Using SeeYou for Soaring Flight Analysis GPS-trace based flight analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WAGA X-Country Lectures En-Route Decisions. 2 What’s here?  What’s the best Secret for Success  When to start?  What ring setting to use?  What speed.
Advertisements

4 2 . How Lift is Created.
By Kevin Finke and Noel Wade
INTRODUCTION TO MODELING
PROBABILITY. Uncertainty  Let action A t = leave for airport t minutes before flight from Logan Airport  Will A t get me there on time ? Problems :
TECHNIQUES FOR EFFICIENT INTERTHERMAL SOARING
Continuous Probability Distributions.  Experiments can lead to continuous responses i.e. values that do not have to be whole numbers. For example: height.
Thermalling The importance of efficient thermalling How thermals are formed Finding thermals Thermal selection Centering Staying centred Leaving Mike Codling.
All Hands Meeting, 2006 Title: Grid Workflow Scheduling in WOSE (Workflow Optimisation Services for e- Science Applications) Authors: Yash Patel, Andrew.
1 The (“Sampling”) Distribution for the Sample Mean*
IMPACT OF WIND AND SINK ON GLIDER PERFORMANCE* Doug Cline * Based on topic suggested by Tom Roberts FLSC 2006 Safety Seminar.
FIN 685: Risk Management Topic 5: Simulation Larry Schrenk, Instructor.
CS 589 Information Risk Management 23 January 2007.
Climbing US Team/Region 1 Comps Doug Jacobs. Why cover such basic stuff? Every XC flight is a race distance vs. daylight Need to achieve reasonable speeds.
Ch. 6 The Normal Distribution
Jana van Greunen - 228a1 Analysis of Localization Algorithms for Sensor Networks Jana van Greunen.
Note to presenter. You may need to modify to suit existing rule changes and tasks in your state.
Robert M. Saltzman © DS 851: 4 Main Components 1.Applications The more you see, the better 2.Probability & Statistics Computer does most of the work.
© 2009 Research In Motion Limited Introduction to developing applications for mobile devices.
Speed To Fly Jim Crowhurst.
Algebra Problems… Solutions
CRUISING FOR SPEED TECHNIQUES FOR EFFICIENT INTERTHERMAL SOARING.
Data Envelopment Analysis. Weights Optimization Primal – Dual Relations.
Multiprocessing The demanding Art of Cross Country Racing US Team/Region 1 XC/Racing Camp Doug Jacobs.
Power Generation from Renewable Energy Sources
1 The Bronze C Airmanship. 2 Is about common sense and thinking ahead Therefore being a minute ahead of the action.
1 S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology Kai Virtanen, Tuomas Raivio, and Raimo P. Hämäläinen Systems Analysis Laboratory (SAL)
Getting Ready For Competition.
Glider Instrumentation and Plumbing NCSA Safety Seminar 11 Feb 2006.
Capacity analysis of complex materials handling systems.
PROBABILITY & STATISTICAL INFERENCE LECTURE 3 MSc in Computing (Data Analytics)
Manual Conversions Regional Gliding School Speed/Time/Distance Speed, time and distance are related by the equation: Speed = Distance Time Given any.
10/25/03 ce Planning Long Flights Carl Ekdahl Presentation for ASC 10/25/03.
TOPTHERM TopTask TopTask Competition Modern meteorological forecasting tools for gliding activities.
Glider Flight Simulation CLGC Spring 2009 Seminar Scott Manley – CFIG, Tow Pilot Trace Lewis – Private ASEL, Glider (Silver, 5 State Records) Scott Manley.
Various topics Petter Mostad Overview Epidemiology Study types / data types Econometrics Time series data More about sampling –Estimation.
Locomotion in Birds I Gliding & Soaring JodyLee Estrada Duek, Ph.D. With much material from Dr. Gary Ritchison
Evolution strategies Luis Martí DEE/PUC-Rio. ES quick overview Developed: Germany in the 1970’s Early names: I. Rechenberg, H.-P. Schwefel Typically applied.
ENGR 1181 College of Engineering Engineering Education Innovation Center Excel Problem Solving.
Power Generation from Renewable Energy Sources Fall 2012 Instructor: Xiaodong Chu : Office Tel.:
GOING FASTER Flight Planning, Time round TPs. Agenda  After Briefing…  In and Out of a TP  Flight Analysis.
Final Glides US Team Region 1 Comps Doug Jacobs. Final Glide – In Theory Simple:Keep flying climb and glide on course Leave the last thermal When you.
Evolution strategies Chapter 4. A.E. Eiben and J.E. Smith, Introduction to Evolutionary Computing Evolution Strategies ES quick overview Developed: Germany.
North Carolina Soaring Association
Lead and Follow Flying Perry XC/Racing Camp 2007 Developed by Kai Gersten.
Beginning Cross Country Thomas Knauff Ridge Soaring Gliderport Julian, Pa
OPERATING SYSTEMS CS 3530 Summer 2014 Systems and Models Chapter 03.
Evolution strategies Chapter 4. A.E. Eiben and J.E. Smith, Introduction to Evolutionary Computing Evolution Strategies ES quick overview Developed: Germany.
Latent regression models. Where does the probability come from? Why isn’t the model deterministic. Each item tests something unique – We are interested.
XC 2: Flying Further and Faster. The Plan The polar curve and performance Flying Further – maximising the glide Flying faster – in theory In practice.
Csci 418/618 Simulation Models Dr. Ken Nygard, IACC 262B
Flying MacCready What Do The Numbers Tell Us?.
Preparation for Contest Flying How To Get Started and How To Have Fun Doing It.
Assigned Area Tasks Speed Tasks (AST) Run tasks. The basics Fly from your start to a number of turn areas then back home in a given task time Scratch.
Decision Analysis & Decision Support Systems: DADSS Lecture 1: Introduction to Modeling John Gasper.
CIVE1620- Engineering Mathematics 1.1 Lecturer: Dr Duncan Borman Differentiation –complex functions - Product Rule - Quotient Rule 2 nd Derivatives Lecture.
Competition Flight  Launch  Start  Final Glide  Finish.
Flight Test Introduction 2016 Introduction to Flight Test Engineering Dan Hrehov Flight Test Engineer.
GOING FASTER Final Glides. Agenda  What You Can Gain  What You Can Lose  Golden Rules of Final Glides  Flight Analysis  Ian Reekie  Alex Hipple.
OPERATING SYSTEMS CS 3502 Fall 2017
Williams Soaring Center 2017 John Cochrane
Analytics and OR DP- summary.
Introduction to Decision Analysis & Modeling
Cross-Country for Beginners Part 5: Flight Computers and Final Glides
Multiprocessing The demanding Art of Cross Country Racing
Where did we stop? The Bayes decision rule guarantees an optimal classification… … But it requires the knowledge of P(ci|x) (or p(x|ci) and P(ci)) We.
Bill Elliott and Rand Baldwin
Who is CAS? Canadian Advanced Soaring Corporation
Process Wind Tunnel for Improving Business Processes
Presentation transcript:

Using SeeYou for Soaring Flight Analysis GPS-trace based flight analysis

Real Question: How I do become a better cross-country glider pilot

Agenda Overview SeeYou capabilities Quick review of theoretical underpinnings of X-country flight optimization Example of competitive analysis of G-Cup flights on May 19 th, 2003

Overview SeeYou Capabilities Turnpoint Database Management –Importing/creating new turnpoints –Modifying/deleting turnpoints Task Database Management –Importing tasks/creating new tasks –Modifying/deleting tasks GPS Trace Analysis –Importing GPS traces (connection wizzard) –Analyzing flights 2-D flight analysis –Single flight –Multiple flights –Synchronization –Customizing screen 3-D flight analysis –Single flight –Multiple flight –How to move about Barograph-type analysis of flight parameters –Cross-matching of parameters Statistical Analysis –Info Available –Selections

Quick review of theoretical underpinnings of X-country flight optimization –MacCready (deterministic) –Mathar (stochastic) –Cochrane (stochastic)

MacCready Theory Q: How fast should I fly based on known lift conditions ahead of me in order to minimize time from A to B when my altitude is unlimited? Answer: Classic speed-to-fly (MacCready) theory – provides explicit interthermal cruise speed and implicit rule, in which thermals to climb A B Distance s Net lift l v cruise polar sink v target polar sink ps at v target Net lift l in next thermal +/-inthermal airmass sink/lift Cruise time to next thermal Time spent regaining altitude in thermal Two key constraints of MacCready theory: Deterministic model, based on known net lift l – which in reality is unknown Doesn’t account for limited altitude

Constraint 1: Uncertain lift – R. Mathar, Technical Soaring Oct 1996 Q: How fast should I fly based on unknown lift conditions ahead of me in order to minimize time from A to B? Answer: If there is a distribution of expected lift set the MacCready ring (or equivalent device) to the harmonic mean rather than the arithmetic mean (=straight average) Mathematics: Practice: Key insight Provides theoretical underpinning for common sense strategy to fly a little more on the cautious side based on uncertainty

Constraint 2: Limited Altitude – R. Mathar, 1996 Q: What is the best strategy in order to minimize time from A to B given variable known lift conditions and limited altitude? Answer: Depends on glider performance and the altitude available. With limited glider performance and/or limited altitude the weakest lift needed to get around the task is dominant in determining optimum speed-to-fly Example: Key insight Provides theoretical underpinning for common sense strategy to fly a little more on the cautious side with limited altitude A B Ground 2 knots6 knots2 knots

Combining the Constraints – J. Cochrane, 1999 Q: What is the best strategy in order to minimize time from A to B given uncertain lift conditions and limited altitude? Answer: No closed form solution. Numerical investigation yields insights: Confirmation of standard McCready theory: Set McCready ring (Speed-to-fly computer) Fly best speed when lift below setting Circle, if above setting Additional insights relative to McCready theory: Lower the setting as you get lower Increase setting with altitude Use setting well below best climb of day Start final glides low & aggressive, end conservative Deficiencies: Thermals assumed static (daytime & height variability) Information driven discrete strategies (clouds, topography) Competitive dynamics (game theory, scoring asymmetries) Wind, ballast options etc. Key insight: Common sense is confirmed; implementation requires a statistical mindset when flying; real life too complicated for theory

Example of competitive analysis of G-Cup flights on May 19 th, 2003

A beautiful day…the weather on May 19 th, completions to analyze1K2, B21 (2 flights), DRT, FD2, PX, SM, TB, TUP

Early bird, doesn’t catch the worm… …but potentially gets to complete the G-Cup twice in a day! The Pros leave at ~1:30 pm… …with a few newcomers painting thermals on course for them

Rush, ΔΣ (=Delta Echo)! High Interthermal speed is not sufficient for success… …but beginners might take heart and lower that nose…

MacCready alright… Too much of a good thing…is a bad thing… …especially when easy does it!

...but in modesty lies wisdom indeed!

Time well spent…? Circling for lift is so 20 th century…

Scaling new heights Low energy consumption is the name of the game, even when energy is free

Summary of Relevant statistics

Summary of Relevant statistics 2