 Increasing concerns about the nursing profession in the U.K.  Concern from NMC over the number of new registrants reported for fitness for practice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presenting: Units A1 and A2
Advertisements

Stage One: Registrant Mentor, (N.M.C., 2006).
Good Medical Practice Evidence to use for Appraisal Good Medical Practice 2006.
Midwifery Mentor Update: Overview of programmes: BSc 2013 Three year (28 students) and Post Experience (6 students) MSc 2013 Three year: Graduate.
Guide to Intern Assessment Processes for Interns.
General Practice Introduction to the eportfolio and the MRCGP KSS Deanery 2014 Dr Susan Bodgener Associate Dean for Assessment KSS Deanery.
Mentor Update March 2015.
Midwifery Programme Overview Health and Well Being Sheffield Hallam University.
Mentor Update The Pre-registration Nursing Assessment Documentation June 2006 Universities of Leeds Practice Partners.
Mentor Update 2007 – Content includes: B71 / B73 SPL Supporting Practice Learning Module, Continuity of Practice Assessment Record, Sign-off Mentor.
PEF/Oct/2007Developed by W. Ainsworth, S.Davies, D.Hassle, S.Parks, M.Wallen Briefing session on the NMC Standards to Support Learning and Assessment in.
Produced by: David Kinnell (Lecturer), May Mentor Update (short version) includes: Student’s Documentation in Practice. Continuity of Practice Assessment.
A Brief overview of the Standards to support learning and assessment in practice. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2006) Standard to Support Learning and.
ADNS/BANS: Assessment of Practice Document update: September 2008 Presentation N.C/L.J 19/11/08.
Mentor Update SM Davis.
Supervising Students in Social Work Placements in Wales and the U.K. Paula McCreary. Tutor and Placement Coordinator, Dept. of Applied Social Science,
Stage One: Registrant, (N.M.C., 2006). Student Handout. (May, 2008).
An overview of the proposed new system of revalidation for nursing March 2015 RCN Policy & International Department.
Northern Ireland Practice and Education Council for Nursing and Midwifery Lesley Barrowman Barbara Bradley.
A Brief overview of the Standards to Support Learning and Assessment in Practice. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2006) Standard to Support Learning and.
Mentor Update 11/12 University Campus Suffolk. Mentor Update Format: Professional Update Scenario with group work focusing on: Ethics Professional Assessment.
Mentor Update 2007/8. Update format Aims and objectives for this update Suffolk College and NMC standard changes Discussion points Questions and answer.
Produced by David Kinnell, Lecturer.. The purpose of annual updating is to ensure that mentors: Have current knowledge of NMC approved programmes, Are.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING
Mentor Update 13/14 University Campus Suffolk. Mentor Update:  Embedding NHS values   Review of new NMC Competencies  2013 Nursing Curriculum  Facilitating.
Mentor Workshop: Assessing Learners Facilitated by a Practice Education Facilitator.
Midwifery Programme Overview Health and Well Being Sheffield Hallam University.
PGCE Full-time SE3 Briefing March Aims Be aware of the expectations of SE3 Understand what is expected of you during the block experience Understand.
Mentorship Preparation Programme Week 6 Clinical Assessment processes Queen’s University Belfast Open University University of Ulster.
Module 5: Quality assurance. What is a quality assurance system? A quality assurance system measures the performance of a service against a range of standards.
Tomorrow’s Workforce Compassion Education Transformation Mentor Guide to Practice Assessment Year One 2012.
An update on revalidation for Nurses and Midwives in NHS Fife
College of Health and Social Care SCHOOL OF NURSING, MIDWIFERY & SOCIAL WORK BSc (Hons) Nursing - Registered Nurse Award in 3 Fields of Practice Pathways.
Mentor Update 10/11 University Campus Suffolk. Triennial Reviews The majority of mentors/sign off mentors at must have had their first TR by September.
NMC Revalidation Staff Briefing
Mentorship Preparation Programme Queen’s University Belfast Open University University of Ulster Session 1.
Mentor Update, (2008) – Extended Version. Content includes: B71 / B73 SPL Supporting Practice Learning Module, Continuity of Practice Assessment Record,
Joint HEI-Mentor Update-Sept Supporting Learning and Assessment in Practice Edge Hill University Liverpool John Moores University University of.
Institute of Health and Society Ruth Pearce. BSc (Hons) Midwifery Portfolio embedded within curriculum Clinical Practice = 50% of programme Clinical Practice.
Mentor Workshop: Supporting and Managing the Underachieving Students Facilitated by a Practice Education Facilitator.
Review of Midwifery Supervision Workshop 20 th April 2015 ‘Revalidation’ Are you ready?
Sign-off Mentor (ReviewedJan 2011) (The NMC Standards to support learning and assessment in practice can be accessed from the main menu of the Placement.
NMC Standards to Support Learning and Assessment in Practice Lesley Barrowman Senior Professional Officer NIPEC.
Paramedic Science Mentor update. Practice Assessment Team Current Teaching and Assessing Qualifications Assessment Taxonomy Assessment Documents Assessment.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
Building and keeping a revalidation portfolio
Joint HEI Mentor Update Supporting Learning and Assessment in Practice Edge Hill University Liverpool John Moores University University of Liverpool.
Safeguarding the public: Through ensuring Fitness to Practise.
V150 Prescribing for Community Practitioners Practice Learning and Assessment.
Building and keeping a revalidation portfolio Building a repository of evidence for revalidation.
UNISON Insert name of Branch here Presented by Insert name of presenter here NMC Revalidation.
Exploring delegation a workshop for registered staff Louise Williams Healthcare Support Worker Development Coordinator, Powys Teaching Health Board.
Introduction to the eportfolio and the MRCGP HEEKSS 2015 Dr Susan Bodgener Associate Dean of Assessment, HEEKSS.
Adey, Sofia, Liz THE DATA PROTECTION Act 1998 defines a health record as any electronic or paper information recorded about a person for the purpose of.
Day 2.1 Planning a Practice Curriculum  Small group review of SWOT analysis. Identify learning available and constraints Identify different specialities.
FOUNDATION PROGRAMME – 2016 CURRICULUM Dr Mike Masding Head of Wessex Foundation School AoMRC Foundation Programme Committee.
School of Health and Life Sciences Glasgow Caledonian University.
Practice learning and assessment for V150 programme
Sign Off Mentor Preparation
NQT Mentor and Tutor Seminar
Introduction to the Mentorship Course
Supporting Students Through Fitness to Practise Hisham Khalil and Liz Hellier Students matter Conference 17 April, 2018.
Standards for student supervision and assessment (change title as required) Add in presenters name; title & date.
Sue West Senior Nursing Education Adviser Rachel Mawby,
Practice Assessment Documentation: Child field of practice
CORE MENTOR UPDATE 2019 January This is the final version of the core update completed by the Midlands, Yorkshire and East Practice Learning Group.
CORE MENTOR UPDATE 2019 January This is the final version of the core update completed by the Midlands, Yorkshire and East Practice Learning Group.
CORE MENTOR UPDATE 2019 January This is the final version of the core update completed by the Midlands, Yorkshire and East Practice Learning Group.
Evidence to use for Appraisal Good Medical Practice 2006
Action planning.
Presentation transcript:

 Increasing concerns about the nursing profession in the U.K.  Concern from NMC over the number of new registrants reported for fitness for practice issues  Concern from patients via Safeguarding the public (Patient’s Association)  Concerns from the profession itself

 Concerns from research;  Duffy (2003) report identified that mentors in practice were reluctant to fail students who were not performing.  Hunt(2010) found that in England some students were being allowed to pass clinical assessments without having demonstrated competence  She found that some mentors did not feel that it was their role to fail students  Almost half of mentors in the survey agreed that students were sometimes passed when not competent

 In England, failure rates for theoretical assessments outstrip failure rates for practical assessments by 5 to 1…how does a student pass practice if they have insufficient theoretical knowledge?  Students most likely to pass in Yr 3, most likely to fail in Yr 1…but wouldn’t logic indicate that as things get harder less should pass?

 The sign-off mentor, is responsible and accountable for making the final sign-off in practice – confirming that a student has successfully completed all practice requirements.  This confirmation will contribute to the portfolio of evidence considered by the University’s examination board.

 Only sign-off mentors and practice teachers that are on the same part of the register and in the same field of practice may confirm to the NMC that students have met the relevant standards of proficiency for the particular programme leading to registration or a qualification that is recordable on the NMC register.

 Identified on the local register as a sign-off mentor or practice teacher  Registered on the same part of the register  Working in the same field of practice And in addition have:  Clinical currency and capability in the field of practice in which the student is being assessed  Met the NMC requirements to remain on the local register  Been supervised on at least 3 occasions for signing off proficiency at the end of a final placement by an existing sign-off mentor or practice teacher  A working knowledge of current programme requirements, practice assessment strategies and relevant changes in education and practice for the student they are assessing  An understanding of the NMC registration requirements and the contribution they make to meeting these requirements  An in-depth understanding of their accountability to the NMC for the decision they make to pass or fail a student when assessing proficiency requirements at the end of a programme

 In order to be identified as a ‘Sign-off’ mentor four activities should be completed. 1. Attendance at a local Sign Off mentor workshop 2. Completion of the scenarios in the sign off mentor workbook 3. Sign-off a final year, final placement student in your area (nursing). Sign off a student at a progression point (midwifery) 4. Completion and return of the Statement of Achievement to the appropriate mentor register administrator (MRA)

 Professional accountability remains the same. Currently, as a mentor signing to pass a student in the final placement period you are confirming to the NMC that they are fit to go on the professional register. This is what a sign-off mentor will do, but you will have access to more information to support the decision to pass or fail that student.

 Students carry responsibility for their actions: ◦ To question if they are unsure ◦ To say if they are not happy about something you have asked them to do ◦ To work within their sphere of competence ◦ To follow local policies and procedures

 All Mentors involved in progression decisions throughout the student’s programme are responsible too; ◦ For maintaining safety of clients ◦ For supervising students (close or distant supervision) ◦ For making sure students know where to find local policies and procedures ◦ For finding out how competent students are (and not just by asking them) ◦ For enabling students to learn effectively ◦ To fail weak students

 Professional accountability for the actions of a student rests with an NMC registrant who is supervising the student (whether close or distant supervision) at any time. This may change from day to day depending on the supervision arrangements.  Professional accountability for the decision to pass or fail a student at the end of a placement rests with the mentor who supervises them for that placement.  Aa a sign-off mentor you will not be expected to re-assess decisions made by previous mentors

 In order to make a judgement regarding the student’s suitability to progress ◦ You must satisfy yourself that the student is competent in each learning outcome ◦ You might need to use different sources of evidence (observation, question and answer, simulation) ◦ You must record any concerns that you have ◦ You must make the student aware of any concerns you have and give them a chance to make the necessary improvements ◦ You must involve others (mentors, practice supervisors, academic supervisors) if you have concerns

 The NMC requires that sign-off mentors have time to reflect, give feedback and keep records of student achievement in their final period of practice learning  The NMC suggests that this should be the equivalent of an hour per student per week  This is in addition to the 40% of the student’s time to be supervised by a mentor

 For nursing programmes, yes – there are some additional things expected of a sign-off mentor in the final placement that will mean the assessment will take more time ◦ As a sign-off mentor you will be expected to review previous practice assessment documentation to ensure any concerns raised earlier in the programme have been appropriately addressed ◦ This does not mean you question the judgements of previous mentors, just that you are satisfied that all appropriate assessments have been made

As a sign-off mentor you were reviewing a student’s practice assessment documentation and you noticed that a concern was raised during a second year placement. It was documented that the student did not always recognise and appropriately report signs of deterioration in a patient’s condition. The student had not failed the placement but the personal supervisor and student had identified this as an area in need of specific attention in the next placement. You then looked through subsequent assessments and noted that no further problems of this nature had been identified and mentor comments suggested that the student had adequately addressed this issue. During your own supervision and assessment of the student in the final placement you make sure, through observation, questioning and discussion, that this is no longer a concern about the student’s performance.

 Once someone is on the professional register they are accountable for their own actions  As the sign-off mentor (or as a mentor now), you are only likely to face a formal proceeding if: ◦ You have taken on the role of mentor/sign-off mentor without having the appropriate qualification or authorisation for doing so ◦ You have been reckless in your decision-making

 Mentors and sign-off mentors should always take account of the input of other members of the team when dealing with assessment decisions  Concerns and worries should always be shared with the link lecturer/PLF/student’s personal supervisor to ensure support from the programme providers  Updates and meetings will provide further advice and guidance – make sure you access regularly  Many placement areas have an identified lead for student issues (e.g. lead nurse for education, learning environment manager). Find out if your area has someone like this.

 You are happy with the student’s competence but they have only just scraped through all previous assessments.  How does this knowledge influence your decision to pass or fail?

 All the previous assessments are good but you are not happy with the student’s competence.  How do the previous assessments influence your decision to pass or fail?

 You are concerned about the student’s competence and your concerns are echoed by the previous mentors.  How does this knowledge affect your decision?

 The sign-off mentor has a major role in safeguarding service users, carers, colleagues and the general public from students who are not fit to enter the register.

 Duffy. K (2003) Failing Students. London;NMC  Glasper.A (2010) Additional options for achieving sign off mentor status. British Journal of Nursing. 19(11):  Hunt. L, McGee. P (2011) Assessing Student Nurses in Practice: A Comparison of Theoretical and Practical Assessment Results in England. UCE Health & Social Care Research Centre  Nursing and Midwifery Council (2008) Standards to Support Learning and Assessment in Practice. London;NMC.