Proposal to Modify Homologation Brake Test Procedure to Improve Safety on Proving Ground 18/09/2013 Mr. Klaus Vosteen ATP Executive Director Mr. Fran Martínez.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A brief history In line with the LRST Recommendation contained in the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions, ENAV laid.
Advertisements

Causes and Solutions of Fleet Safety Accidents
ELECTRONIC STABILITY PROGRAM (ESP) LECTURER NAME: MR
51 st GRSP Session Draft new Regulation on child restraint systems Pierre CASTAING Informal document GRSP (51 st GRSP, May 2012, agenda item.
T h e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n New Snow Test Method for Tyre Class C2 Agenda 1.Scope 2.Requirements.
Advanced Emergency Braking System / Lane Departure Warning System OICA POSITION 1 Informal document No. GRRF-S08-10 Special GRRF brainstorming session.
WLTP-EU DB short trip analyis 1 by H. Steven Overview of the WLTP-EU database short trip analysis.
Transportation Tuesday TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY REAR ENDERS – HOW CAN WE PREVENT THEM? A collision occurs when two vehicles occupy the same space!
Road Safety Audits Ghazwan al-Haji PhD student ”On whats goes wrong in road design and how to put it right safely”
Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad- hoc group on LKAS/RCP Submitted by the Chair of the Special Interest Group on Lane Keeping Assist Systems (LKAS)
Disaster Prevention of a High Speed Rail System – Lessons learnt in a recent earthquake T.C. Kao Vice President - Engineering (retired) Taiwan HSR Corp.
Guidelines for Traffic Control at Surface Mines
Japan’s Efforts to Ensure Safety of Railways October 12th, 2010 Railway Bureau MLIT.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Information on mandatory fitting of advanced safety systems in Japan Engineering Policy Division.
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - September 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT.
Units of Chapter 2 Reference Frames and Displacement (2-1) Average Velocity (2-2) Instantaneous Velocity (2-3) Acceleration (2-4) Motion at Constant Acceleration.
Proposal for amendments to UN R16: Mandatory fitting of safety-belt reminder Informal document GRSP (57th GRSP, May 2015 Agenda item 7) Submitted.
Forty-second session of GRSP December REGULATION No. 94 (Frontal collision) Proposal for draft amendments Proposal submitted by France Informal.
Republic of Korea Ministry of Construction and Transportation Republic of KOREA Overall Status of Recent UN/ECE/WP29 Sessions
STATUS OF CRS IN BUSES AND COACHES 44TH GRSP (9-12 DECEMBER) Informal document No. GRSP (44th GRSP, December 2008, agenda item 19(b))
Drive Right Chapter 7 Negotiating Intersections Unit 4
COMENIUS – PROJECT: TRAIN FOR EUROPE TRAFFIC MADRID (SPAIN) 4-8 MARCH 2013.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Damage Mitigation Braking System
GRRF 61 5 th – 9 th February 2007 Commercial vehicle wheel detachment and fixings Department for Transport GRRF 61 st Session Lawrence Thatcher Informal.
INTRODUCTION TO STATISTICAL STUDY OF BUS ACCIDENT ARE THE BUSES SAFE OR NOT? GRSG, 109 th session Sept. – 2. Oct Presented by Dr. MATOLCSY Mátyás.
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - February 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT Japan.
UN/WP29/GRRF ambassador to UN/IWVTA GRRF 74 February 2013 Informal Document GRRF (74th GRRF February 2013) Agenda item 10.
Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan  Data of Traffic Accidents around Japan Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRRF
European Railway Safety Strategy EIM Safety Group (PhGALLEY and J-Å HALLDEN) 29 september 2009.
Plans for China vehicle noise standards working group 1 Informal document GRB (62 nd GRB, 1-3 September 2015, agenda items 9 & 16 )
1 ACSF Test Procedure Draft proposal – For discussion OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
Remote Control Parking (RCP)
SICOM® Concept Overview. Comparative Travel Safety Modes (safest = #1) 1.Aircraft (non military) 2.Cruise Ships 3.Trains 4.Buses 5.Large Trucks 6.Auto.
Geneva, 09 December Commission Proposal on the General Safety of Motor Vehicles Automotive Unit- F1 Geneva, 09 December Informal document No.
Cart Training California Lutheran University Safety and Security.
Chapter 2 Homework #1 Questions: 2,3,4,5,6,9,16, 17 Problems: 1,2,5,6,9,8,13, 17, 20,22,23,26, 27,28 Due Sept 29 Quiz on Section 1-6 on Sept 29.
Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Minimum Risk Manoeuvres (MRM)
1 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration An Overview of NHTSAs Vehicle Safety Research Priorities Nathaniel Beuse Associate Administrator, Vehicle.
1 ISO TC204/WG14 FVCMS Operation Performance, and Verification Requirements 9, December 2008 WG14 Expert Member of Japan Informal document No. GRRF-S08-08.
Report of the GRB informal Working Group on ASEP Transmitted by the Chairman of the Informal Group Informal document No. GRB-44-2 (44th GRB, 4-6 September.
Emergency Stopping Signal 80th GRRF session Submitted by the experts from IMMA Informal document GRRF th GRRF, September 2015, Agenda item.
TRAFFIC SAFETY Presented By Sgt. Debra Newsome Canton Police Department.
V9 Vehicle Manoeuvering. Fleet Operator Recognition Scheme (FORS) FORS is important to our company because.
Safety in existing lifts and effects
Revision of the Automotive Vehicle Certification System of the Russian Federation Presentation at the 144 th WP.29 Session S.V.Pugatchev, Deputy Head,
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
Informal Document: ACSF-06-16
IRSC 2005 Cape Town - South Africa 9 – 14 october 2005
Timing to be activated the hazard lights
Driving in the Interior
School Bus and School Zone Safety
Proposal for UN Regulation on AEBS for M1/N1
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Rear direction indicator lamp and stop lamp separation
ACSF C tests Prepared by JAPAN 15 November, 2017
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
ETRTO answer to Contracting Party question from GRB 68th session
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Securing of children in buses and coaches
How To be Safe On Stage ?. Introduction Safety in the theater means that the crews, cast and the audiences are kept safe from all possible hazards. Learning.
Status of Korean Safety Regulation on Sleeping Child Check System
Securing of children in buses and coaches
Submitted by the expert
Alternative Approach to UN R13 Type-IIA for Battery Electric Vehicles
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Presentation transcript:

Proposal to Modify Homologation Brake Test Procedure to Improve Safety on Proving Ground 18/09/2013 Mr. Klaus Vosteen ATP Executive Director Mr. Fran Martínez IDIADA Proving Ground Supervisor Informal document GRRF (75 th GRRF, February 2013, agenda item 13(d)) Submitted by the experts from ATP and Idiada

Index Introduction ATP & IDIADA EPGSA Homologation Brake Test Tracks Standard Safety Regulations on High Speed Circuit Accident Background Accident Reconstruction Recently Corrective Actions at IDIADA & ATP Proposals to improve safety Proposed modifications on Test Procedures

Introduction ATP Automotive Testing Papenburg Applus IDIADA

Introduction EPGSA ( The European Proving Ground Safety Assoiciation EPGSA is a forum for the discussion of safety related items regarding vehicle testing. EPGSA was founded in It is not the intention of the organization to develop standards, but to collectively share possible solutions to safety related issues. It is a non-profit organization. The membership is limited to vehicle testing organizations with proving grounds. Members: Arctic Falls (Sweden), ATP (Germany), Bosch (Germany), Bridgestone (Italy), Bruntingthorpe (UK), UTAC -CERAM (France), Continental (Germany), DEKRA (Germany), Ford (Belgium), GoodyearDunlop (France), Icemakers (Sweden), IDIADA (Spain), Jaguar/Land Rover (UK), Opel (Germany), Millbrook (UK), MIRA (UK), Nardo (Italy), Renault (France), Volvo (Sweden),

Homologation Brake Test ECE R13 (Heavy Vehicles) ECE R13H (Passenger cars) ECE R90 (Replacement brake linings)

Homologation Brake Test Tracks Straight Line Braking Surfaces

Homologation Brake Test Tracks High Speed Circuit (HSC): Test usually performed on track Braking Test Engine Performance Test Coast Down Dynamic Test Durability Test …

Preventive Measures: Applus IDIADA Standard Safety Regulations on High Speed Circuit ATP Automotive Testing Papenburg

Preventive Measures: Standard Safety Regulations on High Speed Circuit Identify the test vehicle with the appropriate identifying plate, for high speed braking and for changing lanes, on the rear side of your vehicle. Identify the test vehicle with a flashing light placed on the roof, permanently switched on when performing Braking Test or Lane Changes Switch on the hazard (emergency) lights in the moment you are performing the braking manoeuvre and switch off when you finish. Keep a safety distance between vehicles when performing special tests: 10 seconds between vehicles in ATP 500 meters between vehicles in IDIADA Only in ATP, no stopping for more than 30 seconds

Accident Background IDIADA Date: April 2006 Vehicle 1: Type of test: Brake Test Test Speed: from 120km/h to 0km/h Vehicle 2: Type of test: Durability Test Speed: Acceleration Test Causes of the accident: The driver of the first car stopped at the second lane The driver of the second car was distracted. Consequences of the accident: Hard crash between both cars. Fatal injuries.

Accident Background ATP Date: July 2012 Vehicle 1: Type of test: Durability Test Test Speed: various 170 km/h at the moment of the accident Vehicle 2: Type of test: Durability Test Test Speed: various 0 km/h at the moment of the accident Causes of the accident: The driver of the first car was probably distracted. The driver of the second car was stopping without permission Consequences of the accident: Hard crash between both cars Fatal injuries

Accident Background IDIADA Date: February 2013 Vehicle 1: Type of test: Brake Test Test Speed: from 100km/h to 0km/h Vehicle 2: Type of test: Confidential Test Speed: constant speed 90km/h Causes of the accident: The driver of the first car probably don’t respect safety distance. The driver of the second car was distracted. Consequences of the accident: Hard crash between both cars. Slight human injuries.

Accident Background IDIADA Date: July 2013 Vehicle 1: Type of test: Brake Test Test Speed: from 100km/h to 0km/h Vehicle 2: Type of test: Confidential Test Speed: constant speed 90km/h Causes of the accident: The driver of the first car probably don’t respect safety distance. The driver of the second car was distracted. Consequences of the accident: Hard crash between both cars. Serious human injuries (3 People involved)

Accident Reconstruction

Accident Background Description of the problem 1.Performance tests at high decelerations (eg 1g) from high speeds to ZERO Stopped vehicles at the High Speed Track with vehicles driving at high speed. 2.Fade tests that have to be performed at rigid periods of time (eg every 45 seconds), and if one stop fails or is aborted, the whole test including all the preparation and bedding of the samples is not valid and need to be repeated. It makes the driver do not fulfil the safety regulations mainly the safety distance.

Recently Corretive Actions at Idiada Increase the quantity of Safety Cars in Proving Ground in order to reinforce the safety on test tracks Improve the driver training Timetables restrictions for Braking Test on high speed track Extend the Braking Track.

Recently Corrective Actions at ATP Installation of a new Track Operation Mode No brake testing with more than 5m/s² in standard track operation allowed. No Stopping in standard track operation allowed. Brake tests only in exclusive or special track operation. All tests are to be coordinated by the Test- and Safety Coordinator A Risk Assessment is mandatory

Recently Corrective Actions at ATP New Guard Rails installed Asphalt Safety Lane on high speed oval Collision Warning System mandatory for each vehicle on oval. Installation of Gantry Signs

Proposals to improve safety Proposal for slight modifications on Brake Test Procedures on High Speed Track: Final test Speed ≥ 20 Km/h. More flexibility on Fading Tests

Proposed modifications on Test Procedures Final test Speed ≥ 20 Km/h as for ECE R117 :

Proposed modifications on Test Procedures Final test Speed ≥ 20 Km/h as for ECE R117 :

Proposed modifications on Test Procedures Final test Speed ≥ 20 Km/h as for ECE R117 :

Proposed modifications on Test Procedures Final test Speed ≥ 20 Km/h as for ECE R117 :

Proposed modifications on Test Procedures Final test Speed ≥ 20 Km/h as for ECE R117 :

Proposed modifications on Test Procedures Final test Speed ≥ 20 Km/h as for ECE R117 :

Proposed modifications on Test Procedures More flexibility on Fading Tests : We would like to propose a certain tolerance in the frequency and even more, a scape possibility, if during the 15 snubs, there is a need of extend some of the periods due to safety aspects, at discretion of the technical service, this might be compensated by one additional snub to ensure that the brakes have been sufficiently heated.

For further information: Mr. Klaus Vosteen T Mr. Fran Martínez T Thank you very much for your kind attention