Yasuhiro NISHIMURA Hiroaki NATORI The University of Tokyo MEG collaboration Outline  → e  and MEG experiment Design of detector Calibration Performance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Particle Physics Design Group Studies Big Liquid Argon Neutrino Detector Subgroup Particle Physics Design Group Studies: The BLAND Subgroup BLAND.
Advertisements

Prototype of the Daya Bay Neutrino Detector Wang Zhimin IHEP, Daya Bay.
03 Aug NP041 KOPIO Experiment Measurement of K L    Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO collaborations Contents Physics Motivation.
Reflectivity Measurements of Critical Materials for the LUX Dark Matter Experiment Theory My experiment was a cyclic process involving software, engineering,
Tagger Electronics Part 1: tagger focal plane microscope Part 2: tagger fixed array Part 3: trigger and digitization Richard Jones, University of Connecticut.
The performance of LHCf calorimeter was tested at CERN SPS in For electron of GeV, the energy resolution is < 5% and the position resolution.
Forward Detectors and Measurement of Proton-Antiproton Collision Rates by Zachary Einzig, Mentor Michele Gallinaro INTRODUCTION THE DETECTORS EXPERIMENTAL.
Genova/Pavia/Roma Flavio Gatti, PSI, July 1st, Timing Counter july 2004.
XEC Hardware Status MEG Review Meeting 2010 Liquid Xenon Group.
Upgrade of liquid xenon gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment Daisuke Kaneko, the University of Tokyo, on behalf of the MEG collaboration MEG EXPERIMENT.
Wataru Ootani, ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo SORMA X, May 21, 2002 Development of liquid xenon scintillation detector for new experiment to search for   e 
The ANTARES experiment is currently the largest underwater neutrino telescope and is taking high quality data since Sea water is used as the detection.
PAIR SPECTROMETER DEVELOPMENT IN HALL D PAWEL AMBROZEWICZ NC A&T OUTLINE : PS Goals PS Goals PrimEx Experience PrimEx Experience Design Details Design.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
Malte HildebrandtMEG Review Meeting, 14th February 2007 Report of Run Coordinator Run 2006 Summary Malte Hildebrandt MEG Review Meeting, 14th February.
Satoshi Mihara ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo Feb MEG Review Meeting 1 CEX beam test at piE1 Satoshi Mihara.
Liquid Xenon Photon Detector Feb MEG Review Meeting Liquid Xenon Detector Part I CEX beam test at piE1 Oct-Dec/03 –Hardware operation status –Analysis.
Report of the NTPC Test Experiment in 2007Sep and Others Yohei Nakatsugawa.
2 1/March/2015 日本物理学会大70回年次大会@早稲田大学 東大ICEPP 内山雄祐 他 MEG II collaboration.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
Analysis of PSI beam test R.Sawada 09/Feb/2004 MEG collaboration R.Sawada 09/Feb/2004 MEG collaboration
MEG positron spectrometer Oleg Kiselev, PSI on behalf of MEG collaboration.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
Setup for hypernuclear gamma-ray spectroscopy at J-PARC K.Shirotori Tohoku Univ. Japan for the Hyperball-J collaboration J-PARC E13 hypernuclear  -ray.
Scintillation hodoscope with SiPM readout for the CLAS detector S. Stepanyan (JLAB) IEEE conference, Dresden, October 21, 2008.
1 1.  - ray production by the reactions Li(p,  )Be and B(p,  )C tested at the Legnaro INFN Laboratory 2.Monte Carlo simulation of point-like Americium.
T. Sugitate / Hiroshima / PHX031 / Nov.01 The Photon Spectrometer for RHIC and beyond PbWO 4 Crystal Density 8.29 g/cm 3 Radiation length 0.89 cm Moliere.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
MEG 実験用液体キセノン検出器の現状 東京大学素粒子物理国際研究センター 澤田龍 他 MEG カロリメータグループ 2007 年 9 月 24 日 日本物理学会 第 62 回年次大会 北海道大学.
1 Satoshi Mihara for the   e  collaboration, review meeting at PSI, Jul 2002 Photon Detector Satoshi Mihara ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo 1.Large Prototype.
Dec. 8th, 2000NOON A new   e  experiment at PSI For the MUEGAMMA collaboration Stefan Ritt (Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland) Introduction.
Liquid Xenon Calorimeter Analysis R.Sawada on behalf of the MEG LXe analysis group 17/Feb/2009.
Calibration and monitoring of the experiment using the Cockcroft-Walton accelerator G. Signorelli Sezione di Pisa MEG Review meeting - 20 Feb On.
HBD Gas and QE Monitoring Craig Woody BNL HBD Working Group Meeting October 19, 2005.
MEG Run 2008 液体キセノンガンマ線検出器 東京大学 素粒子物理国際研究セン ター 西村 康宏、 他 MEG コラボレー ション 2008 年秋季物理学会@山形大学小白川キャンパス.
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
Nov Beam Catcher in KOPIO (H. Mikata Kaon mini worksyop1 Beam Catcher in the KOPIO experiment Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO.
1 NaI calibrationneutron observation NaI calibration and neutron observation during the charge exchange experiment 1.Improving the NaI energy resolution.
Catania 11 ICATPP october, 2009 Como 1/12 Catania Comparative measurements of the performances of four super bialkali large.
1 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
A. Bross MICE CM17 February MuCool RF Program 805 and 201 MHz Studies.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
J-PARC でのハイパー核ガンマ線分光実験用 散乱粒子磁気スペクトロメータ検出器の準備 状況 東北大理, 岐阜大教 A, KEK B 白鳥昂太郎, 田村裕和, 鵜養美冬 A, 石元茂 B, 大谷友和, 小池武志, 佐藤美沙子, 千賀信幸, 細見健二, 馬越, 三輪浩司, 山本剛史, 他 Hyperball-J.
Liquid Xe detector for m +  e + g search Kenji Ozone ( ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo, Japan ) Introduction prototype R&D ー PMTs ー small & large type summary Outline.
Current status of XMASS experiment 11 th International Workshop on Low Temperature Detectors (LTD-11) Takeda Hall, University of Tokyo, JAPAN 8/1, 2005.
Detectors for VEPP-2000 B.Khazin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics 2 March 2006.
R&D works on Liquid Xenon Photon Detector for μ  e γ experiment at PSI Satoshi Mihara ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo Outline Introduction Prototype R&D works Summary.
MEG 実験 2009 液体キセノン検出器の性能 II 西村康宏, 他 MEG コラボレーション 東京大学素粒子物理国際研究セン ター 第 65 回年次大会 岡山大学.
Upgrade of the MEG liquid xenon calorimeter with VUV-light sensitive large area SiPMs Kei Ieki for the MEG-II collaboration 1 II.
Development of UV-sensitive MPPC for upgrade of liquid xenon detector in MEG experiment Daisuke Kaneko, on behalf of the MEG Collaboration µ γ Liquid xenon.
g beam test of the Liquid Xe calorimeter for the MEG experiment
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
The Electromagnetic calorimeter of the MEG Experiment
Liquid Xenon Detector for the MEG Experiment
大強度
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
MEG Experiment at PSI R&D of Liquid Xenon Photon Detector
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
MEG実験の液体Xe検出器について 東大 ICEPP  森研究室 M1 金子大輔.
Development of hybrid photomultiplier for Hyper-Kamiokande
MEG II実験 液体キセノン検出器の建設状況
MEG Summary T. Mori for MEG Collaboration February 9, 2005.
New Results from the MEG Experiment
Presentation transcript:

Yasuhiro NISHIMURA Hiroaki NATORI The University of Tokyo MEG collaboration Outline  → e  and MEG experiment Design of detector Calibration Performance in run 2008 The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation 19/Feb./2010

  → e  is a clear 2 body decay  Br(  → e  ) < 1.2× (90%C.L.) given by MEGA experiment  Charged lepton-flavor mixing is not observed yet.  Many extensions of standard model predict  → e   SU(5) or SO(10) models in SUSY-GUT, etc. 19/Feb./2010  Aim at branching ratio in MEG experiment e + from  → e  from  → e   → e  Accidental background is dominant Background energy [m  /2] of e + and  Br (accidental) = R  ・ f e 0 ・ f  0 ・ (  e  /4  ) ・ (2  t e  )  The innovation in MEG experiment for  → e  discovery  Excellent performance of a liquid xenon (LXe)  –ray detector  World's most intense ~10 8 /sec DC  beam at Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI) in Switzerland  3 ×10 7   / sec stop in target  Positron spectrometer operational at high rate Proton ring-cyclotron 590MeV, 2.2mA max.  Backgrounds 2 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation <<

19/Feb./2010  Positron detector  COBRA (COnstant-Bending Radius) magnet ▪B=1.27T, 20% X 0  Drift chamber  Timing counter   -ray detector  900 liters LXe scintillator for the  ray detector 3 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation

[ns]  Design  900 liters (800 liters active volume)  11% solid angle, 14X 0  846PMTs of 2'' size on 6 faces  Waveform taken for all channel 19/Feb./2010 Innercryostat Vacuum vessel vessel HV Feedthru. SignalFeedthru. Pulse tube refrigerator  Merits of liquid xenon  High stopping power 2.98g/cm 3, X 0 = 2.8cm  No self-absorption of scintillation light  High light yield (75% of NaI(Tl))  Fast scintillation process ▪4.2, 22, 45ns components  Difficulties  Short wave length ~178nm (VUV)  Low temperature within 161~165K  Scintillation light absorbed by O 2, H 2 O, etc.  LXe is expensive Developed photomultiplier tube (PMT) 4 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation to purifier HAMAMATSU

 Small prototype  2.3liters active volume  32PMTs  /Feb./2010  Large prototype  68.6liters active volume  228PMTs   LXe detector  active 800 liters / Total 900 liters volume (3t), 846PMTs  Ready at the end of 2007  Operated in 2008 for MEG run 5 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation

 Storage  Gas and liquid  Cooling  Pulse-tube refrigerator and LN 2 19/Feb./2010 pulse-tube refrigerator developed for MEG Cooling pipe with liquid nitrogen 6 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation 8 × 250L gas storage tank 1000L liquid storage tank 900L LXe detector gas liquid LN 2

 Gaseous purification  A getter removes H 2 O,O 2,CO,CO 2,H 2,N 2 and hydro carbon molecules. (10 to 50 l/min)  Liquid purification  By a molecular sieves and O 2 getter, water and O 2 are removed. (100l/h) 19/Feb./2010 Water and oxygen absorb scintillation light 7 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation 900L LXe detector Gas phase Liquid phase

19/Feb./2010  Run 2008  Calibration of PMT  Gain  Quantum efficiency  Monitor  Set up  Light yield and purification Calibration and Monitor in Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation

 Engineering run in 2007  Mar.Maintenance Jun. Installation Jul. Purification and Monitor of the light yield Aug.  0 run for the calibration of LXe detector Sep.Trigger setup and started physics run Oct. Taking physics data, purification again Nov. Dec.   run again at the end of Dec. 19/Feb./2010 purification  0 run physics run 9 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation LXe detector successfully operated in 3-month physics run !

 LEDs at 5 positions on both sides  3 different intensities by attenuation 19/Feb./2010  Gain monitor with stable LED  Calculate absolute gain by mean-variance relation  9 steps of different intensity by changing current   2 = Gain × Mean × e/C (const.) + const. Absolute gain LED peak Charge  1/2hour calibration everyday and LED flushing in physics run for the monitor 10 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation Charge  2 Slope = gain Date 1 month

 Charge / height of waveform  For the estimation of quantum efficiency (Q.E.) of PMT  5.5MeV  from 241 Am source (200Bq, 432years)  25 sources, 5 on a wire, immersed in liquid xenon  Q.E. derived from the comparison between observed charge and expectation in Monte Carlo simulation 19/Feb./2010  Separate signal of  from  by the shape of waveform 100  m diameter, 2mm length Shadow of wire makes ring by reconstruction reconstructed  events 241 Am 11 ~40  m 100  m Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation  Data - MC Q.E.

 1MeV Cockcroft-Walton accelerator  Provide proton beam ~10 12 / sec  Li(p,  )Be 14.6, 17.6MeV  B(p,  )C 4.4, 11.7, 16.1MeV  Proton target quickly switched from  target ~20min.  3 times / week  Cosmic ray and AmBe source are also useful for the monitor 19/Feb./2010 Li FB B LXe detector Beam line at opposite of  Energy of  - ray in LXe detector Accelerator and power module proton muon 12 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation beam line  For the light-yield monitor and to know the uniformity of  energy

Physics data  - beam -- Gas phase purification + Liquid phase purification  The light yield improved by purification  Monitor by Li 17.6MeV, 54.9MeV  from  0 decay, cosmic ray 19/Feb./2010  This increase of the light yield gives  Shape of waveform changing  Better  separation by waveform  In 2009 the light yield completely recovered and stabilized. Start / End of run 2008 Waveform  separation  13 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation

19/Feb./2010  Reconstruction of  ray  Set up for  0 run  Evaluate the performance around 53MeV signal  -ray  Energy  Timing  Position  Detection efficiency  Measurement of  decay Performance of  ray measurement 14 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation

 Energy  Detected photons =  (weight×charge / Q.E. / Gain) PMT  Correct the change of light yield and non-uniformity, eliminate pile-up photons  Timing  Time of each PMT subtracted with ▪Propagation in LXe ▪Time-walk effect ▪Effect of PMT face by incident angle ▪Offset of channel  Average time weighted with the number of photoelectrons of each PMT 19/Feb./2010 Deep event (10cm)‏ Shallow event (1cm)‏ LXe detector LXe inner surface  Position  Light distribution of PMTs  Use PMTs around conversion point to avoid effect of shower and pileup  3d-position fitted with solid angle of each PMT LXe detector can reconstruct all property of  ! 15 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation

 Concept  Acquire performance of energy, timing and position around signal energy (53MeV)  Obtain monochromatic  (55 or 83MeV) by tagging another  from  0 → 2  at opposite side  Determine energy scale near the signal  -ray 19/Feb./2010 LXe energy [MeV] opening angle LXe energy [GeV] (98.8%) ~60% ~40% 8.9MeV MeV 54.9 ~ 83.0MeV n  00 --   p NaI energy [MeV]  Set up In 2008,  0 run in Aug. for 1 month and short  0 run in Dec. Select back-to-back events 16 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation

19/Feb./2010 APD 1cm x 1cm, HAMAMATSU Light guide Plastic scintillators and NaI detector APD and amplifier heat Thermal control (18 ℃,  T< 0.1 ℃ ) Peltier dev. LED NaI Magnet  Energy : 3×3 NaI(Tl) crystals with 9 Avalanche photodiodes (APDs)  Control APD temperature by a peltier device and Pt100  APD enables constant gain wherever in the magnetic field  Timing : Pre-shower counter in front of NaI  2 plastic scintillators with 4PMTs and lead converter 62.5 x 62.5 x 305 mm (12X 0 ) x 9 bars 17 APDs Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation Radiator APD, amp. NaI 60 x 60 x 7mm How to measure whole acceptance of LXe detector?

 Liquid hydrogen target inserted from down stream 19/Feb./ o 120 o  Mover system to scan whole acceptance of LXe L = 75mm  = 50mm  < 6.5 o 18  LXe detector target    (1MHz)  Use the same beam line as  + beam Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation

 55MeV energy peaks at each position  Lower tail of energy spectrum from :  Escape of shower in a shallow event  Interaction with material before reaching LXe  Fit with (Exponential + Gaussian + Difference of pedestal between  - and  + )  Deeper events than 2cm, in acceptance  2.0±0.15%  of upper tail, important to identify the signal  5.8±0.35% FWHM 19/Feb./  [%] of upper tail Map of  (upper tail) on LXe inner surface 19 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation 55MeV  -ray

19/Feb./2010 B Li 0→20→2  Good linearity  Within 0.5%  B (4.4MeV, 12.0MeV), Li (17.6MeV),  0 decay (54.9MeV, 83.0MeV)  Include the uncertainty of the light-yield correction  Energy scale  Determined at only 55MeV  Uncertainty < 0.4%  Due to the correction of light yield, gain, etc. 20 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation

Time difference of 2 detectors contains  Spread of  0 decay point in target : 58 ps   Resolution of reference counter : 93 ps   Time difference of 2PMTs attached with the same scintillator Timing resolution  78 ps  = 135 Ө 58 Ө 93 ps at 55MeV  Better resolution (68ps  ) at the end of run 2008 due to the light-yield recovery  80±6 ps  at signal energy (53MeV) after correction of energy dependence 19/Feb./2010 Pre-shower counter (2 plastic scintillator )    Use pre-shower counter as a reference  Difference of LXe – pre-shower counter  135ps  at 55MeV  127ps  at 83MeV LXe detector 21 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation However…

 Use Monte Carlo simulation for whole acceptance  Partially confirmed by  0 run with lead collimators in front of LXe  18mm thickness with 10mm slits  55~83MeV in  0 decay 19/Feb./2010 lead slit simulation data along beam axis [cm] lower – upper [cm]  5mm  along the LXe surface  Fit with 2 error-functions + 3 gaussians + floor  6.8mm  average  Beam spread of ~8mm  in target → ~2mm  on detector surface  Projection of slit ~ 14mm  6mm  along radial direction from Monte Carlo simulation Projection on surface 22 lower – upper [cm] [cm] Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation

3 methods to estimate the detection efficiency  Monte Carlo simulation of signal  ray  Count  from radiative  decay   0 → 2  tagged with NaI opposite to liquid xenon detector  Count  around 55MeV tagged with around higher 83MeV at tagging NaI detector  Subtract neutron background which comes from tail of 129MeV(  - → n  ) in NaI 19/Feb./2010 ? 83MeV  55MeV   All consistent within a few percent  Efficiency estimated by Monte Carlo simulation  Including analysis efficiency (pile up, cosmic ray, etc.)  E  > 46MeV  Detection efficiency : 63±4% neutron Monte Carlo simulation of  0 23 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation

 ray from   decay 19/Feb./2010  background in  decay Time difference between e + and   → e  pile up 24 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation  Successfully operated during physics run !

 Successful construction of the 900L liquid xenon detector  First evaluation of the performance around signal   Energy 2.0% , 5.8% FWHM  Studying discrimination of pile-up and reconstruction, etc.  Timing 78ps   Almost enough for our requirement  Position 5mm  on surface, 6mm  along depth  Better estimation of Q.E. and gain is the candidate for the improvement  Took first physics data for 3 months in 2008 with stable operation and proper calibration !  MEG experiment will run for next few years to reach branching ratio sensitivity. 19/Feb./ Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation

19/Feb./ Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation

19/Feb./2010 End of slides 27 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation 2008 data in analysis box

19/Feb./2010 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation 28

 Preliminary look at 2009 data 19/Feb./2010 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation 29 Cosmic ray, Li 18MeV   2009 stable 2008 start / end  Light yield   -  separation ▪Enabled identification in trigger level

 Detected scintillation photons in current reconstruction is not independent on the position  Estimated by Li 18MeV peak  Prepared 2 set of correction in 2008 separated by the light yield 19/Feb./2010 Yasuhiro NISHIMURA The 12th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation 30 Lower light yield Higher light yield Peak dependence along radial direction Peak map on LXe inner surface  Better uniformity after the correction