THE PROTECTION OF PLANT VARITIES AND FARMERS’ RIGHTS ACT 2001 – INDIA Objectives: –-Protection of the rights of farmers for their contribution made at.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
26 Sept By D. Calab Gabriel Senior Partner Patent Practice COMMERCIAL AGREEMENTS INVOLVING IPR.
Advertisements

LEGAL AND REGULATORY REGIME FOR ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING IN KENYA Presented By: Anne N. Angwenyi National Environment Management Authority (Kenya)
2/24/20141 PROTECTION OF PLANT VARIETEIES AND FARMERS RIGHTS ACT, April 2010 WIPO Malathi Lakshmikumaran Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan
25 October 2002Geneva1 Plant variety rights - The Breeders Exemption Tim Roberts © 2002.
Ato221 - WIPO-UPOV Symp. on IPRs in Plant Biotech., Gva, Article 27.3(b) of the TRIPS Agreement 3.Members may also exclude from patentability:
WIPO-UPOV SYMPOSIUM October 25, 2002UPOV. Rolf Jördens Vice Secretary-General UPOV LEGAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS LEADING TO THIS SYMPOSIUM: UPOVS.
To Sow or Not to Sow – Dilemmas at the Intersection of IP with Trade Srividhya Ragavan University of Oklahoma Law Center.
Agrobiodiversity and Intellectual Property Rights: Selected Issues under the FAO International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.
Article XXXVI – Signature, ratification, acceptance, approval or accession 1. – This Protocol shall be open for signature in Berlin on 9 March 2012 by.
What are the variety plants ? Fruits, trees, vines, plants, ornemental plants… Protection by Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 of 27 July 1994 on Community.
IPRS, SEEDS & FARMERS’ RIGHTS Clare Westwood PAN AP.
Interface between patent and sui generis systems of protection of plant varieties The 1978 UPOV Act does not allow both systems to be applied to the same.
Price of Being a Breeder Organization Hamdi Çiftçiler MAY Seed / Deputy Chairman of Board of Management.
IPRs in Plant Breeding a live debate Niels Louwaars Director Plantum.
Robust intellectual property rights delivered efficiently Additional Perspectives on Australia’s Implementation of Essentially Derived Varieties Doug Waterhouse.
The Convention on Biological Diversity, access to genetic resources and IPR Yovana Reyes Tagle University of Helsinki.
India’s Plant Protection Issues Srividhya Ragavan Associate Professor of Law University of Oklahoma Law Center.
Climate change, agriculture & intellectual property rights.
Protecting Our Food But Leaving Our Harvest? Srividhya Ragavan University of Oklahoma Law Center.
The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act A Critical Appraisal.
THE LAW MAKING PROCESS OF AN ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING REGIME IN KENYA Presented By: Anne N. Angwenyi National Environment Management Authority (Kenya)
Experiences with implementation of Brazilian A & BS Regime and Suggestions for Reform Juliana Santilli.
THE ROLE OF TRADE AND THE WTO IN ENSURING FOOD SECURITY Trócaire Development Review 2010 Launch Friday November 12th 2010.
1 Including developing country interests in FTAs: biodiversity Third World Network Washington DC 27 February 2006.
How to operationalize the disclosure requirement at the national level in a manner supportive to the TRIPS Agreement and the CBD? Dr. N.S. Gopalakrishnan,
OVERVIEW OF TYPICAL NATIONAL MEASURES (laws,regulations, policies, programmes) RELEVANT FOR THE PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE IN THE CONTEXT OF FARMERS´RIGHTS.
FARM SAVED SEED IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC Ing. Vojtech Dukát 2008.
THE ROLE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN PROTECTING TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE The Philippine Experience Presented by: Marga C. Domingo-Morales Senior Policy.
EXEMPTED INCOMES 1.1. Agricultural income-Fully exempted u/s 10(1). 2.2.Share of income from HUP-FuIly exempted u/s 10(2). 3.3.Share of income from firm.
DOMESTICATION OF TRIPS FLEXIBILITIES IN NATIONAL IP LEGISLATION FOR STRENGTHENING ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN ZAMBIA AN OVERVIEW OF PATENT PROTECTION IN ZAMBIA.
Protecting Traditional Knowledge in India March 22, 2012 Anuradha R.V. Partner, Clarus Law Associates New Delhi, India.
Udo von Kröcher 1 Enforcement of Plant Variety Rights in the Agricultural Sector in Germany Udo von Kröcher Bundessortenamt (Federal Plant Variety Office)
KEY PROVISIONS OF FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS Claro F. Certeza SPCMBLAW.
Data protection and extension of patent rights TRIPS requirements & TRIPS-plus provisions Carlos Correa.
Plant Breeders’ Rights and National Listing Implementation and operational aspects
3 oktober 2015 Plant Breeders Rights Novi Sad, May 22.
Rolf Jördens, Vice Secretary-General, UPOV Geneva, May 29, 2007 A BUSINESS-ORIENTED OVERVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FOR LAW STUDENTS AGRICULTURAL SMEs.
Institutional Frame work for Plant Variety Protection Facilitator : Dr. Sanjeev Saxena Participants : Dr. V.K.Khanna Dr. R.P. Nachane Dr. D. Rama Rao Dr.
India Framework on Farmers’ Rights : From A CBM Perspective S.Bala Ravi Advisor (Biodiversity) M.S.Swaminathan Research Foundation Wageningen.
The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture The Multilateral System of Access and Benefit-sharing.
Session 6 : An Introduction to the TRIPS Agreement UPOV, 1978 and 1991 and WIPO- Administered Treaties.
Genetic Resources Policy and Intellectual Property I. Ownership and control of genetic resources II. Movement of genetic resources III. Intellectual Property.
CRICOS No J a university for the world real R The OAK Law Project Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J 1.
PLANT BREEDERS’ RIGHTS Patrick Ngwediagi Registrar of PBR MAFC, Tanzania 11/19/ TANZANIA LEGAL & INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ON.
Session 9: Cross-Cutting Issues. Law and Policy of Relevance to the Management of Plant Genetic Resources  To describe the key cross-cutting.
Law & Policy of Relevance to the Management of Plant Genetic Resources Implementing the Treaty Session 1: Presentation 3 The International Treaty.
STT2073 Plant Breeding and Improvement Intellectual Properties.
INITIATED BY CGN AND CTDT FUNDED BY DGIS AND OXFAMNOVIB Output of 0nline conference on Options for Farmers’ Rights 2009.
PLANT BREEDERS’ RIGHTS BILL [B11 – 2015]: Response by DAFF on the issues raised by the Parliamentary Legal Advisor 4 SEPTEMBER 2015.
Law and Policy of Relevance for the Management of Plant Genetic Resources Objectives of Session 6 To discuss the meaning of sui generis protection.
Enforcement of PVR in the Ornamental Sector The Growers Point of View Balázs Hamar Hungarian Chamber of Agriculture AIPH Warsaw, 12.May 2006.
International Aspects of Plant Variety Protection Srividhya Ragavan University of Oklahoma Law Center.
A Hybrid Game: Of the Blessed Intellectual Property & the Bastardized Biodiversity Srividhya Ragavan University of Oklahoma Law Center.
Position paper of APSA on IPR in plant breeding and Co- existence of Plant Breeder’s Rights and Patents DR ARVIND KAPUR.
Huib Ghijsen ISF. 2  Mission  PBR / PVP  Patents  Other forms of protection  IP IT-PGRFA & CBD/Nagoya Protocol Source: Crispeels, 2008.
International Aspects of Plant Variety Protection Srividhya Ragavan University of Oklahoma.
Seed industry & IPR perspective from a regional PVP Office Carlos Godinho Vice-President CPVO APSA Workshop – Bangkok, 18/05/15.
Intellectual Property & Information Technology Laws Division By Vijay Pal Dalmia, Advocate Head Intellectual Property & Information Technology Laws Division.
Plant Improvement Bill and International Organisations 3 May 2016 BRIEFING BY THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE.
The need for a new seed legislation
Norwegian implementation on the Novelty provisions
Plant Biotechnology and Plant Breeder’s Rights :
Protecting Traditional Knowledge in India
OVERVIEW OF THE STRUCTURE OF PPV & FR ACT 2001
Ivo Sedláček General Manager SELGEN, a.s.
Online conference on Options for Farmers’ Rights
Breeder’s Rights in India
BRIEFING BY THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES
Farmers’ Rights in India
TRIPS Art. 27.3(b) and Agriculture
Presentation transcript:

THE PROTECTION OF PLANT VARITIES AND FARMERS’ RIGHTS ACT 2001 – INDIA Objectives: –-Protection of the rights of farmers for their contribution made at any time in conserving, improving and making available plant genetic resources for the development of new plant varieties. –-Protection of Plant Breeders Rights to stimulate investment for research and development, both in the public and private sector for development of new plant varieties. –Giving effect to Article 27.3(b)of the TRIPs Agreement.

Coverage of varieties : –New Varieties (genera and species which can be registered will be notified subsequently) - Extant varieties - Farmers varieties - Breeders can exercise their rights over any variety that is essentially derived from the protected variety. Provided that the authorisation by the breeder of the initial variety to the breeder of edv is on mutually agreed upon terms and conditions.

Essentially derived variety is defined as : i)predominantly derived from such initial variety, or from a variety that itself is predominantly derived from such initial variety, while retaining the expression of the essential characteristics that result from the genotype or combination of genotypes of such initial variety. ii)Is clearly distinguishable from such initial variety; and iii)Conforms to such initial variety in the expression of the essential characteristics (Similar to UPOV 91)

Conditions for Protection: A variety is protected if it conforms to the criteria of : -novelty -distinctiveness -uniformity -stability (These terms have been clearly defined in the legislation – Section 15) (Similar to UPOV)

Rights of Breeders: Breeders Rights extend to Seeds and / or Propagating material of the protected variety to : i)Production ii)Selling iii)Marketing iv)Distribution v)Export vi)Import (Similar to UPOV 91)

–However, if the breeders’ variety is essentially derived from a farmers’ variety, the breeder cannot give any authorisation without the consent of the farmers or communities from whose varieties the protected variety is derived.

Farmers’ Rights : i) entitled to save, use, sow, re-sow, exchange, share or sell his farm produce including seed in the same manner as he was entitled earlier (Seeds for sale should not be branded) (essentially correspond to Farmers’ privilege in UPOV 78) ii) Full disclosure of the expected performance of the Seeds or planting material by the plant breeder. Where these fail to perform in the manner claimed by the breeder, the farmer may claim compensation from the plant breeder.

–i)reward the farmer “who is engaged in the conservation and preservation of genetic resources of land races and wild relatives of economic plants and their improvement through selection and presentation”. (Similar to the concept of Farmers’ Rights in ITPGR)

Researchers’ Rights: –Researchers’ Rights are recognised which grant them free and complete access to protected materials for research use in developing new varieties of plants. However, authorisation of the breeder is required “whose repeated use of such variety as parental line is necessary for commercial production of such other newly developed variety”. This provision in effect uses the formulation provided for in UPOV 78 for breeder’s exemption. –____________________________________________ __________

Benefit Sharing : i)For a variety registered as EDV, NGOs or individuals can claim a share of benefits that may arise from its commercialisation on behalf of any village or local community; ii)Any individual or NGO can make a claim on behalf of a village or local community for the contribution that they had made in the evolution of any variety registered under the Act. (Amount of Compensation as determined by an Authority established under this legislation would be deposited by the breeder in the National Gene Fund)

–Compulsory Licensing : –Priority attached to the public interest over the interests of commercial breeders; –Granting of compulsory licences to ensure availability of seed /planting materials of the protected variety in reasonable price, if : –i) three years have elapsed since the date of registration; –ii)reasonable requirements of the public for seeds or other propagating material have not been satisfied; –iii)seed/propagating material not available to the public at a reasonable price.

–The terms and conditions of a Compulsory licence should ensure : –reasonable compensation to the breeder –the licensee provide the farmers the seeds/propagating material in a timely manner and at a reasonable price.

–Conditions Imposed on Applicants: –Applicant must declare that : –a) variety sought to be protected should not contain terminator gene –b) the genetic material or parental material has been lawfully acquired. Applicant should provide the passport date of the parental lines along with the geographical location in India from whose the genetic material has been taken. –c) Contribution made by farmers, village community, institution or organisation in breeding, evolution or development of a variety and use of genetic material conserved by any tribal or rural families in its breeding.

_________________