CAS Chios, 18-30 September 20111 LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS Frank Tecker based on the course by Joël Le Duff Many Thanks! CAS on Intermediate Level Accelerator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 1 Electromagnetic Fields
Advertisements

CHAPTER 5 CROSSED-FIELD TUBES (M-TYPE TUBES)
Particle Accelerators
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Synchrotron Radiation What is it ? Rate of energy loss Longitudinal damping Transverse damping Quantum fluctuations Wigglers Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
Transverse optics 2: Hill’s equation Phase Space Emittance & Acceptance Matrix formalism Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
M. LindroosNUFACT06 School Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Mats Lindroos.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS
Introduction to Particle Accelerators Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis CERN & University of Oxford October 2010 Chulalongkorn University Bangkok, Thailand.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
Introduction to particle accelerators Walter Scandale CERN - AT department Roma, marzo 2006.
Lecture 3 - E. Wilson - 22 Oct 2014 –- Slide 1 Lecture 3 - Magnets and Transverse Dynamics I ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Alessandra Lombardi BE/ ABP CERN
Motion in a constant uniform magnetic field Section 21.
Advanced CAS, Warsaw, September LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS RECAP Frank Tecker CERN, BE-OP Advanced Accelerator Physics Course Warsaw, 27/9-9/10/2015.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
and Accelerator Physics
Double RF system at IUCF Shaoheng Wang 06/15/04. Contents 1.Introduction of Double RF System 2.Phase modulation  Single cavity case  Double cavity case.
Synchrotron Radiation
Lecture 25 - E. Wilson - 12/15/ Slide 1 Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson
Lecture 5 Damping Ring Basics Susanna Guiducci (INFN-LNF) May 21, 2006 ILC Accelerator school.
Zeuten 19 - E. Wilson - 1/18/ Slide 1 Recap. of Transverse Dynamics E. Wilson – 15 th September 2003  Transverse Coordinates  Relativistic definitions.
Tuesday, 02 September 2008FFAG08, Manchester Stephan I. Tzenov1 Modeling the EMMA Lattice Stephan I. Tzenov and Bruno D. Muratori STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
1 Linear Wave Equation The maximum values of the transverse speed and transverse acceleration are v y, max =  A a y, max =  2 A The transverse speed.
1 LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS Slides of Frank Tecker CERN, BE-OP Presented by Piotr Skowronski CERN, BE-ABP Part One.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
R. Bartolini, John Adams Institute, 19 November 20141/39 Electron beam dynamics in storage rings Synchrotron radiation and its effect on electron dynamics.
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
Zeuten 2 - E. Wilson - 2/26/ Slide 1 Transverse Dynamics – E. Wilson – CERN – 16 th September 2003  The lattice calculated  Solution of Hill 
Lecture 4 - E. Wilson - 23 Oct 2014 –- Slide 1 Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
Lecture 4 - E. Wilson –- Slide 1 Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
ELENA RF Manipulations S. Hancock. Apart from debunching before and rebunching after cooling, the principal role of the rf is to decelerate the beam and.
Elliptic Integrals Section 4.4 & Appendix B Brief math interlude: –Solutions to certain types of nonlinear oscillator problems, while not expressible.
WIR SCHAFFEN WISSEN – HEUTE FÜR MORGEN Pendulum Equations and Low Gain Regime Sven Reiche :: SwissFEL Beam Dynamics Group :: Paul Scherrer Institute CERN.
Professor Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University ACAS School for Accelerator Physics January 2014 Longitudinal Dynamics.
WIR SCHAFFEN WISSEN – HEUTE FÜR MORGEN Motion in an Undulator Sven Reiche :: SwissFEL Beam Dynamics Group :: Paul Scherrer Institute CERN Accelerator School.
6 July 2010 | TU Darmstadt | Fachbereich 18 | Institut Theorie Elektromagnetischer Felder | Sabrina Appel | 1 Micro bunch evolution and „turbulent beams“
Lecture 5 - E. Wilson - 6/29/ Slide 1 Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
Damping rings, Linear Collider School Linear beam dynamics overview Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU Accelerator and Beam Physics group Beams Department CERN.
Collective Effect II Giuliano Franchetti, GSI CERN Accelerator – School Prague 11/9/14G. Franchetti1.
Longitudinal Dynamics of Charged Particle
Lecture A3: Damping Rings
Beam Dynamics in Electron Storage Ring
Academic Training Lecture 2 : Beam Dynamics
Large Booster and Collider Ring
LONGITUDINAL beam DYNAMICS RECAP
The Strong RF Focusing:
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2011 E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2015 E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
PHY 554 Fundamentals of Accelerator Physics Lecture 12: Longitudinal Dynamics October 10, 2018 Vladimir N. Litvinenko
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 8
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson
AXEL-2011 Introduction to Particle Accelerators
Accelerator Physics G. A. Krafft, A. Bogacz, and H. Sayed
Accelerator Physics Coupling Control
Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics
Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture 2 - Transverse motion
Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2015 E. J. N. Wilson.
ΑΡΙΣΤΟΤΕΛΕΙΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗΣ
Longitudinal Focusing & The Gamma Transition
Presentation transcript:

CAS Chios, September LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS Frank Tecker based on the course by Joël Le Duff Many Thanks! CAS on Intermediate Level Accelerator Physics Course Chios, September 2011

CAS Chios, September Summary Radio-Frequency Acceleration and Synchronism Condition Principle of Phase Stability and Consequences The Synchrotron Dispersion Effects in Synchrotron Energy-Phase Equations Longitudinal Phase Space Motion Stationary Bucket Injection Matching From Synchrotron to Linac Adiabatic Damping Dynamics in the vicinity of transition energy

CAS Chios, September Bibliography M. Conte, W.W. Mac Kay An Introduction to the Physics of particle Accelerators (World Scientific, 1991) P. J. Bryant and K. Johnsen The Principles of Circular Accelerators and Storage Rings (Cambridge University Press, 1993) D. A. Edwards, M. J. Syphers An Introduction to the Physics of High Energy Accelerators (J. Wiley & sons, Inc, 1993) H. Wiedemann Particle Accelerator Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993) M. Reiser Theory and Design of Charged Particles Beams (J. Wiley & sons, 1994) A. Chao, M. Tigner Handbook of Accelerator Physics and Engineering (World Scientific 1998) K. Wille The Physics of Particle Accelerators: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2000) E.J.N. Wilson An introduction to Particle Accelerators (Oxford University Press, 2001) And CERN Accelerator Schools (CAS) Proceedings

CAS Chios, September Main Characteristics of an Accelerator ACCELERATION is the main job of an accelerator. It provides kinetic energy to charged particles, hence increasing their momentum. In order to do so, it is necessary to have an electric field, preferably along the direction of the initial momentum. BENDING is generated by a magnetic field perpendicular to the plane of the particle trajectory. The bending radius  obeys to the relation : FOCUSING is a second way of using a magnetic field, in which the bending effect is used to bring the particles trajectory closer to the axis, hence to increase the beam density. Newton-Lorentz Force on a charged particle: 2 nd term always perpendicular to motion => no acceleration in practical units:

CAS Chios, September Radio-Frequency Acceleration Cylindrical electrodes (drift tubes) separated by gaps and fed by a RF generator, as shown above, lead to an alternating electric field polarity Synchronism condition L = v T/2 v = particle velocity T = RF period D.Schulte Similar for standing wave cavity as shown

CAS Chios, September Radio-Frequency Acceleration (2) L = vT/2 (π mode) L = vT (2π mode) Single Gap Multi-Gap

CAS Chios, September Energy Gain RF Acceleration (neglecting transit time factor) The field will change during the passage of the particle through the cavity => effective energy gain is lower Newton-Lorentz Force Relativistics Dynamics 2 nd term always perpendicular to motion => no acceleration

CAS Chios, September Transit time factor In the general case, the transit time factor is: Defined as: T a < 1 T a  1 for g  0, smaller ω RF Important for low velocities (ions) Example for g= βλ /3: for Simple model uniform field: follows:

CAS Chios, September Let’s consider a succession of accelerating gaps, operating in the 2π mode, for which the synchronism condition is fulfilled for a phase  s. For a 2π mode, the electric field is the same in all gaps at any given time. is the energy gain in one gap for the particle to reach the next gap with the same RF phase: P 1,P 2, …… are fixed points. Principle of Phase Stability (Linac) If an energy increase is transferred into a velocity increase => M 1 & N 1 will move towards P 1 => stable M 2 & N 2 will go away from P 2 => unstable (Highly relativistic particles have no significant velocity change)

CAS Chios, September Longitudinal phase stability means : The divergence of the field is zero according to Maxwell : defocusing RF force External focusing (solenoid, quadrupole) is then necessary A Consequence of Phase Stability Transverse focusing fields at the entrance and defocusing at the exit of the cavity. Electrostatic case: Energy gain inside the cavity leads to focusing RF case: Field increases during passage => transverse defocusing!

CAS Chios, September Circular accelerators: The Synchrotron The synchrotron is a synchronous accelerator since there is a synchronous RF phase for which the energy gain fits the increase of the magnetic field at each turn. That implies the following operating conditions: Energy gain per turn Synchronous particle RF synchronism (h - harmonic number) Constant orbit Variable magnetic field If v≈c,  r hence  RF remain constant (ultra-relativistic e - ) B injectionextraction  R E Bending magnet

CAS Chios, September Energy ramping is simply obtained by varying the B field (frequency follows v): Since: The number of stable synchronous particles is equal to the harmonic number h. They are equally spaced along the circumference. Each synchronous particle satisfies the relation p=eB . They have the nominal energy and follow the nominal trajectory. The Synchrotron (2) Stable phase φ s changes during energy ramping

CAS Chios, September Dispersion Effects in a Synchrotron If a particle is slightly shifted in momentum it will have a different orbit and the length is different. The “momentum compaction factor” is defined as: If the particle is shifted in momentum it will have also a different velocity. As a result of both effects the revolution frequency changes: p=particle momentum R=synchrotron physical radius f r =revolution frequency E+  E E cavity Circumference 2  R

CAS Chios, September Dispersion Effects in a Synchrotron (2) dd x The elementary path difference from the two orbits is: leading to the total change in the circumference: With ρ =∞ in straight sections we get: m means that the average is considered over the bending magnet only definition of dispersion D x

CAS Chios, September Dispersion Effects in a Synchrotron (3)  =0 at the transition energy definition of momentum compaction factor

CAS Chios, September Phase Stability in a Synchrotron From the definition of  it is clear that an increase in energy gives - below transition ( η > 0) a higher revolution frequency (increase in velocity dominates) while - above transition ( η 0) dominates. Stable synchr. Particle for  < 0  > 0 Crossing transition during acceleration makes the previous stable synchronous phase unstable. RF system needs to make a ‘phase jump’.

CAS Chios, September Longitudinal Dynamics It is also often called “synchrotron motion”. The RF acceleration process clearly emphasizes two coupled variables, the energy gained by the particle and the RF phase experienced by the same particle. Since there is a well defined synchronous particle which has always the same phase  s, and the nominal energy E s, it is sufficient to follow other particles with respect to that particle. So let’s introduce the following reduced variables: revolution frequency :  f r = f r – f rs particle RF phase :  =  -  s particle momentum :  p = p - p s particle energy :  E = E – E s azimuth angle :  =  -  s

CAS Chios, September First Energy-Phase Equation For a given particle with respect to the reference one: Since: one gets: and particle ahead arrives earlier => smaller RF phase ss  R v

CAS Chios, September Second Energy-Phase Equation The rate of energy gained by a particle is: The rate of relative energy gain with respect to the reference particle is then: leads to the second energy-phase equation: Expanding the left-hand side to first order:

CAS Chios, September Equations of Longitudinal Motion deriving and combining This second order equation is non linear. Moreover the parameters within the bracket are in general slowly varying with time. We will study some cases later…

CAS Chios, September Hamiltonian of Longitudinal Motion Introducing a new convenient variable, W, leads to the 1 st order equations: The two variables ,W are canonical since these equations of motion can be derived from a Hamiltonian H( ,W,t):

CAS Chios, September Small Amplitude Oscillations (for small  ) with Let’s assume constant parameters R s, p s,  s and  : Consider now small phase deviations from the reference particle: and the corresponding linearized motion reduces to a harmonic oscillation: where  s is the synchrotron angular frequency

CAS Chios, September Stability is obtained when  s is real and so  s 2 positive: V RF cos (  s ) accelerationdeceleration Stable in the region if Stability condition for ϕ s  <  tr  >  tr

CAS Chios, September Large Amplitude Oscillations For larger phase (or energy) deviations from the reference the second order differential equation is non-linear: (  s as previously defined) Multiplying by and integrating gives an invariant of the motion: which for small amplitudes reduces to: (the variable is , and  s is constant) Similar equations exist for the second variable :  E  d  /dt

CAS Chios, September Large Amplitude Oscillations (2) Second value  m where the separatrix crosses the horizontal axis: Equation of the separatrix: When  reaches  -  s the force goes to zero and beyond it becomes non restoring. Hence  -  s is an extreme amplitude for a stable motion which in the phase space( ) is shown as closed trajectories. Area within this separatrix is called “RF bucket”.

CAS Chios, September Energy Acceptance From the equation of motion it is seen that reaches an extreme when, hence corresponding to. Introducing this value into the equation of the separatrix gives: That translates into an acceptance in energy: This “RF acceptance” depends strongly on  s and plays an important role for the capture at injection, and the stored beam lifetime.

CAS Chios, September RF Acceptance versus Synchronous Phase The areas of stable motion (closed trajectories) are called “BUCKET”. As the synchronous phase gets closer to 90º the buckets gets smaller. The number of circulating buckets is equal to “h”. The phase extension of the bucket is maximum for  s =180º (or 0°) which correspond to no acceleration. The RF acceptance increases with the RF voltage.

CAS Chios, September Potential Energy Function The longitudinal motion is produced by a force that can be derived from a scalar potential: The sum of the potential energy and kinetic energy is constant and by analogy represents the total energy of a non-dissipative system.

CAS Chios, September Stationnary Bucket - Separatrix This is the case sin  s =0 (no acceleration) which means  s =0 or . The equation of the separatrix for  s =  (above transition) becomes: Replacing the phase derivative by the canonical variable W: and introducing the expression for  s leads to the following equation for the separatrix: with C=2  R s W  0  22 W bk

CAS Chios, September Stationnary Bucket (2) Setting  =  in the previous equation gives the height of the bucket: The area of the bucket is: Since: one gets: This results in the maximum energy acceptance:

CAS Chios, September Bunch Matching into a Stationnary Bucket A particle trajectory inside the separatrix is described by the equation: W  0  22 W bk WbWb  mm 2-m2-m  s =  The points where the trajectory crosses the axis are symmetric with respect to  s = 

CAS Chios, September Bunch Matching into a Stationnary Bucket (2) Setting    in the previous formula allows to calculate the bunch height: or: This formula shows that for a given bunch energy spread the proper matching of a shorter bunch (  m close to , small) will require a bigger RF acceptance, hence a higher voltage For small oscillation amplitudes the equation of the ellipse reduces to: Ellipse area is called longitudinal emittance

CAS Chios, September Effect of a Mismatch Injected bunch: short length and large energy spread after 1/4 synchrotron period: longer bunch with a smaller energy spread. W W  For larger amplitudes, the angular phase space motion is slower (1/8 period shown below) => can lead to filamentation and emittance growth stationary bucketaccelerating bucket

CAS Chios, September Capture of a Debunched Beam with Fast Turn-On

CAS Chios, September Capture of a Debunched Beam with Adiabatic Turn-On

CAS Chios, September From Synchrotron to Linac In the linac there is no bending magnets, hence there is no dispersion effects on the orbit and  =0 and  =1/  2. cavity EzEz s or z

CAS Chios, September From Synchrotron to Linac (2) Moreover one has: Since in the linac  =0 and  =1/  2, the longitudinal frequency becomes: leading to: Since in a linac the independent variable is z rather than t one gets by using in terms of ϕ (z): The longitudinal distribution is fixed for higher energy!

CAS Chios, September Adiabatic Damping Though there are many physical processes that can damp the longitudinal oscillation amplitudes, one is directly generated by the acceleration process itself. It will happen in the synchrotron, even ultra-relativistic, when ramping the energy but not in the ultra- relativistic electron linac which does not show any oscillation. As a matter of fact, when E s varies with time, one needs to be more careful in combining the two first order energy-phase equations in one second order equation: The damping coefficient is proportional to the rate of energy variation and from the definition of  s one has:

CAS Chios, September Adiabatic Damping (2) So far it was assumed that parameters related to the acceleration process were constant. Let’s consider now that they vary slowly with respect to the period of longitudinal oscillation (adiabaticity). For small amplitude oscillations the hamiltonian reduces to: with Under adiabatic conditions the Boltzman-Ehrenfest theorem states that the action integral remains constant: (W,  are canonical variables) Since: the action integral becomes:

CAS Chios, September Adiabatic Damping (3) leads to: Previous integral over one period: From the quadratic form of the hamiltonian one gets the relation: Finally under adiabatic conditions the long term evolution of the oscillation amplitudes is shown to be:

CAS Chios, September Dynamics in the Vicinity of Transition Energy one gets: Introducing in the previous expressions:

CAS Chios, September Dynamics in the Vicinity of Transition Energy (2) In fact close to transition, adiabatic solution are not valid since parameters change too fast. A proper treatment would show that:  will not go to zero  E will not go to infinity tt tt tt   