Maryland State Bar Association Health Law Section Understanding Medicare Billing Issues: Anti-Markup Rules, Independent Diagnostic Testing Facility Rules,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Deficit Reduction Act, Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 In the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA) Congress, for the first time, has mandated healthcare.
Advertisements

Module 2: Legal Aspects of Associations & Non-Profits Presented by the Southern Early Childhood Association.
© 2008 Rath, Young and Pignatelli, P.C. 1 STARK III AND PHYSICIAN PRACTICE CONCERNS NHMGMA/NH-VT HFMA April 9, 2008 By Lucy C. Hodder, Esquire
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Healthcare Fraud and Abuse.
Are you ready for HIPPO??? Welcome to HIPAA
HIPAA HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.
Corporate Compliance Education 2009 Presented by Thom Sinnette VA-NWIHCS Compliance Officer.
1 Beyond RADV Does Your Plan’s Risk Adjustment Strategy Run Afoul of the False Claims Act February 13, 2012 Mary Inman Tim McCormack Phillips & Cohen LLP.
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA Institutional Compliance Strategies at the University of Pennsylvania.
BlueCare Tennessee and BlueCare, Independent Licensees of BlueCross BlueShield Association How the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 Impacts BlueCare Tennessee.
2011 FRAUD & ABUSE UPDATE John Hellow Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, PC All views expressed in the seminar materials and.
False Claims in Construction, Update of NCHRP Study Topic
Sales & Marketing Compliance Training
Medicare Parts C and D Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Compliance Training
1 Pennoni Associates, Inc. False Claims Act Investigation.
April 26–28, 2004 Renaissance Orlando Resort at Seaworld Orlando, FL NCMA World Congress 2004 “Maximizing Value to Stakeholders…Contract Management in.
Lori K. Nomura | AWPHD Administrator’s Only Retreat Trends in Hospital/Physician Relations and Corporate Compliance May 22-24,
Regulatory Control of Providers Financial Relationships Civil False Claims The Act.
2005 FPMP Compliance Training: Physician/Hospital Financial Arrangements Presented by: Brigid M. Maloney, Esq. Brigid M. Maloney, Esq. U.B. Associates.
HIPAA COMPLIANCE IN YOUR PRACTICE MARIBEL VALENTIN, ESQUIRE.
Fraud, Waste & Abuse DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT OF 2005 Presented by: MARCH Vision Care, 2013.
FRAUD, WASTE & ABUSE TRAINING
15th Annual Cardiovascular & Medicine Symposium 15th Annual Cardiovascular & Medicine Symposium St. Augustine, Florida – May 15, 2014 Rick M. Reznicsek,
Alex Krouse, JD, MHA Christine Wernert, MBA, CPMA Understanding the Implementation and Compliance Issues Concerning Telemedicine “ What Legal and Regulatory.
DIVISION OF HEALTH SCIENCES OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL INTEGRITY Protecting Yourself and Your Practice.
2008 CMS Anti-Markup Rule and Effect on Pod Labs David N. Henkes, MD, FCAP Chair, Professional Affairs Committee.
Violations of the False Claims Act and The Importance of a Timely and Proper Response to Whistleblower Allegations Thomas J. Finn Paula Cruz Cedillo.
How to Make $4.1Billion in 12 Months: Healthcare Fraud and Abuse Enforcement Mark Bartlett Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 McGraw-Hill Chapter 5 HIPAA Enforcement HIPAA for Allied Health Careers.
Recent False Claims Developments Robert J. Sherry K&L Gates May 2009.
Medicare Advantage & Part D Compliance Training 2009.
Understanding Medicare Billing Issues
THE BRODY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE NEW EMPLOYEE ORIENTATION COMMITMENT TO COMPLIANCE: INTRODUCTION TO THE BSOM COMPLIANCE PROGRAM Joan A. Kavuru, JD, RN Director.
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Restrictions on Referrals v Federal law prohibits referrals among providers that have tainted financial relationships v Any arrangement that confers an.
Legal Issues in Hospital- Hospice (and Other) Partnerships Brooke Bumpers, Esq. Hogan & Hartson, LLP Washington, D.C. October 12, 2002.
COMPLIANCE PROGRAM. Agenda  Initial Scenarios  Review of General Compliance Information  Review UCP’s Compliance Program  Questions and Discussion.
Health Insurance in New York Laura Dillon, Principal Examiner New York Insurance Department Consumer Services Bureau One Commerce Plaza Albany NY
OIG COMPLIANCE GUIDANCE FOR PHYSICIAN PRACTICES Washington County Hospital Association, Inc. CME Program October 26, 2000.
DSDS Quality Assurance Unit State of Alaska, Dept. of Health and Social Services Division of Senior and Disabilities Services (DSDS) Quality Assurance.
Blue Cross of Idaho Medicare Advantage Provider Fraud, Waste and Abuse Training Fall 2009.
Son of Stark III -Is it soup yet? Presentation to CBA Healthcare Section “Brown Bag” Series By Jody Kepler Son of Stark III -Is it soup yet?
Copyright ©2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Pearson's Comprehensive Medical Assisting: Administrative.
Fraud and Abuse in Dentistry. Definition Fraud is the intentional perversion of truth in order to induce another to part with something of value, or surrender.
STARK II PHASE II AWPHD BOARD RETREAT AUGUST 12, 2004 By Lori K. Nomura.
Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 Signed into law February 8, 2006.
OHCAs, ACEs and Hybrid Entities Paul Smith Davis Wright Tremaine LLP One Embarcadero Center Suite 600 San Francisco, CA (415)
1 Recent Physician Self Referral Provisions – Realignment in Hospital and Physician Relationships?
© 2004 Moses & Singer LLP HIPAA and Patient Privacy Issues Raised by the New Medicare Prescription Drug Program National Medicare Prescription Drug Congress.
Flowers Hospital General Compliance Training-Students 2013.
STARK II PHASE II NORTHWEST HOSPITAL COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 17, 2004 By Bradley J. Berg.
Ensures that studies are billed for research specific procedures.
Best Practices in Navigating Emerging ASC Legal Challenges Carol K. Lucas, Esq
Stay Out of Jail: Managing Your Risk Georgia Association for Healthcare Facility Managers 2016 Annual Conference Thursday, June 9, 2016 Richard D. Sanders.
Chapter 4 The Legal and Regulatory Environment of Health Care.
Compliance and Enforcement Roundtable Discussion
HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUMMIT OCTOBER 23, 2004 COMMUNITY-BASED COLLABORATIONS: LEGAL ISSUES: STARK, FRAUD & ABUSE Paul T. Smith, Esq. Partner,
Thomas J. Finn Paula Cruz Cedillo
Dollars & Cents of Billing & Coding Mistakes
FRAUD, WASTE, & ABUSE (FWA) 2012
Trapping Patient & Physicians in Medicare
Stark Exceptions The Stark exceptions are mandatory. That is, if an arrangement falls within the scope of Stark and an exception does not apply – the.
. Lifeblood of the Successful Pharmacy Chain: Marketing, Joint Ventures and Arrangements with Referral Sources…While Remaining Within Legal Parameters.
SHARING CLINICAL DATA: Legal and Privacy Issues
Compliance Program 2018.
Division of Health Sciences Office of Institutional Integrity
COMPLIANCE PROGRAM.
Brussels, June 6, 2007 Paul E. Kalb, M.D., J.D.
LEVERAGING PURCHASED/REFERRED CARE (PRC) RATES
3 Understanding Managed Care: Medical Contracts and Ethics.
Presentation transcript:

Maryland State Bar Association Health Law Section Understanding Medicare Billing Issues: Anti-Markup Rules, Independent Diagnostic Testing Facility Rules, and Liability Risks Associated with Non- Compliance with Medicare Billing Rules Kathleen M. Stratton Crowell & Moring LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C (202)

2 Anti-Markup Rules  Current Medicare statutes and regulations prohibit the markup of the technical component (“TC”) of certain diagnostic tests performed by outside suppliers and billed to Medicare by a different individual or entity.

3 Anti-Markup Rules  42 C.F.R payment to the billing physician is limited to the lowest of the following amounts:  1.The supplier’s net charge to the physician  2.The billing physician’s actual charge; or  3.The Medicare fee schedule amount that would be allowed if the supplier billed directly.

4 Anti-Markup Rules  Significant changes made to anti-markup rules in the 2008 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Rule  Restrictions would apply to technical and professional component billing  Restrictions would also extend to billing for diagnostic tests performed at a site “other than the office of the billing physician”  Significant controversy arose with these changes; CMS delayed implementation until January 1, 2009

5 Independent Diagnostic Testing Facilities  Free-standing facilities providing (and billing for) diagnostic tests, i.e. MRI, CT, PET (not clinical lab or pathology tests) to patients referred by their treating physician (the physician responsible for treating the patient’s medical condition and who will use the results of the diagnostic test in the care of the patient)  Must comply with Medicare Performance Standards specific to IDTFs.  Standards related to business operating procedures, location, medical record-keeping, patient solicitation, etc.

6 When Must a Supplier of Diagnostic Tests Enroll in Medicare Program as an IDTF? An entity may bill for diagnostic tests as a physician office rather than an IDTF only if it meets the following four characteristics: 1.Physician practice is owned by physicians or hospital 2.The entity primarily bills for physician services (e.g. evaluation & management (E&M) codes and not for diagnostic tests 3.It furnishes diagnostic tests primarily to patients being treated by physicians in the practice 4.The tests are performed and interpreted at the same location where the practice physicians also treat patients for their medical conditions.

7 When Must a Supplier of Diagnostic Tests Enroll in Medicare Program as an IDTF?  If a substantial portion of the entity’s business involves the performance of diagnostic tests, the diagnostic testing services may be sufficiently separate business to warrant enrollment as an IDTF in addition to enrollment as a physician group practice.  In this case, the group would bill as an IDTF for tests performed on patients who are not patients of the practice; the group would bill under its group billing number for tests performed on patients of the group.

8 Radiology Groups  Radiology group practices are generally different from those of other physicians because radiologists usually do not bill E&M codes, nor do they treat a patient’s medical condition on an ongoing basis  Generally not required to enroll as an IDTF  Requirements may vary from carrier to carrier

9 New IDTF Standards  2008 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Rule imposed a new performance standard related to shared space  A fixed-based IDTF (as opposed to hospital-based or mobile IDTFs) may not: – share a practice location with another Medicare-enrolled individual or organization; –Lease or sublease its operations or its practice location to another Medicare entity or individual; or –Share diagnostic testing equipment with another Medicare individual or entity  Disruptive to common leasing arrangements such as block leases between IDTFs and physician group practices seeking to take advantage of Stark Law “in-office ancillary services exception – which was in large part CMS intent

10 What Happens When Medicare Rules are Violated?  Routine errors, mistakes vs. intentional violations  Pattern of routine errors = reckless disregard for the law?  When does a routine overpayment become a “false claim?

11 The False Claims Act  Primary government weapon in combating health care fraud - Huge penalties –Favorable burden of proof –“Intent” element is somewhat vague –Scope of activities covered: very broad  Since 1986: $ 20 billion recovered under FCA  In 2007, FCA recoveries exceeded $2 billion; $54 million in 1986  Whistleblower provisions are incorporated in FCA  72% of FCA whistleblower recoveries are health-related

12 Elements of the False Claims Act  Submitting, causing to be submitted, or conspiring to submit: –A claim for payment to the government –When the claim is false or fraudulent and –When the defendant acted “knowingly”  In addition, using a false record or statement in support of a claim is also actionable  “Knowingly” means “deliberate ignorance” or “reckless disregard” of the truth or falsity of the submission –“Intent to defraud” need not be proven

13 Applying the FCA Beyond Mere Truth & Falsity of the Claim  Anyone in the “chain of events” leading to an FCA violation is potentially liable –E.g. Physician, physician office staff, billing company, etc.  Implied Certification Theory –Failure to comply with any applicable law or regulation

14 FCA Damages and Penalties: Enormous  Treble the government’s damages  Additional penalties of $5,500 - $11,000 per claim  Parallel consequences: suspension/exclusion from participation in health care payer programs – the death knell for most physicians  Not to mention: –Time and effort –Attorneys’ fees –Likely Corporate Integrity Agreement –Damage to reputation

15 Examples of Enforcement Actions Related to Physician Billing  Anesthesiologist in Oregon – double billing  Cardiologist in Maryland – billing for left and right heart catheterizations; only performing left heart catheterization  Psychiatrist in New York – Overbilling resulting from glitch in billing software