The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs HOME Program Environmental Review Procedures OCC – Chapter 6.
Advertisements

The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs HOME Program Environmental Review Procedures HBA – Chapter 6.
Ron Bass, J.D., AICP, Senior Regulatory Specialist Jones & Stokes Common NEPA Mistakes and How to Avoid Them January 17, 2008 Oregon Department of Transportation.
Environmental Prescreening Training
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Grant Administrators.
National Environmental Policy Act of Establishes protection of the environment as a national priority Mandates that environmental impacts be considered.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
1 The National Environmental Policy Act in the Oil & Gas Industry.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
2011 CDBG Recipients’ Workshop COMPLIANCE 9:30EnvironmentalRick 10:30BREAK 10:45Wage Rate ProvisionsMary Alice 11:00Uniform Acquisition Robert 11:15Conflict.
Presented to: Association of California Airports By: Peter F. Ciesla, Environmental Protection Specialist Date: September 21, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
Module 15 Environmental Considerations Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
THE ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT Lecture 2
Negotiating the NEPA Maze: It Really Is Rocket Science Start.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
The National Environmental Policy Act
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
EPA!!!!.  One of the first laws ever created to protect the environment  Came into effect due to public concern about the deteriorating human environment.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
What If I Have to Go Beyond an IEE?. EA Training Course Tellus Institute 2 Environmental Assessments (EAs) & Programmatic Environmental Assessments (PEAs)
Completing the NEPA Process for CatEx Projects: Part 3 to CE Closeout.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
CHAPTER 1 FOUNDATION. 1.1 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) “An act to establish a national policy for the environment, to provide for the establishment.
Energy Exploration & Development On National Forest System Lands Barry Burkhardt
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Maryland State Highway Administration’s Secondary and Cumulative Effects Analysis Guidelines For.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Specialist  September 10, 2015.
NOAA Science Advisory Board …advises the Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere on long- and short- range strategies for research, education,
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Streamlining NEPA for Reusable Launch Vehicles Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation May 2004.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
Streamlining NEPA for Reusable Launch Vehicles Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation October 2004.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES. --- “The driving impetus for conducting environmental impact studies is to comparatively present the effects of proposed alternatives.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation NEPA&CEQ.
LBNE Environmental Assessment NEPA Informational Meeting May 23, 2013 Rod Walton, LBNE NEPA Manager.
Rulemaking by APHIS. What is a rule and when must APHIS conduct rulemaking? Under U.S. law, a rule is any requirement of general applicability and future.
FTA Real Estate March 26, 2014 Christopher S. Van Wyk Director FTA Environmental Office.
Federal Aviation Administration ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, 2014 February 2016.
By: Alyssa Kaiser and Celia Rozanski. Before the Act Prior to 1969, the USA had no clear environmental policy Prior to 1969, the USA had no clear environmental.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
CEQA 101  CA Legislature passed CEQA in 1970; signed by Governor Reagan  CEQA statutes are found in Public Resources Code sections et seq.  The.
FCC’s NEPA Process Overview of NEPA Overview of NEPA Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Nuts and bolts.
What If I Have to Go Beyond an IEE?. EA Training Course 2 Environmental Assessments (EAs) & Programmatic Environmental Assessments (PEAs) How Do I Prepare.
National Environmental Policy Act and Endangered Species Act Compliance in the Bureau of Land Management.
ACA Conference - September 2017
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
Unit 6 NEPA.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (Modified from DOE)
Environmental Requirements and planning grants
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Presentation transcript:

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Steve Kokkinakis National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Office of Program Planning and Integration NEPA Compliance and Coordination

The National Environmental Policy Act National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) Signed into law January 1, 1970 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321-4347 Basic national charter for protection of environment

The National Environmental Policy Act National policy that will encourage productive and enjoyable harmony between man and the environment Established Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Each agency develops implementing procedures

Implementation

The National Environmental Policy Act All agencies of the Federal Government shall include in every recommendation or report on proposals for legislation and other major federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment , a detailed statement by the responsible official on the action’s potential environmental impacts, adverse impacts that cannot be avoided, and alternatives to the proposed action.

Applicability Applies to all Federal agencies Federal agencies must analyze and disclose impacts of major actions using a: Categorical Exclusion (CE) Environmental Assessment (EA) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) NEPA analysis must be completed before action is taken (prior to grant award) Some non-Federal activities are subject to NEPA (some grants, permits, etc.)

Significance NEPA analysis is based on significance: Context Intensity Factors beneficial and adverse impact on public health or safety unique characteristics of geographic area degree of controversy, uncertain/unknown risks precedent setting individually insignificant but cumulatively significant threatened or endangered species or critical habitat

Finding Of No Significant Impact Types of NEPA Analysis Environmental Assessment Categorical Exclusion Environmental Impact Statement Finding Of No Significant Impact (FONSI)

Categorical Exclusion (CE) A category of actions NOAA has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment Least complicated and involved type of NEPA analysis Documented by a memo to the record Can be prepared in less than a day

Categorical Exclusion (CE) Common misconception that a CE is excluded from NEPA A CE is a type of NEPA analysis Majority of grant projects qualify for a CE

Categorical Exclusion (CE) MEMORANDUM FOR: The Record FROM: David Givens Director NOAA Office of Coastal Studies SUBJECT: Categorical Exclusion for Grant No. 123-456-78 NAO 216-6, Environmental Review Procedures, requires all proposed projects to be reviewed with respect to environmental consequences on the human environment. This memorandum addresses the applicability of issuing grant number 123-456-78 to Dr. T. Brown, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, to conduct research activities described below. Description of project- Grant number 123-456-78 would award Dr. Brown with $200,000 to conduct a project entitled, “The role of competitive interactions between three species of macroalgae in determining the species density in the intertidal zone of Southeastern Massachusetts.” The project involves the conduct of the following activities: Transit to study site, Take water samples along transect, and Removal of all macroalgae species along transect. Effects of the project- The environmental effects of Dr. Brown’s project will be limited to some limited trampling of intertidal species, removal of approximately 1500 kilograms of macroalgae (total), and some disruption of wildlife (e.g., crabs, birds, fish, etc.) during the placement of the transect lines. All effects will be limited to the 2000 square feet that comprises the study area. All effects will be temporary in nature. Given the growth rate of the macroalgal species being taken, the 1500 kilograms permanently removed will be replaced within 30 days through natural recruitment to the disturbed site. No other disturbances to the intertidal area are planned for the vicinity being studied during this sampling season. Therefore no cumulative effects are anticipated. Categorical exclusion- This project would not result in any changes to the human environment. As defined in Sections 5.05 and 6.03c.3(a) of NAO 216-6, this is a research project of limited size or magnitude or with only short term effects on the environment and for which any cumulative effects are negligible. As such, it is categorically excluded from the need to prepare an Environmental Assessment.

Environmental Assessment (EA) Brief environmental review Analyzes impacts of proposed action, no action, and alternatives Typically takes 3-6 months to prepare

Environmental Assessment (EA) Determines if action will have significant impacts If no significant impacts leads to a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) If significant impacts leads to an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

Environmental Assessment (EA) Initial Planning Define Proposed Action and Alternatives Scoping if necessary Prepare Draft EA Determine if Impacts are Significant Yes Begin EIS process No Circulate Draft EA for Public Review Optional Release Draft EA for 30day Public Review Optional Yes No Revise Draft EA Prepare FONSI Release Final EA and FONSI Implement Action Publish NOA in FR Optional

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Detailed environmental review Analyzes impacts of proposed action, no action, and alternatives Offers mitigation for impacts Results in a Record of Decision Typically takes 12 months or more to prepare

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Initial Planning- Define Purpose and Need Define Proposed Action and Alternatives Public Comment Period Publish NOI in FR ≥ 30 days Before DEIS Released Scoping ≥ 45-day Public Comment Period Prepare DEIS Release DEIS Publish NOA in FR Public Hearings, if Necessary Revise DEIS Yes Are Revisions Substantial? No Release ROD, Publish in FR if Necessary Prepare FEIS Release FEIS Publish NOA in FR ≥ 30-day “Cooling Off” Period Implement Action

Grantee Responsibilities Omnibus Language NOAA must analyze the potential environmental impacts, as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), for applicant projects or proposals which are seeking NOAA federal funding opportunities. Applicants are required to provide detailed information on the activities to be conducted, locations, sites, species and habitat to be affected, possible construction activities, and any environmental concerns that may exist (e.g., the use and disposal of hazardous or toxic chemicals, introduction of non-indigenous species, impacts to endangered and threatened species, aquaculture projects, and impacts to coral reef systems). In addition to providing specific information that will serve as the basis for any required impact analyses, applicants may also be requested to assist NOAA in drafting of an environmental assessment, if NOAA determines an assessment is required. Applicants will also be required to cooperate with NOAA in identifying and implementing feasible measures to reduce or avoid any identified adverse environmental impacts of their proposal.

Grantee Responsibilities Provide detailed project information: Location and timing Permits If scientific research permit is required from NOAA typically NOAA Protected Resources prepares NEPA document Endangered species Cultural/historical resources Data collection Research methods Sampling methods

Grantee Responsibilities Cooperate with NOAA If an EA or EIS is needed may assist NOAA in preparation of environmental impact review

NOAA NEPA Tools NOAA NEPA Website http://www.nepa.noaa.gov NAO 216-6 http://www.nepa.noaa.gov/NAO216_6_TOC.pdf NOAA NEPA Handbook http://www.nepa.noaa.gov/NEPA_HANBOOK.pdf NOAA NEPA Frequently Asked Questions http://www.nepa.noaa.gov/NEPA_FAQs.pdf

Program Planning and Integration NOAA NEPA Contacts Steve Kokkinakis Steve.Kokkinakis@noaa.gov Ext 189 Shelby Mendez Shelby.L.Mendez@noaa.gov Ext 207 Cristi Reid Cristi.Reid@noaa.gov Ext 206 Program Planning and Integration SSMC3, Room 15603 1315 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 Phone: 301-713-1622 Fax: 301-713-0585

Questions