What’s New? Changes in the Law: 2009. Four Major Changes Terminology and Definitions Parenting Plans Best Interest Factors Parenting Coordinators.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Relocation: To move or not to move, that is the question Donna Y. Yamazaki Watson Goepel LLP November 9, 2012 The New Family Law Act: Watson Goepel LLP.
Advertisements

BIE SPECIAL EDUCATION ACADEMY PRESENTERS: JUDY WILEY AND NARCY KAWON I ntroduction to Procedural Safeguards Bureau of Indian Education.
What Small and Emerging Contractors Need to Know Understanding Dispute Resolution Options in the Construction Industry © Copyright 2014 NASBP.
Scott Baroway Mediation Partners Parental Responsibilities.
THE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH FOR CENTRAL MICHIGAN CONSUMER GRIEVANCE SYSTEM.
Is there a claim of child abuse/neglect or DV? Does court to have reason to believe a party has committed child abuse/neglect or DV? § (1.5)(a).
D ISPUTE R ESOLUTION - A COMPARISON. The legal system presents individuals with a range of ways in which they can resolve disputes. Taking a case to court.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
Consent and Confidentiality for Children in New Mexico Liz McGrath Executive Director Pegasus Legal Services for Children.
Yes No Is the student 18 years old or older? ? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart.
Jurisdiction after appeal in family law cases Cheryl Howell June 2004 Institute of Government
Procedural Safeguards Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
YOUTH ATTORNEY. GENERAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 1:  The primary change in the general provisions article is the establishment of an attorney for children.
1 Resolution of Intellectual Property Disputes VenueNovotel Bauhinia Shenzhen Hotel, China Date15 October 2008 Presented by Charmaine KOO Partner, Intellectual.
PERMANENCY PLANNING. Permanency Planning  How is it defined?  What does it mean for parents? For children?
Adoption S 10A of the Children and Young Persons (care and Protection) Act S46(2)(B) of the Adoption Act.
Social Services Attorneys’ Conference March 9-10, 2006 Legislative Update: Juvenile Law Janet Mason Institute of Government.
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
Juvenile Law Update District Court Judges’ Conference June 17, 2004 Janet Mason Institute of Government The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
© 2003 Rule 1.9. Duties to Former Clients (a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person.
Bethanie Barber Assistant Guardian ad Litem Program Coordinator Legal Aid Society of the O.C.B.A. 100 E. Robinson Street Orlando, Fl (407)
1 “For Better or For Worse” State Bar of Arizona American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers January 28, 2010 Rules Update Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure,
N ORTHERN M ARIANA I SLANDS R ULES FOR M ANDATORY A LTERNATIVE D ISPUTE R ESOLUTION.
Child Custody and Parenting
FAMILY LAW WORKSHOP. PRESENTED BY FAMILY LAW FACILITATOR VENTURA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT.
1 Consent for treatment A summary guide for health practitioners about obtaining consent for treatment Bridie Woolnough Resolution Officer Health Care.
Mediation The goal of mediation is not to determine who is write or wrong Purpose is to explore solutions The mediator makes the final decision If no agreement.
S.A. 2003, c. F-4.5 (as amended).  Has been in force since 2005  Covers family members with a “real and substantial connection” to the province  Covers.
LAWYERS ETHICS Poverty Law II Irene M. Opsahl. APPLICABLE PROFESSIONAL RULES  Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct 
Jill Malat Office of Civil Legal Aid Children’s Representation Program
The Law of Child Custody Sandra L. Schpoont, Esq..
1 JUVENILE COURT PROTECTION CASES: THE PLAYERS POVERTY LAW Irene M. Opsahl.
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 53: Family Law Chapter 53: Family Law Business Law Legal, E-Commerce,
Handling a CHIPS Case in FCPC Tribal Court Law Day April 30, 2015.
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
What is the Interstate Compact? The Compact is a uniform law, adopted in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and the U.S. Virgin Islands, for the purpose.
GUARDIANSHIP ORDERS WHAT THE BENCH LOOKS FOR AND NEEDS IN ORDER TO MAKE A GUARDIANSHIP ORDER UNDER S79A.
ADOPTIONS CM 124_ADP_PPT_October 2012 PPT 1. Objectives Professional standards & values Adoption program’s legal base. Florida adoption guidelines. Legal.
2012 Child Welfare Legislative Update Ann Ahlstrom
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
Parenting Coordination: Practice Opportunities for Psychologists APA Annual Convention Boston, 2008 Matthew J. Sullivan, Ph.D.
REDUCING ADVERSITY: Managing the Family Law Case and Promoting Cooperation William C. Fee Steuben Superior Court.
Improving Parenting Plans Developed by Rita Casey, Extension Agent, McNairy Count Edited by Denise J. Brandon, Associate Professor.
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall 1 FAMILY LAW © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall CHAPTER 53.
1 Resolving Special Education Disputes Understanding When and How to Use the New Procedural Safeguard System Education Law Center November 28,
DISPOSITION. Dispositional Hearing  What is it?  A dispositional hearing is required whenever a petition for dependency or neglect has been sustained.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
IV-D Impact on Tribal Clerks of Courts 10:45 a.m. – 12:00 PM, July 15, 2009 National Tribal Child Support Association Ninth Annual Conference Attorney.
Introductions Family Mediation and the New BC Family Law Act.
FAMILY LAW LANIS KARNES. WHAT THIS COURSE WILL COVER Parenting plan as of 7/1/14 Statutory Parental Rights as of 7/1/14 TCA (a) (3) (A) Custody.
Introductions Family Mediation and the New BC Family Law Act.
Revised C.A.R. 3.4 and D&N Appeals. Jurisdictional Requirements C.A.R. 3.4(a) and (b) A final, appealable order A timely filed notice of appeal Standing.
Family Law Workshop.
UNIFORM CHILD CUSTODY AND JURISDICTION ACT (U.C.C.J.E.A.)
Family Law Forum Idaho Law and Parenting Time Evaluations
Mason County School District
Dispute Resolution Between ICT Service Providers in Saudi Arabia
The Children Act 1989 Allocates duties to local authorities, courts, parents and other agencies in the United Kingdom to ensure children are Safeguarded.
EPA SUBCONTRACT TEMPLATE Overview September 2017
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
ADOPTIONS.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS?
CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVILEGE
? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart
Disclaimer Opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the speaker and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Virginia Department for Aging.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS?
Presentation transcript:

What’s New? Changes in the Law: 2009

Four Major Changes Terminology and Definitions Parenting Plans Best Interest Factors Parenting Coordinators

Terminology and Definitions

Parental rights and responsibilities Umbrella term that covers all rights and responsibilities a parent has under Ch relating to custody. Means all rights and responsibilities a parent has concerning the parent's child.

Old Term: Physical Custody New Term: Primary Residential Responsibility Defined as: A parent with more than 50% of the residential responsibility

Old Term: Non-Custodial Parent New Term: A parent with less than 50% of the residential responsibility

Old Term: Physical Custody New Term: Primary Residential Responsibility Defined as: A Parent with more than 50% of the residential responsibility

New Term: Residential Responsibility Defined as: A Parent’s responsibility to provide a home for the child

Old Term: Legal Custody New Term: Decision-making Responsibility Defined as: The responsibility to make decisions concerning the child. The term may refer to decisions on all issues or on specified issues. Does not give power over support issues.

Old Term: Custody Agreement or Proposal New Term: Parenting Plan Defined as: A written plan describing each parent's rights and responsibilities.

Old Term: Custody or Visitation New Term: Parenting Time Defined as: The time when the child is to be in the care of a parent. Example: Tuesday evenings are Mom’s parenting time.

Old Term: Custody or Visitation Schedule New Term: Parenting Schedule Defined as: The schedule of when the child is in the care of each parent. Example: Dad – Mon. after school until 9:00 pm … Mom – pickup at 9:00 until school on Tuesday, etc.

Decision-making responsibility Generally, the court must accept the parent’s decision-making agreement unless the court makes written findings that the agreement is not in the best interest of the children. If the parents do not agree, the court allocates the decision-making authority based on the child’s best interest. If the decision-making is shared in some respect, the allocation must address a method of dispute resolution if the parent’s do not agree. For example, the allocation may say if the parents do not agree, dad will decide. Or, it may say, if they do not agree, they will work with a third party to resolve the dispute.

PARENTING PLANS

Parenting Plan A written plan describing each parent’s rights and responsibilities

Parenting Plans must be filed in ALL cases by parents. If Parents cannot agree on a Parenting Plan, the Court will issue a Plan.

What must be included in a Parenting Plan? Residential responsibility, parenting time and schedule including :  holidays,  days off school,  vacations,  summers,  birthdays,  weekends,  weekdays.

What must be included in a Parenting Plan? Transportation and Exchange of Child

What must be included in a Parenting Plan? Decision making responsibility for routine and major decisions

What must be included in a Parenting Plan? Legal residence of child for school

What must be included in a Parenting Plan? Information Sharing and access

What must be included in a Parenting Plan? Procedure for review and adjustment of the Parenting Plan

Method of Resolving Disputes What must be included in a Parenting Plan?

BEST INTEREST FACTORS

Best Interest Factors Statute: For the purpose of custody parental rights and responsibilities, the best interests and welfare of the child is determined by the court’s consideration and evaluation of all factors affecting the best interests and welfare of the child.

These Factors include all of the following when applicable: Factor “a” The love, affection and other emotional ties existing between the parents and child and the ability of each parent to provide the child with nurture, love, affection and guidance.

Factor “b” The capacity and disposition of the parents to give the child love, affection, and guidance and to continue the education of the child ability of each parent to assure that the child receives adequate food, clothing, shelter, medical care, and a safe environment.

Factor “c” The disposition of the parents to provide the child with food, clothing, medical care or other remedial care recognized and permitted under the laws of this state in lieu of medical care, and other material needs child’s developmental needs and the ability of each parent to meet those needs, both in the present and in the future.

Factor “d” The sufficiency and stability of each parent’s home environment, the impact of extended family, the length of time the child has lived in a stable satisfactory environment each parent’s home and the desirability of maintaining continuity in the child’s home and community.

Factor “e” The permanence, as a family unit, of the existing or proposed custodial home willingness and ability of each parent to facilitate and encourage a close and continuing relationship between the other parent and the child.

Factor “f” and “g” f.The moral fitness of the parents, as that fitness impacts the child. g. The mental and physical health of the parents, as that health impacts the child.

Factor “h” The home, school and community record of the child and the potential effect of any change.

Factor “i” The reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of sufficient intelligence, understanding, and experience to express a preference. If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that a child is of sufficient maturity to make a sound judgment, the court may give substantial weight to the preference of the mature child.

Factor i. (continued) The court also shall give due consideration to other factors that may have affected the child’s preference, including whether the child’s preference was based on undesirable or improper influences.

PARENTING COORDINATORS

Parenting Coordinator Neutral individual authorized to use any dispute resolution process to resolve parenting time disputes. Purpose is to resolve disputes by interpreting, clarifying and addressing circumstances not specifically addressed by an existing court order

Parenting Coordinator May assess whether there has been a violation of an existing court order and require further court proceedings. May resolve one time parenting time disputes or provide ongoing services

Parenting Coordinator Must attempt to resolve dispute by facilitating negotiations between the parties and if it becomes apparent that the dispute cannot be resolved by agreement, then the Parenting Coordinator shall make a decision resolving the dispute.

Agreement or Decision Binding Within 5 days of appointment or notice of dispute, a Parenting Coordinator must meet with parties and make a diligent effort to resolve the dispute. If parties can’t agree, then the Parenting Coordinator must make a decision ASAP but no later than 5 days after receiving all information necessary to make a decision and after the final meeting with the parties.

Agreement or Decision Binding A Parenting Coordinator must put agreement in writing and provide copies to the parents. An agreement of the parties or decision of the Parenting Coordinator is binding on the parties until further order of the court.

Fees Paid by the parties. If the parties cannot afford a Parenting Coordinator, one will NOT be appointed. Court must apportion the fees in a just and equitable manner. After fees are incurred, parties may bring a motion to re-apportion fees. Court may consider information from the Parenting Coordinator to determine bad faith.

Confidentiality Process is confidential. Parenting Coordinator cannot be called as a witness Parenting Coordinator’s notes, records and recollections are confidential and may not be disclosed. Except: –with respect to matters which are mandated to be disclosed, such as abuse of a child –under the fee paying structure, a parenting coordinator could advise the court about bad faith of one of the parents.

The parenting coordinator program law has a sunset of June 30, Legislative Intent is for program to be self funding as of

Immunity Parenting Coordinators are immune from civil liability

CHANGE OF RESIDENCE This statute change simply codifies Maynard v. McNett, 2006 ND 36, 710 N.W.2d 369. Parents who have equal parenting time with their children must also have the primary residential parenting time modified in order to move.

SUMMARY FOUR Major Changes -- Terminology and Definitions Parenting Plans Best Interest Factors Parenting Coordinators

Coordinating rule changes Order of Adoption Supreme Court No Order of Adoption dated June 3, 2009Order of Adoption Amendment to N.D.R.Civ.P. 4-Persons Subject to Jurisdiction Amendment to N.D.R.Ct. 8.2-Interim Orders in Domestic Relations Cases Amendment to N.D.R.Ct. 8.3-Case Management (Divorce Cases) Amendment to N.D.R.Ct. 8.4-Summons in Actions for Divorce, Separation or Custody Amendment to N.D.R.Ct. 8.5-Domestic Relations Summary Proceeding Amendment to N.D.R.Ct. 8.6-Custody Investigators Amendment to N.D.R.Ct. 8.7-Guardian ad Litem Amendment to N.D.Adm.Prac. 4-Licensing and Practice of Foreign Legal Consultants Amendment to N.D.Sup.Ct.Admin.R. 8-Temporary Judges, Appointment Amendment to N.D.Sup.Ct.Admin.R. 27-Court of Appeals Effective August 1, 2009 Comments due by July 31, 2009

Additional Resources PARENTING PLANS Most states use parenting plans so you can go on line to see what resources are available in other states. This is just a sampling. Soon we too will have online resources. Arizona: Oregon: Massachusetts: Minnesota: Montana: New Hampshire: NEW HAMPSHIRE REPORT. This state undertook a 3 year study of the family law system. The Task Force found their conclusions to be helpful as we drafted the new law. The report can be found at PARENTING COORDINATORS Mediators and Parenting Coordinators: Comparing and Contrasting – 20 Questions/40 Answers, Jessani, James, American Journal of Family Law,