Economic Impacts of Specialty Crops in Wisconsin Paul D. Mitchell Ag & Applied Economics, UW-Madison Central Wisconsin Processing Crops March 9, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Minnesota Agriculture Profile Presented By:. Regional Patterns of Agriculture Production Forest Production/Mining Sugarbeets Dairy, Corn, Alfalfa, Soybeans.
Advertisements

Minnesota Agriculture Profile Presented By:. Regional Patterns of Agriculture Production Forest Production/Mining Sugarbeets, wheat, diversified Dairy,
Input-Output Analysis. Input-Output analysis creates a picture of a regional economy describing flows to and from industries and institutions.
Agriculture Science of growing plants and raising animals.
North Carolina Horticulture
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.

C ROP I NSURANCE O PTIONS FOR W ISCONSIN G RAPE G ROWERS Paul D. Mitchell Associate Professor, Agricultural & Applied Economics University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Economic impact of immigration in the Rural Midwest
DR. PAUL D. MITCHELL 418 TAYLOR HALL OVERVIEW OF WISCONSIN AGRICULTURE AAE 320: FARMING SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
Kevin Champeau Paul Larson. Agricultural Education is a part of Career and Technical Education Freedom High School Career Technical Education Agriculture.
Wis Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: Wisconsin 1.
Understanding the Agriculture Industry
Jessica Bloomberg Executive Director Iowa State Dairy Association April 16, 2013.
The Economics and Politics of U.S. Agricultural Policy James Dunn Pennsylvania State University.
“As the state’s second largest economic driver, it’s a sector ripe with opportunity for business expansion, job growth, and is a driving force in our.
California Agriculture is “Top Notch” America’s Top 5 Agricultural States #1 California$36.6 Billion #2 Texas$ 16.4 Billion #3 Iowa$ 14.6 Billion #4.
THE CALIFORNIA WATER CRISIS RISK TO THE CALIFORNIA FOOD SYSTEM CDFA BOARD MEETING Cornelius “Corny” Gallagher Chairman California Banking Association.
Economic Contributions of Florida Agriculture, Natural Resources, Food & Kindred Product Manufacturing, Distribution and Service Industries: 2008 Update.
Memorial Hospital’s Economic Impact on the Community Date.
2014 Food for America. Wisconsin Agriculture Facts We are ranked number 1 in: – Snap Beans – Cranberries – Carrots – Corn for Silage – Dairy Goats with.
Input-Output Model Basics Tom Harris University of Nevada, Reno University Center for Economic Development MS 204 Reno, NV and Gerald A. Doeksen.
Corn Seeding Densities and Transgenic Traits: Economics and Farmer Behavior Paul D. Mitchell Ag & Applied Economics, UW-Madison Wisconsin Crop Management.
Elliott D. Pollack & Company Goodwill Industries Operating in California Economic and Fiscal Impact 2012 Presented By: Elliott D. Pollack & company March.
Greenhouse and nursery products (flowers and shrubbery) generate 14% of Michigan's total agricultural revenues.
Measuring Extension Impacts Ruby Ward
Three Basics Provided by Ag Food Fiber/Clothes Leather, Cotton, Wool, Fur, Cashmere Shelter Lumber.
Insuring Forage Crops for SURE Eligibility and for Winter Cover Paul D. Mitchell Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Wisconsin-Madison (608)
Minnesota Agriculture Profile Presented By:. Regional Patterns of Agriculture Production Forest Production/Mining Sugarbeets, wheat, diversified Dairy,
Agriculture on Wheels ….taking Agriculture to the Classroom Pennsylvania Friends of Agriculture Pennsylvania Farm Bureau.
Chapter 23 – Policies that lower the price of food by increasing supply.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
MSAGED 7-2 Written by Melissa Moulton.  Food and fiber production and processing are key components of Georgia’s economy.  Georgia farmers produce a.
The Economics and Politics of U.S. Agricultural Policy James Dunn Pennsylvania State University.
Crop Insurance and Processing Vegetables: Farmer Practices and Net Returns Paul D. Mitchell Ag and Applied Economics, UW-Madison
Economic Impacts of U.S. Agricultural Trade on the South ORGANIZED SYMPOSIUM Southern Agricultural Economics Association 43rd Annual Meetings Program February.
United States Citizenship and Economics Debra Spielmaker Utah Agriculture in the Classroom Utah State University
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
Econ Quiz #5 In 2007, Wisconsin ranked ninth nationally in the total market value of agricultural products sold. Wisconsin’s agricultural producers sold.
Agriculture In Florida.  13 th Ranked state in overall agricultural production.  1 st Ranked state in citrus production.  2 nd Ranked state in production.
New Decision-Making Tool to Estimate the Net Benefit of Bt Corn in Wisconsin Paul D. Mitchell Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
New York is an Agricultural State Courtesy of the USDA, National Agricultural Statistical Service, New York Field Office.
Value of AGR-Lite for WI Vegetable Growers UW Extension & WPVGA Grower Conference February 7, 2007 Paul D. Mitchell Agricultural.
Imperial County Agriculture By Mr. Urie Info from Imperial County Farm Bureau.
Sponsored by the Plymouth FFA Chapter. Introduction of FFA members Introduction of FFA members – Name – Year in School – Career Goal – Favorite Wisconsin.
Recognizing the Importance of Agriculture. Revisiting the Definition of Agriculture On page 1 of your Know Book On page 1 of your Know Book Agriculture:
Using Multiplier Analysis to Evaluate the Economic Impacts of NRCS Spending in Utah Julie Nelson, State Economist, NRCS Utah The Economic Effects of NRCS.
“Wisconsin and the Agricultural Economy” (Steve Deller, Professor of Agriculture and Applied Economics. UW-Madison)
Areawide Suppression of European Corn Borer with Bt Corn Reaps Benefits for Non- Bt Growers Paul D. Mitchell Ag & Applied Economics, UW-Madison Central.
Overall objective -- to estimate the economic impact of the Medicaid program on Alaska’s economy. More specifically, the report will: 1.provide a brief.
Central Wisconsin Preliminary Food System Assessment Advisory Committee Meeting 1.
Overview of the Ontario Vegetable Industry Elaine Roddy Vegetable Crops Specialist OMAFRA Ridgetown.
Agriculture Historical patterns of cultivation in Wisconsin
The Economic Impact of Agriculture in Southern New Jersey
Update on Risk Management and Processing Crops
Overview of Wisconsin Agriculture AAE 320: Farming Systems Management
Local Foods Scenarios Using the MSU Local Foods Spreadsheet Model to introduce standard practices, terms, interpretation, and limitations.
TRENDS in CALIFORNIA ORGANIC AGRICULTURE
North Carolina Local Foods Scenarios
Agricultural Industry Profile
Agricultural Industry Profile
Introduction to Utah’s Agricultural Crops
Agricultural Industry Profile
2018 Wisconsin Agriculture Outlook Forum
2018 Wisconsin Agricultural Outlook Forum
Specialty Crop Situation and Outlook
Economic Impacts of U.S. Agricultural Trade on the South
The Emerging Role of Agriculture in Economic Development
Presentation transcript:

Economic Impacts of Specialty Crops in Wisconsin Paul D. Mitchell Ag & Applied Economics, UW-Madison Central Wisconsin Processing Crops March 9, 2011

Goal Today Present data on how important specialty crop production is in Wisconsin Not just farm cash receipts, but also economic multipliers and jobs generated Focus both on Production (farmers) and Processing (processing companies)

Products in Which WI Ranked in Top 5 Nationally in 2009 Dairy Milk (2 nd ), Cheese (1 st ), Whey (1 st ), Milk Cows (2 nd ), Milk Goats (1 st ) Field Crops Corn for Silage (1 st ), Oats (1 st ), Forage (2 nd ) Fruits Cranberries (1 st ), Tart Cherries (5 th ) Mint for Oil (6 th ), Strawberries (7 th )

Products in which WI Ranked in Top 5 Nationally in 2009 Potatoes and Processing Vegetables Potatoes (3 rd ), Carrots (2 nd ), Sweet Corn (3 rd ), Green Peas (3 rd ), Snap Beans (1 st ), Cucumbers for Pickles (5 th ) Miscellaneous Maple Syrup (4 th ), Mink Pelts (1 st ) Trout (8 th ) Others not in USDA Data Ginseng (1 st ) Horseradish (? Maybe 2 nd ?)

2010: WI 2 nd in Overall Production of Processing Vegetables (MN close 3 rd ) Sweet corn, snap beans, green peas, carrots, cucumbers, spinach, tomatoes, lima beans RankStateAreaStateProductionStateValue 1CA26.0%CA70.9%CA56.1% 2WI18.4%WI6.2%WI7.7% 3MN16.2%MN5.5%MN7.4% 4WA9.3%WA4.9%WA5.1% 5OR4.7%MI< 2%MI< 2%

2010: WI 2 nd in Overall Production of Processing Vegetables (MN close 3 rd ) Notice: does not include potatoes Processing crop value = $1.70 billion in US, 21% below largest crops in production: tomatoes, sweet corn, and snap beans = 92% US total 3 largest crops in value: tomatoes, sweet corn, and cucumbers = 81% US total

Three Types of Economic Impacts Direct: Money paid directly to farms as farm gate receipts for selling production Indirect: Farmers buy inputs, buy equipment, pay farm workers, use banks, etc. Induced: Farm workers and business employees spend direct and indirect dollars in economy for food, housing, local services, etc How direct and indirect dollars affect household income and hence local economy Add these three to get full Economic Impact

Estimating Economic Impacts Direct: Just add up farm gate receipts Quantity sold x Average price USDA-NASS 3-year average ( ) Estimate multipliers based on business type IMPLAN: county and state multipliers estimated based on large input/output models of the industries in each state and county Build multipliers based on tax records

Employment Impacts Same three as for economic impacts Direct: Jobs working directly in specialty crop production Indirect: Additional jobs resulting from indirect spending effects of specialty crop production Induced: Additional jobs resulting from increased household income induced by specialty crop production

Specialty Crop Production and Processing Economic Activity Multiplier About 1.5 for specialty crop production For each $1 of farm gate receipts, another $0.50 in indirect & induced economic activity About 1.7 for specialty crop processing Jobs/Employment Multiplier About 1.6 for specialty crop production About 2.6 for specialty crop processing For every 10 jobs in specialty crop processing, another 16 jobs due to indirect & induced economic activity

Economic Activity Summary: Specialty Crop Production Economic ActivityDirectIndirectInducedTotal Potatoes $240$66$43$349 Sweet Corn $57$16$10$83 Green Beans $43$12$8$63 Green Peas $18$5$3$26 Carrots, Cucumbers, Onions $19$5$4$28 Cranberries $199$55$46$300 Ginseng $11$3$2$16 All Vegetables $492$136$88$716 All Fruits $253$65$58$376 Specialty Crop Production $745$201$146$1,092

Jobs Summary: Specialty Crop Production JobsDirectIndirectInducedTotal Potatoes 1, ,770 Sweet Corn Green Beans Green Peas Carrots, Cucumbers, Onions Cranberries 2, ,400 Ginseng All Vegetables 3,2451, ,614 All Fruits 2, ,286 Specialty Crop Production 6,1002,4001,4009,900

Summary: Specialty Crop Production and Processing Economic ActivityDirectIndirectInducedTotal Specialty Crop Production $745$201$146$1,092 Specialty Crop Processing $3,063$1,629$576$5,268 Total $3,808$1,830$722$6,360 JobsDirectIndirectInducedTotal Specialty Crop Production 6,1002,4001,4009,900 Specialty Crop Processing 9,7009,6005,50024,800 Total 15,80012,0006,90034,700

Summary: Specialty Crops Production: Almost $1.1 billion annually and almost 10,000 jobs About 2/3 in Vegetable Production 32% from potatoes, 27% cranberries Processing: Almost $5.3 billion annually and almost 25,000 jobs Specialty Crops Nearly $6.4 billion annually (3% WI Economy) Nearly 35,000 jobs (1% WI jobs)

Context: Compare to 2007 Data (Deller and Williams 2009) Income ($ Billion) Jobs (1,000) Dairy On Farm$2.744 (51%)56.5 (43%) Specialty Crop Production$1.092 (21%)9.9 (7%) All On Farm$ Dairy Processing$7.210 (46%)115.5 (46%) Specialty Crop Processing$5.268 (34%)24.8 (10%) All Ag Processing$ All Ag$ Specialty Crop Production 5% 3% Specialty Crop Processing 26% 7%

Main Point What you do is important to the WI economy Created a 10 page document and sent to the various grower and industry organizations WI Potato & Vegetable Growers Assoc. WI State Cranberry Assoc. Ginseng Board of WI Mid-West Food Processors Assoc. Trying to get the word out!

Questions or Comments? Paul D. Mitchell UW-Madison Ag & Applied Economics Office: (608) Cell: (608) Extension Web Page: