Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research The Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Web Seminar Series presents:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
Ensuring that building products meet code requirements ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. The ICC-ES Evaluation Committee conducts open public hearings on proposed.
FDA Communications and Meetings
Single-Patient Use of Investigational Drugs and Biologic Products for Treating Cancer Grant Williams, M.D. Medical Team Leader DODP/CDER/FDA.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
Role of the Executive Secretary Gail Dapolito Advisory Committee Coordinator Div. Scientific Advisors and Consultants Center for Biologics Evaluation and.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Working with FDA: Biological Products and Clinical Development IND Case Studies.
Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Working with FDA: Biological Products and Clinical Development IND Regulatory.
Mitochondrial Manipulation Technologies: Preclinical Considerations
FDA Update on Laboratory Developed Tests Oversight Laura M. St. Martin, M.D., M.P.H. Acting Branch Chief, Human Tissues and Reproduction Branch, Division.
Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee September 6, 2006 ODAC and the FDA Arms-Length or Arm-In-Arm? Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Working with FDA: Biological Products and Clinical Development Critical Path.
Special Topics in IND Regulation
Meetings with FDA Martha A. Feldman, RAC
Investigational New Drug Application 21 CFR Part 312 A Review for OCRA US RAC Study Group September 2005 Ginger Clasby, MS Promedica International
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Working with FDA: Biological Products and Clinical Development IND Case Studies.
Office of Combination Products: Current Initiatives
1 Public Outreach October 2008 By Adelina Murtezaj – Public Relation Officer For Inaugural Partnership Activity between ICC and ERO.
Associate Director for Review Management
Nonclinical Studies Subcommittee Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science CMC Issues for Screening INDs Eric B. Sheinin, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Director.
Industry Perspective on Challenges for Product Developers - Drugs Christine Allison, M.S., RAC Associate Regulatory Consultant, Global Regulatory Affairs.
Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
Understanding the Pre-IDE Program: FDA Perspective
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.2 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.2 How to develop national.
Drug Submissions: Review Process Agnes V. Klein, MD Biologics and Genetic Therapies Directorate February, 2003 www/hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut.
Nonclinical Perspective on Initiating Phase 1 Studies for Small Molecular Weight Compounds John K. Leighton, PH.D., DABT Supervisory Pharmacologist Division.
Student Involvement in Decision-Making. Policy 2.3 Part 1: To promote appropriate levels of student participation... Part 1:... students shall have the.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
NuPAFP Conference October 13-14, 2010 Operational Adjustment Grants.
UNCLASSIFIED10/12/ :41 AM Slide 1 Division of Regulated Activities and Compliance.
Strategies for Preparing for Meetings with FDA Susan M. Mondabaugh, Ph.D. Vice President, Regulatory Affairs Hurley Consulting Associates Ltd. Chatham,
August 28, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency Public Assistance Arbitration Process.
PATRICIA KERBY, MPA HUMAN SUBJECTIONS PROTECTION COMPLIANCE OFFICER OFFICE OF RESEARCH COMPLIANCE What are the FDA’s expectations in 2010?
Mark A. Del Vecchio Director, Regulatory and Clinical Affairs Digene Corporation How to Work with FDA: Industry Perspective IVD Roundtable/OIVD Workshop.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION TWO UNDERSTANDING THE ORGANIZATION OF CODEX Module 2.5 How do Codex Committees function?
General Grant Writing Tips. Research the problem/need and the program before beginning the grant proposal Review research on similar problems/needs and.
1 Combination Products: Jurisdictional Issues MassMEDIC Presentation March 28, 2006 Janice Hogan, Esq. Partner Hogan & Hartson, LLP
School Deans appoint a pool of evaluators who are trained by the Centre for University Teaching The staff member whose teaching is being evaluated is informed.
Rabbanai T. Morgan Current as of 26 January 2006 Protests.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA’s website for reference purposes only.
Proposal for End-of-Phase 2A (EOP2A) Meetings Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences Clinical Pharmacology Subcommittee November 17-18, 2003 Lawrence.
Report on the review of ACG structure The Exchange of Information Task Force October 7-9, 2009 The 13th ACG General Meeting in Hanoi.
Overview of FDA's Regulatory Framework for PET Drugs
1/33.  What is INDA ?  Types of INDAs  Objectives of INDAs  Format & Contents of an INDA  IND Safety reports  IND Annual Reports  IND Review Process.
The New Drug Development Process (www. fda. gov/cder/handbook/develop
TAA2 Assessor Workshop Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA2 Activity Break TAA.
Overview of Gene Therapy Surveillance Inspections Joseph P Salewski, Chief Bioresearch Monitoring Branch CBER.
Arizona Early Intervention Program IDEA 2011 Requirements -Assessment -
TAA2 TEACHER WORKSHOP Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA2 Activity Break TAA.
Chief, Gene Therapy Branch
Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research The Office of Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies Web Seminar Series presents:
UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM t Selection and Employment of Consultants Negotiations with Consultants; Monitoring Performance of Consultants; Resolving Disputes.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CENTER FOR BIOLOGICS AND HUMAN SERVICESEVALUATION and RESEARCH AND HUMAN SERVICES EVALUATION and RESEARCH Update on OCTGT Guidance.
0 End of Year Arrangements Training Presentation for Access Practitioners.
1 IND Applications for Academic Clinical Investigations John Marler, MD US Food and Drug Administration New Hampshire Avenue White Oak, MD
Briefing Documents. Presentation Overview What is a BD BD preparation process Tips 2.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CENTER FOR BIOLOGICS AND HUMAN SERVICESEVALUATION and RESEARCH AND HUMAN SERVICES EVALUATION and RESEARCH Update on the Somatic Cell.
Clinical Trials.
Continuing Medical Education Guidance for Planners of Regularly Scheduled Series (RSS) To insert your company logo on this slide From the Insert Menu Select.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Pre-Investigational New Drug (pre-IND) Meeting with FDA
Formal Meetings between FDA and Sponsors of PDUFA Products
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING RESCIND RESOLUTION NO AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE RULES GOVERNING.
FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) INitial Targeted Engagement for Regulatory Advice on CBER producTs (INTERACT) Meetings *Audio.
Presentation transcript:

Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research The Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Web Seminar Series presents: Sponsor Meetings with OCTGT Lori Tull, RAC Regulatory Management Staff

Meetings with OCTGT –FDA meets with sponsors and applicants who seek guidance relating to the development and review of INDs or the review of marketing applications Because these meetings represent critical points in the regulatory process, it is important that there are efficient, consistent procedures for the timely and effective conduct of such meetings.

Types of Meetings –Type A Immediately necessary for a stalled drug development program to proceed Examples are: Dispute resolution, Clinical holds, Special Protocol Assessment Should be scheduled to occur within 30 days of receipt of the sponsor’s complete written request

Types of Meetings (cont.) –Type B Pre-IND meetings, certain end-of-Phase 1 meetings, End-of-Phase 2 and pre-Phase 3 meetings and pre-BLA meetings Should be scheduled to occur within 60 days of receipt of the sponsor’s complete written request Generally, only one of each of the Type B meetings for each potential application will be granted.

Types of Meetings (cont.) –Type C Meetings other than Type A or B Discussions regarding cost recovery, facility design, general product issues, etc. Should be scheduled to occur within 75 days of receipt of the sponsor’s complete written request

Meeting Requests –How to submit Requests for IND, IDE and BLA meetings should be submitted as an amendment to the IND or BLA Pre-IND or pre-IDE meeting requests may be submitted by fax: (301) to the attention of the Branch Chief, Regulatory Management Staff

Meeting Requests (cont.) –Information needed for a request to be considered complete Product name Application number (if applicable) Chemical name and structure Proposed indication(s) or context of product development

Meeting Requests (cont.) –Information needed for a request to be considered complete (cont.) Type of meeting being requested A brief statement of the purpose and objectives of the meeting A proposed agenda A list of proposed questions grouped by discipline.

Meeting Requests (cont.) –Information needed for a request to be considered complete (cont.) A list of all individuals who will attend the proposed meeting from the sponsor's or applicant's organization and consultants. A list of FDA staff requested to participate in the meeting. Suggested dates and times for the meeting that are within the appropriate time from of the meeting type being requested. The format of the meeting (face-to-face or teleconference).

Scheduling the Meeting –If OCTGT agrees to grant the meeting, the meeting will be scheduled and the sponsor/applicant will be notified within 14 days for a Type A meeting and within 21 days for a Type B or C meeting. The faxed response will contain date, time and location of meeting, tentative participants, number of information packages required and date the information packages are due to be received by OCTGT.

Scheduling the Meeting (cont.) –If the meeting request is denied, the sponsor will be notified with an explanation of the reasons for denial –If a meeting is scheduled by FDA and is later canceled or postponed by the sponsor, FDA will consider a subsequent request to schedule the meeting to be a new request.

Information Package –Timing of Submission Type A meetings – 2 weeks before meeting Type B meetings – 4 weeks before meeting Type C meetings – 4 weeks before meeting –Meeting may be postponed or cancelled if adequate supporting documentation has not been received within these time frames

Information Package (cont.) –Content of Submission Summary information relevant to the product(s) Supplementary information needed to develop responses to the sponsor’s questions. Should support the intended objectives of the meeting Should be organized according to the proposed agenda –Insufficient information package may result in meeting cancellation

Information Package (cont.) –The contents of the information package will vary depending on the product, indication, phase of drug development, and issues to be discussed, information packages generally should include: Product name and application number (if applicable). Chemical name and structure. Proposed indication(s). Dosage form, route of administration, and dosing regimen (frequency and duration).

Information Package (cont.) Information Package Contents (cont.) A brief statement of the purpose of the meeting. A list of the specific objectives/outcomes expected from the meeting. A proposed agenda, including estimated amounts of time needed for each agenda item and designated speaker (s) A list of specific questions grouped by discipline.

Information Package (cont.) Information Package Contents (cont.) Clinical data summary (as appropriate). Preclinical data summary (as appropriate). Chemistry, manufacturing, and controls information (as appropriate). –Once the information package is received, the review division will work with the sponsor or applicant to refine the agenda, as appropriate.

FDA Preliminary Responses –When appropriate, OCTGT will fax preliminary responses to the sponsor’s questions from the meeting package and any additional comments one to two days prior to the meeting. If draft responses and advice are sufficiently clear and complete to obviate the need for further discussion, the sponsor may request that the meeting be cancelled.

FDA Preliminary Responses (cont.) Preliminary responses are not intended to generate the submission of a new meeting agenda and new questions. FDA may not be able to provide comments on any new data submitted in response to the preliminary comments.

Conduct of the Meeting –Introductions and statement of the agenda –Presentation from sponsor generally not needed Sponsor should contact project manager if they wish to make a presentation –Discussion focused on FDA responses to sponsor’s questions –Sponsor presents a summary to ensure mutual understanding of meeting outcomes and actions

Meeting Documentation –Official minutes will be issued to the sponsor within 30 days of the meeting –FDA will summarize in bulleted form Important discussion points Decisions Recommendations Agreements/Disagreements Issues for further discussion Action Items

Dispute Resolution –If after receiving official minutes from FDA, a sponsor or applicant needs additional clarificiation, they may contact the project manager for guidance or to arrange a follow-up teleconference.

Dispute Resolution (cont.) –If sponsor wishes to effect a change in the official minutes, they may send a letter to FDA citing their recommendations and rationale. The sponsor’s concern will be taken under consideration by the review division and the project manager will issue an appropriate response in writing.

Dispute Resolution (cont.) –If FDA agrees to change the official minutes, such changes will be documented in an addendum to the official minutes –If sponsors are not satisfied with the response provided by FDA, they may pursue the Agency’s procedures for internal review and dispute resolution.

Guidance –Guidance for Industry: Formal Meetings Between the FDA and Sponsors or Applicants – anceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Gu idances/UCM pdfhttp:// anceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Gu idances/UCM pdf