1 Patent Term Extension under 35 U.S.C. § 156 Mary C. Till Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal Administration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Disclaimer: The information provided by the USPTO is meant as an educational resource only and should not be construed as legal advice or written law.
Advertisements

Pharma Workshop IV Patent Linkage in the USA Lawrence T. Welch Eli Lilly and Company.
By David W. Hill AIPLA Immediate Past President Partner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Overview of the America Invents Act.
Department of Arts and Culture Briefing on the Use of Official Languages Bill to the Select Committee on Education and Recreation Date:15 August 2012.
FDA Counsel.com 1 ANDAs, OTCs, Orphans and Cosmetics -- Key Issues Wednesday, August 18, 2004 SDRAN RAC STUDY COURSE Michael A. Swit, Esq. FDACounsel.com.
Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) Update August 24, 2006.
1 Hatch-Waxman Boot Camp July 19-20, 2010 Mary C. Till Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal Administration.
VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION AVECO July 14 – 18, 2014 Centralized Certification.
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
Filing Compliant Reexam Requests Andy Kashnikow SPE, Central Reexamination Unit Andy Kashnikow SPE, Central Reexamination Unit June, 2010.
Conversation on the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) and Critical Infrastructure Protection Chemical-Terrorism Vulnerability Information.
GAS DRILLING & HYDRAULIC FRACTURING In the Tidewater Region Photo credit: R.W. Dawson.
Patent Term Adjustments and Extensions
“How Would YOU Revise the Human Subject Research Regulation?” Laura Odwazny Office of the General Counsel U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Introduction to Regulation
Safekeeping of 35 U.S.C. 156 Extensions
Patent Term Adjustment (Bio/Chem. Partnership) Kery Fries, Sr. Legal Advisor Phone: (571)
Green Technology Petition Pilot Robert W. Bahr. 2 Green Tech: Discussion Points 1. Authority and Overview: resources / overview 2.Petition Requirement:
Patent Overview by Jeff Woller. Why have Patents? Patents make some people rich – but, does that seem like something the government should protect? Do.
1 Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board. The Marketplace Fairness Act of 2015(MFA) Grants state and local jurisdictions the right to require the collection.
Cross-Labeling: Legal and Regulatory Issues David M. Fox Hogan & Hartson LLP th Street, NW Washington, DC
A New Pathway for Follow-on Biologics Presented by: Steve Nash May 7, 2010.
1 Civil Rights & Federal Financial Assistance General Overview  Various Federal civil rights laws apply to recipients of Federal financial assistance.
CBER Managed Review Process Sheryl A. Kochman Deputy Director, DBA, OBRR, CBER September 15, 2009.
Regulation of Generic Drugs Office of Generic Drugs Craig Kiester Regulatory Support Branch.
© 2009 Pharmaceutical Law Group PC Market Exclusivity Paradigm Gregory J. Glover, MD, JD Pharmaceutical Law Group
1 FDA Thailand By HIV Module/Marketing Group Mr. Manaswee Arayasiri.
The Life Sciences Lawyer’s Guide to PTA and PTE
July 18, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818/P.L ) Topic: Patent Fees Office of Patent Legal.
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
February 19, Recent Changes and Developments in USPTO Practice Prepared by: Office of Patent Legal Administration (OPLA) Robert J. Spar, DirectorJoni.
DRAFT Guidance for Industry: Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format – Drug Establishment Registration and Drug Listing Denise Sánchez, J.D.,
Subsequent Entry Biologics (SEBs) – Canada Presentation to AIPLA Biotechnology Committee January 25, 2012 Daphne C. Lainson
Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Topic: Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Topic: Biological Deposits.
Korean Patent Practice - Pharmaceutical field - Jonghyeok Park MS., Ph.D.course Jonghyeok Park MS., Ph.D.course Partner Pharmacist Patent Attorney.
SUMMARY OF INFORMAL COMMENTS Temporary Waiver of Terms Regulations May 2006.
Columbus Importers and Brokers Association Import For Export April 20, 2011 Presentation by: Robert Rodriguez, IPM, SCSO FDA Cincinnati District
July 18, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December 10,
1 Rules of Practice Before the BPAI in Ex Parte Appeals 73 Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008) Effective December 10, Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008)
Summary of Rulemaking in California for the Forensic Alcohol Laboratories Regulation Review Committee Cathy L. Ruebusch, RN, MSN Office of Regulations.
1 United States Patent and Trademark Office PTA Post Wyeth USPTO OPLA - Kery A. Fries PTA Post Wyeth Wyeth v. Kappos (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2010 )
MARCH 9, 2006 Boating Safety and Enforcement Grant Program Regulations Stakeholder Workshop Proposed Conceptual Regulations Department of Boating and Waterways.
LAW OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY FALL 2015 © 2015 MICHAEL I. SHAMOS Regulatory Law Michael I. Shamos, Ph.D., J.D. Institute for Software Research School of.
Problem Areas Updates Penalties FRCC Compliance Workshop September / October
Overview of FDA's Regulatory Framework for PET Drugs
Revoking Consent for Special Education Services COSA Fall Special Education Conference October 2009 Rae Ann Ray Office of Student Learning & Partnerships.
CIVIL RIGHTS IMPACT ANALYSIS Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Civil Rights Enforcement and Compliance.
Administrative Law The Enactment of Rules and Regulations.
Biotechnology Chemical Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership
REGULATION OF COMBINATION PRODUCTS Mark A. Heller Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP MassMEDIC Combination Product Program, March 28, 2006.
Yes. You’re in the right room.. Hi! I’m David (Hi David!)
Derivation Proceedings Gene Quinn Patent Attorney IPWatchdog.com March 27 th, 2012.
Andrew B. Freistein Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P. Learning the ABC’s of Patent Term Adjustment 1 © AIPLA 2015.
VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION SLIDE 0 New Requirements for VA ORD Investigators: Implementation of Data Management and Access Plans.
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations Miscellaneous Issues October 23,
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Miners Rights Rights & Responsibilities Under the Mine Safety & Health Act of 1977 NC DOL Mine & Quarry Bureau Mine Safety & Health Training Revised 2010.
Regulation of Generic Animal Drugs in the United States
Customs Rulings and Protests Tips and Best Practices Atlanta International Forwarders and Brokers Association March 8,
The Life Sciences Lawyer’s Guide to PTA and PTE
The Basics of Intellectual Property Reporting
International Trademark Association U.S. Roundtable Program
Dispute Resolution Between ICT Service Providers in Saudi Arabia
Patent Term Extension In Israel
New Frontiers in Rights-of-Way
Biotechnology Chemical Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership
PATENT LAW TREATY Gena Jones Senior Legal Advisor
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
Pharma Workshop IV Patent Linkage in the USA
Linda M. Chatwin, Esq. RAC Business Manager, UL LLC
Presentation transcript:

1 Patent Term Extension under 35 U.S.C. § 156 Mary C. Till Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal Administration

2 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Patent Term Extension, under 35 U.S.C. § 156, as part of the Hatch-Waxman Act, restores to a patent owner, patent term which was effectively “lost” due to pre-market approval requirements before a regulating agency (the agencies involved are the Food and Drug Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture).

3 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Statutory Requirements: The patent claims the product, or a method of using the product or a method of manufacturing the product. (35 U.S.C. § 156(a)) The term of the patent has not expired before the application for PTE has been submitted (35 U.S.C. § 156(a)(1)). The term has never been extended under 156 before (35 U.S.C. § 156(a)(2)).

4 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Statutory Requirements (cont’d): An application is submitted by the patent owner or its agent (35 U.S.C. § 156(a)(3)). The product claimed by the patent has been subject to regulatory review before its commercial marketing or use (35 U.S.C. § 156(a)(4)).

5 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Statutory Requirements (cont’d): The permission for the commercial marketing or use of the product after the regulatory review period is the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the product under the provisions of law under which such regulatory review period occurred (35 U.S.C. §156(a)(5)).

6 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Statutory Requirements (cont’d): An application for patent term extension must be submitted by the owner or record or its agent to the USPTO within the sixty day period beginning on the date the product received permission under the provision of law under which the applicable regulatory review period occurred for commercial marketing or use (35 U.S.C. §156(d)(1)).

7 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Scope of Patent Term Extension 35 U.S.C. § 156(b) The “rights derived” section of 156 specifically defines the scope of protection afforded during the extended period. The rights are dependent upon the type of patent for which extension was sought, i.e., a patent which claims the approved product (§ 156(b)(1)), or a patent which claims a method of using the approved product (§ 156(b)(2)) or a patent which claims a method of manufacturing the approved product (§ 156(b)(3)).

8 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Limitations in 35 U.S.C. § 156(c) The term of an eligible patent shall be extended by the time equal to the regulatory review period for the approved product: Includes only time after the date the patent is issued. Time where applicant failed to exercise due diligence as determined under §156(d)(2)(B) is subtracted. Only one-half of the time in the periods described in paragraphs (1)(B)(i), (2)(B)(i), (3)(B)(i), (4)(B)(i), and (5)(B)(i) of subsection (g) is counted. Only one patent may be extended per regulatory review period.

9 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Requirements of 35 U.S.C. 156(d) The owner of record or his agent must make the application (35 U.S.C. § (d)(1)). Within the sixty-day period beginning on the date the product received permission... for commercial marketing or use (35 U.S.C. § (d)(1)). Application contents (35 U.S.C. § (d)(1)(A)-(E)).

10 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Duties under 35 U.S.C. § 156(e) The Director, upon determining eligibility and compliance with the statutory requirements, shall issue to the applicant for the extension of the term of the patent, a certificate of extension, under seal, for the period prescribed by subsection (c). The certificate of extension shall be recorded in the official file of the patent and shall be considered as part of the original patent.

11 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Limitations on Amount of Term The total market exclusivity time of a drug cannot exceed 14 years, regardless of how much time was lost to clinical testing and regulatory review. See 35 U.S.C. § 156(c)(3). The total time of extension is limited to no more than 5 years. See 35 U.S.C. § 156(g)(6).

12 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Combination Products Where a product contains multiple active ingredients, if any one active ingredient has not been previously approved, it can form the basis of an extension of patent term provided the patent claims that ingredient. See 35 U.S.C. 156(f)(2)(B).

13 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Two Types of Interim Extensions First, interim extensions are available if the patent will expire before product approval. However, product must be in the “approval phase.” Application is filed under 35 U.S.C. § 156(d)(5). There is a time window for filing the application for interim extension where the product has not yet received regulatory approval, between six months and fifteen days before patent expiration. Second, interim extensions are available if the patent will expire before processing of the application for PTE is complete. According to 35 U.S.C. § 156(e)(2), the Director shall extend the term of a patent for periods of up to one year, if the patent would expire before a certificate or extension can be issued or denied, if he determines that the patent is eligible for extension.

14 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Somerset v. Dudas (Fed. Cir. 2007) Applicant sought to extend a patent based on the regulatory review of Emsam® (selegiline formulated in a transdermal patch). USPTO denied the application for patent term extension because the USPTO determined that the permission for commercial marketing or use of Emsam ® failed to comply with 35 U.S.C. § 156(a)(5)(A). Because the application for patent term extension was denied the USPTO had no authority to grant an interim extension pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 156(e)(2).

15 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 USPTO Processing of Patent Term Extension Applications Review Application for compliance with 37 CFR 1.740(a)(1)-(15) and some formal matters (assignment, maintenance fee, trademark, etc.) Review claims for compliance with 35 U.S.C. 156(a), “the term of a patent which claims a product, a method of using a product or a method of manufacturing a product....”

16 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 USPTO Processing of Patent Term Extension Applications (cont’d) After USPTO initial review, USPTO corresponds with the regulating agency and asks for the regulating agency’s determination of eligibility. Once the regulating agency confirms eligibility, then USPTO requests that the regulating agency determine the regulatory review period and publish its findings in the Federal Register. Once the comment period and period for filing any due diligence petitions pursuant to the Federal Register notice is concluded, the regulating agency makes their final determination. Then the USPTO independently calculates the patent term extension and applies any of the statutory caps to the amount of term calculated and communicates their findings to the applicant. If applicant agrees with the USPTO’s determination, the certificate of extension is granted.

17 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Two statutory criteria hotly contested: Definition of “product” 60-day application filing period

18 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 “Product” means: A drug product Any medical device, food additive or color additive subject to regulation under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act See 35 U.S.C. 156(f)(1)

19 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Section 156(a)(5)(A) requires that the permission for the commercial marketing or use of the product... [be] the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the product under the provision of law under which such regulatory review period occurred Section 156(f)(1) defines product as drug product Section 156(f)(2) defines drug product as active ingredient of a new drug... including any salt or ester of the active ingredient, as a single entity or in combination with another active ingredient

20 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Photocure v. Dudas (E.D. Va.) Photocure filed PTE application for METVIXIA® (methyl aminolevulinate hydrochloride) USPTO denied the application for failing to be the first commercial marketing of the active ingredient USPTO reasons that ALA is active ingredient of both METVIXIA ® and the earlier-approved drug LEVULAN® FDA approves LEVULAN® (aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride) FDA approves METVIXIA® (methyl aminolevulate hydrochloride)

21 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Photocure v. Dudas (E.D. Va.) (cont’d) Issue is: meaning of term “active ingredient” USPTO definition: active moiety, excluding salt or ester Stay tuned…summary judgment argued December 2008, awaiting decision.

22 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Section 156(d)(1) requires the owner of the patent to file an application, “within the sixty- day period beginning on the date the product received permission” 60-Day Application Filing Window

23 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Useful Information: Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § and §1.740(a)(13), the Applicant for extension has a duty of candor and good faith to the Director and the Secretary of Health and Human Services or the Secretary of Agriculture. More than one application for patent term extension can be filed per single regulatory review period. In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 1.785, the USPTO would require that the applicant for patent term extension elect one patent to receive the extension. Patent Term Adjustment under 35 U.S.C. § 154(b) is added to the original expiration date prior to any extension under section 156. Terminally disclaimed patents are eligible (Merck & Co. v. Hi-Tech Pharmacal, Co., Inc., Fed. Cir. 2007) for extension under § 156.

24 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Useful On-line Resources Public PAIR: Over 300 PTE applications associated with the patent files, some completed and some in process are available on Public PAIR. The USPTO updates the list of patent terms extended on an as needed basis. It can be found at: ml ml Chapter 2700 of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure provides some commentary on the finer points of PTE applications and processing: pdf pdf

25 Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. §156 Thank you! Contact Information: Mary C. Till Legal Advisor, Office of Patent Legal Administration