Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Inelastic Neutron Scattering: The Baghdad Atlas This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutron Activation Decay Data Richard B. Firestone Isotopes Project, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA DDEP Workshop 8-10 October.
Advertisements

Contributions to Nuclear Data by Radiochemistry Division, BARC
Evaluated Gamma-ray Activation File (EGAF) Richard B. Firestone Isotopes Project, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA IAEA NSDD Meeting,
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory SciDAC Reaction Theory LLNL-PRES Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P. O. Box 808, Livermore, CA
LBNL Isotopes Project Report
One-qusiparticle excitations of the heavy and superheavy nuclei A. Parkhomenko and and A.Sobiczewski Institute for Nuclear Studies, ul. Hoża 69, Warsaw.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Neutron capture cross sections on light nuclei M. Heil, F. Käppeler, E. Uberseder Torino workshop,
Single particle properties of heavy and superheavy nuclei. Aleksander Parkhomenko.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Using Nuclear Resonance Fluorescence to Isotopically Map Containers Micah S Johnson, D.P. McNabb This work performed.
The Nature of Molecules
Measurements of cross-sections of neutron threshold reactions and their usage in high energy neutron measurements Ondřej Svoboda Nuclear Physics Institute,
Periodic Table – Filling Order
Data processing in the Activation technique experiment. Making stacked or sandwiched in the repeated order of Al-Cu-Mo. Irradiation of the samples Using.
The Theory of Partial Fusion A theory of partial fusion is used to calculate the competition between escape (breakup) and absorption (compound-nucleus.
Background Subtraction in Next Generation 0  Experiments Double-Beta Decay Challenges in 0  Decay Detection Small 0νββ decay half-life leads to low.
Status and needs of activation data for fusion Robin Forrest 1 and Jura Kopecky 2 1 Euratom/UKAEA Fusion Association Culham Science Centre, UK 2 JUKO Research,
Futoshi Minato JAEA Nuclear Data Center, Tokai Theoretical calculations of beta-delayed neutrons and sensitivity analyses 1.
Nuclear Data and Applications
IAEA Nuclear Data Section, Vienna, Austria
Measurements of Neutron Activation of 76 Ge and 136 Xe James Esterline Megha Bhike, Josh Bradt, Brent Fallin, Sean Finch, Matt Gooden, Calvin Howell, John.
Please do not write on this document. Thank you. Atomic Radius Data Element Name Atomic Number Atomic Radius (pm) Height of Straws (cm) H He
LLNL-PRES This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.
INDIRECT DETERMINATION OF NEUTRON CAPTURE CROSS SECTIONS ON SPHERICAL AND NEAR-SPHERICAL NUCLEI USING THE SURROGATE METHOD Bethany L. Goldblum Berkeley.
139 Ba decay: precise half-life measurement and gamma-spectroscopy at BARC: an offshoot of ENSDF evaluation work. P.K.Joshi Homi Bhabha Centre for Science.
Studies of neutron cross-sections by activation method in Nuclear Physics Institute Řež and in The Svedberg Laboratory Uppsala and experimental determination.
Anti-neutrinos Spectra from Nuclear Reactors Alejandro Sonzogni National Nuclear Data Center.
Status of the Evaluated Gamma-ray Activation File (EGAF) Richard B. Firestone Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA
LLNL-PRES This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.
Cross-sections of Neutron Threshold Reactions Studied by Activation Method Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic Department.
Modern Periodic Table Objective:
April 17 DoE review 1 Reaction Theory in UNEDF Optical Potentials from DFT models Ian Thompson*, J. Escher (LLNL) T. Kawano, M. Dupuis (LANL) G. Arbanas.
LLNL-PRES This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.
International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Nuclear Data Section ENSDF Activities D. Abriola International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria 17 th Meeting.
A systematic study of  - decay of neutron-rich Rh and Ag isotopes Sixth China Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006 Youbao Wang.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Nicholas Scielzo Physics Division, Physical and Life Sciences LLNL-PRES Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
Radioactive beam spectroscopy of 212 Po and 213 At with the EXOGAM array Nick Thompson University of Surrey.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Physical Sciences Directorate - N Division Coupled Channel Calculations 06/25/2008 Gustavo P. A. Nobre
High Precision Decay Data for Medical Isotopes. Decay Data and Medical Isotopes Essential for determining: Overall dose Specific dose Imaging background.
Background Subtraction in Next Generation 0  Experiments Double-Beta Decay Challenges in 0  Decay Detection Benjamin Spaun Whitworth College Advisors:
LOMONOSOV MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY, SKOBELTSYN INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS Multi-particle photodisintegration of heavy nuclei A.N. Ermakov, B.S. Ishkhanov,
Ondřej Svoboda Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic Department of Nuclear Reactors, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical.
Neutron production in Pb/U assembly irradiated by deuterons at 1.6 and 2.52 GeV Ondřej Svoboda Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of Czech.
Santa Tecla, 2-9 October 2005Marita Mosconi,FZK1 Re/Os cosmochronometer: measurements of relevant Os cross sections Marita Mosconi 1, Alberto Mengoni 2,
Data Needs in Nuclear Astrophysics, Basel, June 23-25, 2006 Nuclear Astrophysics Resources of the National Nuclear Data Center B. Pritychenko*, M.W. Herman,
Pavel Oblozinsky NSDD’07, St. Petersburg June 11-15, 2007 ENDF/B-VII.0 Library and Use of ENSDF Pavel Oblozinsky National Nuclear Data Center Brookhaven.
EGAF Status 2015 Richard B. Firestone Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the University of California, Berkeley, 94720, USA 21 st Technical Meeting.
KIT – The Research University in the Helmholtz Association INSTITUTE for NEUTRON PHYSICS and REACTOR TECHNOLOGY (INR) Nuclear Data for Calculation.
48 Ti(n, xnyp  ) reaction cross sections using spallation neutrons for E n = 1 to 20 MeV Excitation functions have been measured for the interaction of.
Neutron production and iodide transmutation studies using intensive beam of Dubna Phasotron Mitja Majerle Nuclear Physics Institute of CAS Řež, Czech republic.
Three years of cross-section measurements of (n,xn) threshold reactions at TSL Uppsala and NPI Řež O. Svoboda, A. Krása, A. Kugler, M. Majerle, J. Vrzalová,
Report (2) on JPARC/MLF-12B025 Gd(n,  ) experiment TIT, Jan.13, 2014 For MLF-12B025 Collaboration (Okayama and JAEA): Outline 1.Motivation.
Investigation of the proton-induced reactions on natural molybdenum.
S2 SCIENCE CHEMICAL REACTIONS
Transmutation of spent nuclear fuel
Reactor anti-neutrinos and neutrinos
at TSL high energy neutron facility
Cross-section Measurements of (n,xn) Threshold Reactions
M-C simulation of reactor e flux;
Periodensystem Biomaterials Research - Manfred Maitz H He Li Be B C N
Emission of Energy by Atoms and Electron Configurations
Periodic Table of the Elements
4.2 IONIZATION ENERGY 4.6 TABLE 4.2 Ionization Energy of the Elements
PERIODIC TABLE OF ELEMENTS
Electron Configurations
DETECTION LIMITS < 1 ppt ng/L 1-10 ppt ng/L ppt ng/L
Line Spectra and the Bohr Model
Neutron production in Pb/U assembly irradiated by p+, d+ at 0. 7 – 2
O. Svoboda, A. Krása, A. Kugler, M. Majerle, J. Vrzalová, V. Wagner
Presentation transcript:

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Inelastic Neutron Scattering: The Baghdad Atlas This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC L.A. Bernstein Nuclear Structure and Decay Data Network Meeting IAEA – Vienna, Austria April 22, 2015 LLNL-PRES

2 (n,n’) sits at the intersection of structure and reactions (n,n’  ) cross section Evaluated (n,n’  ) cross sections Atlas (n,n’  ) data compilation 56 Fe (n,n’) for E n < 5-10 MeV is VERY sensitive to low-lying nuclear structure …amen Roberto *M.B. Chadwick et al. NDS 118 (2014) 1-25

3 Bauge* highlighted the uncertainty in reaction databases for (n,n el ) and (n,n’) in a prompt fission neutron spectrum +522 p.c.m p.c.m. *E. Bauge et al., Eur. Phys. J. A (2012) 48: 113 Other calls for (n,n’  ) data: “Below 2 MeV differences in 56 Fe(n,n’  ) are 28%”* “New measurements (in 56 Fe) have been requested between MeV” ** *M.B. Chadwick et al. NDS 118 (2014) 1-25 **

4 The most comprehensive collection of (n,n’) data was taken at the IRT-5000 reactor at the Al-Tuwaitha Nuclear Research Facility IRT-5000 Baghdad Nuclear Research Facility (Al-Tuwaitha) The same set-up was used for all measurements  consistency

5 Unfortunately, the facility was “decommissioned” by the US Air Force in 1991… …that he sent on to Brad Sleaford, Aaron Hurst and me Fortunately, Andrej had a copy… …that he sent to Rick… …and the IAEA is cleaning up the mess…

6 The data was released in the “Baghdad Atlas” (1978DE41) by Demidov, Govor, Ahmed et al., Atlas Specifics 7090  -rays 105 targets, 75 elements Separated Isotopes: Mo, Pd, Cd, Sn, Te, Sm, Dy, W Absolute  -ray yields normalized to the 56 Fe 2  847 keV

7 Most of the data in the Atlas (42 out of 75 nuclei) was not published in a form used in the evaluation process Demidov and Govor were focused on using (n,n’  ) as a collective structure probe in even-even heavy nuclei Based on NSR retrieval 1983AV08 34 nuclei in this reference, 14 of which were only present here and in the Atlas, However, it was not used in any structure evaluations

8 Avchukhov et al., reference from NSR 1983AV08 Yad.Fiz. 38, 817 (1983) Regular NSR V.D.Avchukhov, K.A.Baskova, A.B.Vovk, T.M.Gerus, L.I.Govor, A.M.DemidovV.D.Avchukhov, K.A.Baskova, A.B.Vovk, T.M.Gerus, L.I.Govor, A.M.Demidov On Excitation of Levels of Odd Nuclei in Inelastic Scattering of Fast Neutrons NUCLEAR REACTIONS 35 Cl, 39 K, 45 Sc, 47 Ti, 51 V, 55 Mn, 59 Co, 63,65 Cu, 69,71 Ga, 75 As, 79,81 Br, 85,87 Rb, 89 Y, 91 Zr, 93 Nb, 97 Mo, 105 Rh, 105 Pd, 107,109 Ag, 111,113 Cd, 115 In, 121,123 Sb, 127 I, 133 Cs, 141 Pr, 147 Sm, 207 Pb, 209 Bi(n, n'), E=fast; analyzed low-level population data; deduced statistical model validity. 55 Mn, 89 Y, 207 Pb, 209 Bi deduced collective effects.

9 The “Baghdad Atlas” included information about the target irradiation time and sample sizes to provide  det and target thickness info was provided to allow  -yield normalization to the 56 Fe 2  847 keV

10 The non-proliferation community at LLNL started the process of compiling the Atlas The Atlas was scanned and OCR-ed (Sleaford) Data was converted into an excel spreadsheet and normalized to the 847 keV 56 Fe line (Walston) Thanks to June Chen the data can be easily converted to ENSDF format using xls2ens

11 Structured Query Language (SQL) format for (n,n’  ) Atlas data User-defined data retrieval via 3 relational tables for data storage: “atlas”; “ensdf”; “normalization” ENSDF converted ATLAS data can be entered here. SQL Schema for Atlas of (n,n’  ) Data (Hurst)

12 Aaron Hurst translated the Atlas into an SQL database GUI can be used to manipulate data or execute SQL code All  -ray information from the ATLAS entered.

13 The Atlas data can be easily translated into ENSDF format using xls2ens. We have only done this so far for 56 Fe +

14 The energy dependence of the neutron flux (    ) was derived from a set of activation measurements Inelastic neutron scattering in the region A=11-40, L. Nichol and T. j. Kennet Neutron transport is being modeled by R. Slaybaugh and UC

15 Modeling of the partial  -ray cross sections using EMPIRE and TALYS (I. Abramovic) show little sensitivity to    Deviations between the Atlas and EMPIRE can be used to point to deficiencies in the low-lying off-yrast structure,  (J) etc. *All  -rays normalized to the yrast 2 + -> 0 +

16 Demidov et al., recognized the value of (n,n’  ) as a tool for nuclear structure studies (2004DE49) Abstract—Reactions of the (n,nγ) type proceed through a compound-nucleus stage; therefore, the excitation cross section is usually independent of the level nature. Accordingly, all of the excited states must manifest themselves in such reactions through γ transitions (with allowance for their internal conversion). In comparing the energy-level and γ-transition diagrams obtained in investigating γ rays from the inelastic scattering of fast reactor neutrons with the diagrams published in the last issues of Nuclear Data Sheets, it was found that 120 levels in 34 nuclei must be excluded from compiled data because the γ transitions expected from them were not observed. The case of the questionable first 3 − level in 56 Fe at 3076 keV is considered by way of example. It is concluded that there is no such level in 56 Fe.

17 We are performing complementary (n,n’  ) measurements using deuteron breakup at the 88-Inch cyclotron East Alley Cave 02 Cave 01 Bending Magnet Vault Breakup Target Switching Magnet From Cyclotron 03 meters Fe target 20% HPGe Our student-led experimental program: Josh Brown(G), Leo Kirsch (G) and Keegan Harrig (UG) E D =  MeV  n ≤ 10 4 n/s/cm 2 Preliminary E D =  MeV  n ≤ 10 7 n/s/cm 2 Preliminary Clearly we want to talk to Alexandru!

18 Last month we performed our first (n,n’) measurements using  coincidence (L. Kirsch) 56 Fe(n th,  ) is used for energy and efficiency calibration

19 The experiment revealed several new potential transitions at E  > 10 MeV Preliminary

20 Next Steps Compile “high priority” nuclides in the atlas into ENSDF format Model the partial  -ray production cross sections using EMPIRE and TALYS Complete modeling of the neutron beam- line to obtain the Atlas neutron energy spectrum Perform targeted (n,n’  ) measurements All of this leads to a (n,n’  ) horizontal evaluation

21 Collaborators on this work I. Abramovic 1, M.S. Basunia 2, D.L. Bleuel 3, J. A. Brown 4, R.B. Firestone 4, B.L. Goldblum 4, K. Harrig 4, M.W. Herman 5, A.M. Hurst 2, L. Kirsch 4, R. Slaybaugh 4 B.W. Sleaford 3, K.A. Van Bibber, J. Vujic 4, S. Walston 3 1 Eindhoven University 2 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 3 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 4 University of California-Berkeley Dept. of Nuclear Engineering 5 Brookhaven National Laboratory-NNDC