DEVELOPMENT PLANNING FIVE YEAR PLANS Leena Shankaranarayana.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
African Union Commission Economic Report on Africa 2011 Economic Report on Africa 2011 Governing development in Africa – the role of the state in economic.
Advertisements

The Development Priorities of China ’ s of 11th Five-year Plan XU Lin( 徐林) National Development and Reforming Commission of PRC
EIGHTH FIVE YEAR PLAN( )  The planning commission formulated the document detailing the ‘ Objectives, thrust and macro dimensions’ of the Eighth.
ECONOMIC PLANNING IN INDIA
Shaping Growth of Petrochemicals in India Amit Chaturvedi Reliance Industries Limited 1.
Millennium Development Goals: China ’ s Progress Liu Fuhe Director of Policy and Legal Department, State Council Leading Group Office of Poverty Alleviation.
1 September 2, 2011 Secretary Ministry of Economic Affairs ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICY, FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT.
Lusaka, 1 December 2010 Public Expenditure Review Workshop.
Derek Eaton Division of Technology, Industry & Economics Economics & Trade Branch Geneva, Switzerland “Designing the Green Economy” Centre for International.
Agricultural and Policy Development in China Agricultural and Policy Development in China Dr. Ke Bingsheng Director-General Research Center for Rural Economy,
The Indian Economy A brief analysis by John Birchall.
September 25, 2006 Kim, Yong-Moon (President of the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs) Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategies in.
Policy Context Module 2: Analysis of Policy Context.
Rural Poverty and Hunger (MDG1) Kevin Cleaver Director of Agriculture and Rural Development November 2004.
First Five Year Plan ( ). First Five Year Plan 1.It gave importance to agriculture, irrigation and power projects to decrease the countries reliance.
Economic Planning In India
MALAWI CAADP IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS A PRESENTATION MADE AT THE FANRPAN REGIONAL POLICY DIALOGUE- MAPUTO, MOZAMBIQUE. 3 rd September, 2000 By K. Ng’ambi.
The 8-7 National Poverty Reduction Program in China: the National Strategy and its Impact Wang Sangui, Li Zhou, Ren Yanshun.
GHANA’S AGENDA FOR SHARED GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT,
CLASSIFICATION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITIES.
Agricultural Policy Analysis Prof. Samuel Wangwe Executive Director REPOA 28 th July 2012.
An Overview of Poverty Reduction Strategies: First FYP to Fifth FYP Presentation by Dr. Muhammad G. Sarwar Civil Service College, Dhaka 13 June 2011.
First Five Year Plan ( ) Total budget: 206
Thailand Strategies for Pro-Poor Growth Banchong Amornchewin Thailand International Development Cooperation Agency.
WHAT IS PLAN ?  A plan spells out how the resources of a nation should be put to use.  It should have some general goals as well as specific objectives.
Addressing the Challenge of Youth Unemployment in Africa.
Doyananda Debnath Phd Date: 04 July, I. About Bangladesh II. Policy Making Process III. Features of Policy Documents IV. Development Planning.
Vision 2021 Forum : Advocating Towards making Vision 2021 a reality
“ A public enterprise is an organisation which is: — owned by public authorities including Central, State or local authorities, to the extent of 50 per.
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE sustainable solutions for ending hunger and poverty Ghana Strategy Support Program Concluding Remarks and.
A Strategy for Doubling Average Household Incomes in the Least Developed Countries Charles Gore UNCTAD UN International Forum on Poverty Eradication New.
By: Kulwinder Kaur, Parvesh Tulseja. I NTRODUCTION The part of the economy concerned with providing basic government services. The composition of the.
Strategizing Strategizing is about setting institutional goals and finding the best means to reach those goals. Strategizing bridges the chasm between.
COMMENTS ON THE APPROPRIATION BILL 2011 STANDING COMMITTEE OF APPROPRIATIONS 13 A PRIL 2011 For an Equitable Sharing of National Revenue.
The performance of an economy Economic indicators:  inflation rate  foreign trade  employment  productivity  interest rates  money supply Social.
Linkages between Trade, Development & Poverty Reduction Prashmita Ghosh N C Pahariya CUTS CITEE.
POINTS COMMUNICATION TO THE SPRING EUROPEAN COUNCIL Working together for growth and jobs A new start for the Lisbon Strategy POINTS
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTIVITY AND EMPLOYMENT. OUTLINE Introduction 1. Summary of issues 2.What is working 3.Looking ahead: Focus on outcomes 4.What makes.
30 Years of Reform & Opening up and Looking forward LSE, 3 December 2008.
Millennium Development Goals Bhutan & Bangladesh Alicia Madsen & Diana Garcia Determine which country is closer to achieving its developmental goal (*=success)
MDGs in the Arab Region 2007: Progress and Challenges Tarik Alami, Officer In Charge Economic Analysis Division UN ESCWA.
Poverty Alleviation performance in China Experiences and lessons XU Lin National Development and Reform commission PRC.
# 1 DEVELOPMENT AND EMPLOYMENT: A POLICY FRAMEWORK Proposed by Fred Fluitman, Presented by Mostefa Boudiaf International Training Centre of the ILO Turin,
Enterprise & Environment Directorate TRANSPORT FOR REGIONAL GROWTH 5 NOVEMBER 2015 Keith Winter, Executive Director, Enterprise and Environment, Fife Council.
Introduction to the UK Economy. What are the key objectives of macroeconomic policy? Price Stability (CPI Inflation of 2%) Growth of Real GDP (National.
Economic Commission for Africa Growth with Equity: The African Regional Experience 2010 Dialogue with the UNGA Second Committee Growth with Equity: The.
FEDUSA 2010 Medium Term Budget Policy Statement Comments The Joint Portfolio Committee on Finance 11 November 2010.
Implementation of the international development goals by the Lao PDR I. National Development Strategy II.Progress in the implementation of National Development.
Cambodia’s national employment policy and the linkages with social protection Extending social protection and promoting productive employment Training.
Analysis of the Egyptian Labour Market with a Special Focus on MDG Employment Indicators Dr. Magued Osman.
Boosting Investment for Transformative Growth and Competitiveness in Africa: Review of Trends, Policies and Prospects Franklyn Lisk CSGR, University of.
COMMERCIAL BANKS & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Economic Development may be defined as a process whereby an economy’s National Income is carried on from a lower.
SA’s ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL INDICATORS  Economic Indicators -Used to establish the performance of the economy in terms of macro economic objectives of the.
Lecture 2:Perspective on Rural Development Shakeel Hayat 26 th April 2012.
Topic 2: ECONOMIC PLANS AND POLICIES
Module- 5 Planning in India
1 Ensure the consistency between sectoral plan, strategy and budget PRSP Forum, April 2006.
CAUSES -OR- REASONS OF LOW PER CAPITA INCOME A Lecture By Mr.Allah Dad Khan.
NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN UNTIL 2030
Reflections on Implementing Gender Budgeting
MAINSTREAMING OF WOMEN, CHILDREN AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES’ CONSIDERATIONS IN RELATION TO THE ENERGY SECTOR Presentation to the Joint Meeting of the.
Nature of Indian Economy
PRIORITIES in the area of employment and social policy during the Bulgarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union 1 January – 30.
Theme: 4 Employment and Economic Growth Department of Labour
Features of Indian Five Year Plan .
Planning Process in India and the 11th 5 year plan
Summary of Five year Plans
National Income and Economic Growth
Decent Work in the Americas:
Development Perspectives:National Priorities and Global Commitments
Presentation transcript:

DEVELOPMENT PLANNING FIVE YEAR PLANS Leena Shankaranarayana

INDIAN ECONOMY WHAT GOODS AND SERVICES SHOULD BE PRODUCED IN THE COUNTRY? HOW SHOULD THE GOODS AND SERVICES BE PRODUCED? SHOULD PRODUCERS USE MORE HUMAN LABOUR OR MORE CAPITAL (MACHINES) FOR PRODUCING THINGS? HOW SHOULD THE GOODS AND SERVICES BE DISTRIBUTED AMONG PEOPLE? A POLICY OF MIXED ECONOMY IS FOLLOWED IN THE COUNTRY. IN A MIXED ECONOMY, THE PUBLIC SECTOR ENTERPRISES (GOVERNMENT-OWNED) EXIST ALONGSIDE THE PRIVATE SECTOR TO ACHIEVE A SOCIALIST PATTERN OF SOCIETY IN A WELFARE STATE.

WHAT IS A PLAN ? A PLAN SPELLS OUT HOW THE RESOURCES OF A NATION SHOULD BE PUT TO USE. SOME GENERAL GOALS AS WELL AS SOME SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES TO BE ACHIEVED WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD OF TIME IN INDIA PLANS ARE OF FIVE YEARS DURATION OUR PLAN DOCUMENTS SPECIFY THE OBJECTIVES TO BE ATTAINED IN THE FIVE YEARS OF A PLAN PLAN DOCUMENTS ALSO SPECIFY WHAT IS TO BE ACHIEVED OVER A PERIOD OF TWENTY YEARS. THIS LONG-TERM PLAN IS CALLED ‘PERSPECTIVE PLAN’. THE FIVE YEAR PLANS ARE SUPPOSED TO PROVIDE THE BASIS FOR THE PERSPECTIVE PLAN.

PLANNING IN INDIA PLANNING COMMISSION ESTABLISHED IN MARCH 1950 A STATUTORY BODY WITH THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA AS ITS CHAIRMAN SET UP TO FORMULATE BASIC ECONOMIC POLICIES, DRAFT PLANS AND WATCH ITS PROGRESS AND IMPLEMENTATION. PT. JAWAHARLAL NEHRU WAS THE FIRST CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION

India's first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, establishes a five-year plan for agricultural reform, committing India to a socialist path to development.

PLANNING IN INDIA NATIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AN ADVISORY BODY ATTACHED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION ESTABLISHED IN 1965. IT INCLUDES EXPERTS REPRESENTING A CROSS-SECTION OF THE INDIAN ECONOMY. NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ESTABLISHED IN 1951 CMs OF THE STATES, TOGETHER WITH THE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, CONSTITUTE THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL. THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA PRESIDES OVER THE COUNCIL.

FIVE YEAR PLANS THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS ARE DRAWN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO ESTABLISH INDIA'S ECONOMY ON A SOCIALISTIC PATTERN IN SUCCESSIVE PHASES OF FIVE YEAR PERIODS-CALLED THE FIVE YEAR PLANS. IT CONSISTS OF: (I) PLANNING COMMISSION OF INDIA (II) NATIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL (III) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL AND STATE PLANNING COMMISSIONS

FIVE YEAR PLANS THE GOALS OF THE FIVE YEAR PLANS ARE: GROWTH MODERNISATION SELF-RELIANCE AND EQUITY.

PRASANTA CHANDRA MAHALANOBIS : THE ARCHITECT OF INDIAN PLANNING

FIRST FIVE YEAR PLAN (1951-56) IN JULY 1951, THE PLANNING COMMISSION ISSUED THE DRAFT OUTLINE OF THE FIRST FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR THE PERIOD APRIL 1951 TO MARCH 1956. IT WAS PRESENTED TO THE PARLIAMENT IN DECEMBER 1952. IN THE FIRST PLAN, AGRICULTURE RECEIVED THE MAIN THRUST, FOR SUSTAINING OF GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRIES WHICH WOULD NOT BE POSSIBLE WITHOUT A SIGNIFICANT RISE IN THE YIELD OF RAW MATERIALS AND FOOD.

FIRST FIVE YEAR PLAN (1951-56) OBJECTIVES: I) TO INCREASE FOOD PRODUCTION. II) TO FULLY UTILISE AVAILABLE RAW MATERIALS. III) TO CHECK INFLATIONARY PRESSURE. OUTLAY: THE TOTAL PROPOSED OUTLAY WAS RS. 3,870 CRORE. IT WAS MORE THAN A SUCCESS, BECAUSE OF GOOD HARVESTS IN THE LAST TWO YEARS.

SECOND FIVE YEAR PLAN (1956-61) ALSO CALLED MAHALANOBIS PLAN AFTER ITS CHIEF-ARCHITECT. THE MAIN OBJECTIVE WAS TO LAUNCH INDUSTRIALISATION AND STRENGTHEN THE INDUSTRIAL BASE OF THE ECONOMY. IT WAS IN THIS LIGHT THAT THE 1948 INDUSTRIAL POLICY RESOLUTION WAS REVISED AND A NEW RESOLUTION OF 1956 WAS ADOPTED. THE SECOND PLAN STARTED WITH AN EMPHASIS ON THE EXPANSION OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR AND AIMED AT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A SOCIALISTIC PATTERN OF SOCIETY.

SECOND FIVE YEAR PLAN (1956-61) OBJECTIVES: I) A SIZEABLE INCREASE IN NATIONAL INCOME SO AS TO RAISE THE LEVEL OF LIVING. II) RAPID INDUSTRIALISATION OF THE COUNTRY WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF BASIC AND KEY INDUSTRIES. OUTLAY: THE SECOND PLAN PROPOSED A TOTAL PUBLIC SECTOR OUTLAY OF RS. 4,800 CRORES THOUGH ACTUAL OUTLAY WAS ONLY RS. 4,672 CRORE. ADVOCATED HUGE IMPORTS WHICH LED TO EMPTYING OF FUNDS LEADING TO FOREIGN LOANS. IT SHIFTED BASIC EMPHASIS FROM AGRICULTURE TO INDUSTRY FAR TOO SOON. DURING THIS PLAN, PRICE LEVEL INCREASED BY 30%, AGAINST A DECLINE OF 13% DURING THE FIRST PLAN.

THIRD FIVE YEAR PLAN (1961-66) IN THE THIRD PLAN, THE EMPHASIS WAS ON LONG-TERM DEVELOPMENT. THE THIRD PLAN REPORT STATED THAT DURING THE FIVE-YEAR PERIOD CONCERNED, THE INDIAN ECONOMY "MUST NOT ONLY EXPAND RAPIDLY BUT, AT THE SAME TIME, BECOME SELF-RELIANT AND SELF-GENERATING."

THIRD FIVE YEAR PLAN (1961-66) OBJECTIVES: I) AN INCREASE IN NATIONAL INCOME OF MORE THAN 5 PER CENT ANNUALLY. THE INVESTMENT PATTERN LAID DOWN MUST BE CAPABLE OF SUSTAINING THIS GROWTH RATE IN THE SUBSEQUENT YEARS. II) AN INCREASE IN THE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE AND TO ACHIEVE SELF SUFFICIENCY BY INCREASING FOOD GRAIN PRODUCTION. III) GREATER EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITIES, MORE EVEN DISTRIBUTION OF ECONOMIC POWER AND REDUCING WEALTH AND INCOME DISPARITIES. ALSO, IT WAS REALIZED FROM THE EXPERIENCE OF FIRST TWO PLANS THAT AGRICULTURE SHOULD BE GIVEN THE TOP PRIORITY TO SUFFICE THE REQUIREMENT OF EXPORT AND INDUSTRY. COMPLETE FAILURE DUE TO UNFORESEEN MISFORTUNES, VIZ. CHINESE AGGRESSION (1962), INDO-PAK WAR (1965), SEVEREST DROUGHT IN 100 YEARS (1965-66).

THREE ANNUAL PLANS (1966-69) PLAN HOLIDAY FOR 3YEARS. THE PREVAILING CRISIS IN AGRICULTURE AND SERIOUS FOOD SHORTAGE NECESSITATED THE EMPHASIS ON AGRICULTURE DURING THE ANNUAL PLANS. DURING THESE PLANS A WHOLE NEW AGRICULTURAL STRATEGY INVOLVING WIDE-SPREAD DISTRIBUTION OF HIGH-YIELDING VARIETIES OF SEEDS, THE EXTENSIVE USE OF FERTILIZERS, EXPLOITATION OF IRRIGATION POTENTIAL AND SOIL CONSERVATION WAS PUT INTO ACTION TO TIDE-OVER THE CRISIS IN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION. DURING THE ANNUAL PLANS, THE ECONOMY BASICALLY ABSORBED THE SHOCKS GIVEN DURING THE THIRD PLAN, MAKING WAY FOR A PLANNED GROWTH.

FOURTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1969-74) AFTER THE ‘PLAN HOLIDAY', THE FOURTH PLAN WAS BEGUN IN 1969. OBJECTIVES: I) TO ACHIEVE STABILITY AND PROGRESS TOWARDS SELF-RELIANCE. II) TO ACHIEVE AN OVERALL RATE OF GROWTH OF 5.7 PER CENT ANNUALLY. III) TO RAISE EXPORTS AT THE RATE OF 7 PER CENT ANNUALLY. OUTLAY: THE TOTAL PROPOSED OUTLAY WAS RS. 24,880 CRORE, WHICH INCLUDED RS. 15,900 CRORES AS PUBLIC SECTOR OUTLAY AND RS. 8,980 CRORE AS PRIVATE SECTOR OUTLAY.

FOURTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1969-74) MAIN EMPHASIS ON AGRICULTURE'S GROWTH RATE SO THAT A CHAIN REACTION CAN START. FARED WELL IN THE FIRST TWO YEARS WITH RECORD PRODUCTION, LAST THREE YEARS FAILURE BECAUSE OF POOR MONSOON. HAD TO TACKLE THE INFLUX OF BANGLADESHI REFUGEES BEFORE AND AFTER 1971 INDO-PAK WAR.

FIFTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1974-79) THE PLAN WAS FORMULATED AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF SEVERE INFLATIONARY PRESSURE. THE FIFTH PLAN PREPARED AND LAUNCHED BY D.D. DHAR PROPOSED TO ACHIEVE TWO MAIN OBJECTIVES VIZ, 'REMOVAL OF POVERTY' (GARIBI HATAO) AND 'ATTAINMENT OF SELF RELIANCE', THROUGH PROMOTION OF HIGH RATE OF GROWTH, BETTER DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME AND A VERY SIGNIFICANT GROWTH IN THE DOMESTIC RATE OF SAVINGS. OBJECTIVES: IN ADDITION TO REMOVAL OF POVERTY AND ATTAINMENT OF SELF-RELIANCE, THE FIFTH PLAN HAD THE FOLLOWING MAJOR OBJECTIVES. I) 5.5 PER CENT OVERALL RATE OF GROWTH IN GROSS DOMESTIC OBJECTIVES.

FIFTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1974-79) II) EXPANSION OF PRODUCTIVE EMPLOYMENT AND FULLER UTILISATION OF EXISTING SKILLS AND EQUIPMENT. III) A NATIONAL PROGRAMME FOR MINIMUM NEEDS AND EXTENDED PROGRAMMES OF SOCIAL WELFARE. OUTLAY: A TOTAL OUTLAY OF RS. 53,410 CRORE WAS PROPOSED FOR THE FIFTH PLAN. THE PLAN WAS TERMINATED IN 1978 (INSTEAD OF 1979) WHEN JANTA GOVT.CAME TO POWER.

SIXTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1980-85) THE DRAFT OF THE SIXTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1978-1983) WAS PRESENTED IN 1978. HOWEVER, THE PLAN WAS TERMINATED WITH THE CHANGE OF GOVERNMENT IN JANUARY 1980. THE NEW SIXTH FIVE YEAR PLAN WAS IMPLEMENTED IN APRIL 1980. OBJECTIVES: I) TO ELIMINATE UNEMPLOYMENT AND UNDEREMPLOYMENT. II) TO RAISE THE STANDARD OF LIVING OF THE POOREST OF MASSES. III) TO REDUCE DISPARITIES IN INCOME AND WEALTH. OUTLAY: THE PROPOSED OUTLAY FOR THE SIXTH PLAN TOTALLED RS. 1,58,710 CRORE.

SEVENTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1985-90) THE DRAFT OF THE SEVENTH PLAN WAS APPROVED ON NOVEMBER 9, 1985 BY THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL. THE PLAN WAS PART OF THE LONG-TERM PLAN FOR THE PERIOD OF 15 YEARS. OBJECTIVES: I) DECENTRALISATION OF PLANNING AND FULL PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN DEVELOPMENT. II) THE MAXIMUM POSSIBLE GENERATION OF PRODUCTIVE EMPLOYMENT. III) REMOVAL OF POVERTY AND REDUCTION IN INCOME DISPARITIES. IT WAS A GREAT SUCCESS, THE ECONOMY RECORDED 6% GROWTH RATE AGAINST THE TARGETED 5%.

EIGHTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1992-97) THE EIGHTH PLAN WAS POSTPONED BY TWO YEARS BECAUSE OF POLITICAL UPHEAVALS AT THE CENTRE AND IT WAS LAUNCHED AFTER A WORSENING BALANCE OF PAYMENT POSITION AND INFLATION DURING 1990-91. THE EIGHTH PLAN PROPOSED A GROWTH RATE OF 5.6 PER CENT PER ANNUM ON AN AVERAGE DURING THE PLAN PERIOD. THE EIGHTH PLAN FOCUSED ON CLEAR PRIORITISATION OF SECTORS/PROJECTS FOR INVESTMENT IN ORDER TO FACILITATE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE POLICY INITIATIVES TAKEN IN THE AREAS OF FISCAL, TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL SECTORS AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT.

EIGHTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1992-97) OBJECTIVES: I) GENERATION OF ADEQUATE EMPLOYMENT TO ACHIEVE NEAR FULL EMPLOYMENT LEVEL BY THE TURN OF THE CENTURY. II) CONTAINMENT OF POPULATION GROWTH THROUGH PEOPLE'S ACTIVE CO-OPERATION AND AN EFFECTIVE SCHEME OF INCENTIVES AND DISINCENTIVES. III) UNIVERSALISATION OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION AND COMPLETE ERADICATION OF ILLITERACY AMONG THE PEOPLE IN THE AGE GROUP OF 15 TO 35 YEARS.

EIGHTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1992-97) SOME OF THE MAIN ECONOMIC PERFORMANCES DURING EIGHTH PLAN PERIOD WERE RAPID ECONOMIC GROWTH, HIGH GROWTH OF AGRICULTURE AND ALLIED SECTOR, AND MANUFACTURING SECTOR, GROWTH IN EXPORTS AND IMPORTS, IMPROVEMENT IN TRADE AND CURRENT ACCOUNT DEFICIT.

NINTH FIVE-YEAR PLAN (1997-2002) IT BEGAN ON APRIL 1, 1997. THE NINTH PLAN WAS THE FIRST CONCRETE ATTEMPT TO TRANSLATE THE PROGRAMME OF ECONOMIC REFORMS AND THE NEW ECONOMIC POLICY WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF AN INDICATIVE PLAN. THE APPROACH PAPER TO THE NINTH PLAN (1997-2002) WAS APPROVED BY THE N.D.C. ON 16TH JANUARY, 1997.

NINTH FIVE-YEAR PLAN (1997-2002) OBJECTIVES: I.) PRIORITY TO AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT II.) ACCELERATING GROWTH RATE OF ECONOMY III.) FOOD AND NUTRITIONAL SECURITY FOR ALL IV.) CONTAINING GROWTH RATE OF POPULATION V.) EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN AND SOCIALLY DISADVANTAGED GROUPS SUCH AS SC/ST, BACKWARD CLASSES AND MINORITIES. VI.) PROMOTING AND DEVELOPING PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONS LIKE "PANCHAYATI RAJ" INSTITUTIONS, CO-OPERATIVES AND SELF-HELP GROUPS.

TENTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (2002-07) ON DECEMBER 21, 2002, THE TENTH FIVE YEAR PLAN WAS APPROVED BY THE NDC. THE PLAN FURTHER DEVELOPED THE NDC MANDATED OBJECTIVES, OF DOUBLING PER CAPITA INCOME IN 10 YEARS, AND ACHIEVING A GROWTH RATE OF 8% OF GDP PER ANNUM. THE PLAN HAD A NUMBER OF NEW FEATURES, SUCH AS, FOR THE FIRST TIME (A) IT RECOGNISED THE RAPID GROWTH OF LABOUR FORCE OVER THE NEXT DECADE (B) ADDRESSED THE ISSUE OF POVERTY AND THE UNACCEPTABLY LOW LEVELS OF SOCIAL INDICATORS

TENTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (2002-07) (C) ADOPTED A "DIFFERENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY" TO EQUATE NATIONAL TARGETS INTO BALANCED REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AS THERE IS VAST DIFFERENCE IN THE POTENTIALS AND CONSTRAINTS OF EACH STATE (D) RECOGNISED THAT THE GOVERNANCE IS PERHAPS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTORS FOR ENSURING REALISATION OF THE PLAN (E) IDENTIFIED MEASURES TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY, UNLEASH ENTREPRENEURIAL ENERGY, AND PROMOTE RAPID AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH (F) PROPOSED MAJOR REFORMS FOR AGRICULTURAL SECTOR MAKING 'AGRICULTURE' THE CORE ELEMENT OF THE PLAN.

TENTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (2002-07) SINCE ECONOMIC GROWTH IS NOT THE ONLY OBJECTIVE, THE PLAN AIMS AT HARNESSING THE BENEFITS OF GROWTH TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE PEOPLE BY SETTING THE FOLLOWING KEY TARGETS: 1. ALL CHILDREN TO BE IN SCHOOL BY 2003 AND ALL CHILDREN TO COMPLETE FIVE YEARS OF SCHOOLING BY 2007 2. REDUCTION IN POVERTY RATIO FROM 26% TO 21% 3. GROWTH IN GAINFUL EMPLOYMENT TO, AT LEAST, KEEP PACE WITH ADDITION TO THE LABOUR FORCE 4. DECADAL POPULATION GROWTH TO REDUCE FROM 21.3% IN 1991-2001 TO 16.2% BY 2001-11

TENTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (2002-07) 5. REDUCING GENDER GAPS IN LITERACY AND WAGE RATES BY 50% 6. LITERACY RATE TO INCREASE FROM 65% IN 1999-2000 TO 75% IN 2001 7. INFANT MORTALITY RATE (IMR) TO BE REDUCED FROM 72 IN 1999-2000, TO 45 IN 2007 8. .MATERNAL MORTALITY RATE (MMR) TO BE REDUCED FROM 4 PER 1000 IN 1999-2000 TO 2 PER 1000 IN 2007 9. PROVIDING PORTABLE DRINKING WATER IN ALL VILLAGES 10. CLEANING OF MAJOR POLLUTED RIVER STRETCHES 11. INCREASE IN FOREST/TREE COVER FROM 19% IN 1999-2000 TO 25% IN 2007

ELEVENTH PLAN (2007-2012) THE UNITED PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE GOVERNMENT ISSUED A PAPER IN THE ELEVENTH PLAN TITLED "TOWARDS FASTER AND MORE INCLUSIVE GROWTH." ACCORDING TO THE APPROACH PAPER, THE MONITORABLE TARGETS OF FIVE-YEAR PLAN ARE: 1. GDP GROWTH RATE TO BE INCREASED TO 10% BY THE END OF THE PLAN; 2. FARM SECTOR GROWTH TO BE INCREASED TO 4%; 3. CREATION OF SEVEN CRORE JOB OPPORTUNITIES; 4. REDUCE EDUCATED UNEMPLOYED YOUTH TO BELOW 5 PERCENT

ELEVENTH PLAN (2007-2012) 5. INFANT MORTALITY RATES TO BE REDUCED TO 28 PER 1000 BIRTHS; 6. MATERNAL DEATH RATES TO BE REDUCED TO 1 PER 1000 BIRTHS; 7. CLEAN DRINKING WATER TO ALL BY 2009; 8. IMPROVE SEX RATIO TO 935 BY 2011-12 AND TO 950 BY 2016-17; 9. ENSURE ELECTRICITY CONNECTION TO ALL VILLAGES AND BROADBAND OVER POWER LINES (BPL) HOUSEHOLDS BY 2009

ELEVENTH PLAN (2007-2012) 10. ROADS TO ALL VILLAGES THAT HAVE A POPULATION OF 1000 AND ABOVE BY 2009; 11. INCREASE FOREST AND TREE COVER BY 5%; 12. ACHIEVE THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION STANDARD AIR QUALITY IN MAJOR CITIES BY 2011-12; 13. TREAT ALL URBAN WASTEWATER BY 2011-12 TO CLEAN RIVER WATERS; 14. INCREASE ENERGY EFFICIENCY BY 20 PERCENT BY 2016-17

REAL GROWTH IN INDIA – FIRST PLAN TO ELEVENTH PLAN Period Real Income Growth Sectoral Growth Rate Actual   Target Growth Agriculture Industry Services First Plan 1951-56 2.1 3.5 2.9 5.9 3.7 Second Plan 1956-61 4.5 4.2 3.2 6.4 4.6 Third Plan 1961-66 5.6 2.8 -0.5 6.8 5 Fourth Plan 1969-74 5.7 2.6 4 Fifth Plan 1974-79 4.4 4.7 3.4 6.3 5.5 Sixth Plan 1980-85 5.2 6.2 5.4 Seventh Plan 1985-90 7.5 7.4 Eighth Plan 1992-97 6.5 3.9 8 7.9 Ninth Plan 1997-02 2 8.1 Tenth Plan 2002-07 7.7 2.3 9.2 9.3 Eleventh 2007-12 9 7.8$ NA

Growth during Five Year Plans

SECTORAL GROWTH RATE

Plan Outlay in Public Sector in India Year Plan Outlay First Plan 1960 Second Plan 4672 Third Plan 8576.5 Fourth Plan 15778.8 Fifth Plan 39426.2 Sixth Plan 110467.3 Seventh Plan 218729.6 Eighth Plan 485457.24 Ninth Plan 813997.9 Tenth Plan 1119552

PLAN OUTLAY

SECTORAL OUTLAYS DURING THE PLAN Sectoral Outlays during the Plans (Rs. Crore) (First Plan to Eleventh Plan)   Agriculture & Irrigation Power Industry Transport & Communications Social Services Total First Plan 1951-56 600 (31) 260 (13) 120 (6) 520 (27) 460 (22) 1960 (100) Second Plan 1956-61 950 (20) 440 (10) 1080 (24) 1300 (28) 830 (18) 4600 (100) Third Plan 1961-66 1750 (21) 1250 (14) 1970 (23) 2120 (25) 1490 (17) 8580 (100) Fourth Plan 1969-74 3810 (24) 2450 (15) 3630 (23) 3240 (20) 2770 (18) 15900 (100) Fifth Plan 1974-79 8740 (22) 7400 (19) 9580 (26) 6870 (18) 6840 (17) 39430 (100) Sixth Plan 1980-85 26130 (24) 30750 (28) 16950 (16) 17680 (16) 17780 (16) 109290 (100) Seventh Plan 1985-90 48100 (22) 61690 (28) 29220 (13) 41000 (19) 38720 (18) 218730 (100) Eighth Plan 1992-97 101150 (21) 128900 (27) 47890 (10) 101550 (21) 105570 (22) 485460 (100)

Plan-wise Financial Expenditure on Irrigation in India (At Constant Prices 1980-81=100) (First Plan to 1999-2000) (Rs. in Crore) Period Major & Medium Minor Command Area Deve- Major & Medium, Minor and CAD Total Plan Expen- Perce State Institu- Total lopment Cumu- Average Per Year diture in All Sectors -ntage of Expend. On Irrigation to Total tional   lative First Plan (1951-56) 2154.6 375.7 0.0 2530.4 2530.7 506.1 11225.7 23 Second Plan (1956-61) 1950.7 730.0 99.6 829.4 2780.1 5310.8 556.0 23983.6 12 Third Plan (1961-66) 2366.5 1339.8 474.1 1813.9 4181.3 9491.1 836.1 35238.3 Annual Plans (1966-69) 1246.9 932.1 680.9 1613.0 2859.9 12351.0 953.3 19219.6 15 Fourth Plan (1969-74) 2875.7 1171.8 1530.3 2702.1 5577.8 17928.8 1115.6 36525.5 Fifth Plan (1974-78) 3647.7 909.7 1158.0 2067.7 214.0 5929.4 23858.2 1482.4 41538.1 14 Annual Plans (1978-80) 2653.0 633.3 613.1 1246.4 274.8 4174.1 28032.3 2087.0 29291.6 Sixth Plan (1980-85) 6401.0 1719.3 1248.8 2968.0 645.5 10014.5 38046.8 2002.9 94937.5 11 Seventh Plan (1985-90) 7003.3 1974.7 1930.0 3904.7 912.7 11820.7 49867.5 2364.1 137913.0 9 Annual Plan (1990-91) 1319.4 406.7 338.3 745.0 143.0 2207.4 52074.9 29228.3 8 Annual Plan (1991-92) 1243.5 371.7 296.8 668.5 147.0 2059.0 54133.9 28512.1 7 Eighth Plan (1992-97) (Anticipated) 7330.8 2107.8 1435.0 3542.8 655.6 11529.2 65663.1 2305.8 164231.6 Ninth Plan (1997-02) Outlay 11944.8 2605.3 739.3 3344.6 804.1 16093.6 81756.7 3218.7 238900.6 Annual Plan (1997-98) Actual 2102.0 416.9 125.6 542.5 120.3 2764.8 68427.9 36078.9 Annual Plan (1998-99) (Anticipated) 2446.5 471.1 157.1 628.3 3200.3 71628.3 @21972.8 Annual Plan (1999-2000) 3121.9 553.1 181.8 734.9 125.1 3982 75610.2 43419.9

Plan-wise Investment on Water Supply and Sanitation Sector in India (Rs. in Crore) Plan Period   % of Public Sector Outlay I Plan (1951-56) 1.48 1.28 0.18 II Plan (1956-61) 1.07 0.65 0.41 III Plan (1961-66) 1.23 1.04 0.19 3 Annual Plans (1966-69) 1.6 N.A IV Plan (1969-74) 2.75 1.77 0.97 V Plan (1974-79) 2.62 1.4 1.22 Annual Plan (1979-80) 3.43 1.58 1.85 VI Plan (1980-85) 4.15 1.81 2.34 VII Plan (1985-90) 3.62 1.65 1.98 2 Annual Plans (1990-92) 3.23 1.26 1.97 VIII Plan (1992-97) 3.85 1.38 2.47 IX Plan (1997-02) 4.46 2.16 2.43 X Plan (2002-07) 2.89 1.3 1.8

Budgetary Allocations for Education by Centre/States and its Percentage of GDP in India Budgetary Allocations for Education by Centre/States and its Percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in India (1991-1992 to 2005-2006) Year Budgetary Allocation on Education by Education and Other Deptt. (Centre + States/Uts)  Allocation for Education as Percentage of GDP (Rs. in Crore) 1991-1992 22393.69 3.8 1992-1993 25030.3 3.72 1993-1994 28279.69 3.62 1994-1995 32606.22 3.56 1995-1996 38178.09 1996-1997 43896.48 3.53 1997-1998 48552.14 3.49 1998-1999 61578.91 3.85 1999-2000 74816.09 4.17 2000-2001 82486.48 4.27 2001-2002 79865.7 3.81 2002-2003 85507.34 3.79 2003-2004 89079.25 3.5 2004-2005 104566.00 (RE) 3.68 2005-2006 119029.88 (BE)

Average for Plan Period (Plan Period Averages at current prices) Planwise Share of Public and Private Sectors in Gross Domestic Capital Formation in India (First Plan to Eighth Plan) Average for Plan Period (Plan Period Averages at current prices) Public Sector (Rs. million) Private Sector (Rs. million) Total (Rs. million) Percentage Share in Total Saving As % of GDP Total at Market Prices Public Sector Private Sector First Plan (1951-56) 3587 7229 10816 33.2 66.8 3.5 7.1 10.7 Second Plan (1956-61) 8587 11667 20254 42.4 57.6 6.1 8.4 14.5 Third Plan (1961-66) 15932 17558 33490 47.6 52.4 7.4 8.1 15.5 Annual Plans (1966-69) 21207 31739 52947 40.1 59.9 6.3 9.4 15.7 Fourth Plan (1969-74) 32885 49919 82804 39.7 60.3 6.8 10.3 17.1 Fifth Plan (1974-78#) 69496 89694 159190 43.7 56.3 8.3 10.8 19.1 Annual Plans (1978-80) 108776 138944 247720 43.9 56.1 10 12.7 22.7 Sixth Plan (1980-85) 177414 200004 377418 47 53 9.7 11 20.7 Seventh Plan (1985-90) 356950 458250 815200 43.8 56.2 13.2 23.4 Annual Plan (1990-92) 577799 886316 1464115 39.5 60.5 15.4 25.4 Eighth Plan (1992-97*) 843419 1694157 2537576 8.6 17.4 26

ACHIEVEMENTS OF PLANNING IN INDIA INCREASE IN NATIONAL AND PER CAPITA INCOME PROGRESS IN AGRICULTURE Progress in the use of agricultural inputs Increased Agricultural Production PROGRESS IN INDUSTRY

ACHIEVEMENTS OF PLANNING IN INDIA (Contd.) DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE DIVERSIFICATION OF EXPORTS AND IMPORT SUBSTITUTION DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM

FUNDAMENTAL FAILURES OF PLANNING FAILURE TO ELIMINATE POVERTY FAILURE TO PROVIDE EMPLOYMENT FAILURE TO REDUCE INEQUALITIES OF INCOME AND WEALTH FAILURE TO CHECK THE GROWTH OF BLACK MONEY

FUNDAMENTAL FAILURES OF PLANNING (Contd.) FAILURE TO REDUCE CONCENTRATION OF ECONOMIC POWER FAILURE TO IMPLEMENT LAND REFORMS