The Relationship between Inspection and School Improvement Scotland and Uganda Martyn Roebuck, University of Glasgow, Scotland.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Advertisements

Institutional Audit Who runs it? What is it and how often does it occur? How will it affect us? What do we need to do? What will the outcome be and does.
Aberdeen City Council 2008 QUALITY IMPROVEMENT VISITS TO SCHOOLS GUIDANCE Alan Stewart.
Issues Assessment frameworks and items Test design Proficiency levels Scaling models.
HM Inspectorate of Education 1 The Quality Framework for Scottish FE Colleges Angus Allan, HMIE.
Improving School Library Inspections Rhona Arthur, Assistant Director, Scottish Library & Information Council.
Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA) Mike Cladingbowl Her Majesty's Inspector, Ofsted 21 April 2009.
Moving forward with Curriculum for Excellence Phil Denning HMI.
British Nutrition Foundation Conference Update from Learning Teaching Scotland (LTS) Liz Nicoll – Development Officer Health & Wellbeing September 2010.
MOOCs and the Quality Code Ian G. Giles PFHEA Medical Education
New Relationship with Schools LGA Presentation Peter Wanless 17 th November 2004.
Towards a diversified review model for FE colleges First and second thoughts with no formal status! Dr Iain MacRobert and other HMI thinking out loud!
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU. Vilnius, May 2006 Performance Appraisal and Performance-Related.
Transforming lives through learning Future Approaches to Inspection and Review Scottish Learning Festival 24 th September 2014 Marie McAdam, HMI Patricia.
Lessons Learned for Strong Project Delivery & Reporting Sheelagh O’Reilly, Kristin Olsen IODPARC Independent Assessors for the Scottish Government IDF.
Research and Museums Galleries Scotland KT Scotland: Policy and Practice Conference 23 April 2010 Alison Turnbull Head of Research & Standards.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
1 National Training Programme for New Governors 2005 Module 3 Ensuring accountability.
Ofsted lessons Clerks’ Update Jan Ofsted Sept 2012 The key judgements: Inspectors must judge the quality of education provided in the school – its.
The role of governance in self-assessment NATSPEC conference Sue Preece HMI March
MONITORING AND EVALUATION A GENERAL OVERVIEW A PRESENTATION AT ISSER 28 June, 2013 By Bruno B. Dery.
DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Inspection 2012 S48 Diocesan Inspection.
Quality Assurance in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities Maria Helena Nazaré EUA President Former Rector Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
Being Rated as Outstanding for Governance: A workshop for the Cornwall Governor Network Conference Bob Damerell
What makes a successful development project? Kristin Olsen IOD PARC
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
ENQA a key player in the European Higher Education Area Meeting of the Belarus University System representatives Minsk, March 2013 Josep Grifoll / Жузэп.
Headteachers’ Briefing 18 September 2013 CHILDREN’S & ADULTS’ SERVICES.
S.S.R.G. Improving Outcomes: The Results–Based Accountability Approach 8 th October 2007 Developing Outcome Focused Performance Frameworks In Scotland.
CPD Network meeting 1 February 2008 Annette Bruton Chief Inspector, HMIE.
Standards and Quality and Improvement Planning for Session 2014/15 Anne Paterson Education Manager.
MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?
NHS Education for Scotland Defining A Quality Improvement Framework For A Coordinated Service Model Workshop 27 th May 2003 Dr Ann Wales NHS Scotland Library.
Education Scotland REGIO PROJECT September UK Government Scottish Parliament 32 Local Councils.
Challenge Partners is a collaborative group of schools at various points in a journey towards excellence We have a moral commitment to ensure that we.
Partnership in ISCs and examples of good practice Sue Preece HMI February 10 th 2010.
EDPQS in 10 minutes: Overview of European Drug Prevention Quality Standards (EDPQS) With financial support from the Drug Prevention and Information Programme.
BMH CLINICAL GUIDELINES IN EUROPE. OUTLINE Background to the project Objectives The AGREE Instrument: validation process and results Outcomes.
Mr. Walter Balfe, Development Officer, FETAC Provider Self Evaluation of Programmes and Services Walter Balfe Development Officer – FETAC 4 October 2007.
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
Agencia Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad y Acreditación Methods and approaches for a management and evaluation of research at the Higher Education.
DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Inspection 2012 The new inspection process.
DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Inspection 2012 The new inspection process.
Improving Outcome Measurement Scottish Annual Statistics Users Conference 29/10/09 Dr Mark McAteer Director of Governance & Performance Management.
Teaching at the University of Luxembourg: Organization, quality assurance and evaluation of student achievements
LIFELONG GUIDANCE SYSTEMS: COMMON EUROPEAN REFERENCE TOOLS ELGPN PEER LEARNING ACTIVITY WP2 Prague April 2008 Dr John McCarthy, Director International.
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
Using results frameworks to shift the focus of evaluation to a strategic level Emerging research on the principles underpinning results frameworks Kate.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement Shirley Jones.
Governors Introduction Part Three WELCOME Accountability.
1 Quality Assurance in VET M. Kirsch & Y. Beernaert Internal Quality Assurance and the self-evaluation report Magda Kirsch & Yves Beernaert Bulgaria –
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
The evaluation system for the assessment of teaching and teachers at the University of Luxembourg Fernand Anton Marian van der Meulen.
How good is our school? (4 th edition) Professional learning events November 2015.
PowerPoint Guidance Layout for title or holding page By Creative Services Text should be ranged left, used in white only and main headings be set in 30.
Transforming lives through learning SCHOOLS IMPROVEMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMME Welcome and Introductions Alastair Delaney Strategic Director Education Scotland.
Self Evaluation Therese Laing QIO Primary. Key Features This indicator relates to the school’s arrangements for improvement through self- evaluation and.
Learning in Scotland's Communities. What we mean by a learning community A learning community seeks to address the learning needs of its locality through.
Assessor Training 11 TH FEBRUARY Key Messages from Ofsted  Strengths  The partnership has a clear vision for improving the quality of practice.
A Brief Overview of the Irish Inspectorate and its work in schools 29 October 2015 Dr. Suzanne Dillon Assistant Chief Inspector.
Advancing teaching: inspiring able learners every day Meeting the Challenge 14 th November 2012.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement 15 th March 2016 Nigel Finch.
Transforming lives through learning Building social outcomes for young people through inspection.
An introduction to SICI Inspection – a SICI view across European Inspectorates P1.1/1.
The puzzle of partnerships
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh
Minimum Contract Level Collaborative Self Assessment October 2011 Chris Bealey, LSIS Adviser Emphasise for contractors (lead/sub –contractors): existing.
THE INSPECTION SYSTEM AND THE SCHOOL EXTERNAL EVALUATION
Minimum Contract Level Collaborative Self Assessment October 2011 Chris Bealey, LSIS Adviser Emphasise for contractors (lead/sub –contractors): existing.
Presentation transcript:

The Relationship between Inspection and School Improvement Scotland and Uganda Martyn Roebuck, University of Glasgow, Scotland

Uganda and Scotland Uganda In 1992 decided to set up an Education Standards Agency (ESA) In 1992 decided to set up an Education Standards Agency (ESA) Process began in 2000, based on Scottish experience Process began in 2000, based on Scottish experienceScotland In 1992 when OFSTED set up in England, HMI in Scotland continued unchanged In 1992 when OFSTED set up in England, HMI in Scotland continued unchanged

Indicators for an Inspectorate Clarity of function, remit, philosophy Clarity of function, remit, philosophy Output, impact and status Output, impact and status Validity, reliability and transparency Validity, reliability and transparency Capability of inspectorate to deliver Capability of inspectorate to deliver Capability of system to respond Capability of system to respond

Quality Initiative in Scotland Identified criteria of effectiveness of schools Identified criteria of effectiveness of schools Shared Indicators with schools and LAs Shared Indicators with schools and LAs Promoted self-evaluation and development / improvement planning by schools Promoted self-evaluation and development / improvement planning by schools Published “How Good is Our School?” 1996 Published “How Good is Our School?” 1996 Accountability across the system defined Accountability across the system defined Capacity building via associate inspection force Capacity building via associate inspection force Published “Journey to Excellence” 2007 incorporating 3rd edition of HGIOS Published “Journey to Excellence” 2007 incorporating 3rd edition of HGIOS

Relevance of Scottish approach to other countries European Union School Self-Evaluation projects European Union School Self-Evaluation projects OECD ethos indicators OECD ethos indicators Bertelsmann Foundation translated HGIOS Bertelsmann Foundation translated HGIOS Hong Kong Quality Assurance System Hong Kong Quality Assurance System New Zealand and many other countries using the 4-point scale (and now OFSTED … !) New Zealand and many other countries using the 4-point scale (and now OFSTED … !)

Issues to address in Uganda (and in other countries) Clarity of function: “everything except inspection”; inappropriate constraints Clarity of function: “everything except inspection”; inappropriate constraints Philosophy: punitive rather than supportive Philosophy: punitive rather than supportive Validity: unclear criteria, non-evaluative reports, unsuitable points for action Validity: unclear criteria, non-evaluative reports, unsuitable points for action Capability of inspectorate: limited manpower, limited finance, low status Capability of inspectorate: limited manpower, limited finance, low status Capability of System: lack of accountability; districts unable to support follow-up Capability of System: lack of accountability; districts unable to support follow-up

Approach Work within existing resources - remove other functions Work within existing resources - remove other functions Make procedures feasible, but focus on evaluation, quality and improvement Make procedures feasible, but focus on evaluation, quality and improvement Develop explicit criteria and QIs Develop explicit criteria and QIs Set up partnerships to share purposes, criteria and procedures Set up partnerships to share purposes, criteria and procedures Incorporate capacity building Incorporate capacity building Try to address accountability at different levels Try to address accountability at different levels

Examples of changes to procedures What are the KEY features to be evaluated? Define a limited range of QIs What are the KEY features to be evaluated? Define a limited range of QIs Make inspection experience positive Make inspection experience positive Identify strengths to build on Identify strengths to build on Identify realistic key points for action Identify realistic key points for action Feedback should assist SIP Feedback should assist SIP Collate evidence for district and national reporting Collate evidence for district and national reporting

What was achieved in 2002? Limited length inspection visits (< 1 day) Limited length inspection visits (< 1 day) School profile which incorporated school analysis of own strengths School profile which incorporated school analysis of own strengths Limited number of QIs ( Management, Learning and Teaching) Limited number of QIs ( Management, Learning and Teaching) Sampling of data within schools Sampling of data within schools Unintended scale of National coverage! Unintended scale of National coverage!

What outcomes? Over 1450 schools ‘inspected’ (primary, secondary and technical) …..! Over 1450 schools ‘inspected’ (primary, secondary and technical) …..! 280 AAs involved 280 AAs involved Identified important new information about quality of practice in schools Identified important new information about quality of practice in schools Universal approval for evidence-based model Universal approval for evidence-based model Universal approval for transparency and supportive approach Universal approval for transparency and supportive approach Districts keen to incorporate features - but how? Districts keen to incorporate features - but how?

Subsequent support for partnerships with Districts Joint working between Masindi District and ESA Joint working between Masindi District and ESA ESA QIs used to support local inspection as part of long term programme funded by LINK for development of SIPs ESA QIs used to support local inspection as part of long term programme funded by LINK for development of SIPs LINK funding of ESA to inspect and monitor Masindi district schools LINK funding of ESA to inspect and monitor Masindi district schools After 6 years in Masindi, LINK extends support and joint working with ESA to cover 4 more of the poorest Uganda districts After 6 years in Masindi, LINK extends support and joint working with ESA to cover 4 more of the poorest Uganda districts Masindi now one of top 5 performing districts Masindi now one of top 5 performing districts

Issues addressed in Uganda Clarity of function: focus on inspection Clarity of function: focus on inspection Philosophy: positive and supportive Philosophy: positive and supportive Validity: explicit criteria, evaluative reports, improved points for action Validity: explicit criteria, evaluative reports, improved points for action Capability of inspectorate: limited finance inhibits work force, status improved Capability of inspectorate: limited finance inhibits work force, status improved Capability of System: still lack of accountability; districts dependent on external funding to support follow-up, but significant initiatives Capability of System: still lack of accountability; districts dependent on external funding to support follow-up, but significant initiatives

Inspection & School Improvement: Scotland and Uganda Two different cultural, financial contexts Two different cultural, financial contexts Partnerships in school improvement between LA/District and Inspectorate Partnerships in school improvement between LA/District and Inspectorate Separate, arm’s length but complementary functions and accountabilities Separate, arm’s length but complementary functions and accountabilities Compatible philosophies, common aims: Compatible philosophies, common aims: to improve schools

Professor Martyn Roebuck