Fringe Field in DH Marco Oriunno (SLAC), January 13, 2015 SID Workshop 2015, SLAC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SiD Surface assembly Marco Oriunno (SLAC) MDI-CFS Meeting Sep. 4-6, 2014, Ichinoseki (Japan)
Advertisements

Replies by N.Meyners (in green) 27 August 2007ILC Questions M. Breidenbach1 ILC Detector Strategy Questions Some of us have been wondering about the fundamental.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Presentation to ASAC R. Casey Radiation Shielding: Assumption and Design April 24, 2007.
Global Design Effort Goals and Introduction Andrei Seryi, SLAC, September 17, 2007.
Global Design Effort Detector concept # Plenary introductory talk IRENG07 Name September 17, 2007.
PROBLEM: Radiation Dose Rate in IR2 When IR1 is Operating (and Vice Versa) Muon Dose Rate > 1 mRem/hr for 0.1% Collimated Halo.
G2p Safety Readiness Review January 17, 2012 Expected Radiation Exposure Levels from Activated Local Dump George Kharashvili, Radiation Control.
1 Infrastructure at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov, RAL MICE Collaboration CERN, 29 March 2003.
1 Status of infrastructure MICE Video Conference, August 17, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Backgrounds Update Tom Markiewicz SLAC LCWS Cornell 15 July 2003.
Twin Solenoid Twin Solenoid - conceptual design for FCC-hh detector magnet - Matthias GT Mentink Alexey Dudarev Helder Pais Da Silva Leonardo Erik Gerritse.
MICE CM30 Magnetic Shielding Update Mike Courthold 6 th July
Push Pull Considerations
Global Design Effort Detector concept Plenary introductory talk IRENG07 Kurt Krempetz September 17, 2007.
August 2012SiD DBD SLAC1 SiD DBD Costs M. Breidenbach.
3 March 2009M. Breidenbach1 SiD LoI Costs M. Breidenbach.
MICE CM30 Magnetic Shielding Update Mike Courthold 6 th July
CD meeting R.Yamada1 Thoughts on 4CD (4 th Concept Detector) Solenoid System based on Alex Mikhailchenko’s Basic Design Ryuji Yamada October 20,
MICE Magnetic Field Mitigation Review Potential impact on ISIS of MICE Stray Magnetic Fields 24 th September 2013 Martin Hughes.
SID Engineering Marco Oriunno (SLAC), Jan CLIC Workshop, CERN Toward the TDR.
October 13, 2006 Global Design Effort 1 International Linear Collider Machine Detector Interface Materials for discussion at Engineering Forum: experiences.
Magnetic Shielding Issues Roy Preece STFC - RAL. Overview Issues Items in harms way – Step IV Step IV mitigation plan –Racks –Compressors Current / Future.
MICE CM32 8 th February 2012 Magnet Group Report Vicky Bayliss Victoria Blackmore John Cobb Mike Courthold Roy Preece Mike Zisman 1.
1 W.Ootani ICEPP, University of Tokyo MEG experiment review meeting Feb , PSI W.Ootani ICEPP, University of Tokyo MEG experiment review meeting.
Static Magnetic Fields Safety hints for entering magnetic field volumina Fritz Szoncso SC/GS.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
Beam Commissioning Marco Oriunno (SLAC), May 14, 2014 ALCW 2014, Fermilab Engineering Issues.
Tungsten Calorimeter Model Calculations and Radiation Issues Pavel Degtiarenko Radiation Control Group, Jefferson Lab.
Experimental equipment interacting with beam operation D. Macina TS/LEA Many thanks to my colleagues both from the experiments and the machine for their.
September 18, 2007H. J. Krebs1 SiD Collaboration One Piece End Door Design Concept plus Forward Equipment Interfaces H. James Krebs SLAC September 18,
IR Interface Document Draft Andrei Seryi SLAC for BDS design team and MDI-D representatives of Detector Concepts May 25-30, 2008, Budker INP, Novosibirsk,
Alain Hervé, ILD Workshop, Seoul 17 February 2009, 4365-ILD-T-Coil-Developments.ppt Possible Coil Developments ILD Workshop - SEOUL - 17 February 2009.
CEA DSM Irfu - F. KIRCHER - [Seoul Workshop, Feb 16-18, 2009] 1 ILD detector magnet: LoI version F. Kircher, O. Delferrière CEA Saclay, DSM/Irfu/SACM.
MDI DBD Editors Report Tom Markiewicz/SLAC SiD Collaboration Meeting, SLAC 22 August 2012.
1 MICE Radiation Shielding MICE Phone Conference, 28 January 2004 Yury Ivanyushenkov Engineering Department, RAL.
1 SiD Push-pull Plans Marco Oriunno, SLAC International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 Geneva, October 2010 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010.
SiD Workshop Magnet DBD STATUS SLAC January 17, 2013 Wes Craddock.
Radiation Protection aspects for SHIP Doris Forkel-Wirth, Stefan Roesler, Helmut Vincke, Heinz Vincke CERN Radiation Protection Group 1 st SHIP workshop,
PID PC 7th Sept MICE MAGNETIC FIELDS & SHIELDS J. H. Cobb & H. Witte Oxford University Magnet fields for MICE (VI) calculated including magnetic.
RICH1 Gas Enclosure Installation. Experimental Area Meeting at CERN on 21st June 2006 Bill Cameron (Imperial College London) on behalf of the RICH1 team.
A common 400 Hz AC Power Supply Distribution System for CMS FEE. Authors C. Rivetta– Fermilab. F. Arteche, F. Szoncso, - CERN.
CLIC Machine-Detector Interface Working Group (MDI) Emmanuel Tsesmelis CERN TS/LEA CLIC-ACE of 3 September 2008.
Access Yard Assembly Marco Oriunno (SLAC), November 13, 2013 LCWS13, TOKYO.
SiD Engineering and Solenoid Kurt Krempetz (Layer 5) (Layer 1) VXD.
Global Design Effort Magnetic and Mechanical FEA of SiD IRENG07 Bob Wands September 18, 2007.
An Hybrid QD0 for SID ? Marco Oriunno (SLAC), Nov. 14, 2013 LCWS13, TOKYO.
September 20, 2007H. J. Krebs/B. Wands/B. Cooper1 SiD Collaboration Preliminary End Door Design Concept Support of Forward Systems H. James Krebs Bob Wands.
1 COBRA Magnet Status W.Ootani MEG Experiment Review Meeting, Jul W.Ootani MEG Experiment Review Meeting, Jul
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
MICE CM32 25 th February 2012 Magnet Group Report Vicky Bayliss Victoria Blackmore John Cobb Mike Courthold Roy Preece Mike Zisman 1.
Magnet Infrastructures and Cavern Layout CLIC Detector WG5, April 1st 2010 Andrea Gaddi Physics Dept. - CERN.
Mu2e Mu2e Remote Handling Review Comparisons: Costs, Risks & Maintainability Ryan Schultz Deputy L3 Manager Target Station 3/3/2015.
SuperB Integration SuperB Experimental hall. Related topics of Slac D&D activities.
1 Implementation at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov on behalf of Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Tony Jones, Jim Rochford Engineering Department, RAL MICE Collaboration.
12 July 2007IRENG07 WG-A M. Breidenbach1 SiD Concept SiD is relatively modest in scale compared to the LHC detectors, and comparable to SLD: Tracker Radius.
Proton and neutron irradiation facilities in the CERN-PS East Hall Maurice Glaser and Michael Moll CERN- PH-DT2 - Geneva - Switzerland 6 th LHC Radiation.
M.Oriunno, SLAC 1 MDI & Cryo System design Marco Oriunno, SLAC SiD Collaboration Meeting 2-3 March 2009 SLAC.
F. Kircher CLIC concept meeting 12/15/08 1 Some points about the superconducting magnet for a CLIC detector F. Kircher (CEA Saclay/DSM/Irfu/SACM) December.
SuperB Experimental hall General considerations on the Babar experimental area Preliminary space requirements hall proposal. A floor plan. Specification.
SiD Solenoid Dump Resistor Wes Craddock SLAC Design Parameters and Concept Assume worse case of 2 GJ Use CMS parameters: Same Conductor with.
2016/9/30 Yasuhiro Infra/CFS mini-ws
Detector Hall Design and Cost Information CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES
Marco Oriunno (SLAC), March 12, 2014 MDI WG
HEL – Safety aspects Christelle Gaignant
Magnetic System Overview Solenoid and DID
SiD LoI Costs M. Breidenbach 29 July 2010 M. Breidenbach.
RICH1 B-field Measurements Conclusions:
RDR Baseline Layouts for Interaction Region
WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING
Safety Readiness Review (SRR) Thomas Hansson, ESH
Presentation transcript:

Fringe Field in DH Marco Oriunno (SLAC), January 13, 2015 SID Workshop 2015, SLAC

The Push-Pull require self-shielded detector minimizing the magnetic and radiations stray fields in the detector hall Regional authorities will ultimately dictate the upper limits for personal safety. As example the values in force at CERN : 5 Gauss (0.5 mTesla) for people wearing pacemakers 100 Gauss (10 mTesla) for the general public 2000 Gauss (200 mTesla) for occupational exposure Self Shielding and Safety

The garage area housing the off-beamline detector The area on and around the on-beamline detector Regions of interest

A magnetic environment suitable for personnel access to the off-beamline detector during beam collisions must be guaranteed by the beamline detector using their chosen solution. We take the limiting field as 50 Gauss, which will allow the use of iron-based tools and assume that individuals wearing pacemakers will be excluded from this area when the on-beamline detector is operational. The garage area housing the off beamline detector

CMS Stray Field at 50cm from floor

Detector Hall

Det1 Det2  = + 3 m B(r) decreases 50% Push-pull and B(r)

 Human Safety: < 2,000 Gauss, with denial of access for people with pacemakers and the general public  Operation of magnetically sensitive equipment: at the complete discretion of the detector group < 1,000 Gauss  The off-beamline detector may wish to operate its solenoid while in its garage for measurement or test purposes. The distortion of the magnetic field map of the on-beamline detector due to such operation must be less than 0.01% of the field anywhere inside the on-beamline detector’s tracking volume.  While administrative and engineering protocols can be used to protect personnel in the zone of a detector exercising its magnetic field, it is incumbent on that detector (normally the on-beamline detector) to guarantee the safety of personnel working in the zone of the second detector (normally the off-beamline detector) against any transitory event that could conceivably provoke an accident. The area around the on beamline detector

SID Fringe Fields W. Craddock

o 50 Gauss at the off-line detector area is safe number to consider and we should not change it. o No technical reason founded why this limit should be fulfilled at 15m. o It should be probably restated as “Maximum field at the edge of the platform” o If a concern, the additional cost of the iron should be traded of with a longer (+ 3m ) push-pull, i.e. a longer DH. Now it is the right time ! o The 1,000 Gauss limit in the proximity of the beamline detector looks a safe value for components and personnel safety….and iron is needed ! o I am afraid that the access of the personnel above/under an energized solenoid of 1.5 GJ class will be anyway very limited. o Field reduction with compensating magnets is doable but a passive solution is still preferable under many aspects. My conclusions