Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 802.11ai simulations Date: 2012-03-05 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission May 2010 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 M-QoS Comments Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0553r0 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Response Criteria of Probe Request Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0443r0 March 2014 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 What Is P2P Traffic in HEW Simulation Scenarios? Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0578r0 Submission 2008 May Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Forwarding in mesh containing MPs in power save Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0313r1 Submission March 2011 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames Date: Authors:
PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/771r0 July 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 FILS STA Support for QoS, HT and VHT? Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/772r0 July 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Non-HT Duplicate PPDU FILS Advertisement Frame Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0327r0 March 2015 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Microsleep for HE STA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1323r0 November 2012 Submission Relays for ah Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1019r1 Submission July 2011 MediaTek, Inc Slide 1 Supporting Large Number of STAs in ah Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE ai May 2012 InterDigital, KDDI, Nokia, Huawei, Intel, Qcomm Slide 1 Proposed SFD Text for ai Passive Scanning.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0306r3 March 2015 Eric Wong (Apple)Slide 1 Power Save Mode Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r1 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0103r0 January 2015 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Power Save Calibration Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0550 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Kiseon RyuLG Electronics10225 Willow Creek Rd, San Diego, CA, 92131, USA +1
Doc.: IEEE /1303r5 Submission November 2010 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Overlapping BSS Co-Existence Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0112r4 Submission Supporting Authentication/Association for Large Number of Stations September 2012 Slide 1 I2R Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/1127r01 Sep 2012 Hiroshi Mano (ATRD)Slide 1 TGai- Motion/Straw Poll-Sep-2012-Indian Wells Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1165r0 September 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Discussion of the comments related to FILS Request Parameter Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0259r0 March 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 CID 266 & CID 281 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1054r0 Submission Sep Santosh Pandey (Cisco)Slide 1 FILS Reduced Neighbor Report Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Wireless LANs Prof. F. Tobagi MAC Management 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0281r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Recommendations for association Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0103r0 Submission January 2008 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Peer Service Period Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0878r0 Submission July 2012 Timo Koskela, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 On the Channel Switching in ah Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE ai March 2012 InterDigital, KDDI, Nokia, Huawei, IntelSlide 1 Proposed SFD Text for ai Passive Scanning Improvement.
Doc.: IEEE /0897r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Active Scanning considering Operating Status of APs Date: July 2012.
Doc.: IEEE / ai Submission Nov 2011 Huawei Technologies Co. LtdSlide 1 Broadcast Probe Response in TGai Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0061r1 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Probe Response frame transmission interval Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0102r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 TGah Power Saving Date: Authors: Date: Jan, 2012.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0553r4 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Response Criteria of Probe Request Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 1 RTS/CTS Operation for Wider Bandwidth Date: Authors: Nov
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/535r1 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Scanning and FILS requirements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0362r0 March 2015 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) Beacon Transmission Issues Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /0292r1 Submission March 2012 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 1 Beacon Pointer for FILS Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1149r0 Submission September 2010 Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia CorporationSlide 1 Operation rules for > 40MHz Bandwidth Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0097r0 SubmissionJarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Bandwidth Specific TXOP Limits Date: Authors: January 2011.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0592r0 May 2015 Eric Wong (Apple)Slide 1 More Power Save Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1204r1 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Power saving mechanism consideration for ah framework Date: Authors: Sept 2011.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1361r0 November 2015 Slide 1 Dmitry Akhmetov (Intel) Energy consumption with Scheduled PSP Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1086r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Authors: Improved Virtual Carrier Sensing Mechanism for 45GHz Sep ZTE Corp.
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Doc.: IEEE /0409r5 Submission May 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Supporting Low Power Operation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /2446r0 Submission September 2007 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 MIB Attributes for 40 MHz Scanning in 2.4 GHz Date:
Doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Submission January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Scanning with FILS Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0206r1 March 2012 Slide 1 Necessity of Probe Reduction Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0294r2 Submission March 2012 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 1 Active Scanning Reply Window Date: Authors:
Wide Scanning Requests and Responses
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
Wake Up Frame to Indicate Group Addressed Frames Transmission
Improvement to TWT Parameter set selection
TWT SP initiation and termination and legacy PS
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Power efficient and unified s solution
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Power Efficiency for Individually Addressed Frames Reception
VTS Robust Multicast/Broadcast Protocol
Scheduled Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Resolutions of the Remaining Power Management Comments
Cooperative AP Discovery
Peer Service Period Date: Authors: January 2008 Month Year
Reserving STA Date: Authors: January 2011 January 2011
Power Efficiency for Individually Addressed Frames Reception
Utilizing Unused Resources by Allowing Simultaneous Transmissions
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide ai simulations Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 2 Abstract The presentation provides simulation results for active and passive scanning. The statistics of scanning overhead and scanning quality are explained and showed. The benefits of the ai active scanning enhancements are clearly shown.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 3 Simulation scenario A single room indoor scenario with 4 APs and 4 background traffic STAs When background traffic was used, each background STAs transmitted and received 2Mbps data (4Mbps per STA) ac 40MHz, 2*2 MIMO The TGac propagation model was used 30m 10m AP 3m STA

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 Simulation scenario STAs were created to random positions within the room at random intervals The STAs were created with mean of 1 ms, 10 ms and 100 ms intervals This results to 3 different real time simulation lengths (10s, 100s and 1000s) Following steps were taken for all the created STAs: 1.Performed scanning to discover AP with the best RxP level Passive scanning STA listens to the channel for 100 ms Active scanning STA listens to the channel for 10 ms after it has transmitted a Probe Request 2.After the scanning the STA transmits and receives a frame (200 octets) with one (the selected) AP 3.The STA is removed from the simulation Slide 4Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia March 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 Simulation scenario The management frames used AC 3, background data AC1 Default EDCA parameters were used Beacon, Probe Request and Probe Response were transmitted at lowest MCS at 20 MHz transmission bandwidth (6 Mbit/s) Beacon frame is 145 octets, TX ON 220 micro seconds Probe Request is 101 octets, TX ON 156 micro saeconds Probe Response is 165 octets, TX ON 240 microseconds Additional information for one BSS increases frame size by 15 octets Probe Delay is 6 ms Slide 5Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia March 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 Simulated scanning mechanisms The simulations benchmarked 4 different scanning mechanisms: 1.Passive scanning 2.Active scanning 3.Active scanning with enhancement set 1 4.Active scanning with enhancement set 1 and 2 The scanning mechanisms are described in more details in the following slides Slide 6Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia March 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 1. Passive scannning Beacons are transmitted on every 100 TU from each AP Each AP selects random time to transmit the first Beacon, i.e. the Beacon transmission times between APs is not coordinated The scanning STA listens to the channel for 100 TU and then selects the strongest AP from which it has received a beacon Slide 7Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia March 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 2. Active scanning When a STA is created, it starts Probe Delay (6tu) timer and listens to the channel If a PHYRxStart.indication primitive is received or Probe Delay is elapsed, the STA transmits a Probe Request to broadcast address All the APs that received the request will transmit Probe Response to the broadcast address All STAs receive all beacons and probe responses to get information of all APs When 10 ms has elapsed since the probe request is sent, the strongest known AP is selected Please note that active scanning takes less than 20 ms Slide 8Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia March 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 Active scanning example March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 9 Please note that in all active scanning modes only one probe request was transmitted per a scanning STA

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 3. Active scanning with enhancement set 1 This active scanning has enhancements to cancel the transmission of Probe Response: The Probe Response transmission is cancelled, if TBTT is within the next 5tu, i.e. Beacon replaces the Probe Response AP will respond to multiple similar Probe Requests with a single Probe Response If terminal receives a Beacon or Probe Response during probe delay it will put the AP to filter list of the probe request The APs in filter list shall not respond to the Probe Request Slide 10Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia March 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 4. Active scanning with enhancement set 1&2 This scanning mechanism is able to cancel the Probe Response transmission as described in the previous slide AND: When AP receives a probe request, it will reply with a probe response containing operation parameters of all 4 APs When AP receives a Probe Response frame including its parameters, the AP cancels Probe Response transmission Slide 11Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia March 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 Simulation results 1.The number of transmitted Probe Responses indicates the amount of overhead created by the scanning mechanism 2.The time needed to receive the operating parameters of the first and the last AP The operating parameters include SSID, BSSID, capability, etc. 3.The number of operating parameters received within the scanning time 4.The number of APs from which a frame is received within the scanning time The reception of frame enables the radio link assessment Slide 12Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia March 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 Number of transmitted Probe Responses March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 13 Without background loadWith background load Please note that active scanning enhancements reduce the number of transmitted Probe Response frames Total number of transmitted Probe Responses

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 Time needed to receive operating parameters of the AP The time to receive AP operating parameters indicates the time from the creation of the STA to the first time the AP has received operating parameters of the AP The operating parameters are SSID, BSSID, capabilities, etc. The slide#9 shows the timing diagram of the active scanning The operating parameters are transmitted in Beacon and Probe Response frames Simulations of active scanning with enhancement set 2, the probe responses may contain parameters of many Aps As described in slides 7 and 8, the simulations used constant durations to receive at channel These durations define the duration of scanning operation Slide 14Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia March 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 Time needed to receive the first operation parameters Time needed to receive the last operation parameters 15 Time needed to receive operating parameters without background load The passive scanning requires longer time than the active scanning. The Probe Delay (6 ms) is visible in the active scanning. March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia CDF, 1 = all scanning STAs ms

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 16 Time to receive AP operating parameters with background load Time needed to receive the first operation parameters Time needed to receive the last operation parameters The passive scanning results are similar regardless of background traffic. The probe delay is no longer visible in active scanning. March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia CDF, 1 = all scanning STAs ms

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 Number of APs which operating parameters are received The operating parameters transmission may have failed for many reasons: The probe request, probe response and beacon frame are transmitted only once With background traffic collisions in TXOP obtaining may occur The Scanning STAs may have received probe responses that were transmitted as a response to probe request transmitted by other STA When STA creation interval was 100 ms, retransmission logic for probe request and use of acknowledgements should increase the number of received operating parameters Slide 17Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia March 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 18 Number of APs from which the operating parameters are received Without background loadWith background load The active scanning with enhancement sets 1&2 and passive scanning receive operating parameters. Perhaps the colliding probe responses are visible at other active scanning results. March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia Amount of scanning STAs Total number of APs which parameters are received

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 Number of APs from which a frame is received The number of APs from which a frame is received indicates the number of APs from which the STA has received a data, ack, probe response or beacon frame If the value is smaller than four, the scanning STA has not received a frame from all Aps The scanning STA transmits the probe request once No additional operation to receive a frame or scanning information from all APs was present Additional operations make the scanning results very difficult to understand Slide 19Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia March 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 Without background loadWith background load 20 Number of APs from which a frame is received Active scanning with enhancement sets 1&2 does not receive a frame from all APs. With background traffic all scanning mechanisms perform nicely. March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia Amount of scanning STAs Total number of APs from which a frame is received Amount of scanning STAs

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 Conclusions The active scanning and passive scanning have different delay Measurement Pilot transmissions may reduce delays in passive scanning, but it is not sure will all BSSs transmit Measurement Pilots The active scanning enhancements reduce the amount of transmitted probe responses Without background logic, the scanning STA may need additional logic to receive a frame and assess the radio link More advanced (re)transmission logic for probe requests and probe responses could have improved the results Slide 21Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia March 2012