Immigration Issues & Consideration for Child Welfare Administrators Presentation by Ken Borelli, Deputy Director Dept of Family & Children’s Services,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gender Based Analysis Division Strategic Policy October, 2010
Advertisements

Child Protection Units
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Back to the Drawing Board Summary of the work of the Human Services Redesign Committee from May 2012 forward.
Disproportionality of WA Juveniles Ages by Race/Ethnicity
PCCYFS 2012 Annual Spring Conference Crossing Borders: Immigration Issues In The Child Welfare System Presented By: Benjamin Drinen, Esq.
March 29, 2012 Improving Health Outcomes for Children in Foster Care: the Role of Electronic Information Exchange.
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
Building a Foundation for Community Change Proposed Restructure 2010.
Immigrant Issues in Texas: Integration into Child Welfare Dr. Rowena Fong The University of Texas at Austin School of Social Work
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
PREVENTION & INTERVENTION PILOT PROGRAM Prevention and Intervention of Child Sex Trafficking.
C Commitment Service Community County of Orange Social Services Agency Differential Response in OC Ingrid Harita, Director Michael Riley PhD, Chief Deputy.
Understanding and Using CONCURRENT PLANNING To Achieve Permanency for Children and Youth
1 Court-Agency Collaboration in Child and Family Service Reviews (CFSRs): Steps for Each Stage of the Process Hon. Stephen W. Rideout & Hon. William Jones.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Improving the Commonwealth’s Services for Children and Families A Framework.
FosterEd: Santa Cruz County Judge Denine Guy, Superior Court of Ca., Santa Cruz County, Juvenile Division Mark Holguin, Family and Children’s Services.
EDUCATION STABILITY MATTERS OREGON. 2 PRESENTED BY: Catherine Stelzer, MSW Oregon Team: A.J. Goins (Project Manager), Julie York, Sarah Walker, Annie.
"The Changing Expectations of Juvenile Justice in Texas"
Improving Outcomes for Minnesota Youth that Crossover between Child Welfare & Juvenile Justice.
Towards the Best Interests of the Child in Cross- Border Situations - Singapore’s Experience- District Judge Joyce Low Director, Planning, Policy and Administration,
Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Fresno County Department of Children and Family Services April 2008.
CWS Stakeholders Summit May 16-17, 2002 CWS STAKEHOLDERS SUMMIT MAY 16, 2002 ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA.
Building Tribal programs that invest in children, youth, and families, while preserving tribal cultural values and traditions. Hankie P. Ortiz,Deputy Bureau.
AB 1331: Status of Implementation March 11, 2010 Presentation to the Children’s Committee of CWDA Contact Hannah Haley, Policy Intern, John Burton Foundation.
Improving Outcomes for Minnesota’s Crossover Youth Implementation of the CYPM April 18, 2012.
Reforms for Justice for Children: A Case Study of Belize Legal and Institutional Reform in Belize: Strengthening Child Protection Systems Presented by.
Legislation and Working Practices. AIM: To understand the importance of policy and legislation To identify & summarise Key legislation To examine policies.
MODULE V LEADERSHIP ROLE OF THE JUDGE AND ICWA: ON AND OFF THE BENCH IN MEANINGFUL ENGAGEMENT AND COLLABORATION MODEL ICWA JUDICIAL CURRICULUM.
Bay Area Consortium RBS Stakeholders Communication Plan.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
July 9, 2008 Planning Meeting. Today’s Agenda Welcome & Introductions Framework of the California Kinship Caregiver Advocacy Network California Kinship.
The New York City Experience: Working Toward Better Family Outcomes NCSACW Annual Conference July 14-15, 2004 Lisa Lite-Rottmann, Regional Coordinator,
Mark Miller, Director of Training Maryam Fatemi; Regional Administrator Tedji Dessalegn Regional Administrator A Los Angeles “Regional Update” Fairness.
Alaska’s Behavioral Health System Presentation to the Idaho Behavioral Health Transformation Workgroup March 24 th 2010 Bill Hogan Commissioner Commissioner.
Tel: Family Mediation Child Contact Children’s Advice & Support Developing partnerships with Family Mediation Services.
Using an Institutional Analysis to Identify Systemic Barriers to Racial Equity in the Child Welfare System Fresno County DSS Howard Himes & Wendy Osikafo.
Page 1 Fall, 2010 Regional Cross Sector Meeting Elements of an Effective Protocol.
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Quarterly Meeting – October 21, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on.
What is a Family Connections Program? An Overview of a New Service Approach Being Developed by the Bay Area Residentially Based Services Consortium.
Immigration Options, Service Models and Special Concerns in Immigration Guidelines for Child Welfare Staff California Family to Family Statewide Convening:
NEW MEXICO CRIME DATA PROJECT Prepared and Presented by Ada Pecos Melton, MPA American Indian Development Associates th St., NW, Suite 212 Albuquerque,
Briefing on Progress made with regard to Prevention and Management of Child Abuse and Neglect Especially Child Sexual Abuse Presentation at the Portfolio.
The Community Collaboration Coaches Roles, Strategies, and Tools.
Alternatives to detention: the role of the community and best practices Riga, Latvia 2015.
Positive Outcomes for All: The Institutional Analysis in Fresno County’s DSS Catherine Huerta 1.
CA COUNTY PEER QUALITY CASE REVIEW (Insert Review Week Dates)
UNICEF Child Friendly City Framework: a rights based local planning approach Dave Pugh CEO St Luke’s Anglicare.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Day One Introduction Review: Foundations of Independent Living Continuum of Services – Phase I Continuum of Services – Phase II Continuum of Services –
SESSION SIX YOU ARE NOT ALONE SERVICES WHICH ARE AVAILABLE TO HELP.
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
Forging Partnerships with Law Enforcement: An Essential Partner in Serving Unaccompanied Youth Joe Lagana, CEO and Founder, Homeless Children’s Education.
IOWA PARTNERSHIPS Kara Hudson,CFSR State Coordinator (515) Michelle Muir, Executive Officer (515)
Learnings from the Maricopa County Human Services Campus, DAVID BRIDGE MANAGING DIRECTOR HUMAN SERVICES CAMPUS LODESTAR DAY RESOURCE CENTER.
Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement Options: Community Partnership Governor’s Action Group for Safe Children Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement.
California Department of Public Health / 1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH Standards and Guidelines for Healthcare Surge during Emergencies How.
A PATH TO HOME: SUPPORTING HOUSING NEEDS FOR NEWCOMERS YMCA of Greater Toronto – National Program Coordinator Funded by: Citizenship and Immigration Canada.
What Is Child Find? IDEA requires that all children with disabilities (birth through twenty-one) residing in the state, including children with disabilities.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
New Director Orientation Child Support Directors Association CSDA.
Chautauqua Tapestry Family driven ~ Youth guided ~ Culturally sensitive Community based ~ Evidence-based.
Public Health Law and Policy: Principles, Examples, and Applications
Ongoing Assessment and Permanency
FIRST PLACEMENT IS THE RIGHT PLACEMENT
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Senate Health and Human Services Committee
FIRST PLACEMENT IS THE RIGHT PLACEMENT
Presentation transcript:

Immigration Issues & Consideration for Child Welfare Administrators Presentation by Ken Borelli, Deputy Director Dept of Family & Children’s Services, County of Santa Clara, Social Services Agency Family to Family Leadership Summit May 1-3, 2006 (Nashville, TN)

Introduction: Every immigrant has an unique story. Many of these tales include overcoming tremendous obstacles in order to establish themselves in the United States. Once finally here, interaction with the public child welfare system, and “the authorities”, will create a high level of anxiety, especially if it is perceived that it will jeopardize a tenuous stay in the United States. To provide relevant child welfare services to immigrate families, you need to be aware of this reality.

Introduction (Continued): At the same time Child Welfare clientele with immigration issues raise unique challenges for agency administrators. The issues range from allocation of resources, bias, lack of familiarity with the dynamics of immigration law, and how intervention strategies impact families struggling to survive in the United States.

Part 1: Agency Inventory for Policy Consideration 1) Does your agency’s training include sensitivity to the needs of immigrant families, including confidentiality issues? 2) Is there specific immigration training, especially for relief strategies such as VAWA, Special Immigrant Juvenile Status, U Visas? 3)How are immigration services delivered: contracts with community-based organizations, consultants, specialized units, departmental task forces service committees, liaisons?

Part 1: Agency Inventory for Policy Consideration (Continued) 4) What support documents are available to staff: special handbooks, memos and protocols (i.e. best practice protocol with Mexican consulate)? 5) What is the integration of immigration services into overall child welfare service delivery system. Guidelines for TDMs, domestic violence, duel status youth, ILP plans, relative searches, SIP/PIP strategies, disproportionality issues?)

Part 1: Agency Inventory for Policy Consideration (Continued) 6) Does your agency have pro-active amnesty planning in place: implication for child welfare agencies, intervention strategies, knowledge of the population within the agencies, services to families and/or children, PRUCOL guidelines, status of county funding services).

Part 2: Family Immigration Assessment and the Role of TDM 1. Critical prerequisite – trust building: In order to provide a relevant assessment and service plan, you need to get the actual immigration facts. 2. TDM Protocols regarding confidentiality timelines and consultations. 3. Accuracy and familiarity of terms: “citizenship,” “legal alien status,” “greencard,” “deportation,” “public charge,” “asylum,” etc.

Part 3: Key Immigration Issues Which Impact Family Dynamics  Who in the family is/are United States born?  Who are naturalized US citizens/American nationals?  Who are legal permanent residents?  Who are legal temporary residents?  Who are undocumented?  Who are the identified extended families (here and abroad) and their legal resident status?

Part 4: Examples of Differential Response Strategies for Immigrant Families in the Child Welfare System Department of Family and Children’s Services Immigration Assessment/Child Welfare Cross-over Services Matrix/System Improvement Plan (SIP) (Towards Addressing The Needs of Immigrant Families Impacted by Child Maltreatment & Family Violence) (Each path builds upon the immigration resources develop or in previous process)

Path One: Community Diversion Services. (Referral to Community Based Community Based Immigrant Service Agencies)  For what purpose?  How will the immigration services impact the overall child welfare service plan?  Current immigration status assessment?  In the event the child welfare service plan needs augmentation, how will it be coordinated with the immigration services?  Feedback loops into child welfare system, for safely reassessments.

Path Two: Child Welfare Departmental Diversion Services (The child welfare services are being handled at the voluntary, or informal services level) · It assumes a willingness to work on the referring issues voluntarily. · Immigration services may be referred out to community service agencies but more collaboration is needed in coordinating both child welfare and immigration services. · If voluntary services fail, and court intervention is necessary, a further immigration assessment is critical. · TDM may want to include Immigration services CBO. Begin the process identifying key family supports both in the United States and abroad.

Path Three: Departmental Review by Juvenile Court (At this point, immigration services need judicial reviews and updates) Assessment of targeted immigration relief: Is it focused on the family or the individual. Is the foreign national’s government involved in the decision making process? Status updates of relative support systems for the children, locally, nationally and internationally. Services to provide family maintenance, reunification, or permanency for the minor children. May need to apply for VAWA amendments, U Visas, and other immigration relief clauses.

Path Four: After Care and Continued Permanency Planning Support for Youth (Immigration services targeted to specific court dependent minors) · Follow up tracking applications for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status, U Visa and other immigration relief clauses. · Impact of immigration status on guardianship, adoption, and or Independent living plans of emancipating minors. · No minor if at all possible should emancipate without access to immigration relief. Cross over issues and collaboration with juvenile justice system. The resolution of an immigration matter is a major component of an emancipation staffing/TDM Continued support to families with immigration concerns. Immigration timelines can differ from Child Welfare timelines by years. What is set in motion in ER may take several years to resolve.

Presentation by: Ken Borelli, LCSW Deputy Director Department of Family & Children’s Services County of Santa Clara Social Services Agency 373 W. Julian Street, San Jose, California Phone: (408) Fax: (408)