An Energy Product Breakthrough! Bob Hughes Manager, Product Marketing Georgia Power Company FlatBill for the Energy Industry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pay-As-You-Save (PAYS®) March 8, 2005 Paul A. Cillo Harlan Lachman Energy Efficiency Institute, Inc.
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Dynamic Pricing - Potential and Issues Joe Wharton and Ahmad Faruqui Kansas Corporation Commission Workshop on Energy Efficiency March 25, 2008.
Winter Heating Season Presentation To: Delaware Public Service Commission June 17, 2008.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Objective 5.02 The Price Strategy.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
1 The Potential For Implementing Demand Response Programs In Illinois Rick Voytas Manager, Corporate Analysis Ameren Services May 12, 2006.
1 Wal-Mart’s View on Demand Response Program Design Anoush Farhangi Angela Beehler.
Electrical Engineering Fundamentals for Non-EEs; © B. Rauf
Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Separate Efforts or Two Ends of a Continuum? A Presentation to: Association of Edison Illuminating Companies Reno,
ECO 436 Natural Gas. ECO 436 David Loomis Natural Gas Unbundling in IL for Small Customers 1What are benefits to unbundling? 1What are the.
Customer Presentation
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
1 Managing Revenues in Regulated Industries Rate Design May 2008 Richard Soderman Director-Legislative Policy and Strategy.
Community Electricity Aggregation Public Information Session May 21, 2015 Martha Grover, Energy Efficiency Manager Office of Planning and Community Development.
Form #S For Agent Use Only Simplicity Agent Training.
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 14 Energy Efficiency Module 14: DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT.
Market Analysis Writing and Presenting a Business Plan Chapter 2.
COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY MARKETS March 15, PA Customer Choice Legislation  Distribution service remains regulated by PAPUC.  Transmission service.
NEW YORK Market Profile July NEW YORK Market Service Map Market Size: $21.7 Billion Market Potential 20.9 Million Potential Customers.
Incentive Regulation Topics Scott A. Struck, CPA Financial Analysis Division Public Utilities Bureau Illinois Commerce Commission.
Less is More: SEE Action and the Power of Efficiency Hon. Phyllis Reha Commissioner, Minnesota PUC Co-Chair, SEE Action Customer Information and Behavior.
Incentive Mechanisms NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and Finance Portland, Oregon September 8-12, 2013 Presented By Bill Steele Bill Steele and.
GDS Associates, Inc. 1 Virginia Energy Efficiency and Conservation Savings Potential Presented by Richard F. Spellman Vice President GDS Associates, Inc.
Plug-In Vehicles are Here, More are Coming major auto manufacturers with 10 production models over 20 production models Consensus - 3.
Project Planning and Capital Budgeting
From NTS review to unmetered calls: an Internet company’s perspective Simon Hampton European Public Affairs Director AOL Europe.
Dealing with Customers’ Inability to Pay in Tough Economic Times The Memphis Light, Gas and Water Perspective Jerry R. Collins Jr., P.E. President & CEO.
Green Energy Program Redesign Wilson Mallard – Georgia Power Company NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and Finance Fall Meeting October 13, 2008 Wilson.
Innovative approach to DSM through Open Access Jayant Deo MD & CEO, Indian Energy Exchange
Presentation to the: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Demand-Side Response Working Group December 8, 2006 Gas Utility Decoupling in New Jersey A.
MEC: Customer Profitability Models Topic DSM – DR, Advanced EE and Dispatch Ability Jesse Langston, OG&E Oct 20 th 2013.
Energy Efficiency Program Costs Project No Rulemaking to Amend Energy Efficiency Rule June 30, 2010.
© 2008 Eventure Events. All rights reserved. Customer Self-Service and Empowerment Lawanda Parnell Senior Director, Enterprise Application Delivery Sandra.
Regulatory Responses to Natural Gas Price Volatility Commissioner Donald L. Mason, Esq. Vice-Chairman of NARUC Gas Committee Vice Chairman or the IOGCC.
Demand Response How to make money by not using electricity?
Energy Analysis Office Lori Bird Senior Energy Analyst National Renewable Energy Lab Trends in Utility Green Pricing Programs 10 th.
Leveraging the Skills of Load Research to Add to the Bottom Line AEIC Load Research Conference Myrtle Beach, SC July 10-13, 2005.
MAY 17, 2001 ENERGY MARKETS IN TURMOIL PRESENTED TO THE INSTITUTE FOR REGULATORY POLICY STUDIES
PG&E Winter Bill Programs and Plans Low Income Oversight Board Meeting September 17, 2008 Sacramento, CA.
Public Water and Sewer Affordability Meg Neafsey American Water April 30, 2015.
MODULE ? CUSTOMER CHOICE PROGRAM. The opportunity for a retail electric or natural gas customer to choose who supplies their electric or natural gas.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Strategic Planning for DSM in a Community-owned Utility Presented by Shu-Sun Kwan & Ed Arguello Colorado Springs Utilities 2005 APPA Engineering & Operations.
0 Florida’s Medicaid Reform National Medicaid Congress June 5, 2006 Thomas W. Arnold Deputy Secretary for Medicaid.
The Governor’s Plan for a Healthier Indiana
Developing A Price Structure Chapter 16. Price Administration Price administration is also concerned with handling price adjustments for sales made under.
Dynamic Pricing Case Studies. Digi International.
2/27/ % below 2005 by 2020 cap and trade 11/15/2007 set emissions targets by 11/15/08 ~60-80% cuts by ???? (2040?) cap and trade; C inventory, reporting.
Demand Response
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
SEE Energy Poverty Nexus Aleksandar Kovacevic. 2 Concept of Affordable Energy compromises: Total social costs of energy that could be covered by productivity.
Marin Clean Energy Choice and Competition - Driving Innovation towards Environmental Goals May 2015.
Karen Chiang Diane Cunningham Southern Company Load Research 1 When Normal Weather Is Not Normal AEIC Load Research Workshop April 2006.
CEC Public Workshop Order Instituting Informational and Rulemaking Proceeding (08-DR-01) March 3, 2008.
June 17, 2015 (Regina) June 18, 2015 (Saskatoon) SaskEnergy 2015 Rate Application.
San Diego Gas & Electric February 24 th, 2016 Energy Matinee Pricing Tariff Proposal.
Pay-As-You-Go Update November Program Overview Paying advance for electricity Flexibility and Customer benefits Make as many payments as necessary.
Los Angeles County Community Choice Aggregation Regional CCA Task Force Meeting October 28, 2015.
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND PLAN 2010 Emerging Energy Solutions 1.
State and Regional GHG Initiatives What are the individual states doing to mitigate GHG emissions? What are the common elements? and regional differences?
Advanced Meter School August 18-20,2015 Time of Use and Load Profile Jeremiah Swann.
POSITIVE ENERGY TOGETHER ® Pay As You Go - Draft Executive Product Development Meeting 3/29/2013.
Inclusive Financing for Housing Energy Upgrades
Time-of-Use Options.
Propensity Modeling and Targeted Marketing
Tom Clark Vice President, Customer Service & Service Area Development
Retail Rate Design & Administration
Presentation transcript:

An Energy Product Breakthrough! Bob Hughes Manager, Product Marketing Georgia Power Company FlatBill for the Energy Industry

Residential and Small Commercial Customer Concerns  Some customers want to know exactly how much they will be paying for utilities – No Surprises!  They want a totally flat bill with no possible bump or additional, after-the-fact charge when costs are higher than had been expected as found with Budget Billing  Many customers dislike their bills for energy subject to the weather  They are better able to manage their energy bills if the bills are spread equally over the year rather than spiking in certain months

FlatBill: A Classic Win-Win Product on the Verge of Market Prominence  FlatBill is an exciting and remarkable pricing innovation!  Customer is offered a Flat price for an entire billing period regardless of underlying costs and usage changes  Conceived through market research directed at mass markets  Will capture a large market share AND  Provides a healthy return to the provider!

Program Design Target Customers  Residential/small commercial  At least one year history  Good credit but may be ideal for bad credit

Electric Utilities Commission Approval Status Map Permanent FlatBill Tariff Pilot FlatBill Tariff Without FlatBill

Electric Utilities Offering Flat Bill  Permanently approved tariffs  Georgia Power  Duke Power  Progress Energy (NC, SC)  Gulf Power Company  Indianapolis Power & Light  Pilots  Jacksonville Electric Authority  Oklahoma Gas & Electric  Alabama Power Company  Pending approval or roll-out  Savannah Electric  East Kentucky Power Cooperative  Public Service of Indiana  Electric Power Board of Chattanooga

Why Should Utilities Offer FlatBill?  Marketing and financial product catalyst  Customer satisfaction  High retention  Open access Customer Satisfaction Customer Choice 95% of those surveyed said Flat Bill met/exceeded expectations 71% of those surveyed said they are very “likely” to renew; 1% “unlikely”; actual renewals > 90%

Why Offer Flat Bill? Customer Satisfaction Results  Favorable public reaction (Ex. In Georgia received favorable press in local newspaper, AP Press, Local Radio/TV, Paul Harvey newscast)  Reduction to deferred payments  10%+ market penetration rate for residential customers  Enrollment rates vary based on customer segment and profile

Why Should Utilities Offer Flat Bill?  Earnings  + $1.3m EBIT per every 25,000  Pricing product portfolio fit  Penetration 7-15% for residential; 5% for commercial  Growth  Primarily off peak

Why Should Utilities Offer Flat Bill?  Addresses some regulatory concern  Creates bill simplicity by bundling components  Complaints due to unexpectedly high bills  Flat billing products approved by regulators in at least 10 states  Catalyst for product innovations in the mass market

What to Expect from FlatBill?  Healthy growth mostly off-peak  High customer satisfaction and renewal  Reduced deferral payments and bad debt  Good penetration rates with attractive premiums  Strong interest from budget pay customers  Manageable risks  Natural hedge

Flat Bill Data Management Actual Usage OFFERS Analysis & Design* Weather Pricing Parameters Customer Care and Marketing CUSTOMERS Accounting and Risk Mgmt Agents Pricing Department Historical Usage Billing System and Data Bases Tracking Software Inputs/Outputs Systems Offer Software Reports *Christensen Associations **Direct Options * * * *

Flat Bill Issues  Accounting  Above or below  Regulatory approval/Conservation  Volatility of Fuel Cost  Program Resource Needs  Target Marketing  Renewals  Segmentation  Tracking software  Reporting

FlatBill Issues  Pilot or permanent initial rollout  Financial impacts  Product design –Bill algorithm and software Risk coverage and premium –Tariff design Eligibility Pro-rate Force majeure Early termination Meter route changes Budget billing History and credit

FlatBill  Separating Fact from Fiction!!

The Georgia Power FlatBill™ Experience  Pilot programs: residential, small commercial  500 customers –  10,000 customers –  Permanent program – present  130,000 customers approx. in population of 1.3 million  Renewal rates: very high  Issues:  Measurement of response  Treatment of rapid-growth customers  Pricing strategy (segmentation needed?)

Unfounded Risk Perceptions  System Capacity Will Suffer  Customers Won’t Buy It  Unmanageable Risk  Regulators Won’t Approve It

System Capacity Doesn’t Suffer  There is an increase in energy and demand consumption  Occurred during off-peak times  Program accurately measures participant’s change in behavior  Change in demand is quantified and factored into following year’s pricing  Efficiency rewarded with a lower offer  Program materials encourage energy efficiency

Customers Buy It  Customers value predictability and are willing to pay a premium to get it  Appeals to identifiable customer segments  Can be modified to extend reach into incremental segments  Results have exceeded clients’ expectations

The Risk Reality  Program not designed to “win” every year  Earn a given return over multiple years  Product not for every customer  GPC exceeded goals in 2001, 2002 and 2003 and 2004  Need remains for a Budget Billing (EPP) product

Regulators Do Approve  Shift risk away from customers to utility  Reduces customer complaints to commission  Gives customer the opportunity to say, “No”  At least seven states have granted approval

Offer Development  KISS – Keep It Simple & Sweet  Focus on customer benefits  Vary Terms & Conditions of offer to meet needs of the market segment  Facilitate customer understanding  Provide meaningful comparisons  Make it easy to say “Yes”

Market Segmentation  Various target audiences  Customer segments are “offer sensitive”  Product supports various offers and pricing/payment options  Propensity model assists in segmentation

Creative Materials Tested a range of formats and messages  #10 Personalized Mailing  Follow-up “Deadline” Mailer  Enrollment Confirmation Package  Avoid jargon, caveats and “commission” language  Allow customer to make informed decision

25 Bill Volatility Extreme Weather Bad Credit Seasonal Effects Developer Packages Conservation Package Multi-year Apartment Packages “Green” Package Prepay w/Discount Prepay “Phone card” Limits Plus Banded Flat Bill Standard Flat Bill Flat Bill Family