Sharing Tacit Knowledge: An Integrative Model (Research in progress) Vikas Sahasrabudhe

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ability-Based Education at Alverno College. Proposed Outcomes for Session 1. To introduce you to Alvernos approach to designing integrative general education.
Advertisements

DS-01 Disaster Risk Reduction and Early Warning Definition
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
New Organisational Forms and CSCW (part 2) M. Baptista Nunes 14/03/2000.
.  How you refined your question. Include things like: o Research proposal o Any s/communication with others you have had that helped you decide.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 15 Creating Collaborative Partnerships.
Evaluating Creatives *  Concept Testing: Assessment of potential Creatives  Communication Research: A Look at the Advertising Creative  Copy Testing:
Graduate Program Assessment Report. University of Central Florida Mission Communication M.A. Program is dedicated to serving its students, faculty, the.
Consistency of Assessment
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University1 digital libraries and human information behavior Tefko Saracevic, Ph.D. School of Communication, Information and.
1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont.
From Diagnostic Feedback To University Policy Carmel McNaught.
3 Chapter Needs Assessment.
Organizational Design, Diagnosis, and Development Session 13 Organizational Diagnosis, III Survey Feedback & Design of Interventions.
Creating Collaborative Partnerships
Refining Your Research Question. In this session, we will… Discuss guidelines for creating a ‘good’ research question Provide time to revisit and revise.
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University1 digital libraries and human information behavior Tefko Saracevic, Ph.D. School of Communication, Information and.
Delmar Learning Copyright © 2003 Delmar Learning, a Thomson Learning company Nursing Leadership & Management Patricia Kelly-Heidenthal
PPA 503 – The Public Policy Making Process
More than Knowing At Mercy College Karin Gilbert & Michelle Cotter.
Human capital management
Quality Improvement Prepeared By Dr: Manal Moussa.
Human Resource Management (HRM) The Basics of Performance Management.
Health promotion and health education programs. Assumptions of Health Promotion Relationship between Health education& Promotion Definition of Program.
Evaluation Process/Requirements for CAPP Algebra Project.
1.Rationale for using and engaging with wikis 2.Preparation for using wikis 3.Purpose and uses of wikis 4.Wiki to aid in assessment 5.Outcomes from using.
RESEARCH PROPOSAL: THEORY, RESEARCH QUESTION & HYPOTHESIS
Research Methods Key Points What is empirical research? What is the scientific method? How do psychologists conduct research? What are some important.
© 2009 On the CUSP: STOP BSI Identifying Barriers to Evidence-based Guideline Compliance.
電管碩一 R 凌伊亭 Social Media Use In a Mobile Broadband Environment : Examination of Determinants of Twitter and Facebook Use International Journal of.
Online Focus Groups Online Focus Groups A How-To Guide in 8 Steps Maniactive. Copyright 2001.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Leadership in Organizations 4-1 Chapter 4 Participative Leadership, Delegation, and Empowerment.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Leadership in Organizations publishing as Prentice Hall 4-1 Chapter 4 Participative Leadership, Delegation, and.
Autism Team Training in South Dakota Presented by Brittany Schmidt, MA-CCC/SLP Center for Disabilities Autism Spectrum Disorders Program
Marymount University & Digital Focus Business Ethics Survey of Technology CEOs Technology CEOs Ethics Forum May 15, 2001 McLean, Virginia.
ATL’s in the Personal Project
 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.
PERSONAL AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Effective Teams. CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE TEAMS 
Innovate, Engage and Empower Lakeside Elementary Proud to be an “A” School!
Chapter 6 Attitudes.
Chemistry Assessment Update C101-Lecture C121-Laboratory Chemistry department expanding into C100-Lecture C120 Laboratory Assessment Committee Mandate.
Research Design – Where to Begin…. Purpose of EDD 9300 Provide guidance and help you to: Select a topic Conduct a Preliminary Literature Review Design.
AN INTRODUCTION Managing Change in Healthcare IT Implementations Sherrilynne Fuller, Center for Public Health Informatics School of Public Health, University.
Chapter 4 Developing and Sustaining a Knowledge Culture
Chapter 4 Developing and Sustaining a Knowledge Culture
How To: A Process for Successful Partnerships. Partnership Definition A partnership IS: A written agreement between the parties. Mutual interest in, mutual.
Judith M. Whipple, Ph.D. Department of Marketing and Supply Chain Management Michigan State University 325 North Business Complex
1 Roles and Responsibilities of The Learning Evidence Team at CCRI Presented at CCRI Peggy Maki
1 ATTITUDES. 2 WHAT IS ATTITUDE? 3 Attitudes is a positive or negative evaluation of an objects, people, or ideas. Beliefs are pieces of information.
University as Entrepreneur Results of Surveys of ASU Faculty, Students and Staff Spring 2007 Surveys conducted by the Institute for Social Science Research.
PROGRESS REPORT Daphne Leger. Background Launched in Feb 2007 at Hanoi 3 rd MfDR Roundtable Two year workplan ratified by members at 1 st annual meeting.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Chapter 14: Affective Assessment
Click to edit Master subtitle style 3/7/10 LEADING.
Teaching Business: BADM Major Requirements Six Foundational Courses BADM 101 Introduction to Business BADM 110 Foundations of Management BADM 226 Organizational.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 15 Creating Collaborative Partnerships.
Educational Research Chapter 8. Tools of Research Scales and instruments – measure complex characteristics such as intelligence and achievement Scales.
Applying Principles of Learning Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University Assessment.
CSWE Overview This resource highlights key aspects of the mission of the Commission on Research and its goals for the next 5 years. It will then.
1 Innovative Teaching and Learning (ITL) Research Corinne Singleton SRI International.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
CHAPTER 5 Transfer of Training.
By Dr. Talat AnwarAdvisor Centre for Policy Studies, CIIT, Islamabad Centre for Policy Studies, CIIT, Islamabad
The effects of workshop participation in scenario-planning workshops on propensity to collaborate Survey findings Lisa Rayle Master in City Planning Master.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Intro to Research Methods
Organization and Knowledge Management
The Heart of Student Success
Strategies for mobilizing research knowledge: A conceptual model and its application KM research team OISE.
Presentation transcript:

Leveraging Collaborative Technologies for Sharing Tacit Knowledge: An Integrative Model (Research in progress) Vikas Sahasrabudhe Subhasish Dasgupta The George Washington University ASC 2005 – Washington, DC

ASC2005 Sahasrabudhe/Dasgupta 2 Outline of presentation Research objective Definitions Relevant current theories and models Proposed integrative model Propositions Results from an experiment Next steps

ASC2005 Sahasrabudhe/Dasgupta 3 Research objective Develop a model to assess the potential of collaborative technologies for sharing tacit knowledge in an organization (without having to make it explicit). Subsequent, practical objectives are to: ● Identify features and functions that ought to be present in collaborative technologies to enable sharing of tacit knowledge in an organization and ● Provide an appropriate policy framework to enable sharing of tacit knowledge in an organization.

ASC2005 Sahasrabudhe/Dasgupta 4 Applicability/importance Organizations are eager to “tap” their knowledge assets in the interest of their business objectives; it is increasingly important for organizations that are geographically dispersed, even global. Significant amount of knowledge in most organizations is tacit, and is not or cannot be made explicit for sharing. Using information technology for sharing knowledge has been studied for many years, IT capabilities and availability have increased significantly, and yet there is no clear evidence of wide use of such collaborative technologies for sharing knowledge that is not made explicit.

ASC2005 Sahasrabudhe/Dasgupta 5 Past and current mechanisms

ASC2005 Sahasrabudhe/Dasgupta 6 Need for “virtual water-cooler” Collaborative Technologies (Virtual Water Cooler)

ASC2005 Sahasrabudhe/Dasgupta 7 Definitions Collaborative technologies are systems that create an environment in which individuals and groups to communicate with each other. They provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and knowledge. (e.g. , instant messaging, chat rooms, discussion groups, groupware) Tacit knowledge is knowledge that is not made explicit, generally that is in the head of individuals.

ASC2005 Sahasrabudhe/Dasgupta 8 Relevant current theories and models Technology acceptance model (2) Theory of planned behavior Innovation diffusion theory Social cognitive theory Communities of practice Social networking theory Other published results

ASC2005 Sahasrabudhe/Dasgupta 9 Individual characteristics affecting use of collaborative technologies Organizational characteristics affecting use of collaborative technologies Individual characteristics affecting sharing of tacit knowledge Use of collaborative technologies Organizational characteristics affecting sharing of tacit knowledge Sharing of tacit knowledge Proposed integrative model

ASC2005 Sahasrabudhe/Dasgupta 10 Propositions on individual characteristics affecting use of collaborative technologies Affecting positively: perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, subjective norm Affecting negatively: perceived behavioral control

ASC2005 Sahasrabudhe/Dasgupta 11 Propositions on organizational characteristics affecting use of collaborative technologies Affecting positively: role of MIS personnel, organizational size Affecting negatively: actual behavioral control

ASC2005 Sahasrabudhe/Dasgupta 12 Proposition on use of collaborative technologies affecting sharing of tacit knowledge The more collaborative technologies are used in an organization, the more sharing of tacit knowledge will take place.

ASC2005 Sahasrabudhe/Dasgupta 13 Propositions on individual characteristics affecting sharing of tacit knowledge Affecting positively: propensity to share/adopt new ideas, image, and outcome expectations Affecting negatively: perceived behavioral control

ASC2005 Sahasrabudhe/Dasgupta 14 Propositions on organizational characteristics affecting sharing of tacit knowledge Affecting positively: support and time for communicating new ideas, social system of norms, task interdependence, meaningful rewards, mechanisms for reputation building, and mechanisms for community building Affecting negatively: Actual behavioral control “Ownership” of new ideas will affect positively if individuals own them, and negatively if the organization owns them.

ASC2005 Sahasrabudhe/Dasgupta 15 First experiment ● A discussion forum set-up for use by a total of 42 students enrolled in two courses and seeking feedback from them at the end of the semester on their experience and perception of potential future use. ● Not testing for statistical significance, but seeking only descriptive statistics. ● Focused only on individual characteristics for using collaborative technologies and for sharing tacit knowledge, intentionally without any organizational settings or constraints.

ASC2005 Sahasrabudhe/Dasgupta 16 Findings All the students said that they were not averse to sharing knowledge, 40 (out of 42) students said that they were not averse to using the discussion forum, And yet, 38 (out of 42) students did not use the discussion forum. (This was expected in the absence of any organizational setting or constraints). The reasons given were: □ Were not required use it (20) □ Did not have time (7) □ Did not need it (4) □ Only if others needed it (4) □ was better choice (3)

ASC2005 Sahasrabudhe/Dasgupta 17 Findings (continued) Those did not use the discussion forum were surveyed to find out their perceptions of potential use of the forum to share tacit knowledge. They were asked to respond to 9 statements on a 7-point scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The frequency of responses to each statement were analyzed for descriptive statistics.

ASC2005 Sahasrabudhe/Dasgupta 18 Findings (continued) ○ A very small minority of respondents were negative about the (potential) usefulness of the discussion forum and its ease of use. ○ More than a third of the respondents agreed that: ● discussion forum will be easy to use ● discussion forum will be useful in assignments ○ Majority of the respondents indicated that use of discussion forum should not be made mandatory. ○ And majority of the respondents were neutral on their intention to use the discussion forum if made available the following semester.

ASC2005 Sahasrabudhe/Dasgupta 19 Current experiment The results were encouraging enough in support of the propositions dealing with individual characteristics An expanded experiment this semester includes one organizational characteristic, namely task interdependence. Each student is provided access to two discussion forums, namely one for all students and one for his/her team working on a group project.

ASC2005 Sahasrabudhe/Dasgupta 20 Next steps Collect data on actual use, perceptions of ease of use and usefulness, and perceptions about other organizational characteristics that may affect use and usefulness. Based on the results – refine the model, refine and expand experiments, conduct rigorous analysis of the model.