How Genomics is changing Business and Services of Associations Dr. Josef Pott, Weser-Ems-Union eG, Germany.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reliable genomic evaluations across breeds and borders Sander de Roos CRV, the Netherlands.
Advertisements

2006 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD USDA Genetic.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
Use of Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) in Dairy Sire Selection Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.
Bull selection based on QTL for specific environments Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2009 G.R. WiggansCroatian.
Level II Agricultural Business Operations. What is the objective... ?  To produce a more efficient dairy animal  Milk producers want healthy cows, acceptable.
2005 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD AIPL Projects.
Wiggans, 2013RL meeting, Aug. 15 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans, Acting Research Leader Bldg. 005, Room 306, BARC-West (main office);
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Selection and Application – Making More Profitable Holsteins (male selection) North American Perspective Marjorie Faust and Katie Olson USA.
 87 of the top 100 active proven TPI sires are descendants of Planet, O Man, Shottle and Goldwyn.  58 descendants of O Man  32 descendants of Shottle.
But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.
Introduction to Animal Breeding & Genomics Sinead McParland Teagasc, Moorepark, Ireland.
2007 Jana L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
Click each slide to move forward through the presentation.
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects Chuanyu Sun 1, Paul M. VanRaden 2, Jeff R. O'Connell 3 1 National Association of.
Changes in the use of young bulls K. M. Olson* 1, J. L. Hutchison 2, P. M. VanRaden 2, and H. D. Norman 2 1 National Association of Animal Breeders, Columbia,
Is our dairy cow sustainable for the future? L. B. Hansen University of Minnesota.
Impacts of inclusion of foreign data in genomic evaluation of dairy cattle K. M. Olson 1, P. M. VanRaden 2, D. J. Null 2, and M. E. Tooker 2 1 National.
Van Eenennaam 11/17/2010 Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D. Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
A.I. Management Manual Fifth Edition CHAPTER 15 HEIFER A.I.
Wiggans, 2013SRUC Imputation (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD ,
Selection for Disease Resistance Gert Pedersen Aamand Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation.
Breeding Jersey cattle for Africa in the era of genomics Prof Norman Maiwashe 1,2 (PhD, Pri. Sci. Nat) 1 ARC-Animal Production Institute Private Bag X2.
Bovine Genomics The Technology and its Applications Gerrit Kistemaker Chief Geneticist, Canadian Dairy Network (CDN) Many slides were created by.
2003 G.R. Wiggans,* P.M. VanRaden, and J.L. Edwards Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Genomics. Finding True Genetic Merit 2 Dam EPD Sire EPD Pedigree Estimate EPD TRUE Progeny Difference Mendelian Sampling Effect Adapted from Dr. Bob Weaber.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA The use and.
Low-Cost, Low-Density Genotyping and its Potential Applications K.A. Weigel, O. González-Recio, G. de los Campos, H. Naya, N. Long, D. Gianola, and G.J.M.
T. A. Cooper and G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Council.
Why is it important for Geno to establish research collaboration with the U.S? Sverre Bjørnstad Sverre Bjørnstad.
Beef Data & Genomics Programme Information Meetings 2015 Teagasc Beef Specialists.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
April 2010 (1) Prediction of Breed Composition & Multibreed Genomic Evaluations K. M. Olson and P. M. VanRaden.
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Jeff O’Connell 2, George Wiggans 1, Kent Weigel 3 1 Animal Improvement Programs Lab, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA 2 University of Maryland.
John B. Cole Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD What.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD California Dairy Herd.
H. D. Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD DRMS annual.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD G.R. WiggansADSA 18.
2006 GEORGE R. WIGGANS Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, Maryland ,
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Considering.
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 New.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Select Sires‘ Holstein.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2011 National Breeders.
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Curt Van Tassell 2, George Wiggans 1, Tad Sonstegard 2, Bob Schnabel 3, Jerry Taylor 3, and Flavio Schenkel 4, Paul VanRaden 1, Curt.
Meori Rosen Past, Present, and Future Dairy Cattle Breeding in Israel.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2011 G.R. Wiggans DNA.
My vision for dairy genomics
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
J.R. Thomasen, H. Liu and A.C. Sørensen
Genetic diversity of sires used in the Irish dairy industry
Validation of €uro-Star Replacement Index.
S. Naderi1, R. R. Mota1, S. Vanderick1, N. Gengler1
THE ROYAL GUERNSEY AGRICULTURAL AND HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
Genomic Evaluations.
A National Sire Fertility Index
Daughter Proven or Genomic Bulls?
Genomic Selection in Dairy Cattle
Use of a threshold animal model to estimate calving ease and stillbirth (co)variance components for US Holsteins.
Predictions of Breed Composition Using Holsteins, Jersey, and Brown Swiss Genotypes K. M. Olson and P. M. VanRaden.
Percent of total breedings
Increased reliability of genetic evaluations for dairy cattle in the United States from use of genomic information Abstr.
Alternatives for evaluating daughter performance of progeny-test bulls between official evaluations Abstr. #10.
Using Haplotypes in Breeding Programs
Development of Genomic GMACE
Presentation transcript:

How Genomics is changing Business and Services of Associations Dr. Josef Pott, Weser-Ems-Union eG, Germany

Associations Member owned and directed Purpose: improve the Holstein breed Collect and analyze data and provide information and services to members

Business activities of associations Core services: ‐Registration ‐Shows ‐Classification Other services: ‐Milk recording ‐Genetic evaluation and/or genotyping ‐A. I.

Genomic Selection -Based on DNA sequences - Genotyping of large number SNPs on low costs -Allows tracking the inheritance of short chromosomal segments - Reference population: SNPs linked to EBVs of progeny proven bulls - - essential: verified parentage, good and complete data

Genomic EBVs Reliability: parent average < genomic EBVs < progeny proven EBVs Earlier available => decreasing the generation interval Obtain acceptance by validation

gEBV – validation in Germany (S. Rensing, vit 2012) production, RZM conformation, RZE SCC, RZS Total Performance Index, RZG progenyproofprogenyproof gEBV 962 validation bulls – December 2010 – no daughter information August 2012: at least a second daughter based proof

Use of genomic bulls in Germany (Jan 2011 – May 2012, Rensing, vit 2012) regional differences: 20 % to 75 %

LD-chip LD-predictions: roughly 95% as accurate as predictions from the 50 k chip Gained popularity due to lower price => testing females More accurate and earlier information than parent average - production - conformation - productive life - SCC - calving ease - fertility - inbreeding and genetic de fects

Impact of Genomics on: classification progeny testing

Objectives of classifications Improve functional conformation - workability - resistance to diseases - longer lifetime - natural ability to produce milk Can enhance the value of an animal Type EBVs

Factors influencing the functional conformation/value of an animal value productionconformationhealthfertility productive life

Reliabilities of parent average and gEBVs vit 2009 parent average; reliability % genomic estimated breeding value (gEBV) reliability % % production3570 conformation2963 health (SCC)2965 fertility2448 longevity3052 gEBVs are of greater value than individual production records or classifications Genomic testing of females can reduce # of classifications

How will progeny testing be affected? # young bulls entering AI in Germany (2011) (vit, 2012) diff. % Holstein Red and White Total # of progeny groups is decreasing - Total # of inspected daughters is decreasing => less progeny proven bulls/year in reference population - - increasing # of daughters/bull (?) – bias! => classification in representative sample herds

Basic conditions of dairy farming Decreasing # of farms Increasing herd sizes Farmers are: more progressive, less traditional, always short of time Growing demand for services  simple, complete solutions

Genomic services Genomic testing (i.e., different types of SNP panels) Parent verification/identification Replacement management Improved mating service

Genomic testing and parent verification Genomic testing (LD, 50K, HD) EBVs for all traits Parent verification - currently: DNA-micro satellite technology (animal itself + dam + sire required) - in future: SNP technology to confirm parentage for Herdbook validation all potential parents must be tested one sample for – genomic testing - parentage verification - genetic recessives - coat colour

GENOID – Holstein Canada Genomic testing and creating a record in the Herdbook in one step for non registered animals Genomic EBVs AI sires and previously genotyped dams will be identified Registration confirmation and gEBVs to owner

Genomic testing of females; replacement management Low costs of genotyping required; to test all heifers is profitable at € 29; attractive at € 15 (Pryce et al. 2012) Cost effective in particular - if pedigree information is unavailable (if pedigree information is available pre-sort animals based on pedigree data) Weigel (2011) - if available heifers exceeding replacement needs (sexed semen)

Genomic testing of females; replacement management Applications: Selection among heifer calves or springing heifers Mating Evaluation of elite females Screening prior to purchase Manage animals more individually

Improved mating service Up to now: based on production, pedigree, physical assessment Now: based on genomic EBVs Higher reliabilities for all traits Avoid inbreeding Deal adequate with recessives Enhance genetic progress

Conclusions Genomic selection is widely introduced gEBVs are gaining acceptance Decreasing # of bulls entering AI Female genotyping is getting popular Threats: less classifications? + less progeny testing Opportunities: genomic service