CARLOS CEDEÑO DSES-6070 12/04/2008 Reliability of the Three Main Engines of Space Shuttle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
©GoldSim Technology Group LLC., 2004 Probabilistic Simulation “Uncertainty is a sign of humility, and humility is just the ability or the willingness to.
Advertisements

Case 3.5 – The Columbia Shuttle Disaster by Margaret Battin & Gordon Mower.
Continuous Random Variables. L. Wang, Department of Statistics University of South Carolina; Slide 2 Continuous Random Variable A continuous random variable.
Comprehend the Challenger accident Comprehend the Columbia accident The Space Shuttle Program: Challenger and Columbia Accidents.
Importance Sampling. What is Importance Sampling ? A simulation technique Used when we are interested in rare events Examples: Bit Error Rate on a channel,
Helicopter System Reliability Analysis Statistical Methods for Reliability Engineering Mark Andersen.
1 Software Testing and Quality Assurance Lecture 38 – Software Quality Assurance.
Introduction to Risk Assessment in Engineering: With Application to Heat Shield Reliability Modeling Presented by: Austin Howard University of Idaho Mechanical.
1 Applying Simulation to Decision Problems. 2 Monte Carlo simulation: A simple example Cash inflows Probability outflows Probability ($) (%) ($) (%) 50.
Title slide PIPELINE QRA SEMINAR. PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION TO RISK IDENTIFICATION 2.
Automobile Warranty Data Analysis by Anita Rebarchak DSES-6070 HV5 Statistical Methods for Reliability Engineering Professor Ernesto Gutierrez-Miravete.
West Virginia University A Bayesian Approach to Reliability Predication of Component Based Systems H. Singh, V. Cortellessa, B. Cukic, E. Gunel, V. Bharadwaj.
Testing safety-critical software systems
4. Dynamic reliability models Objectives Be able to find reliability of series, parallel, stand-by and shared load parallel systems, when the reliabilities.
Reliability Model for Compressor Failure SMRE Term Project Paul Zamjohn August 2008.
1 Reliability Prediction A Quest for Reliable Parameters By Yair Shai.
Engineering Economy, Sixteenth Edition Sullivan | Wicks | Koelling Copyright ©2015, 2012, 2009 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. TABLE 12-1.
OSMA2003 Center for Reliability Engineering 1 Integrating Software into PRA Presented by C. Smidts Center for Reliability Engineering University of Maryland.
ERT 312 SAFETY & LOSS PREVENTION IN BIOPROCESS RISK ASSESSMENT Prepared by: Miss Hairul Nazirah Abdul Halim.
Chapter 14 Monte Carlo Simulation Introduction Find several parameters Parameter follow the specific probability distribution Generate parameter.
Integrated circuit failure times in hours during stress test David Swanick DSES-6070 HV5 Statistical Methods for Reliability Engineering Summer 2008 Professor.
FAULT TREE ANALYSIS (FTA). QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS Some of the commonly used quantitative risk assessment methods are; 1.Fault tree analysis (FTA)
Lecture 2: Combinatorial Modeling CS 7040 Trustworthy System Design, Implementation, and Analysis Spring 2015, Dr. Rozier Adapted from slides by WHS at.
1 6. Reliability computations Objectives Learn how to compute reliability of a component given the probability distributions on the stress,S, and the strength,
MAT 4830 Mathematical Modeling 05 Mean Time Between Failures
Reliability analysis of statically indeterminate steel frame (pilot study) David Pustka VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava Faculty of Civil Engineering.
Software Testing and Quality Assurance Software Quality Assurance 1.
DSES6070 Statistical Methods for Reliability Engineering Reliability of a Bicycle as a Commuter Vehicle By Adam Brown.
A Different Type of Monte Carlo Simulation Jake Blanchard Spring 2010 Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers1.
Aircraft Windshield Failures Statistical Methods for Reliability Engineering Professor Gutierrez-Miravete Erica Siegel December 4, 2008.
Reliability Reliability of Adhesives used in High Quality Audio Components.
1 3. System reliability Objectives Learn the definitions of a component and a system from a reliability perspective Be able to calculate reliability of.
Machine Design Under Uncertainty. Outline Uncertainty in mechanical components Why consider uncertainty Basics of uncertainty Uncertainty analysis for.
Investigation of Turbine Electric Motor Winding Failure Rate Data DSES-6070 HV3 and HV4 Statistical Methods for Reliability Engineering Fall 2007 Michael.
Learning Goals  I will be able to identify the names of the space shuttles in NASA’s program.  I will be able to identify two shuttle disasters.
Reliability of New High Tech Roller Coasters By: Topher Schott DSES-6070 HV5 Statistical Methods for Reliability Engineering Spring 2008 Professor Ernesto.
By Morgan Bonner.  Space shuttle Columbia was launched (January 16,2003) the disaster (April 12,1981) first launch. It was launched at the Kennedy Space.
RLV Reliability Analysis Guidelines Terry Hardy AST-300/Systems Engineering and Training Division October 26, 2004.
Emerging Developments & Issues - Suborbital Commercial Spaceflight
Thermal Protection for Space Craft The problem of space craft high heating The solution The crash of the Columbia space ship national Alex&TybyNational.
Components are existing in ONE of TWO STATES: 1 WORKING STATE with probability R 0 FAILURE STATE with probability F R+F = 1 RELIABLEFAILURE F R Selecting.
Determination of the Optimal Replacement Age for a Preventive Maintenance Problem involving a Weibull Failure Probability Distribution Function Ernesto.
Materials for Lecture 19 Readings Chapter 14
Hypothesis Testing Steps for the Rejection Region Method State H 1 and State H 0 State the Test Statistic and its sampling distribution (normal or t) Determine.
Launch Structure Challenge - Background Humans landed on the moon in 1969 – Apollo 11 space flight. In 2003, NASA started a new program (Ares) to send.
1 Software Testing and Quality Assurance Lecture 38 – Software Quality Assurance.
Prof. Enrico Zio Event tree analysis Prof. Enrico Zio Politecnico di Milano Dipartimento di Energia.
Process of Diagnosing a Dynamic System Lab Seminar June 19th, 2007 Seung Ki Shin.
Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis
16111 presentation by Arindam Das System Reliability Prediction A presentation by Arindam Das.
1 Common Cause Modeling Huntsville Society of Reliability Engineers RAM VIII Training Summit November 3-4, 2015 Frank Hark Bastion Technologies, Inc. Paul.
SPACE SHUTTLE.
Plot Diagram.
CHALLENGER DISASTER : CASE STUDY – TO BE
Maintenance strategies
CHAPTER 5 Probability: What Are the Chances?
PRA: Validation versus Participation in Risk Analysis PRA as a Risk Informed Decision Making Tool Richard T. Banke– SAIC
Reliability, Redundancy, and Resiliency
People in Space.
Continuous Random Variables
ACCURACY IN PERCENTILES
Essential Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and the
Essential Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and the
by Xiang Mao and Qin Chen
Knowing When to Stop: An Examination of Methods to Minimize the False Negative Risk of Automated Abort Triggers RAM XI Training Summit October 2018 Patrick.
The Challenger “Again Science Fails”
Chapter 14 Monte Carlo Simulation
Below is the full data set. Would you have launched?
Continuous distribution curve.
Presentation transcript:

CARLOS CEDEÑO DSES /04/2008 Reliability of the Three Main Engines of Space Shuttle

Introduction Objective  Determine the reliability of the NASA Space Shuttle’s three main engines. Problem  The flight readiness of the three Main Engines of the space shuttle to launch safely has been argued to be between 80% – 85% during the program early stages.  After the 2003 Columbia accident NASA took on the initiative of improving the Space Shuttle system. The new improvements included to make the three main engines more reliable. In 2008 the Shuttle three Main Engines are 40% more reliable during ascent than the old ones, with an ascent risk of 1 in 2,123 flights (failure rate ~.0004).  The Space Shuttle can still perform with 2 out of the 3 main engines working.

Reliability Functions It was assumed that the three engines have the following cumulative probability distribution:  F = 1-exp(-.0004*t) Using Maple, the reliability functions were calculated for a system that fails when 2 out of the 3 components fail.  MTTFs2oo3 = 2083 flights

Reliability Plots

Monte Carlo Simulation A Monte Carlo Simulation using a 1000 runs was performed to get the Reliability that 2 out of the 3 Main Engines still work under any given time.

Conclusion The new improvements to the Shuttle Main Engines makes the Shuttle very reliable and safe.

Reliability Block Diagram of Space Shuttle three Main Engine Engine μ= Engine μ= Engine μ= Computer μ=.001 Computer μ=.001 Computer μ=.001

Space Shuttle Crash Unresponsiv e Space shuttle Loss of Lift Force Engine Over-heated High Temperature Reading Fault Tree Analysis Shuttle Three Main Engines Without Computer Engine failure Loss of Lift Force Engine Over- heated High Temperature Reading Engine failure Loss of Lift Force Engine Over-heated High Temperature Reading Engine failure

Event Tree Analysis Shuttle Three Main Engines Without computer High Temperature Reading True Uncontrolled Landing, with Possible loss of vehiche Initial EventEngine Over-heatedLoss of LiftOutcome False Normal Operation Of Engine Mission aborted with Controlled Landing