1 Geometry and Spatial Reasoning Develop adequate spatial skills Children respond to three dimensional world of shapes Discovery as they play, build and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topic Splash Quadrilaterals
Advertisements

P.M van Hiele Mathematics Learning Theorist Rebecca Bonk Math 610 Fall 2009.
Agenda. Mathematical Practices 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3. Construct viable arguments.
Chapter 8 Introductory Geometry Section 8.3 Triangles, Quadrilateral and Circles.
Developing Geometric Thinking: Van Hiele’s Levels Mara Alagic.
CI 319 Fall 2007 Mara Alagic 1 Developing Geometric Thinking: The Van Hiele Levels Adapted from Van Hiele, P. M. (1959). Development and learning process.
The van Hiele levels MA418 – Spring 2010 McAllister.
Developing Geometric Thinking: The Van Hiele Levels Adapted from Van Hiele, P. M. (1959). Development and learning process. Acta Paedogogica Ultrajectina.
VDW Ch 20: Geometric Thinking
The Concept Attainment Model
(7.6) Geometry and spatial reasoning. The student compares and classifies shapes and solids using geometric vocabulary and properties. The student is expected.
The van Hiele Model of Geometric Thought
Grade 10. Benchmark 10.3.E Draw and construct representations of two-and three-dimensional geometric objects using a variety of tools, such as straightedge,
Geometry and English Language Learning
Developing Geometric Reasoning Mary Jane Schmitt August 22–24, 2006 Washington, DC.
Grade 3 Fluency Unit Lesson 1 I can check my fluency with addition & subtraction I can review strategies for addition I can review strategies for subtraction.
Developing Geometric Reasoning K-2 Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Class March 14, 2011 Paige Richards and Dana Thome.
Students can identify objects by their overall shape. They need to see many examples and non-examples. Van Hiele Model of Geometric Understanding Level.
Geometry Grades K-2. Goals:  Build an understanding of the mathematical concepts within the Geometry Domain  Analyze how concepts of Geometry progress.
Properties of Rhombuses, Rectangles, & Squares Goal: Use properties of rhombuses, rectangles, & squares.
Prop. of Rhom., Rect., and Squares
Quadrilaterals.
Chapter 8.4 Notes: Properties of Rhombuses, Rectangles, and Squares
1 The van Hiele levels of Geometrical thought in an in-service training setting in South Africa. Ronél Paulsen South Africa
Classifying Quadrilaterals
TIPM3 Second and Third Grade Geometry November 3, 2010.
Tending the Greenhouse Vertical and Horizontal Connections within the Mathematics Curriculum Kimberly M. Childs Stephen F. Austin State University.
An Introduction to Chapter 9: Geometric Figures
Van Hiele Levels of understanding shapes in geometry.
Geometry and Measurement ECED 4251 Dr. Jill Drake.
1 The van Hiele Model Matthew C. Robinson, Summer B 2006.
T1PM3 4 th and 5 th grade Math Institute Focus on Geometry, Measurement and Data & The Eight Mathematical Practice September 27, 2011.
Class 4: Part 1 Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Class April 4, 2011.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Understanding Shape in Kindergarten and Grade 1 Common Core.
A plane figure with four sides and four angles.
Chapter 15 To accompany Helping Children Learn Math Cdn Ed, Reys et al. ©2010 John Wiley & Sons Canada Ltd.
Geometry EDN 322. NCTM’S STANDARD FOR GEOMETRY  analyze characteristics and properties of two-and three-dimensional geometric objects and develop mathematical.
Teaching children to reason mathematically Anne Watson Ironbridge 2014 University of Oxford Dept of Education.
Using GSP in Discovering a New Theory Dr. Mofeed Abu-Mosa This paper 1. Connects Van Hiele theory and its levels of geometric thinking with.
 Van Hiele Levels Math Alliance September 14, 2010 Kevin McLeod Chris Guthrie.
Geometry 6-4 Properties of Rhombuses, Rectangles, and Squares.
EXAMPLE 3 List properties of special parallelograms
Teaching Young Learners with the Ohio Early Mathematics Standards in Mind Sponsored by the Ohio Department of Jobs & Family Services in collaboration with.
Geometry The Van Hiele Levels of Geometric Thought.
L13-4 Notes: Two-Dimensional Figures
TIPM3 March 2, 2011 Kindergarten and First Grade.
Geometry in NZC Shape - a teaching progression Sandra Cathcart LT Symposium 2009.
QUADRILATERALS SPI: Identify, define or describe geometric shapes given a visual representation or written description of its properties.
Classifying Quadrilaterals
CHAPTER 20 Geometric Thinking and Geometric Concepts
Developing Geometric Thinking and Spatial Sense
Framing Grade 1 Math Instruction
Creating, Describing, and Comparing Shapes
Developing Geometric Thinking: The Van Hiele Levels
CHAPTER 15 Geometry Tina Rye Sloan To accompany Helping Children Learn Math10e, Reys et al. ©2012 John Wiley & Sons  
I can classify quadrilaterals by their properties.
Proofs Geometry - Chapter 2
8.4 Properties of Rhombuses, Rectangles, and Squares
Levels of Geometric Thinking The van Hiele Levels
Classifying Quadrilaterals
Dr. Lee Wai Heng & Dr. Ng Kok Fu
The Geometer’s Sketchpad
Section 6.4 rhombuses, rectangles and squares
Properties of Rhombuses, Rectangles, & Squares
Prop. of Rhom., Rect., and Squares
Classifying Quadrilaterals
Classifying Quadrilaterals
Classifying Quadrilaterals
Section 6.4 Properties of Rhombi, Rectangles, & Squares
The Concept Attainment Model
Presentation transcript:

1 Geometry and Spatial Reasoning Develop adequate spatial skills Children respond to three dimensional world of shapes Discovery as they play, build and explore toys Spatial reasoning creates mental images of one’s surroundings and objects in them(NCTM 2000) Spatial skills are important for everyday life

2 Why Geometry? Practical experiences involve problem solving situations that require knowledge in geometric concepts Making frames Building furniture Grass seed, fertilizer required Wallpaper and paint

3 Teaching Strategy Incorporate geometry into everything you do not just mathematics instruction Help develop spatial reasoning and understanding

4 Van Hiele Levels Two Dutch educators studied children’s acquisition of geometric concepts and the development of geometric thought The Van Hieles concluded that children pass through five levels of reasoning in geometry

5 Van Hiele Levels of Geometric Thinking Level 0 Visualization Description: Children recognize shapes by their global, holistic appearance For example, a child might think of shapes in terms of what they resemble A triangle may be described as a mountain At this level children can sort shapes into groups that look alike to them in some way

6 Van Hiele Levels Level 1 Analysis Description: Children observe the component parts of a figure (ex. parallelogram has opposite sides that are parallel) but are unable to explain the relationships between properties within a shape or among shapes

7 Van Hiele Levels At level 1 analysis children think in terms of properties They understand that all shapes in a group such as parallelograms have the same properties Four sides Opposite sides parallel Opposite sides are congruent Opposite angles are congruent

8 Van Hiele Levels Level 2 Informal deduction Description: Children deduce properties of figures and express interrelationships both within and between figures Example, all squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares

9 Van Hiele Levels Level 3 Formal deduction Description: Children create formal deductive proofs (high school level) Example: Children at this level think about relationships between properties of shapes and understand relationships between axioms, definitions, theorems, corollaries and postulates.

10 Comments on the Levels of Thought Not age dependent but related to experiences that children have had The levels of sequential To move from one level to the next, children need to have many experiences Language must match the child’s level of understanding It is difficult for two people at different levels to communicate effectively

11 Van Hiele Levels Level 4 Rigor Description: Children rigorously compare different axiomatic systems (college level) Example: Children at this level can think in terms of abstract mathematical systems