J. Daunizeau Motivation, Brain and Behaviour group, ICM, Paris, France Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK Dynamic Causal Modelling for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J. Daunizeau Institute of Empirical Research in Economics, Zurich, Switzerland Brain and Spine Institute, Paris, France Bayesian inference.
Advertisements

Bayesian inference Lee Harrison York Neuroimaging Centre 01 / 05 / 2009.
EEG-MEG source reconstruction
Bayesian inference Jean Daunizeau Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging 16 / 05 / 2008.
Dynamic causal Modelling for evoked responses Stefan Kiebel Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging UCL.
Dynamic Causal Modelling for ERP/ERFs
DCM for ERP/ERF A presentation for Methods for Dummies By Ashwini Oswal and Elizabeth Mallia.
Bayesian models for fMRI data
Dynamic Causal Modelling for ERP/ERFs Valentina Doria Georg Kaegi Methods for Dummies 19/03/2008.
What do you need to know about DCM for ERPs/ERFs to be able to use it?
DCM demo André Bastos and Martin Dietz Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging.
Computational and physiological models Part 2 Daniel Renz Computational Psychiatry Seminar: Computational Neuropharmacology 14 March, 2014.
Models of Effective Connectivity & Dynamic Causal Modelling
Hanneke den Ouden Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, UK Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen,
J. Daunizeau Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK Institute of Empirical Research in Economics, Zurich, Switzerland Bayesian inference.
Dynamic Causal Modelling THEORY SPM Course FIL, London October 2009 Hanneke den Ouden Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging Radboud University.
Rosalyn Moran Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute Dynamic Causal Modelling for Cross Spectral Densities.
Dynamic Causal Modelling
DCM Advanced, Part II Will Penny (Klaas Stephan) Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging Institute of Neurology University College London SPM Course 2014.
Abstract We start with a statistical formulation of Helmholtz’s ideas about neural energy to furnish a model of perceptual inference and learning that.
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany A hierarchy of time-scales and the brain Stefan Kiebel.
Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM): Theory Demis Hassabis & Hanneke den Ouden Thanks to Klaas Enno Stephan Functional Imaging Lab Wellcome Dept. of Imaging.
Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) for fMRI
DCM for ERPs/EFPs Clare Palmer & Elina Jacobs Expert: Dimitris Pinotsis.
EEG/MEG Source Localisation SPM Course – Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging – Oct ? ? Jérémie Mattout, Christophe Phillips Jean Daunizeau Guillaume.
J. Daunizeau Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK UZH – Foundations of Human Social Behaviour, Zurich, Switzerland Dynamic Causal Modelling:
Dynamic Causal Modelling of Evoked Responses in EEG/MEG Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London Stefan Kiebel.
Dynamic causal modelling of electromagnetic responses Karl Friston - Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, UCL In recent years,
J. Daunizeau ICM, Paris, France ETH, Zurich, Switzerland Dynamic Causal Modelling of fMRI timeseries.
Input Single-state DCM Intrinsic (within- region) coupling Extrinsic (between- region) coupling Multi-state DCM with excitatory and inhibitory connections.
Abstract This talk will present a general approach (DCM) to the identification of dynamic input-state-output systems such as the network of equivalent.
Dynamic Causal Modelling for EEG and MEG
Abstract This tutorial is about the inversion of dynamic input-state-output systems. Identification of the systems parameters proceeds in a Bayesian framework.
Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) Marta I. Garrido Thanks to: Karl J. Friston, Klaas E. Stephan, Andre C. Marreiros, Stefan J. Kiebel,
Dynamic Causal Modelling Introduction SPM Course (fMRI), October 2015 Peter Zeidman Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London.
Bayesian Model Comparison Will Penny London-Marseille Joint Meeting, Institut de Neurosciences Cognitive de la Mediterranee, Marseille, September 28-29,
Dynamic Causal Model for evoked responses in MEG/EEG Rosalyn Moran.
DCM: Advanced issues Klaas Enno Stephan Centre for the Study of Social & Neural Systems Institute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich.
Bayesian inference Lee Harrison York Neuroimaging Centre 23 / 10 / 2009.
Dynamic Causal Models Will Penny Olivier David, Karl Friston, Lee Harrison, Andrea Mechelli, Klaas Stephan Mathematics in Brain Imaging, IPAM, UCLA, USA,
Bayesian Inference in fMRI Will Penny Bayesian Approaches in Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm February 2016.
Bayesian selection of dynamic causal models for fMRI Will Penny Olivier David, Karl Friston, Lee Harrison, Andrea Mechelli, Klaas Stephan The brain as.
Dynamic Causal Models Will Penny Olivier David, Karl Friston, Lee Harrison, Stefan Kiebel, Andrea Mechelli, Klaas Stephan MultiModal Brain Imaging, Copenhagen,
DCM for evoked responses Ryszard Auksztulewicz SPM for M/EEG course, 2015.
Principles of Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) Bernadette van Wijk Charité-University Medicine Berlin SPM course for MEG & EEG 2016.
1 Jean Daunizeau Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging 23 / 10 / 2009 EEG-MEG source reconstruction.
DCM for ERP/ERF: theory and practice Melanie Boly Based on slides from Chris Phillips, Klaas Stephan and Stefan Kiebel.
J. Daunizeau ICM, Paris, France TNU, Zurich, Switzerland
Dynamic Causal Modelling for event-related responses
Principles of Dynamic Causal Modelling
Dynamic Causal Model for Steady State Responses
Dynamic Causal Modeling of Endogenous Fluctuations
DCM for ERP/ERF: theory and practice
Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM): Theory
Dynamic Causal Model for evoked responses in M/EEG Rosalyn Moran.
Dynamic Causal Model for Steady State Responses
Dynamic Causal Modelling for ERP/ERFs
Dynamic Causal Modelling
DCM for evoked responses
SPM2: Modelling and Inference
Dynamic Causal Modelling for M/EEG
Dynamic Causal Modelling
Bayesian Methods in Brain Imaging
CRIS Workshop: Computational Neuroscience and Bayesian Modelling
Bayesian inference J. Daunizeau
Bayesian Inference in SPM2
Wellcome Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL, UK.
Mixture Models with Adaptive Spatial Priors
Dynamic Causal Modelling for evoked responses
Presentation transcript:

J. Daunizeau Motivation, Brain and Behaviour group, ICM, Paris, France Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK Dynamic Causal Modelling for EEG/MEG: principles

Overview 1 DCM: introduction 2 Dynamical systems theory 3 Neural states dynamics 4 Bayesian inference 5 Conclusion

Overview 1 DCM: introduction 2 Dynamical systems theory 3 Neural states dynamics 4 Bayesian inference 5 Conclusion

Introduction structural, functional and effective connectivity structural connectivity = presence of axonal connections functional connectivity = statistical dependencies between regional time series effective connectivity = causal (directed) influences between neuronal populations ! connections are recruited in a context-dependent fashion O. Sporns 2007, Scholarpedia structural connectivityfunctional connectivityeffective connectivity

u1u1 u 1 X u 2 A B u2u2 u1u1 A B u2u2 u1u1 localizing brain activity: functional segregation effective connectivity analysis: functional integration Introduction from functional segregation to functional integration « Where, in the brain, did my experimental manipulation have an effect? » « How did my experimental manipulation propagate through the network? » ?

neural states dynamics Electromagnetic observation model: spatial convolution simple neuronal model realistic observation model realistic neuronal model simple observation model fMRI EEG/MEG inputs Introduction DCM: evolution and observation mappings Hemodynamic observation model: temporal convolution

Introduction DCM: a parametric statistical approach DCM: model structure  24 u likelihood DCM: Bayesian inference model evidence: parameter estimate: priors on parameters

Introduction DCM for EEG-MEG: auditory mismatch negativity S-D: reorganisation of the connectivity structure rIFG rSTG rA1 lSTG lA1 rIFG rSTG rA1 lSTG lA1 standard condition (S) deviant condition (D) t ~ 200 ms … … S SS D S S S S D S sequence of auditory stimuli Daunizeau, Kiebel et al., Neuroimage, 2009

response or time (ms) Put PPAFFA PMd P(outcome|cue) PMdPutPPAFFA auditory cue visual outcome cue-independent surprise cue-dependent surprise Den Ouden, Daunizeau et al., J. Neurosci., 2010 Introduction DCM for fMRI: audio-visual associative learning

Overview 1 DCM: introduction 2 Dynamical systems theory 3 Neural states dynamics 4 Bayesian inference 5 Conclusion

time Dynamical systems theory motivation 12 3 u

Dynamical systems theory exponentials

Dynamical systems theory initial values and fixed points

Dynamical systems theory time constants

Dynamical systems theory matrix exponential

Dynamical systems theory eigendecomposition of the Jacobian

Dynamical systems theory dynamical modes

Dynamical systems theory spirals

Dynamical systems theory spiral state-space

Dynamical systems theory embedding

Dynamical systems theory kernels and convolution

Dynamical systems theory summary Motivation: modelling reciprocal influences System stability and dynamical modes can be derived from the system’s Jacobian: o D>0: fixed points o D>1: spirals o D>1: limit cycles (e.g., action potentials) o D>2: metastability (e.g., winnerless competition) Link between the integral (convolution) and differential (ODE) forms limit cycle (Vand Der Pol)strange attractor (Lorenz)

Overview 1 DCM: introduction 2 Dynamical systems theory 3 Neural states dynamics 4 Bayesian inference 5 Conclusion

Neural ensembles dynamics DCM for M/EEG: systems of neural populations GolgiNissl internal granular layer internal pyramidal layer external pyramidal layer external granular layer mean-field firing ratesynaptic dynamics macro-scalemeso-scalemicro-scale EP EI II

Neural ensembles dynamics DCM for M/EEG: from micro- to meso-scale S(x)H(x) : post-synaptic potential of j th neuron within its ensemble mean-field firing rate mean membrane depolarization (mV) mean firing rate (Hz) membrane depolarization (mV) ensemble density p(x) S(x)

Neural ensembles dynamics DCM for M/EEG: synaptic dynamics time (ms) membrane depolarization (mV) post-synaptic potential IPSP EPSP

Neural ensembles dynamics DCM for M/EEG: intrinsic connections within the cortical column GolgiNissl internal granular layer internal pyramidal layer external pyramidal layer external granular layer spiny stellate cells inhibitory interneurons pyramidal cells intrinsic connections

Neural ensembles dynamics DCM for M/EEG: from meso- to macro-scale lateral (homogeneous) density of connexions local wave propagation equation (neural field): 0 th -order approximation: standing wave

Neural ensembles dynamics DCM for M/EEG: extrinsic connections between brain regions extrinsic forward connections spiny stellate cells inhibitory interneurons pyramidal cells extrinsic backward connections extrinsic lateral connections

Overview 1 DCM: introduction 2 Dynamical systems theory 3 Neural states dynamics 4 Bayesian inference 5 Conclusion

Bayesian inference forward and inverse problems forward problem likelihood inverse problem posterior distribution

Bayesian inference the electromagnetic forward problem

Bayesian paradigm deriving the likelihood function - Model of data with unknown parameters: e.g., GLM: - But data is noisy: - Assume noise/residuals is ‘small’: → Distribution of data, given fixed parameters: f

Likelihood: Prior: Bayes rule: Bayesian paradigm likelihood, priors and the model evidence generative model m

Principle of parsimony : « plurality should not be assumed without necessity » “Occam’s razor” : model evidence p(y|m) space of all data sets y=f(x) x Bayesian inference model comparison Model evidence:

free energy : functional of q mean-field: approximate marginal posterior distributions: Bayesian inference the variational Bayesian approach

12 3 u Bayesian inference DCM: key model parameters state-state coupling input-state coupling input-dependent modulatory effect

Bayesian inference model comparison for group studies m1m1 m2m2 differences in log- model evidences subjects fixed effect random effect assume all subjects correspond to the same model assume different subjects might correspond to different models

Overview 1 DCM: introduction 2 Dynamical systems theory 3 Neural states dynamics 4 Bayesian inference 5 Conclusion

Conclusion back to the auditory mismatch negativity S-D: reorganisation of the connectivity structure rIFG rSTG rA1 lSTG lA1 rIFG rSTG rA1 lSTG lA1 standard condition (S) deviant condition (D) t ~ 200 ms … … S SS D S S S S D S sequence of auditory stimuli

Conclusion DCM for EEG/MEG: variants  DCM for steady-state responses  second-order mean-field DCM  DCM for induced responses  DCM for phase coupling time (ms) inputdepolarization time (ms) auto-spectral density LA auto-spectral density CA1 cross-spectral density CA1-LA frequency (Hz) 1 st and 2d order moments

Suitable experimental design: –any design that is suitable for a GLM –preferably multi-factorial (e.g. 2 x 2) e.g. one factor that varies the driving (sensory) input and one factor that varies the modulatory input Hypothesis and model: –define specific a priori hypothesis –which models are relevant to test this hypothesis? –check existence of effect on data features of interest –there exists formal methods for optimizing the experimental design for the ensuing bayesian model comparison [Daunizeau et al., PLoS Comp. Biol., 2011] Conclusion planning a compatible DCM study

Many thanks to: Karl J. Friston (UCL, London, UK) Will D. Penny (UCL, London, UK) Klaas E. Stephan (UZH, Zurich, Switzerland) Stefan Kiebel (MPI, Leipzig, Germany)