MAXIMIZE YOUR OPPORTUNITIES JUMPSTART YOUR PROJECT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Siskiyou County Land Development Manual 2006 Update Planning Commission Hearing Land Development Manual Update.
Advertisements

Identify Problems, Planning Objectives and Constraints.
Environmental Project Commitments The Alberta Experience
BLM Bureau of Land Management Oil and Gas Permitting Process Expediting Oil and Gas Development in Western States Kent Hoffman.
Chapter 2 Analyzing the Business Case.
The BC Oil & Gas Commission Proactively Participating in Project Decision Making Processes James O’Hanley Deputy Commissioner.
1 The National Environmental Policy Act in the Oil & Gas Industry.
29e CONFÉRENCE INTERNATIONALE DES COMMISSAIRES À LA PROTECTION DES DONNÉES ET DE LA VIE PRIVÉE 29 th INTERNATIONAL DATA PROTECTION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONERS.
Oil and Gas Leasing Jim Albano – Lead Natural Resource Specialist Reservoir Management and Operations Section Montana State Office – (406)
Geothermal - Utah Program - General Program - General Areas of Geothermal Potential – Prospectively Valuable and Known Geothermal Resource Areas (KGRA)
Chapter 3 Project Initiation
1 Public Lands Advocacy HOW TO REVIEW A FEDERAL PLANNING DOCUMENT.
Lecture(3) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
Opportunities for RAC Participation. Three Part discussion General presentation; Example of oil and gas decision making; and Panel Discussion of RAC involvement.
Chapter 3 Project Initiation. The stages of a project  Project concept  Project proposal request  Project proposal  Project green light  Project.
Environmental Assessment August 2012 Oil & Gas Lease Sale.
Overview of Oil & Gas Sector The following slides are not a tutorial but merely an overview of the various phases involved in an oil & gas development.
NUNAVUT TUNNGAVIK INCORPORATED Lands Policy Advisory Committee Draft Uranium Policy.
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
Master Development Plans (MDPs) Oil and Gas Projects.
SCOPING MEETING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REQUIRED BY PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 3161 (b)(3) AND (4) (SENATE BILL 4) (PAVLEY) C ALIFORNIA D EPARTMENT.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
Part 1.3 Mineral Rights & Leasing. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Understand.
What If I Must Go Beyond a Preliminary Assessment? (the example of a USAID EA under Reg. 216) [DATE][SPEAKERS NAMES]
VIRGINIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE EDUCATION FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCURE ACT OF 2002 (PPEA) Augusta County Board of Supervisors Wednesday, January 6, 2009.
E&P STORM WATER OVERVIEW Domestic Onshore Energy E&P STORM WATER OVERVIEW Domestic Onshore Energy May 10, 2005.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
Presented by: Pechanga Environmental Department Designing and Managing a Recycling Program Source Reduction Strategies for Tribal Solid Waste Programs.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
Review of the Nipissar Lake Replenishment Project, Rankin Inlet, Nunavut September 25, 2014 NWB Hearing Presentation Type A Water License Amendment Application.
Phased Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Process for Oil & Gas Development in New Brunswick Department of Environment January 2011.
Module 23 Environmental Safeguards Accreditation Training, January 21 – 25, 2013 Public Consultation.
Energy, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Development Presented by Cat Shrier, Ph.D., P.G. Water Resources Planner (403)
Synopsis EIA Purpose of EIA Origin Key Elements NGO Participation Content Analysis 1.
Energy Exploration & Development On National Forest System Lands Barry Burkhardt
Communication 2 Report Writing.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Maryland State Highway Administration’s Secondary and Cumulative Effects Analysis Guidelines For.
April 9, 2011 Mike Wieszchowski, P.E., PTOE Professional Traffic Operations Engineer Road Use Planning Guidelines to Protect Your Roadways.
Welcome to Session 3 – Project Management Process Overview
Rulemaking for Central Florida Coordination Area Coordinated Rulemaking by the South Florida, St. Johns River and Southwest Florida Water Management Districts.
The Development of BPR Pertemuan 6 Matakuliah: M0734-Business Process Reenginering Tahun: 2010.
Chapter 37 Pipeline Construction. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Explain the.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The Pre-Filing Process IRWA/AI January 13-14, 2009 IRWA/AI.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
1 1 Reasonably Foreseeable Compliance Measures Sandi Potter Engineering Geologist.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 4: How to Develop SCEA Land Use Information How to Develop Land Use Information.
Feasibility Study.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Proposition 1 Workshop: the Grant Application Process July 2015.
Stuart Birnbaum Department of Geological Sciences The University of Texas at San Antonio Learning objectives and assessments June 15, 2015.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Presenter Name School of Drafting Regulations for Borehole Disposal of DSRS 2016 Vienna, Austria Siting Strategies.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
PRE-PLANNING FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. OVERVIEW ASSESSING OWNER CAPABILITIES ANALYSIS OF RESOURCES REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWING.
GBLWMP-SLUP Integration February 5, 2010 Deline. Ecological Integrity Policy GBLWMPSLUP (a): All activities in the GBLW must be consistent with.
1 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board Public Hearing on the Draft 3 Sahtu Land Use Plan May 2011 INAC Presentation.
PAC Meeting July 2, Agenda  Introductions and thanks  Project to date  Next steps  Questions.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Planning – LUP Process I. Introduction II. Inventory Procedures III.Planning A. Background to LWCs in Planning B. Factors to Consider When Protecting LWCs.
Stages of Research and Development
Municipal Class Environmental Assessment
FIVE PROJECT PHASES 5C-3 Sun. 8:00-10:00am 21/ 2/2016.
Fifth Standard Solar Project Complex
5. IMPACT ASSESSMENT WORLD CAFÉ: ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Presentation transcript:

MAXIMIZE YOUR OPPORTUNITIES JUMPSTART YOUR PROJECT

OPPORTUNITIES How will you gain project approval? (Pre[NEPA]-planning) Why do you want to do it? (Purpose and Need) What do you want to do? (Project Description)

PRE-PLANNING From concept to project definition… internal first steps Develop BIG picture description of future project. –Project area location/definition. –How many wells? Surface density? Spacing? –Seismic: source line miles, types of sources. Explain rationale behind big picture description. –Reservoir characteristics. –Area-specific emerging technologies (directional/horizontal drilling). –Varying mineral ownerships/surface owners, collocated wells. Determine operational capacities  time frame for project. –# of drill rigs in operation, etc. –Seismic: survey crew/helicopter/data acquisition crew availability.

PRE-PLANNING Initiate agency contact - objectives To secure agency buy-in and lay groundwork for expedited project approval. Preliminary knowledge of issues as seen by managing agency. Demonstrate company’s understanding of resource issues. Better ability to refine scope of project and project time frame. Suggest a preferred NEPA approach. Confirm project consistency with land use plan. Value / positive result depends on agency/company culture and staff.

PRE-PLANNING Initial (BIG picture) meeting Contact likely lead agency first, then meet with all involved agencies. Explore possible interagency MOU, if several agencies. Bring project description overview and maps. Discuss NEPA contractor selection in preparation for next meeting. Review agency approval process steps in detail, with time lines. Identify possible sources of delays (example: NOI or NOA review, Section 7 consultation).

PRE-PLANNING Results Viability of scope and timing for project. Identify most obvious sources of delay. –Funding opportunities. –Staff support. Confirmation of land use plan consistency. –If not, agency determines if project warrants additional consideration. –Plan amendment/plan revision/new plan needed. –Or, modify project to conform to scope of the land use plan. Assessment of agency cooperation / enthusiasm and its willingness to work together to secure project approval. Introduction of key players: POCs within agency and company, possible cooperating agencies.

PURPOSE AND NEED Purpose: Agency objectives for considering a non-agency action. –Regulatory framework for consideration of proposed action and other resource objectives. Need: Company objectives –Who, what,why, where, when. –Describe resource opportunities or resource problems.

PURPOSE AND NEED Why is the P&N important? Basis of alternatives evaluation. “Purpose” provides the basis for development of alternatives to Proposed Action by relating it to other agency objectives. “Need” sets the minimum standards that the alternatives must meet. Fully analyzed alternatives must meet the P&N. Approved alternative must meet the P&N. Cannot preclude legitimate, reasonable alternatives.

PURPOSE AND NEED Example: Geophysical P&N To determine whether to attempt to develop hydrocarbon resources, pursuant to its rights under valid existing oil and gas leases granted by the BLM. To determine with greater certainty the potential for occurrence of oil and gas resources in geologic formations underlying the project area; To verify and/or supplement the existing subsurface geologic data; To generate new data that may be used to more accurately locate potential reservoirs of commercial quantities of hydrocarbons in areas where geophysical surveys and/or drilling have not occurred; To eliminate some areas from future exploratory drilling, and focus well-drilling activity in only those areas where the resource is most likely present; and To reduce unnecessary drilling and construction of associated roads, well pads, and other surface disturbances that would otherwise be needed to evaluate the subsurface formations and possible reservoirs.

PURPOSE AND NEED Example: Well exploration and development P&N Allow COMPANY to exercise its legal right to reasonably drill and develop its leaseholds and extract the leased hydrocarbons from the subsurface; Add to the existing knowledge of the complex subsurface geology and reservoir characteristics of the Paradox fold and fracture belt; Further define drilling and completion techniques necessary to produce hydrocarbons from reservoirs in the Paradox fold and fracture belt; Provide additional data with which to evaluate future well spacing; Confirm or disprove the interpretation of seismic data obtained from a 2001 geophysical survey; Provide additional data for use in evaluating the level of activity of future drilling in the Paradox fold and fault system; Allow natural gas to be transported to a nearby mine where it would be utilized to operate the existing infrastructure; and Contribute to available domestic oil supply if the wells are productive.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION How are you going to meet your P&N? Development of a strategic project plan may not be straightforward. Pre-planning can shape/modify the scope and time frame of the project. PD may be (somewhat) issue-driven.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION Scope and time frame: Ask for what you want! Initial project scope and time frame (company) Land Use Plan consistency Approval time frame (agency) Modified scope and time frame (possible company re-appraisal)

PROJECT DESCRIPTION Conceptual or site-specific? Approach determined by the scope of the project and flexibility of the project. –Example: This EA discusses the purpose, need, and potential environmental impacts of drilling three exploratory oil and gas wells and is a site-specific analysis of potential impacts to the human environment that may result from drilling 3 exploratory oil and gas wells. The three wells were proposed under individual APDs. –Example: The Company proposes to drill approximately 1,800 new wells as infill wells to all productive formations beneath the project area. Of these proposed new wells, the company intends to drill approximately 630 completions by either deepening an existing well bore or by drilling a twin well on the existing pad. Conceptual approach: Describe operational details in a broad way, but with as many details as possible.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION General operational details Example: Approximately 20 temporary staging areas would be located on public lands where the pipeline would cross a road. The numbers and locations of staging areas on private lands are yet to be determined. The preliminary locations of staging areas on public lands would be chosen to result in the maximum use of existing disturbance; however the final determination of the number and location of the staging areas would be cooperatively chosen by the agency and the pipeline construction company. Example: Gas will be transported from the wellhead via gathering pipelines to two centralized compressor stations located within the project area but owned by Another Company. Each station consists of two 1,500 HP compressors. The existing compressors are expected to maintain acceptable pressure levels within the existing and new gathering system; however, additional supplemental compression may be needed to accommodate increased volume, throughput, and field pressure needs.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION The NEPA analysis will consider the most conservative option. Example: “Produced water will be trucked to 5 to 10 evaporation ponds, each requiring 10 acres, for disposal.” Example: “The Company proposes to drill between 2,000 and 3,400 new well bores on new and existing pads. Between 1,000 and 1,700 new well pads would be required.” Within each example, which scenario will be analyzed?

PROJECT DESCRIPTION Include “existing environment” Date, “as of…,” sets baseline. Keep it current. Exploratory or well development project: Number of active wells, number of current locations, miles of access road, current produced water disposal, gas and oil processing and disposition, remote monitoring, truck access/frequency. Geophysical project: Wells (active and P&A), prior seismic surveys, available roads.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION Addressing issues Applicant-committed environmental protection measures. Allow agency options for additional mitigation. Include what makes sense. –Company will comply with all applicable rules, regulations, and guidelines. –Company will perform resource surveys as needed and determined by the agency. Don’t promise too much (at least initially). –Company will pave 20 miles of county road needed for access. –Company will perform offsite mitigation, as determined by the NEPA analysis.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION Alternatives Considered Include them as part of your agency submission. Helps the agency to formulate its own alternatives. Address the resources you know to be of concern. Explain your rationale in detail. –Example: The Company considered an alternate pipeline route that would increase the offset from a MSO nest adjacent to the proposed route. The Company determined that it would be able to construct near the nest during certain times of the year and not affect the owls. Alternatives that you considered (but rejected) may be fully analyzed in the NEPA document.

SUMMARY Pre-plan: Approach the agency early. Purpose and need: Clear and detailed. Project description: Detailed, with operational flexibility, up-front mitigation, and the alternatives you considered. Set a date for the official kickoff meeting. Bring P&N, project description, and alternatives considered. Bring NEPA contractor if possible) And you’re off…

MAXIMIZE YOUR OPPORTUNITIES