Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geometry Chapter 2 Terms.
Advertisements

Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley.
Truth Tables The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to construct truth tables and use them to test the validity of arguments. Go To Next Slide.
With examples from Number Theory
Chapter 2 Geometric Reasoning
Unit 1A Recognizing Fallacies. LOGIC Logic is the study of the methods and principles of reasoning.
Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5. ” All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusion is called a philosopher.” Ambrose Bierce “ Those who lack the courage.
Chapter 1 The Logic of Compound Statements. Section 1.3 Valid & Invalid Arguments.
Intro to Logic: the tools of the trade You need to be able to: Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people’s claims). Organize arguments.
CS128 – Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science
DEDUCTIVE REASONING: PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC Purposes: To analyze complex claims and deductive argument forms To determine what arguments are valid or not.
Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 1, Unit 1B, Slide 1 Thinking Critically 1.
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley.
Discrete Mathematics Lecture 1 Logic of Compound Statements Harper Langston New York University.
Syllabus Every Week: 2 Hourly Exams +Final - as noted on Syllabus
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions and Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
SEVENTH EDITION and EXPANDED SEVENTH EDITION
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Thinking Critically.
Is there any proof that the Bible is true?
Chapter 3 Section 5 - Slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 1, Unit 1A, Slide 1 Thinking Critically 1.
1.1 Sets and Logic Set – a collection of objects. Set brackets {} are used to enclose the elements of a set. Example: {1, 2, 5, 9} Elements – objects inside.
Chapter 3 Section 4 – Slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 1.
3.6 Analyzing Arguments with Truth Tables
Chapter 8 Logic DP Studies. Content A Propositions B Compound propositions C Truth tables and logical equivalence D Implication and equivalence E Converse,
CH1 – 3 REVIEW Summary. CHAPTER 1: 1A RECOGNIZING FALLACIES KEY TERMS AND KEY IDEAS AND SKILLS  Key Terms  Logic  Argument – premises, conclusions.
CSCI 115 Chapter 2 Logic. CSCI 115 §2.1 Propositions and Logical Operations.
Chapter 1 Logic Section 1-1 Statements Open your book to page 1 and read the section titled “To the Student” Now turn to page 3 where we will read the.
Thinking Critically 1.What are the jobs you identified with your 3 people? 2.What are the 6 misconceptions? 3.Describe a way that mathematics is involved.
Recognizing Fallacies.  Logic ◦ The study of the methods and principles of reasoning  Premises ◦ Facts or assumptions  Fallacy ◦ A deceptive argument-
Unit 1D Analyzing Arguments. TWO TYPES OF ARGUMENTS Inductive Deductive Arguments come in two basic types:
Chapter 3: MAKING SENSE OF ARGUMENTS
1 CMSC 250 Discrete Structures CMSC 250 Lecture 1.
Fundamentals of Logic 1. What is a valid argument or proof? 2. Study system of logic 3. In proving theorems or solving problems, creativity and insight.
Chapter 3: Introduction to Logic. Logic Main goal: use logic to analyze arguments (claims) to see if they are valid or invalid. This is useful for math.
Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.
Thinking Mathematically
Aim: Invalid Arguments Course: Math Literacy Do Now: Aim: What’s an Invalid Argument? Construct a truth table to show the following argument is not valid.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Thinking Critically 1C Discussion Paragraph 1 web 88. State Politics 89. US Presidents 90. Web Venn Diagrams.
DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize, analyze, and evaluate deductive arguments.
Syllogisms and Three Types of Hypothetical Syllogisms
Copyright © 2014, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 3.4, Slide 1 3 Logic The Study of What’s True or False or Somewhere in Between 3.
Chapter 2 Fundamentals of Logic 1. What is a valid argument or proof?
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Thinking Critically.
Reasoning and Proof Chapter Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on an observation Inductive reasoning- finding a pattern.
Discrete Math by R.S. Chang, Dept. CSIE, NDHU1 Fundamentals of Logic 1. What is a valid argument or proof? 2. Study system of logic 3. In proving theorems.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
Chapter 1 Logic and proofs
Introduction to Deductive Proofs
2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary
Deductive Arguments.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Thinking Critically What are the jobs you identified with your 3 people? What are the 6 misconceptions? Describe a way that mathematics is involved in.
Chapter 8 Logic Topics
Evaluate Deductive Reasoning and Spot Deductive Fallacies
2 Chapter Introduction to Logic and Sets
CS201: Data Structures and Discrete Mathematics I
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic 2012 Pearson Education, Inc.
Thinking Critically Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
1 Chapter An Introduction to Problem Solving
1 Chapter An Introduction to Problem Solving
Inductive Reasoning and Conjecture, and Logic
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
Arguments in Sentential Logic
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley.
CS201: Data Structures and Discrete Mathematics I
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 1

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-3 Quantitative Reasoning College Course Work Career Experiences Daily Life Quantitative Skills Prologue

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-4 Six Math Misconceptions 1. Math requires a special brain. 2. Math in modern issues is too complex. 3. Math makes you less sensitive. 4. Math makes no allowance for creativity. 5. Math provides exact answers. 6. Math is irrelevant to my life. Prologue

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-5 What is mathematics? Sum of its branchesWay to model the world Language Math Prologue

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-6 Importance of Logic Parade Magazine Ask Marilyn Column Question:“What is the most important thing a person can do to improve his or her critical thinking skills?” Phyllis Evitch, Rice Lake, Wisconsin Answer:“Study logic. Without a sound foundation in the principles of reasoning, you’ll be less able to understand your world, and the ramifications of this will ripple through everything from work to play. Even worse, you won’t realize what you’re missing.” Marilyn Vos Savant 1-A

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-7 Definitions Logic is the study of the methods and principles of reasoning. An argument uses a set of facts or assumptions, called premises, to support a conclusion. A fallacy is a deceptive argument—an argument in which the conclusion is not well supported by the premises. 1-A

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-8 Fallacy Structures Appeal to PopularityMany people believe p is true; therefore... p is true. False CauseA came before B; therefore... A caused B. Appeal to IgnoranceThere is no proof that p is true; therefore... p is false. Hasty GeneralizationA and B are linked one or a few times; therefore... A causes B or vice versa. Limited Choicep is false; therefore... only q can be true. 1-A

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-9 Fallacy Structures Appeal to Emotionp is associated with a positive emotional response; therefore... p is true. Personal AttackI have a problem with the person or group claiming p. p is not true. Circular Reasoningp is true. p is restated in different words. Diversion (Red Herring)p is related to q and I have an argument concerning q; therefore... p is true. Straw ManI have an argument concerning a distorted version of p; therefore... I hope you are fooled into concluding I have an argument concerning the real version of p. 1-A

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-10 Negations (Opposites) 1-B

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-11 And Statements (Conjunctions) Note: Conjunction is false unless both p and q are true. 1-B

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-12 Or Statements (Disjunctions) Note: Disjunction is true unless both p and q are false. 1-B

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-13 If... Then Statements (Conditionals) Note: Conditional is true unless p is true and q is false. 1-B

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-14 Truth Table Practice Note: ~ signifies NEGATION  signifies AND  signifies OR Practice by writing the truth values of each row in the table above. 1-B

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-15 Truth Table Practice Practice by writing the truth values of each row in the table above. 1-B Note: ~ signifies NEGATION  signifies AND  signifies OR

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-16 Truth Table Practice Practice by writing the truth values of each row in the table above. 1-B Note: ~ signifies NEGATION  signifies AND  signifies OR

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-17 Truth Table Practice Practice by writing the truth values of each row in the table above. 1-B Note: ~ signifies NEGATION  signifies AND  signifies OR

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-18 Truth Table Practice Practice by writing the truth values of each row in the table above. 1-B Note: ~ signifies NEGATION  signifies AND  signifies OR

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-19 Converse, Inverse, and Contrapositive Conditional:If it is raining, then I will bring an umbrella to work. Converse:If I bring an umbrella to work, then it must be raining. Inverse:If it is not raining, then I will not bring an umbrella to work. Contrapositive:If I do not bring an umbrella to work, then it must not be raining. 1-B

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-20 Definitions A set is a collection of objects; the individual objects are the members of the set. We often describe sets by listing their members within a pair of braces, {}. If there are too many members to list, we can use three dots, …, to indicate a continuing pattern. 1-C

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-21 Real Number Venn Diagram 1-C

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-22 Venn Diagram for Categorical Propositions 1-C All S are P

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-23 Venn Diagram for Categorical Propositions 1-C No S are P

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-24 Venn Diagram for Categorical Propositions 1-C Some S are P

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-25 Venn Diagram for Categorical Propositions 1-C Some S are not P

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-26 Negations for Categorical Propositions 1-C PropositionNegation All S are P No S are P Some S are P Some S are not P Some S are P No S are P All S are P

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-27 Venn Diagram of Blood Types 1-C

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-28 Two Types of Arguments 1-D Inductive Reasoning specific premises general conclusion Deductive Reasoning general premises specific conclusion

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-29 Basic Forms of Conditional Deductive Arguments 1-D Valid (modus ponens) Affirming the Antecedent: If one gets a college degree, then one can get a good job. Marilyn has a college degree. Marilyn can get a good job.

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-30 Basic Forms of Conditional Deductive Arguments 1-D Affirming the Consequent: If one gets a college degree, then one can get a good job. Marilyn gets a good job. Marilyn has a college degree. Invalid (inverse fallacy)

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-31 Basic Forms of Conditional Deductive Arguments 1-D Denying the Antecedent: If one gets a college degree, then one can get a good job. Marilyn does not have a college degree. Marilyn cannot get a good job. Invalid (converse fallacy)

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-32 Basic Forms of Conditional Deductive Arguments 1-D Denying the Consequent: If one gets a college degree, then one can get a good job. Marilyn does not have a good job. Marilyn does not a college degree. Valid (modus tollens)

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-33 Inductive Counterexample 1-D 4 2  4  11  23 (prime)  5  11  31 (prime)  3  11  17 (prime)  2  11  13 (prime)  1  11  11 (prime)  0  11  11 (prime) 0 n 2  n  11 n Consider the following algebraic expression: n 2  n  11 It appears that n 2  n  11 will always equal a prime number when n ≥ 0. Or does it? How about n = 11? 11 2  = 121 (a non-prime counterexample)

Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-34 Critical Thinking In Everyday Life General Guidelines. 1.Read (or listen) carefully. 2.Look for hidden assumptions. 3.Identify the real issue. 4.Use visual aids. 5.Understand all the options. 6.Watch for fine print and missing information. 7.Are other conclusions possible? 1-E