Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/0045r0 Submission Jan 2014 E-Education Analysis HEW SG Date: 2014-01 Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
April 2013 doc.: IEEE Nov 2013 Dense Apartment Complex Capacity Improvements with Channel selection and Dynamic Sensitivity Control Date:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0328r2 Submission Dense Apartment Complex Throughput Calculations Channel Selection and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP.
Doc.: IEEE /1489r4 Submission Jan 2014 Airport Capacity Analysis Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0058r0 Submission Jan 2014 Pico Cell Use Case Analysis HEW SG Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0045r1 Submission Jan 2014 E-Education Analysis HEW SG Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0868r0 July 2014 Johan Söder, Ericsson ABSlide 1 UL & DL DSC and TPC MAC simulations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / hew Submission March 2014 Raja Banerjea, CSRSlide 1 A Simplified Simultaneous Transmit and Receive Mechanism Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0839r0 Submission Slide 1S. Abraham, Qualcomm Inc. July 2010 DL MU-MIMO performance with QoS traffic and OBSS.
Dynamic Sensitivity Control V2
Doc.: IEEE /1012r0 Submission Sept 2013 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Improvement to area throughput Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide.
Submission Sep doc.: IEEE /1046r2 Zhigang Wen,et. al (BUPT)Slide 1 Discussion on Massive MIMO for HEW Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax Date: Slide 1Huawei Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission Jan 2015 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Roaming Date: 2015-January Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1443r0 SubmissionEsa Tuomaala Adapting CCA and Receiver Sensitivity Date: Authors: Slide 1 November 2014.
Discussion on OFDMA in IEEE ax
Doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission Jan Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies)Slide 1 Further Considerations on Calibration of System Level Simulation.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0287r3 March 2013 Yasuhiko Inoue, NTTSlide 1 Beyond ac – A Very High Capacity WLAN Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1126r0 Submission September 2012 Krishna Sayana, SamsungSlide 1 Wi-Fi for Hotspot Deployments and Cellular Offload Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0 Slide 1 Non-linear Multiuser MIMO for next generation WLAN Date: Authors: Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR.
Doc.: IEEE /0787r0 Submission July 2013 Wu TianyuSlide 1 Follow-up Discussions on HEW Functional Requirements Date: Authors:
Doc. No. IEEE hew-r1 Submission July 2013 Klaus Doppler, NokiaSlide 1 Evaluation Criteria and Simulation Scenarios Date: July 16, 2013 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 11-13/0000r0 Submission July 2013 Dapeng Liu (CMCC)Slide 1 Interference Control Use Case for HEW Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0534r1 May 2013 HanGyu Cho, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Direction and Use Cases for HEW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1456r0 Submission Nov 2013 Simone Merlin (Qualcomm)Slide 1 Considerations on WFA feedback Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0514r0 Submission HEW Usage Scenarios and Applications May 2013 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 1 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0486r1 Submission May 2013 Ron Porat, Broadcom HEW- Metrics, Targets, Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0831r0 Submission July 2010 Yusuke Asai (NTT)Slide 1 Frame Sequence of Interference Management Using Beamforming Technique in OBSS.
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1290r0 Submission Nov 2013 Dynamic Sensitivity Control for HEW SG Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0328r0 Submission Dense Apartment Complex Throughput Calculations Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1 Mar 2014.
Submission Sep doc.: IEEE XXXXr1 Zhigang Wen,et. al (BUPT)Slide 1 Discussion on Massive MIMO for HEW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0795r0 Submission HEW Usage Scenarios Categorization July 2013 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 1 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0648r0 Submission May 2014 Chinghwa Yu et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Performance Observation of a Dense Campus Network Date:
Doc.:IEEE /0536r0 Submission May 11th, 2009 Slide 1 OBSS issue in ac Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0804r0 Submission July 2015 TG ax Outdoor Enterprise Scenario and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0723r1 SubmissionSlide 1 HEW SG Evaluation Methodology Overview Date: Authors: Minyoung Park (Intel Corp.) July 2013.
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1489r0 Submission Nov 2013 Airport Capacity Analysis Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0786r0 Submission July 2013 Wu TianyuSlide 1 Discussions on System Level Simulation Methodology Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0637r0 Submission May 2014 James Wang et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Spatial Reuse and Coexistence with Legacy Devices Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0030r0 January 2013 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 User Level Performance Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0328r1 Submission Dense Apartment Complex Throughput Calculations Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1 Mar 2014.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1395r2 Simultaneous Transmission Technologies for HEW Date: November 2013 Koichi Ishihara, NTTSlide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0372r2 Slide 1 System Level Simulations on Increased Spatial Reuse Date: Authors: Jinjing Jiang(Marvell) March.
Doc.: IEEE /0779r2 Submission June 2014 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Practical Usage Date: 2014-July Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0542r0 SubmissionSimone Merlin, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Scenarios and Goals Date: Authors: May 2013.
Doc.: IEEE / aa Submission Apr 2009 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1 Considerations for Statistical Multiplexing Support in OBSS Proposal.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 September 2013 Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc.Slide 1 Outdoor Stadium Simulation Details Discussion Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /1031r0 Measurement results for OBSS in home network scenarios Date: September 2009.
Doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission July 2013 James Wang (MediaTek)Slide 1 HEW Beamforming Enhancements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1263r2 Submission Dec 2009 Z. Chen, C. Zhu et al [Preliminary Simulation Results on Power Saving] Date: Authors: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /0294r1 Submission Dynamic Sensitivity Control Channel Selection and Legacy Sharing Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide.
Doc.: IEEE /0805-r0 SubmissionSlide 1 On Definition of Dense Networks and Performance Metric Date: Authors: Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek.
Doc.: IEEE / Submission March 2013 Juho Pirskanen, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Discussion On Basic Technical Aspects for HEW Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Feb 2016 TG ax Enterprise Scenario, Color and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0108r0 January 11 Slide 1 Evaluation of neighbors impact on channel allocation for dense environment and Video use cases.
Doc.: IEEE /0635r1 Submission May 2014 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Implementation Date: 2014-May Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1054 Sept 2013 SubmissionYonggang Fang, ZTETX HEW Evaluation Metrics Suggestions Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
11ax PAR Verification using UL MU-MIMO
Simulation-based evaluation of DSC in enterprise scenario
TG ax DSC Summary Date: Authors: July 2015 April 2013
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
OBSS issue and simulation scenarios in TGac
20/40MHz Channel Selection
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Increased Network Throughput with Channel Width Related CCA and Rules
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission Jan 2014 E-Education Analysis HEW SG Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1

doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission Background This presentation looks at the E-Education HEW Use Case. See also: Use Case Dense Apartments 13/1487r2 Airport Capacity 13/1489r4 DSC is explained in 13/1012 Jan 2014 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 2

doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission To look at the prime HEW Use Cases and see what is theoretically possible using known techniques. Then to determine if there is a “gap” that can lead to a requirement for HEW. Objective Jan 2014 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 3

doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission July e e-Education Scenario Characteristics: –Dense STAs (40~60 STAs) in one classroom with one AP –20~30 classrooms in one typical school building (3~6 floors) –Thus, nearby 1,000 STAs with 20~30 APs within a building space. Typical education applications: –Video streaming among teacher and students; –Teachers/Students demonstrate theirs desktop to others; –File transfer and sharing; –4+ subgroup in one classroom with multicasting traffic for screen sharing or video; Throughput assumption: longtime/stable throughput in one classroom >= 20 Mbps Challenges and Issues: –Fast Connection: Very long STAs registering time (1~5 minutes) delay the start of a class; –Interference Control and Delay Optimization: Annoying lag in screen sharing, video streaming and command response (sometimes it is longer than 20 seconds) Very low bandwidth for e-homework submission in the same period. Slide 4Laurent Cariou (Orange)

doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission July e e-Education Pre-Conditions WLAN is deployed in a each classroom of a campus in order to provide communication tools for e-Education. Environment Dense STAs (40~60 STAs) in one classroom with one AP. 20~30 classrooms in one typical school building (3~6 floors). Nearby 1,000 STAs with 20~30 APs within a building space. Applications Video streaming among teacher and students; Teachers/Students demonstrate theirs desktop to others; File transfer and sharing; 4+ subgroup in one classroom with multicasting traffic for screen sharing or video; Throughput assumption: longtime/stable throughput in one classroom >= 20 Mbps Traffic Conditions Interference between APs in different classrooms belonging to the same managed ESS due to high density deployment. interference with peer-to-peer networks within each classroom. Use Case e-Education starts in multiple classrooms simultaneously. Teacher/students demonstrated their desktop to others, video or screens are shared. Slide 5Laurent Cariou (Orange)

doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission Classroom Jan 2014 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 6 Say 30 x 30ft 40 desks

doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission Channels Jan 2014 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 7 Ref:Wikipedia

doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission Building Complex example – one side Jan 2014 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 8 Assumed 3dB wall loss 10dB Floor loss Use of directivity on antennas could assist

doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission Building Complex Example – Other side Jan 2014 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 9 Note: Without DSC blocked rooms doubles.

doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission Channel Selection Jan 2014 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 10 As situation is controlled, AP channels can be preset Example is extreme for 36 classrooms, worse case layout

doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission Assuming 2SS for the STA, and using SU MIMO With DSC 10 Channels (40MHz) Without DSC 20 Channels (20MHz) Signal strength within each class is >-45dBm hence can use 256 QAM 5/6 –11ac PHY Rate for 40MHz, 2SS is 400Mbps (10 Channels) Max Throughput 344Mbps (131k agg) Say 240Mbps throughput* –11ac PHY Rate for 20MHz, 2SS is 173Mbps (3/4 rate, 5/6 is excluded) Max Throughput 150Mbps (65k agg – 131k exceeds length) Say 105Mbps throughput* Downlink could use MU-MIMO? *Assuming EDCA Overhead. 11ac Rates Jan 2014 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 11

doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission Unclear what the Use Case requirement is. –20 Mbps? Downlink would be multicast? With DSC ~240Mbps per class (6Mbps per pupil) Without DSC ~ 105Mbps per class (2.6Mbps per pupil) Not sure what the ‘gap’ is, but hopefully this quick analysis will help determine it. What is Use Case Requirement? Jan 2014 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 12

doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission Isolation between classrooms could be improved by antenna directivity With 11ac SU-MIMO, DSC provides 240Mbps per classroom throughput Without DSC SU-MIMO provides ~105Mbps per classroom throughput “Fast” connection – is this satisfied with 11ai? Interference/OBSS greatly improved by DSC and also by antenna positing. Discussion Jan 2014 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 13

doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission My personal opinion is that 11ac provides sufficient data throughput and efficiency and not easy to see any need for improvement. The basic need is for higher channel re-use so that the higher BWs can be used. Channel re-use can be improved with DSC but also by not using omni-directional antennas. –Corner antennas, such as used in cellular for example. –Easy to do if a ‘managed’ network. Conclusions Jan 2014 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 14