Les Dommages- Interêts et la Cour Unifiée des Brevets Damages and the Unified Patent Court.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Click to edit Master title style 1 Financial aspects of closure European Commission Felix LOZANO, DG Agriculture and Rural Development.
Advertisements

European payment order Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment.
European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims
COLLECTIVE REDRESS IN CROATIA NATIONAL REPORT. 1. LEGAL FRAMEWORK Consumer Protection Act (CPA) Consumer Protection Act interrupted the collective.
Arbitration in Poland Practical issues Monika Hartung Legal Adviser, Partner Warsaw 16 June 2011.
Chapter 18: Torts A Civil Wrong
Judicial Protection of Patent Rights in China --If Apple Sued Samsung in China, What would be the Remedies ? ZHANG Guangliang Renmin University of China.
Liability and Procedure in European Antitrust Law The EU Damages Directive Does the European Union overstep the mark again?
Chapter 8.  Burden of proof – plaintiff  Standard of proof – balance of probability  The case is called and an appearance is entered  Empanelling.
Class action in The Netherlands Mr. Bertjan de Lange Mr. Tessa Havekes.
Chapter 5 Life Insurance Meals / Lodging Foreign Income Exclusion Tax Benefit Rule Scholarships Personal Injury Settlements Long Term Care Insurance Group.
THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION.  Established in 1952  The judicial authority of the EU  Cooperates with the courts and tribunals of the.
N ORTHERN M ARIANA I SLANDS R ULES FOR M ANDATORY A LTERNATIVE D ISPUTE R ESOLUTION.
Workers Compensation Commission Sian Leathem Registrar 29 September 2008.
- november STATUS OF THE HARMONIZATION OF MEASURES RELATING TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF IP RIGHTS - EU DIRECTIVE OF RIGHT OF INFORMATION DAMAGES.
European payment order Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment.
China’s Investment Treaty Policy ---Recent Changes and Future Direction Wenhua Shan Xi’an Jiaotong University, China Oxford Brookes University, UK.
Institut der beim Europäischen Patentamt zugelassenen Vertreter Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office Institut des.
WTO FORUM: ARTICLE 25 OF THE DSU Christian Albanesi Managing Counsel ICC International Court of Arbitration.
Introduction to EU Law Cont.d. ECJ – TFI (Arts ) “The Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance, each within its jurisdiction, shall ensure.
WIPO NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON NEGOTIATING TECHNOLOGY LICENSING AGREEMENTS organized by The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in cooperation with.
D R HAB. F RYDERYK Z OLL, P ROFESSOR AT THE J AGIELLONIAN U NIVERSITY Formation of Contract.
European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims JUDr. Radka Chlebcová.
Small claims procedure Regulation (EC) No 861/2007of European Parlament and of the Council of 11 July establishing a European Small Claims Procedure (OJ.
Taking privacy cases through the Human Rights Review Tribunal Some observations on process and the roles of the Privacy Commissioner and the Director of.
Ioannis Iglezakis Infosociety Directive. Objectives of the Directive on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information.
1 Digital Spark September 2010 Remedies and Sanctions under the IP Enforcement Directive Enrico Bonadio - Lecturer in Law Dundee Business School.
Damages for Patent Infringement in The Netherlands Munich, October 27, 2008 Mr. Otto Swens, Vondst Advocaten Van Leijenberghlaan GG Amsterdam.
Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.
Supreme Court civil pre-trial procedures: an overview
Infringement Claims and Defenses Professor Todd Bruno.
Institut der beim Europäischen Patentamt zugelassenen Vertreter Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office Institut des.
Institut der beim Europäischen Patentamt zugelassenen Vertreter Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office Institut des.
1 Exempted Information and Exempted Organisations Exceptions Day 4.
© COPYRIGHT DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Post Grant Proceedings Before the USPTO and Litigation Strategies Under the AIA Panelists:David.
‘Right to appeal’ IFIs and Accountability – on the Way to Independent Compliance and Appeal Mechanisms for the EIB Conference on 30 November 2006, Brussels.
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 5 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
“THE UNITARY PATENT AND THE UNIFIED PATENT COURT: A PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE” Prof Dr Paul L.C. Torremans School of Law University of Nottingham.
1 Report of Patents Committee Meeting October 19, 2010 Kenji Asai Co-chair of the Patents Committee.
John Y. Gotanda Villanova University School of Law
Essential Elements of the Complaint Request for Review of Public Procurement Procedure Kiev, 19 April 2012 Essential Elements of the Complaint Hubert Reisner.
Law in the Global Marketplace: Intellectual Property and Related Issues Hosted by: Update on U.S. Patent Legislation.
Civil Procedure Part 36 Allocation.
Session 31: Interim Measures in International Commercial Arbitration and Recent Developments including Emergency Arbitrator Reliefs NJA Advanced Course.
Legal Remedies or damages are monetary awards granted to an injured party in a contractual dispute whenever money would be an appropriate method of rectifying.
Civil Law Civil Law – is also considered private law as it is between individuals. It may also be called “Tort” Law, as a tort is a wrong committed against.
IPRs and Standards - Balancing Interests of Licensors and Licensees Claudia Tapia Research In Motion 14. October 2009.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 16 – Taxation Bilateral screening:
Turkish private international law on matrimonial property and successions Zeynep Derya TARMAN Koç Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi
EU-China Workshop on the Chinese Patent Law 24/25 September 2008 Topic IV: Legal Consequences of Invalidity of a Patent Prof. Dr. Christian Osterrieth.
1 TOPIC III - PATENT INVALIDATION PROCEDURES EU-CHINA WORKSHOP ON THE CHINESE PATENT LAW HARBIN, SEPTEMBER 2008 Dr. Gillian Davies.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 5 – Public Procurement Bilateral screening:
Procedure and application.  Before the enactment of the consumer Protection Act,1986 a person aggrieved by the defective goods or deficiency in service.
Article 4 [Obligations of Applicant] 4.1. As a sole and exclusive owner of the Application, Applicant warrants that.
16/20/11/09 – EU Civil Patent Enforcement HG Patent Rights in the EU – The Civil Enforcement Perspective Heinz Goddar Boehmert & Boehmert.
Tech Mahindra Limited v Commissioner of Taxation
SPCs and the unitary patent package
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Arbitral Awards
Damages in Patent Infringement Litigation
An overview of Georgia Workers‘ Compensation
Civil law STANDARD CE.10c.
Describe the procedures for a Civil case
The Courts: Procedure and damages for negligence cases
Trial before court of session
Prof. Elena D’Alessandro University of Turin
CIPIL conference: Mens Rea in Intellectual Property Intention and Knowledge in Remedies for Infringement of IPRs David Stone Cambridge, 9 March 2019.
Civil Courts: Judgment and Civil Remedies
Gordon HUMPHREYS Chairperson of the 5th Board of Appeal
Royal University of Law and Economic
Presentation transcript:

Les Dommages- Interêts et la Cour Unifiée des Brevets Damages and the Unified Patent Court

I. Where to look? Which texts apply?  A) Agreement on a Unified Patent Court/ Accord relatif à une juridiction unifiée du brevet:  Article 68  B) The Rules of Procedure/ Règlement de procédure:  Rule

I. Agreement on a Unified Patent Court  Article 68 Award of damages.  Different provisions apply depending if the infringer knowingly engaged in the patent infringing activity or not:  If the infringer knowingly infringed the patent: Article 68 (1) applies.  If the infringer did not knowingly infringed the patent: Article 68 (4) applies.

Why is it important to differentiate between these two types of infringers?  Because the nature of the damages and possibly the amount of the award will be different.  For the infringer who was aware of the infringement, the court shall order damages appropriate to the harm actually suffered as a result of the infringement (art.68 (1)).  For the infringer who was not aware of the infringement the court may order the recovery of profits or the payment of compensation (art.68 (2)).

What are the purposes of damages under the UPC Agreement?  In applying article 68 (1) the Court shall place the injured party in the position it would have been if no infringement had taken place.  The infringer shall not benefit from the infringement.  Damages however cannot be punitive.

What should the Court take into account when awarding damages?  Following Article 68 (3) (a) and (b) the Court shall take into account either :  “all appropriate aspects, such as the negative economic consequences, including lost profits, (…) any unfair profits made by the infringer, and in appropriate factors elements other than economic factors, such as the moral prejudice caused to the injured party by the infringement” Art.68 (3) (a).  Or  Damages can also be set as a lump sum “on the basis of elements such as at least the amount of the royalties or fees which would have been due if the infringer had requested authorisation to the the patent in question” Art.68 (3) (b).

II. The Rules of Procedure  Chapter 4: PROCEDURE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF DAMAGES AND COMPENSATION: 18 rules divided into two sections.  Section 1 : APPLICATION FOR THE DETERMINATION OF DAMAGES (Rules 125 – 140).  Section 2: REQUEST TO LAY OPEN BOOKS (Rules ).

The Application / Section 1: Application for the determination of damages  The determination of the amount of damages ordered for the successful party may be the subject of separate proceedings (Rule 125).  The applicant shall lodge its application no later than one year from service of the final decision on the merits on both infringement (Rule 126).  Contents of the application listed in Rule 127.

The Application / Section 1: Application for the determination of damages  A fee will be applicable but has not been determined yet ( Rule 132 & 133 ).  If the application meets the criteria listed in rule 131 and the fee is duly paid, it will then be registered the Registry (Rule 135).  The application will be heard by the panel which gave the decision on the merits (Rule 135.2).

What happens next?  Following Rule 136 the Court may stay the application pending an appeal on the merits.  If the defendant (to the application) accepts the claim made in the application, it shall inform the Registry within 2 months and the Judge-Rapporteur shall make the order for the determination of damages in accordance with the application.  If the defendant contests the claim, it shall within 2 months lodge a defence.  The applicant may then lodge within 1 month a reply to the defence.

Application / Section 2: Application to lay open books  Rule 141 lists the contents of the request to lay open books which must be in accordance with Rule 131.  Rule 142 states that:  the defendant to the application to lay open books who accepts the request should inform the Registry. The Judge- rapporteur shall then make the order to lay open books.  The defendant who contests the request to lay open books shall within two months lodge a defence.  The applicant to lay open books may then within 14 days of the service of the defence to the request lodge a reply to the defence limited to the matters raised in the defence.  The defendant may within 14 days of service of the reply lodge a rejoinder, limited to the matters raised in the reply.

Application / Section 2: Application to lay open books  Rule 138 (Contents of the Defence of the Application for the determination of damages)  Rule 139 (Reply to the Defence for the determination of damages and Rejoinder to the Reply)  Rule 140 (Further procedure (Application for the determination of damages)  shall apply mutatis mutandis.

Application / Section 2: Application to lay open books  Finally the Court may following Rule 143 :  If the applicant is successful:  Order the Defendant to open its books to the applicant within a time period to be specified and subject to terms defined by the Court.  Inform the applicant and specify a time period within which the procedure for the award of damages shall be continued.  If the applicant is unsuccessful:  Inform the applicant and specify a time period within which the procedure for the award of damages shall be continued.