Towards a protection of species at the population level: derivation of PNEDR values by modelling population responses to ionizing radiations Emilie Lance,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The conversion of Saul to St Paul (Michelangelo, 1542) Marcel Leist Doerenkamp-Zbinden Chair For Alternative in vitro Methods, University Konstanz, Konstanz.
Advertisements

1 PROTECT: Numerical Benchmarks Workshop, May 2008 Update of UNSCEAR 1996 Presented To: Workshop on Numerical Benchmarks for Protecting Biota Against Radiation.
Application of ERICA outputs and AQUARISK to evaluate radioecological risk of effluents from a nuclear site J. Twining & J. Ferris Objectives of this study.
David Copplestone Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster October 2011.
Introduction to the ERICA Tool
Numerical benchmarks: proposed levels and underlying reasoning
PROTECTFP PROTECT: First Proposed Levels for Environmental Protection against Radioactive Substances Definitions, Derivation Methods to Determine.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014 David Copplestone & Nick Beresford.
PROTECT FP CEH SSI IRSN NRPA (+ UMB) EA Protection of the Environment from Ionising Radiation in a Regulatory Context.
PROTECTFP Protection of the Environment from Ionising Radiation in a Regulatory Context PROTECT An EC Co-ordinated action.
Time is of the essence! Tjalling Jager Dept. Theoretical Biology.
PROTECTFP Radioprotection of the environment in France: IRSN current views and workplan K. Beaugelin-Seiller, IRSN Vienna IC, June 2007.
Alexander Brandl ERHS 630 Radiation and Tissue Weighting Factors Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences.
1 Development & Evaluation of Ecotoxicity Predictive Tools EPA Development Team Regional Stakeholder Meetings January 11-22, 2010.
PROTECTFP CEH, UK (Co-ordinator) SSI, Sweden IRSN, France NRPA, Norway EA, England & Wales.
Methods for Incorporating Aquatic Plant Effects into Community Level Benchmarks EPA Development Team Regional Stakeholder Meetings January 11-22, 2010.
ELIN RENBORG DEPT. OF MARINE ECOLOGY - TJÄRNÖ UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG Effects of Ocean Acidification on Keystone Species of the Baltic Ecosystem.
Experiences from testing the ERICA Integrated Approach Case study application of the ERICA Tool and D-ERICA.
9 Population Growth and Regulation. 9 Population Growth and Regulation Case Study: Human Population Growth Life Tables Age Structure Exponential Growth.
Population ecology Chapter 53- AP Biology.
Dynamic Energy Budgets i.r.t. population effects of toxicants Tjalling Jager Dept. Theoretical Biology.
Mechanistic modeling of zebrafish metabolism in relationship to food level and the presence of a toxicant (uranium) S. Augustine B.Gagnaire C. Adam-Guillermin.
Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) theory by Elke, Svenja and Ben.
Tjalling Jager Dept. Theoretical Biology How to simplify biology to interpret effects of stressors.
Environmental Health III. Epidemiology Shu-Chi Chang, Ph.D., P.E., P.A. Assistant Professor 1 and Division Chief 2 1 Department of Environmental Engineering.
and Environmental Risk Assessment
Elke Zimmer, PhD-Project DEB-1 Supervisors: Tjalling Jager, Bas Kooijman (VU Amsterdam) Co-Supervisor: Virginie Ducrot (INRA, Rennes) Elke Zimmer CREAM.
Intra-specific Interactions II What are the implications of density dependence in real populations? Do natural populations show fluctuations that could.
Current and Emerging Paradigms in Environmental Toxicology Lecture 2.
Application of DEB theory to a particular organism in (hopefully somewhat) practical terms Laure Pecquerie University of California Santa Barbara.
Bio432 Topic(s) for 2nd paper: Mating system evolutionary ecology Kin selection Non-kin cooperation Cultural evolution See references on course webpage.
Effects of combined stressors Tjalling Jager, Bas Kooijman Dept. Theoretical Biology From individuals to population using dynamic energy budgets.
From developmental energetics to effects of toxicants: a story born of zebrafish and uranium S. Augustine B.Gagnaire C. Adam-Guillermin S. A. L. M. Kooijman.
“to provide and apply an integrated approach of addressing scientific, managerial and societal issues surrounding environmental effects of ionising.
Risk Analyses and the Development of Radiological Benchmarks Tom Hinton (IRSN)
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Protection of the environment from ionising radiation - views of a regulator.
PROTECTFP Numerical Benchmarks for protecting biota against radiation in the environment Methodology to derive benchmarks, selected methods used.
EFFECTS OF RADIATION ON BIOTA AND SETTING BENCHMARKS Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
Introduction to the ERICA Tool Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
RADIATION PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster October 2011 David Copplestone & Nick Beresford.
Continuous addition of births and deaths at constant rates (b & d)
Are we over carrying capacity?
INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION —————————————————————————————————————— ICRP And Protection of The Environment Dr Jack Valentin Scientific.
National Committee for the Certification of Radiation Protection Officer BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings Population Ecology.
TREE project, Challenges and Future Updates Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
Tjalling Jager Dept. Theoretical Biology Assessing ecotoxicological effects on a mechanistic basis the central role of the individual.
PROTECTFP Derivation of Environmental Radiological Protection Benchmarks an overview
Detecting Radiation in our Radioactive World. Nuclear Technology in our Lives Eaten Eggs? Driven over a Metal Bridge? Attached a Postage Stamp? Use Contact.
CEH Lancaster 27 th – 29 th June What is a benchmark? Why are benchmarks needed? How are benchmarks derived? How are benchmarks used?
Fig Organismal ecology Population ecology Community ecology Ecosystem ecology Landscape ecology Global ecology.
PROTECTFP PROTECT recommendations – application in practice.
MAIN TOXICITY TESTING. TESTING STRATEGIES A number of different types of data are used in order to establish the safety of chemical substances for use.
Criterion 1: Conservation of Biological Diversity Indicator Refinement: What is the state of Indicator Science? 1. Overview of the Criterion 2. Review.
55.2 How Do Ecologists Study Population Dynamics? To understand population growth, ecologists must measure population processes as well as population traits.
Water Quality Criteria: Implications for Testing Russell Erickson U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mid-Continent Ecology Division, Duluth, MN, USA.
EACHINGOSSILS CROSS URRICULUMS ORTHAROLINA.
PROPAGULES AND OFFSPRING. Patterns of Development Nutritional mode 1) Planktotrophy - larval stage feeds This separates marine invertebrates from all.
Cunningham - Cunningham - Saigo: Environmental Science 7 th Ed. Population Dynamics Chapter 6.
RADIATION PROTECTION IN RADIOTHERAPY
Life-history Strategies of Fishes and their Relevance to Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management Rainer Froese IfM-GEOMAR
Biodiversity of Fishes: Life-History Allometries and Invariants Rainer Froese
Biology-Based Modelling Tjalling Jager Bas Kooijman Dept. Theoretical Biology.
PROTECTFP Recommendations of Work Package 1 David Copplestone.
MEASUREMENT OF TOXICITY By, Dr. M. David Department of Zoology, Karnatak University Dharwad.
Dynamic energy budgets in individual based population models
Comparison of MCNP and ERICA results in two different marine areas
Susan Makris U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development
Jos van Gils, Elena Semenzin, Muriel Gevrey, Peter Von der Ohe,
Presentation transcript:

Towards a protection of species at the population level: derivation of PNEDR values by modelling population responses to ionizing radiations Emilie Lance, Frédéric Alonzo, Jacqueline Garnier-Laplace Direction de l’Environnement et de l’Intervention Service d’Etude du Comportement des Radionucléides dans les Ecosystèmes Laboratoire de Modélisation Environnementale EMRAS Meeting, 26-27/01/2010, Vienna, Austria

- Titre Partie/Dir/Service – Page 2 Evaluation of environmental risk from ionizing radiations IAEA : standards for environmental radioprotection ICRP : recommendation of similar method than for chemical substances, 2005 Sept Background on ERICA and PROTECT: recommendation FASSET ( ) 5 th PCRD ERICA ( ) 6 th PCRD PROTECT ( ) 6 th PCRD European projects: Risk assessment screening dose or dose rate, « benchmarks » for the protection of wild species againts impact of ionizing radiations. EMRAS Meeting, /27, Vienna, Austria

- Titre Partie/Dir/Service – Page 3 FREDERICA database : effects of ionizing radiations on non-human organisms Ecotoxicity data couples (dose or dose rate, effect) from 1040 references 16 pseudo-taxonomic groups 3 ecosystems Ecosystems terrestrial freshwater marine Biological complexity Background on ERICA and PROTECT: data set EMRAS Meeting, /27, Vienna, Austria

- Titre Partie/Dir/Service – Page 4 Effects observed at the individual and sub-individual level Which data for the derivation of benchmarks ? On the first hand, data on chronic exposure to gamma radiation, external radiation exposure (µGy.h -1 ) 4 categories: - (1) morbidity: growth rate, immune system, behavior (impact on the central nervous system), - (2) mortality: also mutations that affect life expectancy - (3) reproductive capacity: fertility, fecundity, hatching/survival of embryos… - (4) mutations of somatic and reproductive cells Background on ERICA and PROTECT: data set EMRAS Meeting, /27, Vienna, Austria

- Titre Partie/Dir/Service – Page 5 Radiotoxicity data relative to life-history traits (protection of the population) Dose (rate)-effect relationships: critical data, EDR10 (dose rate inducing 10% of effect on the endpoint in comparison with controls) For a given species, if an EDR10 is available for several endpoints, the most sensitive is selected Derivation of criteria for the protection of populations Effect (%) Dose (Gy) Dose rate (µGy/h) ED10 EDR10 ED50 EDR50 10 Regression model Experimental data Background on ERICA and PROTECT: method EMRAS Meeting, /27, Vienna, Austria

- Titre Partie/Dir/Service – Page 6 Background on ERICA and PROTECT: method Extrapolation model « Species Sensitivity Distribution » (SSD) HDR 5 = Dose rate protecting 95% of species (95% are affected at maximum 10% of effect in comparison with controls) 5% HDR 5 Garnier-Laplace et al. (2008) HDR5 / safety factor = PNEDR (Predicted No Effect Dose Rate) Derivation of criteria for the protection of populations EMRAS Meeting, /27, Vienna, Austria

- Titre Partie/Dir/Service – Page 7 Background on ERICA and PROTECT: possible improvements Biochemical level Whole organism level Physiological level Population level Community level Ecosystem level Time scale Life-history traits: survival, growth, fecundity Sensitivity of the population growth rate to impact on individuals endpoints Life history strategies dynamics impact Hypothesis: the toxicity at the individual level is comparable between species and endpoints Ecotoxicity data at the individual level EMRAS Meeting, /27, Vienna, Austria

- Titre Partie/Dir/Service – Page 8 age Abundance time 1) Population structured per age classes 2) Cohorts vary over time depending on survival and fecundity 1 2 3… i age max N i+1 = P i  N i at time t + 1 i  N 1 = F i  N i N i at time t Eggs, juveniles (future cohort N 1 )  Modeling population size in number  Determination of population growth rate Population dynamic depending on survival and reproduction in each life stage Fecundity rate F i Survival rate P i depending on age i Background on ERICA and PROTECT: possible improvements EMRAS Meeting, /27, Vienna, Austria

- Titre Partie/Dir/Service – Page 9 Reduction in survival Reduction in fecundity Delay in reproduction %20%40%60%80% Individual level effect %20%40%60%80% Delay in population growth (relative to generation time T) T = 10 days T = 12 weeks  Sensitivity of population depends on individual endpoints  Sensitivity of population depends on life history strategy of different species Comparison of population sensitivity to changes in different endpoints and different species Eisenia fetida toxicité chronique de radiations gamma externes (Co-60) Daphnia magna toxicité chronique de U et Am-241 dissous et radiations gamma externes (Cs-137) Alonzo et al., 2008 Background on ERICA and PROTECT: possible improvements EMRAS Meeting, /27, Vienna, Austria

- Titre Partie/Dir/Service – Page 10 Simulation of population dynamics of each species in control conditions and with 0 to 100% decrease in each life-history trait Method and required data: a first theoretical step Toward a protection of species at the population level Hypothesis of the model Enclosed system No density-dependence Optimum environnemental conditions Relative sensitivity of the population to different individual endpoints for a species Population dynamic time (days) taille de population To understand and compare life-history strategies between different species age sexual maturity survival at each stage fecundity at each stage (number of eggs, hatching %, juveniles survival…) Bibliography modélisation Pop-EDR 10 : Dose rate inducing 10% decrease in population growth rate Dose rate (µGy/h) ED 10 EDR Effect (%) % Dose rate ? -10% on the population growth rate 2nd step: utilization of data from FREDERICA EMRAS Meeting, /27, Vienna, Austria

- Titre Partie/Dir/Service – Page 11 5% HDR 5 Derivation of benchmarks Extrapolation model « Species Sensitivity Distribution » (SSD) with pop-EDR10 = at the population level New HDR 5 = Dose rate protecting population dynamics for 95% of species (decrease in population growth rate of less than 10% in comparison with controls) Pop-EDR 10 Toward a protection of species at the population level EMRAS Meeting, /27, Vienna, Austria

- Titre Partie/Dir/Service – Page 12 Thanks for your attention // more informations on… European program ERICA Risques des substances radioactives pour l’environnement European program PROTECT Protection of the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context FREDERICA Radiation Effects Database CIPR NEA EMRAS Meeting, /27, Vienna, Austria