The Use of Flight Simulation to Analyze Aircraft Design and Performance Douglas L.Wilson – Chief Test Pilot Abraham Gutierrez – Chief Systems Engineer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ex. 11 – Slow Flight What’s this plane’s AoA? Can’t tell untill you know which way it is going! This plane is actually on a “high alpha” pass – flight.
Advertisements

Torque Reaction The fuselage’s reaction to the turning of the main rotor system is Torque Reaction Newton's third law of motion states that for every action,
Retreating Blade Stall
PROFILES & PROCEDURES FOR PIPER WARRIOR & CHEROKEE
Tailwinds Flying Club Spring Safety Session Engine Takeoff Lake Elmo Airport (21D)
Learning from failure Mahabubul Alam CS/SE 6361, Fall 2014  Term Paper Presentation – I  The University of Texas at Dallas Asiana Airlines #214.
Weight and Balance.
Love the One You’re With Tom Bell Go Home with the One That Brought You or.
Airplane Components and Systems
Flutter Analysis of the Polen Special II Emphasizing Addition of a Wet Wing and Ailerons to Flutter Model ASE463Q [Fall2002] Final Presentation Structural.
Short Field Takeoff & Landing
Controls, Systems, Instrumentation 2 February 2005.
Airplane forces. Weight and Lift WEIGHT – directed to the center of earth – airplane parts, fuel, and people, luggage or freight LIFT – generated by the.
Gimli Glider Incident Investigation By Lee Xuan Hong.
Tailwinds Flying Club Fall Safety Session Know your airplane Piper Arrow III PA28R- 201T.
Steep Turns.
Predicting Performance
Chandelles.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Soft Field Takeoff and Landing. Soft Field Takeoff w Before landing, will you be able to take off? w Complex and high performance aircraft often have.
Aero Engineering 315 Lesson 33 GR3 Review. General strategy  Prior to class Review reading for lessons 23 – 32 Work / review problems #26 – 42 Review.
Flying Further Than Any Other Aircraft in History
MAE 4261: AIR-BREATHING ENGINES
Aircraft Introduction. PA46 Initial Training PA46 Aircraft General.
Tailwinds Flying Club Spring Safety Session Know your airplane Cherokee Six 300 (PA )
Overview of Chapter 6 Douglas S. Cairns Lysle A. Wood Distinguished Professor.
FLAP MALFUNCTIONS Taken, in part, from article by Barry Schiff, and from “Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators” Flaps- High lift devices used to increase maximum.
Warm-Up – 5/7 – 10 minutes Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: Describe the effect of a tailwind and headwind on an.
Lesson 2-2a Principles of Flight
The Use of Flight Simulation to Analyze Aircraft Design and Performance Douglas L.Wilson – Chief Test Pilot Abraham Gutierrez – Chief Systems Engineer.
Use of Flight Simulation To Investigate Aviation Safety Concerns and Stability & Control Analysis of the Mooney Rocket 305 and Cessna 172 Douglas Wilson.
Lecture 7: DESCENT PERFORMANCE
#3205. What is the relationship of lift, drag, thrust, and weight when the airplane is in straight-and-level flight? A- Lift equals weight and thrust equals.
Emergency Procedures for Beech Bonanzas and Debonairs
READ GLEIM CHAPTER 5 ( ) 17 QUESTIONS
A FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS GUIDE FOR SOLOING A STUDENT PILOT.
READY OR NOT THE FLIGHT REVIEW. FLIGHT REVIEW A FLIGHT REVIEW IS REQUIRED WITHIN THE PREVIOUS 24 CALENDAR MONTHS TO ACT AS PIC.
Lecture 5: Climb PERFORMANCE
SPUD TC (OCT 07) REVISION ACADEMICS. SPUD TASK 1114 PERFORM A ROLLING TAKEOFF.
ASIANA AIRLINES FLIGHT 214 BY DANIEL LEE. AIRCRAFT: BOEING 777.
Aviation Seminars1 #3661. Which items are included in the empty weight of an aircraft? A- Unusable fuel and undrainable oil. B- Only the airframe, powerplant,
Performance Chapter 5 Lecture 10. Performance What does performance mean? What determines performance? –How fast will it climb, how quickly will it take.
TWA 800 Accident Overview Michael Collins Fuel Tank Safety Program Manager Transport Standards Staff, ANM-112 November 5, 2001.
PROPELLER SYSTEM 1st - Look at how lift is generated
Airplanes By : Hebron Yam,Justin Minucci. How do airplane work? Problem???
National Transportation Safety Board Airplane Performance Daniel R. Bower, Ph.D. Airplane Performance Specialist Daniel R. Bower, Ph.D. Airplane Performance.
Design Chapter 8 First Half. Design Requirements and Specifications Payload Range Cruising Speed Takeoff & Landing Distance Ceiling.
6.07 Stalls References: FTGU pages 18, 35-38
Office of Aviation Safety Airspeed Selection and Stall Training Procedures Operations presentation.
North Florida Flight Standards District Office
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Topic of the Month May 2015 Aircraft Performance.
Slow Flight Chris Evans.
Ex. 7 - Climbing Ex. 7 - Climbing.
The Private Pilot.
Warm-Up – 1/24 – 10 minutes Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: Describe three main purposes of the aircraft powerplant?
READY OR NOT THE FLIGHT REVIEW.
Lecture 6: CRUISE PERFORMANCE
Approaching to land By c/a1c Farley.
ROTARY WING AERODYNAMICS
Cessna Aircraft Differences Training.
Ground School 3.06 Weight & Balance.
Warm-Up – 12/13 – 10 minutes Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: Define the Rate of Turn. Define Radius of Turn. What.
FP-2 T-44 Ops Limits 5/6/15.
West Point Aviation Club Private Pilot Ground Instruction
Matching of Propulsion Systems for an Aircraft
ENGINE-OUT PROCEDURES
Weight and Balance Private Pilot Ground School
3667. (Refer to Figures 33 nd 34.) Calculate the weight and balance and determine if the CG and the weight of the airplane are within limits . Front seat.
MISCELLANEOUS PERF. The performance data for takeoff and landing an aircraft can be obtained from the aircraft's flight manual or pilot's operating handbook.
Basic Stalling The Flight Training Manual - Section 10
Presentation transcript:

The Use of Flight Simulation to Analyze Aircraft Design and Performance Douglas L.Wilson – Chief Test Pilot Abraham Gutierrez – Chief Systems Engineer Anh Huy Nguyen – Chief Flight Engineer Advisor – Basil Philip Sponsor: Dr. Ron O. Stearman

Presentation Outline  Outline -Abraham Gutierrez Mooney 305 Mooney 305 Mooney Findings Mooney Findings Mooney Summary Mooney Summary -Anh Huy Nguyen Cessna 172 H Cessna 172 H Cessna 172 H Background Cessna 172 H Background Cessna 172 H Flight Test Cessna 172 H Flight Test -Douglas Wilson Cessna 172 H Cessna 172 H Cessna 172 Findings Cessna 172 Findings Cessna Summary Cessna Summary Entire Project Overview Entire Project Overview Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Objective  Design - X-Plane Software - Flight Simulator  Investigation - Mooney (Phugoid mode) - Cessna 172H-2000 (Flaps Settings)  Objective Approach Mooney 305 Background Phugoid Mode Summary Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Approach  Mooney 305 -Research Crash and Investigation Reports -Build a Mooney 305 (X-plane) -Flight Simulation Data vs Radar Data (Phugoid Mode)  Cessna 172 H -Build a Cessna 172H (X-plane) -Validation of the Flight Simulator -Climbing Trends Objective  Approach Mooney 305 Background Phugoid Mode Summary Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Mooney 305 Background  Accident -Bakersfield Municipal Airport -Phugoid Mode  Investigation -Several Changes -Lack of Testing Objective Approach  Mooney 305 Background Phugoid Mode Summary Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Mooney 305 Background Modification Mooney M20k Mooney305 Horsepower 210 HP 305 HP Propeller 2 blade 3 blade Max Weight 2900 lbs 3200 lbs Empty Weight 1860 lbs 2068 lbs Stall Speed 60 kts 61 kts Objective Approach  Mooney 305 Background Phugoid Mode Summary Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Phugoid Mode  Oscillations Long period Maximum speed Minimum speed -Long Period (phugod mode) Change In Altitude Altitude Change In Altitude Altitude Motion Occurs at Nearly Constant Speed -Short Period (Several Seconds) Objective Approach Mooney 305 Background  Phugoid Mode Summary Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Phugoid Mathematical Analysis  Phugoid Period -T=.142*(2+a)^1/2*U a=aerodynamic characteristics U=true airspeed  Phugoid Damping Ratio -ς=(sqrt(2)/4)*Cd/Cl Cd=Coefficient of Drag Cl=Coefficient of Lift Objective Approach Mooney 305 Background  Phugoid Mode Summary Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Phugoid Mode Findings  Radar Findings Objective Approach Mooney 305 Background  Phugoid Mode Summary Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Phugoid Mode Findings  Radar Findings  Test Findings Objective Approach Mooney 305 Background  Phugoid Mode Summary Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Phugoid Mode Findings  Radar Findings  Test Findings Objective Approach Mooney 305 Background  Phugoid Mode Summary Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Summary  Accomplishments -Create Mooney 305 -Compare Radar Data with Simulator Data  Future Work -Test the Mooney 305 -Work on the Autopilot Objective Approach Mooney 305 Background Phugoid Mode  Summary Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Cessna 172 H  Timeline  Weights and Balances  Investigation  Real Flight Tests  Simulation Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Timeline of the Cessna 172H Crash  Timeline Weights and BalancesInvestigation Real Flight Tests Simulation Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Weights and Balances Max Gross Weight 2300 lbs. Empty Weight 1400 lbs. Full Fuel Tanks 252 lbs. Pilot 264 lbs. Front Passenger 251 lbs. Rear Passenger 120 lbs. The aircraft was close to max weight. Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna Timeline  Weights and Balances BalancesInvestigation Real Flight Tests Simulation

Cessna NTSB Findings  The airplane was found 300 yards southwest of the end of runway 31  The engine and nose was found aft in the cabin area  Chord-wise crush damage sustained aft to the wing forward spars  Propeller blade bent and scratched  Left door torn from fuselage  Flap actuator was working properly  No mechanical malfunction to engine assembly  Wing flaps were set at 40 degrees (Manufacturer recommended 0 degree settings for take-off) Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna Timeline Weights and Balances  Investigation Real Flight Tests Simulation

Further Investigation  At impact the tachometer was stuck at 1500 RPM  If this was the correct engine output, the aircraft would not be able to maintain a climb attitude. Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna Timeline Weights and Balances  Investigation Real Flight Tests Simulation

Probable Causes  Pilot attempted a touch-and- go landing and left the flaps down at 40 degrees  Engine malfunction during take-off that resulted in a partial or total power loss Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna Timeline Weights and Balances  Investigation Real Flight Tests Simulation

Real Flight Testing (1)  Test SP4-E101  Georgetown, TX  February 22, 2004  Georgetown Municipal Airport (KGTU)  Participants: Stearman, Wilson, Weaver  Cessna 739ZY  172 N model  160 HP (O-320 engine)  Tests performed  2 weights  2 altitudes (2000 ft and 3000 ft)  5 flap settings Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna Timeline Weights and BalancesInvestigation  Real Flight Tests Simulation

Weights for Test SP4-E101 Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna Cessna 739ZYWeight 1 (lbs)Weight 2 (lbs) A/C empty weight Fuel Capacity (40 gal) Passengers / gear Total test weight Timeline Weights and BalancesInvestigation  Real Flight Tests Simulation

Real Flight Testing (2)  Test SP4-D101  San Antonio, TX  April 3, 2004  Stinson Airport (KSSF)  Participants: Wilson, Nguyen, Gutierrez, McGhee  Cessna 2632L  172 H model  145 HP (O-300D engine)  Climb Prop  Tests performed  2 weights  2 altitudes (2000 ft and 3000 ft)  5 flap settings Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna Timeline Weights and BalancesInvestigation  Real Flight Tests Simulation

Weights for Test SP4-D101 Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna Cessna 2632LWeight 1 (lbs)Weight 2 (lbs) A/C empty weight Fuel Capacity ( 38 gal) Passengers / gear Total test weight Timeline Weights and BalancesInvestigation  Real Flight Tests Simulation

Real Flight Testing (3)  Test SP4-D102  Houston, TX  April 27, 2004  Weiser Air Park (KEYQ)  Participants: Wilson, Nguyen, Gutierrez, Weaver  Cessna 2320U  172 H model  145 HP (O-300D engine)  Cruise Prop  Tests performed  2 weights  2 altitudes (1500 ft and 2500 ft)  5 flap settings Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna Timeline Weights and BalancesInvestigation  Real Flight Tests Simulation

Weights for Test SP4-D102 Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna Cessna 2320UWeight 1 (lbs)Weight 2 (lbs) A/C empty weight Fuel Capacity (38 gal) Passengers / gear Total test weight Timeline Weights and BalancesInvestigation  Real Flight Tests Simulation

Aircraft Modifications PART 172 SP (N463QB) 172 SP (N463QC) 172 H (N463QD) 172 N (N463QE) Flaps 30 deg 40 deg Horsepower 180 hp 145 hp 160 hp Fuel System Fuel Injected CarburetorCarburetor Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna Timeline Weights and BalancesInvestigation Real Flight Tests  Simulation

Flight Simulation Verification Tests  Performance tests to compare to manufacturer and actual flight data Repeat previous flight tests Reconstruct accident  Take-offs with 40 degrees of flaps at desired weight Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna Timeline Weights and BalancesInvestigation Real Flight Tests  Simulation

Test Flight Results Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna Test Results Projected Flight Flight Recreation Conclusions Cost Analysis Time Analysis Future Projects Acknowledgements

Test Results - Simulation Test Results Projected Flight Flight Recreation Conclusions Cost Analysis Time Analysis Future Projects Acknowledgements Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Projected Flight Test Results  Projected Flight Flight Recreation Conclusions Cost Analysis Time Analysis Future Projects Acknowledgements Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Flaps Down Recreation

Conclusions  C-172H would need approximately 58 seconds to climb to 275 feet  If flaps were set at 40 degrees of flaps, aircraft could not have reached altitude  Separate aircraft problem Test Results Projected Flight Flight Recreation  Conclusions Cost Analysis Time Analysis Future Projects Acknowledgements Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Potential Problems  Conditions were adequate for carburetor icing – decreased engine performance  Additional Engine Failure  Potential mechanical error – aircraft had completed 100 hour inspection the day before incident Test Results Projected Flight Flight Recreation  Conclusions Cost Analysis Time Analysis Future Projects Acknowledgements Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Cost Analysis  Aircraft Flight Tests  Aircraft rental(~11 hr): $79/hr - $880  Instructor fee(~11 hr): $35/hr - $385  Travel Expenses: $500  Total expenses ~ $1765 Test Results Projected Flight Flight Recreation Conclusions  Cost Analysis Time Analysis Future Projects Acknowledgements Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Time Analysis  Phase 1 – Completed  Background investigations into both accidents  Phugoid mode analysis  A/C modifications made in flight simulators  Phase 2A – Completed  Actual flight testing of Cessna A/C  Added to validate flight simulator data Test Results Projected Flight Flight Recreation Conclusions Cost Analysis  Time Analysis Future Projects Acknowledgements Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Time Analysis  Phase 2B – Completed  Flight Simulator Testing  Validation phase  Accident Recreation  Cessna 172 H  Mooney Rocket  Phase 3 – Completed  Analysis of flight data  Final reports and recommendations Test Results Projected Flight Flight Recreation Conclusions Cost Analysis  Time Analysis Future Projects Acknowledgements Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Future Projects  Continue to analyze the Mooney Rocket  Additional C-172 testing to check performance due to carb ice  Expand the simulator testing to additional aircraft  Other General Aviation accidents  Commercial aircraft Test Results Projected Flight Flight Recreation Conclusions Cost Analysis Time Analysis  Future Projects Acknowledgements Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Acknowledgments  Wright Aviation in Georgetown, TX  Bill Eldredge and staff  Alan Weaver – Flight Instructor  Check Six Aviation – San Antonio, TX  Mario McGhee – Chief Flight Instructor  Windsock Aviation – Cypress, TX  Gary Ryan and staff Test Results Projected Flight Flight Recreation Conclusions Cost Analysis Time Analysis Future Projects  Acknowledgements Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Acknowledgments  Chuck Barnett  Dr. Ron O. Stearman  Basil Philip  Marcus Kruger  Joshua Foxworth  Jennifer Lehman Test Results Projected Flight Flight Recreation Conclusions Cost Analysis Time Analysis Future Projects  Acknowledgements Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna

Summary  Mooney 305  Bakersfield, CA accident  Phugoid Mode  Cessna 172H  Falcon Field Accident  Flap settings and Engine Concerns  Flight Testing  Real Flight tests  X-Plane Simulator testing  Successfully demonstrated simulator usefulness Abraham Gutierrez Anh Huy Nguyen Douglas Wilson Mooney Cessna Cessna Mooney Cessna Cessna