E.C. Aschenauer arXiv: 1212.1701 & 1108.1713 This is us !!! protons, neutrons electrons increase beam energy beam energy Quarks and Gluons 10 -17 m Proton.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
April 06, 2005 JLab 12 GeV upgrade DOE Science Review 1 Fundamental Structure of Hadrons Zein-Eddine Meziani April 06, 2005 DOE Science Review for JLab.
Advertisements

Longitudinal Spin at RHIC 29 th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics February 7, 2013 Cameron McKinney.
The Color Glass Condensate and RHIC Phenomenology Outstanding questions: What is the high energy limit of QCD? How do gluons and quarks arise in hadrons?
A probe for hot & dense nuclear matter. Lake Louise Winter Institute 21 February, 2000 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez.
The Science of an EIC Nuclear Science Goals: How do we understand the visible matter in our universe in terms of the fundamental quarks and gluons of QCD?
J. Seele - WWND 1 The STAR Longitudinal Spin Program Joe Seele (MIT) for the Collaboration WWND 2009.
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
The Glue that binds us all Phases of Matter Town Hall meeting, Jan. 12th, 2007 Probing the nature of gluonic matter with EIC: the world’s first eA collider.
Working Group on e-p Physics A. Bruell, E. Sichtermann, W. Vogelsang, C. Weiss Antje Bruell, JLab EIC meeting, Hampton, May Goals of this parallel.
Christina Markert Physics Workshop UT Austin November Christina Markert The ‘Little Bang in the Laboratory’ – Accelorator Physics. Big Bang Quarks.
New States of Matter and RHIC Outstanding questions about strongly interacting matter: How does matter behave at very high temperature and/or density?
Working Group on e-p Physics A. Bruell, E. Sichtermann, W. Vogelsang, C. Weiss Antje Bruell, JLab EIC meeting, Stony Brook, Dec Physics Topics Working.
9/19/20151 Nucleon Spin: Final Solution at the EIC Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
THE DEEP INELASTIC SCATTERING ON THE POLARIZED NUCLEONS AT EIC E.S.Timoshin, S.I.Timoshin.
Future Opportunities at an Electron-Ion Collider Oleg Eyser Brookhaven National Laboratory.
A New Round of Experiments for HERA A. Caldwell, April 26, 2003 Motivation Letters of intent e e What’s in the bubble ?? Radiation patterns Mass generation.
Spin Azimuthal Asymmetries in Semi-Inclusive DIS at JLAB  Nucleon spin & transverse momentum of partons  Transverse-momentum dependent distributions.
UK Hadron Physics D. G. Ireland 10 October 2014 NuPECC Meeting, Edinburgh.
Experimental Approach to Nuclear Quark Distributions (Rolf Ent – EIC /15/04) One of two tag-team presentations to show why an EIC is optimal to access.
The Color Glass Condensate Outstanding questions: What is the high energy limit of QCD? How do gluons and quarks arise in hadrons? What are the possible.
Parton Model & Parton Dynamics Huan Z Huang Department of Physics and Astronomy University of California, Los Angeles Department of Engineering Physics.
E.C. Aschenauer 2 Diffractive events are characterized by a large rapidity gap and the exchange of a color neutral particle (pomeron) The diffractive.
Longitudinal Spin Physics at RHIC and a Future eRHIC Brian Page Brookhaven National Laboratory CIPANP 2015 – Vail, CO.
Deliverablesobservables what we learn requirementscomments/competition HP13 (2015) Test unique QCD predictions for relations between single-transverse.
U N C L A S S I F I E D 7 Feb 2005 Studies of Hadronic Jets with the Two-Particle Azimuthal Correlations Method Paul Constantin.
Particle Physics Chris Parkes Experimental QCD Kinematics Deep Inelastic Scattering Structure Functions Observation of Partons Scaling Violations Jets.
SPHENIX The Future Program of the PHENIX collaboration (central and forward rapidity) Richard Seto Hard Probes May 31,
High Energy Nuclear Physics and the Nature of Matter Outstanding questions about strongly interacting matter: How does matter behave at very high temperature.
Spin structure of the nucleon
Future Physics at JLab Andrew Puckett LANL medium energy physics internal review 12/14/
Studies of e+A physics at an Electron-Ion Collider Liang Zheng On behalf of the BNL EIC Science Task Force Brookhaven National Lab Institute of Particle.
E.C. Aschenauer Why run top-energy p+p in run-16 2 Transverse momentum dependent parton distribution functions  initial state effects  important in.
E.C. Aschenauer & M. Stratmann arXiv: &
2 Gluon density dominates at x
General Discussion some general remarks some questions.
1 EIC EW Meeting, W&M, VA, May 2010 E.C. Aschenauer.
Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and Ultra-Dense Matter.
Searching for Polarized Glue at Brian Page – Indiana University For the STAR Collaboration June 17, 2014 STAR.
Single-Spin Asymmetries at CLAS  Transverse momentum of quarks and spin-azimuthal asymmetries  Target single-spin asymmetries  Beam single-spin asymmetries.
Hadron Collider Physics 2012, 12/Nov/2012, KyotoShinIchi Esumi, Univ. of Tsukuba1 Heavy Ion results from RHIC-BNL ShinIchi Esumi Univ. of Tsukuba Contents.
Measurements with Polarized Hadrons T.-A. Shibata Tokyo Institute of Technology Aug 15, 2003 Lepton-Photon 2003.
EIC — Bring the Glue to Light. Gluons dominate QCD QCD is the fundamental theory that describes structure and interactions in nuclear matter. Without.
E Entering the Electronic Age at RHIC: RHIC APS Division of Nuclear Physics Fall Meeting October 24, 2012 Christine A. Aidala University of Michigan.
Measurement of Flavor Separated Quark Polarizations at HERMES Polina Kravchenko (DESY) for the collaboration  Motivation of this work  HERMES experiment.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Anthony.
TMD flavor decomposition at CLAS12 Patrizia Rossi - Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN  Introduction  Spin-orbit correlations in kaon production.
The Color Glass Condensate and Glasma What is the high energy limit of QCD? What are the possible form of high energy density matter? How do quarks and.
Physics Potential of an ep Collider at the VLHC  Why ep? When?  Physics Results from the first ep Collider – HERA  Future ep Physics Priorities  Perturbative.
Implications for LHC pA Run from RHIC Results CGC Glasma Initial Singularity Thermalized sQGP Hadron Gas sQGP Asymptotic.
EPHENIX for eRHIC 1 Mostly from Sasha’s Presentation from DIS.
Unpolarized Physics Program HERA-3 Workshop, MPI, 17-Dec-2002 A. Caldwell Physics Topics: eP, eD, eA Detector Requirements Accelerator Requirements Sources:
New results from Delia Hasch DPG Spring Meeting 2004 – Nuclear Physics Cologne (Germany) March, (on behalf of the HERMES Collaboration) Exotic.
Forward/p+A Update June 2005 Carl Gagliardi, Mike Leitch, Kirill Tuchin.
E+ eRHIC Raju Venugopalan RHIC-AGS Users Meeting, BNL, June 2nd, 2009.
Gluon polarization and jet production at STAR Pibero Djawotho for the STAR Collaboration Texas A&M 4 June 2013.
Transverse Spin Physics with an Electron Ion Collider Oleg Eyser 4 th International Workshop on Transverse Polarisation Phenomena in Hard Processes Chia,
E.C. Aschenauer arXiv: EIC User Meeting, Berkley, E.C. Aschenauer Does this saturation produce matter of universal properties in the.
Non-Prompt J/ψ Measurements at STAR Zaochen Ye for the STAR Collaboration University of Illinois at Chicago The STAR Collaboration:
1 Proton Structure Functions and HERA QCD Fit HERA+Experiments F 2 Charged Current+xF 3 HERA QCD Fit for the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations Andrew Mehta (Liverpool.
Timelike Compton Scattering at JLab
EIC NAS review Charge-2 What are the capabilities of other facilities, existing and planned, domestic and abroad, to address the science opportunities.
Review of ALICE Experiments
Explore the new QCD frontier: strong color fields in nuclei
Physics of the EIC Cyrille Marquet Theory Division - CERN.
EIC NAS review Charge-2 What are the capabilities of other facilities, existing and planned, domestic and abroad, to address the science opportunities.
Physics with Nuclei at an Electron-Ion Collider
F2/FL with HERA III/eRHIC A. Caldwell, Max-Planck-Institut f. Physik
PheniX, STAr AND AN EIC E.C. Aschenauer
fsPHENIX and Hadron Calorimeters
Introduction and Workshop Charge
Presentation transcript:

E.C. Aschenauer arXiv: &

This is us !!! protons, neutrons electrons increase beam energy beam energy Quarks and Gluons m Proton m Binding-energy: ~10 9 eV Proton: Quark-Masses: ~1% M p Proton mass completely generated by QCD dynamics HOW ? Need a high resolution microscope to resolve quark and gluon structure  eRHIC Gluon density dominates at x<0.1 HERA’s discovery:

3  gluons distribution cannot rise forever  non-linear pQCD effects provide a  non-linear pQCD effects provide a natural way to tame this growth natural way to tame this growth  characterized by the saturation  characterized by the saturation scale Q 2 s (x) scale Q 2 s (x) QCD: Dynamical balance between splitting and recombination and recombination A new regime of QCD matter  Color Glass Condensate (CGC) Hints from HERA, RHIC and LHC discover it unambiguously at eRHIC Enhancement of Q S with A Enhancement of Q S with A ⇒ saturation regime reached at ⇒ saturation regime reached at significantly lower √s in nuclei significantly lower √s in nuclei Au: ~200 times smaller effective x ! E.C. Aschenauer  Which correlations constitute the dynamics of the multi body system at low x of the multi body system at low x  How does quark and gluon dynamics generate the proton spin? It is more than the number 1/2 ℏ ! It is more than the number 1/2 ℏ !  crucial interplay between the intrinsic  crucial interplay between the intrinsic properties and interactions of quarks and properties and interactions of quarks and gluons gluons  How do hadrons emerge from a created quark or gluon? or gluon? Neutralization of color - hadronization Neutralization of color - hadronization  2+1D Structure of nucleons and nuclei How does the glue bind quarks and itself into How does the glue bind quarks and itself into nucleons and nuclei? nucleons and nuclei? Q 2 GeV 2 Probingmomentum 200 MeV (1 fm) 2 GeV (1/10) fm) Color Confinement Asymptotic freedom

Proton spins are used to image the structure and function of the human body using the technique of magnetic resonance imaging. 4e’ (Q 2 ) e L*L*L*L* x+ξ x-ξ H, H, E, E (x,ξ,t) ~ J  p/A p’/A’ t Measure exclusive cross sections for different final states ( , J/Ψ, …) as fct. of t, x and Q 2  spatial parton distributions (GPDs)  access to orbital angular momentum E.C. Aschenauer

5  Hard diffraction at small x Why is diffraction so important  Sensitive to spatial gluon distribution (t  b T )  Hot topic:  Lumpiness?  Just Wood-Saxon+nucleon g(b T )  coherent part probes “shape of black disc”  incoherent part (large t) sensitive to “lumpiness” of the source sensitive to “lumpiness” of the source (fluctuations, hot spots,...) (fluctuations, hot spots,...) t = Δ 2 /(1-x) ≈ Δ 2 (for small x) possible Source distribution with b T g = 2 GeV -2 Analogy: plane monochromatic wave incident on a circular screen of radius R Impact:  discover unambiguously a new state of QCD matter  understand the initial conditions for AA collisions  influence on Sphaleron transition probabilities  one of the possibilities to generate CP-violation in the early universe needed to explain the in the early universe needed to explain the baryon-antibaryon ratio baryon-antibaryon ratio

6 Current knowledge about Gluons in p /A Why eRHIC now? “all stars align”:  theory developments will allow to obtain the answers to the critical questions the answers to the critical questions discussed discussed  accelerator technologies allow for a high energy, high luminosity polarized ep/eA energy, high luminosity polarized ep/eA collider collider  detector technologies allow for a collider detector with high resolution, wide detector with high resolution, wide acceptance and particle ID in the acceptance and particle ID in the entire  range entire  range with eRHIC eRHIC science program will profoundly impact our understanding of QCD, uniquely tied to a future high energy, high luminosity, polarized ep / eA collider never been measured before & never without E.C. Aschenauer

7 BACKUP

8  Utilize the theoretical concepts of transverse momentum distributions (TMDs) and un-integrated PDFs, which encode correlations and un-integrated PDFs, which encode correlations  spin-orbit correlations on parton level  hydrogen atom  teach us how colors charges in QCD interact  Observable: azimuthal modulations of 6-fold differential cross section in semi-inclusive DIS cross section in semi-inclusive DIS can be viewed as parton flow inside nucleus analogy: currents in oceans

9 Measure of resolution power Measure of inelasticity Measure of momentum fraction of struck quark Kinematics: Quark splits into gluon splits into quarks … Gluon splits into quarks higher √s increases resolution m m E.C. Aschenauer

10 Does this saturation produce matter of universal properties in the nucleon and all nuclei viewed at nearly the speed of light? Where does the saturation of gluon densities set in? Is there a simple boundary that separates the region from the more dilute quark gluon matter? If so how do the distributions of quarks and gluons change as one crosses the boundary? How are sea quarks and gluons and their spin distributed in space and momentum inside the nucleon? How are these quark and gluon distributions correlated with the over all nucleon properties, such as spin direction? What is the role of the motion of sea quarks and gluons in building the nucleon spin? How does the nuclear environment affect the distribution of quarks and gluons and their interaction in nuclei? How does matter respond to fast moving color charge passing through it? Is this response different for light and heavy quarks? How does the transverse spatial distribution of gluons compare to that in the nucleon? q h **** e’e’e’e’ e only at EIC EIC only in eA/ep E.C. Aschenauer

11 time CGCJIMWLK/BK Hydro (EoS) Hard Processes (pQCD) FF/coal. HadronTransport I Our understanding of some fundamental properties of the Glasma, sQGP and Hadron Gas depend strongly on our knowledge of the initial state! 3 conundrums of the initial state: 1.What is the spatial transverse distributions of nucleons and gluons? 2. How much does the spatial distribution fluctuate? Lumpiness, hot-spots etc. fluctuate? Lumpiness, hot-spots etc. 3. How saturated is the initial state of the nucleus? nucleus?  unambiguously see saturation  unambiguously see saturation Advantage over p(d)A:  eA experimentally much cleaner no “spectator” background to subtract no “spectator” background to subtract  Access to the parton kinematics through scattered lepton (x, Q 2 )  initial and final state effects can be disentangled cleanly  Saturation: no alternative explanations, i.e. no hydro in eA no alternative explanations, i.e. no hydro in eA The Initial Conditions E.C. Aschenauer

12 Hadron-Hadron: Electron-Hadron:  probe has structure as complex as the “target” the “target”  More direct information/access on the response of a nuclear medium to gluon response of a nuclear medium to gluon probe probe  Soft color interactions before the collision can alter the nuclear wave fct. collision can alter the nuclear wave fct. and destroy universality of parton and destroy universality of parton properties (break factorization) properties (break factorization)  no direct access to parton kinematics  Point-like probe  High precision & access to partonic kinematics kinematics  Dominated by single photon exchange  no direct color interaction  no direct color interaction  preserve the properties of partons  preserve the properties of partons in the nuclear wave function in the nuclear wave function  Nuclei always “cold” nuclear matter

13  Idea: momentum transfer t conjugate to transverse position (b T ) o coherent part probes “shape of black disc” o incoherent part (dominant at large t) sensitive to “lumpiness” of the source (fluctuations, hot spots,...) Spatial source distribution: t = Δ 2 /(1-x) ≈ Δ 2 (for small x) ϕ, nosat Golden eA measurement for eRHIC E.C. Aschenauer

14 Other than in p: G(x,Q 2 ) for nuclei is little known Key: F L (x,Q 2 ) ~ xG(x,Q 2 ) 99% of all h ± have p t < 2 GeV/c “Bulk Matter”  x < 0.01 E.C. Aschenauer

lowest x so far 4.6 x10 -3 COMPASS RHIC pp data constraining Δg(x) in approx < x <0.2 data plotted at x T =2p T /√S 15 eRHIC extends x coverage by up to 2 decades (at Q 2 =1 GeV 2 ) likewise for Q 2 E.C. Aschenauer

16 5 x 250 starts here 5 x 100 starts here hep-ph: cross section: pQCD scaling violations world data E.C. Aschenauer

DIS scaling violations mainly determine Δg at small x in addition, SIDIS data provide detailed flavor separation of quark sea includes only “stage-1 data” includes only “stage-1 data” can be pushed to x=10 -4 with can be pushed to x=10 -4 with 20 x 250 GeV data 20 x 250 GeV data “issues”: eRHIC limited by eRHIC limited by systematic uncertainties systematic uncertainties need to control rel. lumi, need to control rel. lumi, polarimetry, detector performance, polarimetry, detector performance, … very well … very well 17 yet, small x behavior completely unconstrained  determines x-integral, which enters proton spin sum dramatic reduction of uncertainties: E.C. Aschenauer

can expect approx. 5-10% can expect approx. 5-10% uncertainties on ΔΣ and Δg uncertainties on ΔΣ and Δg but need to control systematics but need to control systematics current data w/ eRHIC data 18 total quark spin  spin  gluon spin  g ✔ what about the orbital angular momentum? E.C. Aschenauer

experimental program to address these questions: azimuthal asymmetries in DIS adds their transverse momentum dependence exclusive processes adds their transverse position inclusive and semi-inclusive DIS longitudinal motion of spinning quarks and gluons machine & detector requirements prerequisites all need √s ep > 50 GeV to access x < where sea quarks and gluons dominate multi-dimensional binning multi-dimensional binning to reach k T > 1 GeV to reach k T > 1 GeV to reach |t| > 1 GeV 2 to reach |t| > 1 GeV 2 19 E.C. Aschenauer

20 Upstream low Q 2 taggerandluminositydetector PID: -1<  <1: DIRC or proximity focusing Aerogel-RICH + TPC: dE/dx 1<|  |<3: RICH Lepton-ID: -3 <  < 3: e/p 1<|  |<3: in addition Hcal response &  suppression via tracking 1<|  |<3: in addition Hcal response &  suppression via tracking |  |>3: ECal+Hcal response &  suppression via tracking -5<  <5: Tracking (TPC+GEM+MAPS)   To Roman Pots hadron beam lepton beam Mainly based on detector technologies as proposed in EIC-Detector R&D: E.C. Aschenauer