DR. PAUL A. BUKAVECKAS VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY Developing water quality standards to Protect the James River against Impacts from Algal Blooms.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Framework for the Ecological Assessment of Impacted Sediments at Mining Sites in Region 7 By Jason Gunter (R7 Life Scientist) and.
Advertisements

Water Quality in Catchments and its Impact on Human and Ecological Health Kenneth H. Reckhow Duke University.
I will be examining how chlorophyll relates to exceedences in the following water quality parameters (criteria/thresholds in parentheses): 1.
The MWRA outfall monitoring program. What we measure and what we have observed so far.
James River Chlorophyll Study Status Update: January 2015 House Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources Committee David K. Paylor, DEQ Director.
Modeling Support for James River Chlorophyll Study Dave Jasinski, CEC Jim Fitzpatrick, HDR|HrydroQual Andrew Parker, Tetra Tech Harry Wang, VIMS Jian Shen,
Water Policy in the US and the EU K H Reckhow and C Pahl-Wostl Part I: US Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
WP12. Hindcast and scenario studies on coastal-shelf climate and ecosystem variability and change Why? (in addition to the call text) Need to relate “today’s”
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
Chesapeake Bay Program Presented by: Elizabeth Mills, Heather Plumridge, Elizabeth Repko Possibilities, Problems, and Promise.
1 Issue: Society Depends on Ecosystem Modeling to Predict Threats and Minimize Risk.
Maintaining healthy watersheds in the Chesapeake LGAC meeting December 4, 2014 Mark Bryer The Nature Conservancy Chair, Healthy Watershed Goal Team.
Harmful Algal Blooms and Microcystin in the Tidal Fresh James River, Joe Wood, Ph.D. - Chesapeake Bay Foundation *Research performed while at VCU.
1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Building the scientific foundation for sound environmental decisions U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office.
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment National Water Quality Monitoring Council Meeting August 20, 2003.
Tom Singleton Associate VP, Director, Integrated Water Resources an Atkins company Linking TMDLs & Environmental Restoration.
LCA Mississippi River Hydrodynamic and Delta Management Study (MRHDMS) Carol Parsons Richards River Studies Manager Governor’s Advisory Commission on Coastal.
Neuse Estuary Eutrophication Model: Predictions of Water Quality Improvement By James D. Bowen UNC Charlotte.
How much of our planet is H 2 O? BIOL 3240 Plant and Animal Ecology – Life in Water.
Lake Tahoe TMDL Science Objectives l What are sources and relative contributions of “contaminants” causing clarity decline? l How much of a reduction is.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Model Upgrade Projects Blue Plains Regional Committee Briefing November 30, 2004 Presented by: Steve Bieber Metropolitan Washington.
MJ Paul Tetra Tech Inc. Center for Ecological Sciences RTP, NC USING BIOLOGICAL RESPONSES IN NUTRIENT CRITERIA DEVELOPMENT: APPLICATIONS, OPPORTUNITIES,
Submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) abundance and diversity in the tidal Potomac River and estuary By Nancy Rybicki, Jurate Landwehr, Edward Schenk, and.
Science Advisory Panel Data Analysis Workgroup Paul Bukaveckas July
THE LOW DOWN ON RISK ASSESSMENT HOW SAFE ARE OUR CITIES?
Biotic controls on microbial communities in estuarine and riverine habitats Trisha Pascal-Lopez Microbial Ecology Lab, Mentors: Rima Franklin, Ph.D, and.
Groundwater chemical status in Denmark Klaus Hinsby, GEUS Climate change and adaptive water management in EU and beyond: Themeday at ATV winter meeting.
Chesapeake Bay Hypoxia: History and Management Response Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science Chesapeake Bay Program Office U.S. Environmental Protection.
NarrCHRP: Ecological Modeling Mark J. Brush Virginia Institute of Marine Science Annual Managers’ Meeting CHRP Narragansett Bay Project October 2008.
TMDLs and Statistical Models Kenneth H. Reckhow Duke University.
Comments on the Research of Dr. Bob Musselman (Atmospheric Deposition Research) Allen S. Lefohn, Ph.D. A.S.L. & Associates Helena, Montana August 10, 2005.
OLC-OST Environmental Protection Program Research and Educational Collaboration Charles Jason Tinant, OLC Robert Pille, OLC Delinda Simmons, OST EPP Hannan.
This project is supported by the NASA Interdisciplinary Science Program The Estuarine Hypoxia Component of the Coastal Ocean Modeling Testbed: Providing.
Transitioning a Chesapeake Bay Ecological Prediction System to Operations 1. Introduction NOAA’s National Weather Service (NWS) Draft Strategic Plan (22.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Anne Schlegel VA DEQ November 16, Two Discussion Topics Presentations at the recent SAP meeting Glance at a couple of the “take homes” from 2 of.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
State Agency Needs for Remote Sensing Data Related to Water Quality By Bob Van Dolah Marine Resources Research Institute South Carolina Department of Natural.
Detecting Ecological Effects of Development in the Wappingers and Fishkill Watersheds Karin Limburg, Karen Stainbrook, Bongghi Hong SUNY College of Environmental.
Development of Nutrient Water Quality Standards for Rivers and Streams in Ohio Ohio EPA ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center. Temporal Changes in SAV Coverage Total # of Species Total No. of All Species Eurasian Watermilfoil Dominant.
 Salinity: Salinity is the concentration of dissolved salts in the water and is an important element of a  habitat. Aquatic animals are adapted to living.
Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.
-WHAT IS A PROJECT ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION PLAN? -WHY ARE WE ASKING GRANTEES TO ASSESS, EVALUATE, & REPORT PERFORMANCE & WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS? - HOW DO.
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Nitrogen loading from forested catchments Marie Korppoo VEMALA catchment meeting, 25/09/2012 Marie Korppoo, Markus Huttunen 12/02/2015 Open DATA: Nutrient.
High Rock Lake Nutrient Modeling Update Pam Behm - NC Division of Water Resources Environmental Management Commission Water Quality Committee Information.
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
K. Bruce Jones EPA Office of Research and Development U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board Regional Vulnerability Assessment Advisory Panel Meeting October,
Topic 4: Water and aquatic food production systems and societies Topic 4.4: Water Pollution Starter: 1) List as many sources of water pollution as you.
Hypoxia Forecasts as a Tool for Chesapeake Bay Fisheries
Development of a HAB Model for the James River Estuary
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
CBP Update: Climate Change and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL
AQUATOX v. 3.1 Host Institution/URL
US Environmental Protection Agency
Michael, B. D. , Trice, T. M. , Heyer, C. J. , Stankelis, R. M
Total Maximum Daily Loads of Fecal Coliform for the Restricted Shellfish Harvesting/Growing Areas of the Pocomoke River in the Lower Pocomoke River Basin.
Water Quality Restoration Challenges
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
Developing a Water Quality Trading Framework
Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Criteria and their Assessment:
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
TOWARDS THE GOAL OF SETTING NUTRIENT CRITERIA FOR THE DELAWARE ESTUARY
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Pearce Creek DMCF Baseline Exterior Monitoring Spring 2017 Results
Lower James River is unique
IBI’s: An Introduction
How Do You Know an Ecosystem is Healthy?
Presentation transcript:

DR. PAUL A. BUKAVECKAS VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY Developing water quality standards to Protect the James River against Impacts from Algal Blooms.

Today’s Panel The TMDL process: reductions in nutrient loads to reach restoration goals. Water Quality Criteria: their role in establishing nutrient reduction targets. Algal Blooms in the James River Estuary: causes and threats to designated uses. My Presentation: assessing risk from algal blooms in the James.

10/15 15/22 12/10 15/23 Current James River CHLa standards (µg/L) based on season (spring/summer) & salinity Attainability (load reductions) based on CB model; estimated cost to achieve = $1-2 billion. VA response: “let’s make sure first”  Are standards defensible?  Are model forecasts of attainability reliable?

James River Algal Blooms Study 6-year ( ), $3 million study funded by Commonwealth of Virginia (administered by Department of Environmental Quality).  understand when, where, and why of algal blooms.  improve water quality models – specifically, their reliability to predict CHLa under changing nutrient load scenarios.  assess whether current CHLa-based regulatory standards are protective of designated uses. How much CHLa is ‘too much’? Changes to regulatory standards, or modeling framework, directly affect allowable nutrient loads.

Science Advisory Panel Evaluate existing numeric CHLa criteria for the James. Are they protective of designated uses? Assess modeling framework: Can model performance be improved to reliably predict responses to management scenarios? Data Collection ( ): When, where, why of algal blooms. Effects on water quality, human health and aquatic life resources. Modeling Team: model development, calibration and simulations of nutrient load scenarios.

Mean CHLa in relation to current criteria for tidal fresh James. Spring Summer

Deleterious Effects of Algal Blooms Water quality  transient (night-time) oxygen minima  elevated pH: daytime maxima Water Clarity: algal contributions to suspended particulate matter Phytoplankton metrics  Community indices: PIBI evenness, richness  Harmful algal abundance & Algal Toxins

Water Quality Standards for the James Are current CHLa standards protective of designated uses (aquatic life, etc.)? A dual- probability approach: What is the risk of deleterious effects at a given CHLa concentration? What is the likelihood of exceeding that CHLa concentration if current CHLa standard is attained? CHLap (DO<5)p (CHLa)p (combined) 0-301%50%0.5% %35%3.5% %15%7.5%

Effects of Algal Blooms on Water Quality Risk to water quality conditions from daytime pH maxima exceeding 9.0 in relation to CHLa for the tidal fresh and oligohaline segments of the James. Vertical lines denote current criteria. pH > 9 Summer Spring

Phytoplankton Community Structure Phytoplankton Index of Biotic Integrity in relation to CHLa and occurrence of communities in ‘least degraded’ (PIBI>2.67) state.

Stressors, Criteria & Risk Stressor (e.g., CHLa) Threats to Designated Uses (e.g., low DO) ideal standard

Assessing Risk to Aquatic Life Designated Uses based on Combined Probability Approach Tidal Fresh Polyhaline Mesohaline