Two-Dimensional Gas Dynamics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Example 3.4 A converging-diverging nozzle (Fig. 3.7a) has a throat area of m2 and an exit area m2 . Air stagnation conditions are Compute.
Advertisements

Graphs of the Sine, Cosine, & Tangent Functions Objectives: 1. Graph the sine, cosine, & tangent functions. 2. State all the values in the domain of a.
Non-frictional Source of Entropy Generation… P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Rotational Inviscid Flows.
Operating Characteristics of Nozzles P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi From Takeoff to cruising …… Realizing New.
10 o d e f g h i M=2 Method of characteristics solution for wave reflection from wall, showing PowerPoint construction of flow field, for a total turn.
Chapter 12: Compressible Flow
Chap 5 Quasi-One- Dimensional Flow. 5.1 Introduction Good approximation for practicing gas dynamicists eq. nozzle flow 、 flow through wind tunnel & rocket.
Example 3.1 Air flows from a reservoir where P = 300 kPa and T = 500 K through a throat to section 1 in Fig. 3.4, where there is a normal – shock wave.
Analysis of Oblique Shocks P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi A Mild, Efficient and Compact Compressor ….
Ch4 Oblique Shock and Expansion Waves
Discovery of A Strong Discontinuity P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi A Break Through Finding To Operate.
Team 18: Design Optimization of a Supersonic Nozzle
Scalar-Vector Interaction for better Life …… P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Vector Analysis : Applications to.
An Ultimate Combination of Physical Intuition with Experiments… P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Boundary Layer.
The Thrust Generator P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Another Passive Device…… An Obvious Concept for Generation of Motive Power.
Description can be an Imagination, but Action must be Real …… P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Material Derivative.
MAE 4262: ROCKETS AND MISSION ANALYSIS
1 CFD Analysis Process. 2 1.Formulate the Flow Problem 2.Model the Geometry 3.Model the Flow (Computational) Domain 4.Generate the Grid 5.Specify the.
If the shock wave tries to move to right with velocity u 1 relative to the upstream and the gas motion upstream with velocity u 1 to the left  the shock.
Stagnation Properties P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Capacity of A Resource…..
Ch9 Linearized Flow 9.1 Introduction
Analysis of A Disturbance in A Gas Flow P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Search for More Physics through.
PTT 204/3 APPLIED FLUID MECHANICS SEM 2 (2012/2013)
MAE 3241: AERODYNAMICS AND FLIGHT MECHANICS
P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi
Two Dimensional Steady State Heat Conduction
Analysis of Expansion Waves P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Another Zero Cost Nozzle …..
Quasi - One Dimensional Flow with Heat Addition P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi A Gas Dynamic Model for Combustion.
Slide Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.
CP502 Advanced Fluid Mechanics Compressible Flow Lectures 5 and 6 Steady, quasi one-dimensional, isentropic compressible flow of an ideal gas in a variable.
One Dimensional Flow of Blissful Fluid -III P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Always Start with simplest Inventions……..
Basics of GAS DYNAMICS P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Alphabets of this new literature called Gas Dynamics.
One Dimensional Flow with Heat Addition
Gas Dynamics of Variable Area Ducts P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Development of Efficient and Compact Passive.
Numerical Investigation of Hydrogen Release from Varying Diameter Exit
Design of Supersonic Intake / Nozzle P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Meeting the Cruising Conditions…
255. Airplane model in free flight at M=1
MAE 3241: AERODYNAMICS AND FLIGHT MECHANICS
Convection in Flat Plate Boundary Layers P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi A Universal Similarity Law ……
An Ultimate Combination of Physical Intuition with Experiments… P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Boundary Layer.
Steps in Development of 2 D Turbine Cascades P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department A Classical Method Recommended by Schlichting.……
© Fox, Pritchard, & McDonald Introduction to Fluid Mechanics Chapter 13 Compressible Flow.
Design & Aerodynamics of Inlets & Nozzles P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Understanding of Real Flow Through Passive Devices…….
Reflection of Oblique Shocks P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi A Train of Waves ….. Where to End ???
Gas Dynamics of Flow through Valves Method to Estimate the Flow Capacity of Valve Passage…. P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department.
Theory of Turbine Cascades P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Its Group Performance, What Matters.……
Great Innovations are possible through General Understanding …. P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Thermodynamic View.
I- Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD-I)
Design and analysis of Parabolic nozzle using MOC and CFD
Stagnation Properties
One Dimensional Flow of Blissful Fluid -III
Mach’s Vision of Flying
MAE 4262: ROCKETS AND MISSION ANALYSIS
Blade Design for Modern Wind Turbines
Shock Wave/ Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions on a Cylinder
Gas Dynamics for Design of Nozzles
Figure 2.9 T-s diagram for converging only nozzle
P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department
Design of Passive (Adiabatic) Control Volumes
Gas Dynamics for Study of Critically Off-Design Conditions
Vector Calculus for Measurements in Thermofluids
Estimation of Profile Losses
MAE 5380: ROCKETS AND MISSION ANALYSIS
Section 11 Lecture 2: Analysis of Supersonic Conical Flows
CHAPTER THREE NORMAL SHOCK WAVES
Second Order-Partial Differential Equations
Control of Entropy Generation due to Shock
Analysis of Hyperbolic SO-PDES
Section 8, Lecture 1, Supplemental Effect of Pressure Gradients on Boundary layer • Not in Anderson.
Introduction to Fluid Mechanics
Presentation transcript:

Two-Dimensional Gas Dynamics P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi More Realistic Modeling of Real Applications….

Geometrical Description of Wing Sweep Section A—A

Equivalent 2-D Flow on Swept Wing • Freestream Mach number resolved into 3 components i) vertical to wing … ii) in plane of wing, but tangent to leading edge iii) in plane of wing, but normal to leading edge Flow past a wing can be split into two independent 2D Flows.

An Approach to 2D Compressible Flow

Generalization of Prandtl-Meyer Expansion Fan • Consider flow expansion around an infinitesimal corner • From Law of Sines

Consider flow compression around an infinitesimal corner Mach Wave m dq V-dV V V dq V s i n p 2 - m + d q æ è ç ö ø ÷ =

• Generalization of “ Differential form” of Prandtl-Meyer wave • For an infinitesimal disturbance (mach wave)

Characteristic Lines • Right running characteristic lines Slope: q  m • C- “right running” characteristic Line is a Generalization For infinitesimal expansion corner flow

• Left and Right running characteristic lines Slope: q + m • C+ “left running” characteristic Line is a Generalization infinitesimal compression corner flow

Characteristic Lines • Supersonic “compatibility” equations • Apply along “characteristic lines” in flow field

Regions of Influence and Domains of Dependence D strongly feels the influence of B,C A D

Regions of Influence and Domains of Dependence

Basic principle of Methods of Characteristics

Compatibility Equations Compatibility Equations relate the velocity magnitude and direction along the characteristic line. • In 2-D and quasi 1-D flow, compatibility equations are Independent of spatial position, in 3-D methods, space becomes a player and complexity goes up considerably • Computational Machinery for applying the method of Characteristics are the so-called “unit processes” • By repeated application of unit processes, flow field Can be solved in entirety.

Unit Process 1: Internal Flow Field • Conditions Known at Points {1, 2} • Point {3} is at intersection of {C+, C-} characteristics

“Method of Characteristics” • Basic principle of Methods of Characteristics -- If supersonic flow properties are known at two points in a flow field, -- There is one and only one set of properties compatible* with these at a third point, -- Determined by the intersection of characteristics, or mach waves, from the two original points.

( ) { } ( ) P o i n t { 1 } ® M , q k w n = g + - t a M ì í ï î ü ý þ 2 ( ) ì í ï î ü ý þ A l o n g C - { } ® q 1 + = c s t K ( )

( ) { } ( ) P o i n t { 2 } ® M , q k w n = g + 1 - t a M ì í ï î ü ý þ A l o n g C + { } ® q 2 - = c s t K ( )

Flow Direction solved for at Mach and Flow Direction solved for at Point 3 q 3 = 1 + n ( ) 2 - K é ë ê ù û ú P o i n t { 3 } ® q 1 + = 2 - é ë ê ù û ú ® M 3 = S o l v e n g + 1 - t a 2 ( ) ì í ï î ü ý þ é ë ê ù û ú

But where is Point {3} ? • {M,q} known at points {1,2,3} ---> {m1,m2,m3} known

Intersection locates point 3 • Slope of characteristics lines approximated by: Intersection locates point 3

Unit Process 1: Internal Flow Example

• Point 1, compute

• Point 2, compute

• Point 3 Solve for

• Point 3 Solve for M3 = 2.3419 ---> m = 25.2776o

• Locate Point 3 • Line Slope Angles

• Solve for {x3,y3}

• Solve for {x3,y3}

• Solve for {x3,y3} x3= =2.2794

• Solve for {x3,y3} y3= =1.726

Unit Process 2: Wall Point • Conditions Known at Points {4}, Wall boundary at point 5

• Iterative solution

• Iterative solution • Pick q5

• Pick q5 • Solve for

• Solve for Mach angle, C- slope • In Similar manner as before find intersection of C- and surface mold line .. Get new q5, repeat iteration

Unit Process 3: Shock Point • Conditions Known at Points {6}, Shock boundary at point 7 Freestream Mach Number Known • Along C+ characteristic • Iterative Solution

• Iterative solution Repeat • Pick 7---> Oblique Shock wave solver M, q7 ---> M7 (behind shock) • Iterative solution Repeat Using new q7 until convergence

• Pick q7---> Oblique Shock wave solver ---> M7 • Iterative solution

• But • Iterative solution

Initial Data Line • Unit Processes must start somewhere .. Need a datum from which too start process • Example nozzle flow … Throat

Supersonic Nozzle Design • Strategic contouring will “absorb” mach waves to give isentropic flow in divergent section

• Rocket Nozzle (Minimum Length) • Wind tunnel diffuser (gradual expansion) • Find minimum length nozzle with shock-free flow

Minimum Length Nozzle Design • Find minimum length nozzle with shock-free flow • Along C+ characteristic {b,c} C+ • Along C- characteristic {a,c} q=0 C-

• Find minimum length nozzle with shock-free flow • Along C- characteristic {a,c} at point a C+ • But from Prandtl-Meyer expansion C-

C+ C-

• Criterion for Minimum Length Nozzle • Length for a given expansion angle is more important than the precise shape of nozzle …

Minimum Length Nozzle: Construction Example • Use Method of characteristics, compute and graph contour for two-D minimum length nozzle for a design exit mach number of 2.0 Mexit = 2.0

= 26.3798o = 13.1899o

Point K- = K+ =  =  = M  = #  +   - v 1/2(K-+K+) 1/2(K--K+) (deg), (deg), (deg), (deg). (deg), 1 0.38 0 0.19 0.19 1.026 77.14 2 2.38 0 1.19 1.19 1.092 66.29 3 8.38 0 4.19 4.19 1.225 54.88 4 14.38 0 7.19 7.19 1.337 48.42 5 20.38 0 10.19 10.19 1.442 43.92 6 26.38 0 13.19 13.19 1.544 40.40 7 26.38 0 13.19 13.19 1.544 40.40 8 2.38 -2.38 0 2.38 1.150 60.41 9 8.38 -2.38 3 5.38 1.271 51.90 10 14.38 -2.38 6 8.38 1.379 46.69 11 20.38 -2.38 9 11.38 1.482 42.44 12 26.38 -2.38 12 14.38 1.584 39.16 13 26.38 -2.38 12 14.38 1.584 39.17

Point K- = K+ =  =  = M  = #  +   - v 1/2(K-+K+) 1/2(K--K+) (deg), (deg), (deg), (deg). (deg), 14 8.38 -8.38 0 8.38 1.379 46.49 15 14.38 -8.38 3 11.38 1.482 42.44 16 20.38 -8.38 6 14.38 1.584 39.16 17 26.38 -8.38 9 17.38 1.685 36.40 18 26.38 -8.38 9 17.38 1.685 36.40 19 14.38 -14.38 0 14.38 1.584 39.16 20 20.38 -14.38 3 17.38 1.684 36.40 21 26.38 -14.38 6 20.38 1.788 34.00 22 26.38 -14.38 6 20.38 1.788 34.00 23 20.38 -20.38 0 20.38 1.788 34.00 24 26.38 -20.38 3 23.38 1.893 31.89 25 26.38 -20.38 3 23.38 1.893 31.89 26 26.38 -26.38 0 26.38 2.000 30.00 27 26.38 -26.38 0 26.38 2.000 30.00

Physical Meaning of Characteristic Lines • Schlieren Photo of Supersonic nozzle flow with roughened wall