Intraocular lenses for small incision surgery

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Toric and Modern IOL Technology
Advertisements

VisTor The new Toric IOL by Hanita Lenses
Dr H. Razmjoo Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Multifocal IOLs
Efficacy of 360-Degree Square Edge on PC IOLs: Laboratory Study
Action on cataract Whipps Cross Hospital Harold Wood Hospital North East London Eye Partnership.
Accommodative IOL’s Dr. H. Razmjoo
The new Akreos MI 60 lens Joel Pynson, MD - Director Design Engineering Bausch & Lomb, Toulouse - France London, September 9th 2006.
Sulcus-Placed Single-Piece Acrylic IOL After Posterior Capsule Tear A.K. Junk, S. R. Wellik Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University.
NEW TRULIGN™ TORIC IOL Surgeon Training
SPINNING THE WHEEL- STABILITY OF COMMONLY USED IOL IN-THE-BAG DR ARUP BHAUMIK DISHA EYE HOSPITALS AND RESEARCH CENTRE BARRACKPORE, WEST BEGAL, INDIA
Ruth Lapid-Gortzak MD PhD 1,2, Jan Willem van der Linden BOpt 2, and Ivanka J. van der Meulen MD 1,2 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Medical Center,
Disclosure of finanacial interest * Author has no financial interest in this paper. ** Author's research is partially funded by Imperial Medical Technologies.
Progressive Multifocal Intraocular Lens G. Rubiolini M.D. Italy Disclosure of finanacial interest Author's research is partially funded.
Clinical evaluation of foldable acrylic phakic IOL (fP) implantation ASCRS, San Diego, 2011 A.John Kanellopoulos, MD Professor NYU Medical School, NY Director,
1 Clinical Performance of the Crystalens® AO Guy M. Kezirian, MD, FACS.
Placement of Toric Intraocular Lens and the Long-term Change in the Axis of Corneal Astigmatism after Sutureless Cataract Extraction by Phacoemulsification.
Implantation of a single-piece acrylic intraocular lens using an anterior chamber maintainer Tomoyuki Kunishige, Hisaharu Suzuki, Toshihiko Shiwa, Hiroshi.
Intraocular lens dislocation secondary to haptic torsion Lawrence E. Lohman, MD FACS Matthew C. Willett, MD.
Microcoaxial phaco using 1
Transparency of Transition from 2.75 mm to 1.8 mm Microincision Surgery Jay McDonald II, MD Adjunct Clinical Professor University of Arkansas School of.
Title slide Surgical Peculiarities in Cases of Irido- fundal Coloboma Having Cataract Extraction Prof Sudarshan K. Khokhar, MD Dr Sanjay K. Mishra, MS.
ASCRS/ESCRS Survey on Foldable IOLs Requiring Explantation or Secondary Intervention 2005 Update.
“ ” “Clinico-pathologic correlation of capsulorhexis phimosis with anterior flexing of single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens haptics” Liliana.
Phacoemulsification in eyes with previous anterior chamber phakic IOL surgery Walton Nosé, MD, PhD 1,2 Adriana dos Santos Forseto, MD 1 Mariana Ávila,
1.8 mm Cataract Surgery: Clinical Results 6 Months after Coaxial and Biaxial MICS and Implantation of a New Micro- incision IOL Rosa Braga-Mele, M. Ed,
Outcomes after WIOL – CF accommodative intraocular lens implantation Institute of Vision and Optics University of Crete School of Medicine Heraklion, Crete.
Rumex International Co. Bridge between innovative technology and perfect surgery Rumex International Company th Street North, Suite 317 Clearwater,
Rumex International Co. Bridge between innovative technology and perfect surgery Rumex International Company th Street North, Suite 317 Clearwater,
Reproducibility of Optical Measurements in Pseudophakic eyes Using Double-Pass Measurement System St Thomas Hospital, London Anish Dhital, David Spalton,
A case of hypermature cataract formation following implantation of a posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central hole The Catholic University.
Edge profile of commercially available square-edge intraocular lenses
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Early capsular bag contraction with haptic dislocation following implantation of a flexible hydrophilic acrylic “psuedoaccomodating” IOL Nigel Morlet FRACS.
Comparative Study of the Aspheric Akreos Adapt AO IOL Versus the Spherical Akreos Adapt IOL Maghizh Anandan Martin Leyland.
Comparison of visual function following piggyback implantation of Acrysof ReSTOR intraocular lenses with Tecnis multifocal ZM900 intraocular lenses. Rodrigo.
I have no financial interest in any devices or techniques discussed in this presentation.
Comparison of 2 Models of Aspheric Diffractive Multifocal IOL
O.I.I. EC-3 Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lens: The European Experience Thierry Amzallag, M.D. Institut Ophtalmique Somain, France.
Preliminary Results after Cataract Surgery with the Aspheric Acrysof ReSTOR IOL to Correct Presbyopia Meeting of the ASCRS Chicago 8-10 February 2007 R.M.M.A.
Corneal shape and corneal aberrations after MicroIncision Cataract Surgery (MICS) NOCHEZ Y, BUREL B, MAJZOUB S, PISELLA PJ C.H.U.
Precision with the VisTor IOL Prof. Med. Manfred Tetz ESCRS 2015 Barcelona.
Outcomes Update for an Aspheric Accommodating IOL John A. Hovanesian, M.D. Clinical Instructor, UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute Harvard Eye Associates,
Vinohrady Teaching Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic Vinohrady Teaching Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic M. Vokrojova MD, M. Vokrojova MD, D. Sivekova MD,
Kavita Gala David Spalton Mayank Nanavaty St Thomas’ Hospital , London
Studený P., Dědková B., Farkaš A., Vokrojová M., Siveková D., Břešťák M. Oční klinika FNKV a 3 LF UK Praha Oční oddělení, Karlovarská krajská nemocnice.
September RayOne® fully preloaded IOL injection system, designed to deliver without compromise What you want: A design that can deliver an IOL.
J. E. “Jay” McDonald, II M.D. McDonald Eye Associates Fayetteville, Arkansas Financial disclosure: Bausch and Lomb – Consultant; Addition.
OUR EXPERIENCE WITH PRELOADED IOL CT LUCIA 601P(Y)
Effect of Axial Length Measurement Method on Refractive Outcomes of Cataract Surgery: Real World Comparison of Partial Coherence Interferometry and Immersion.
Eye clinic of the 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
Evaluation of Akreos AO micro-incision IOL, implantation in 350 eyes :
Opacification of the optic of an Akeos Adapt® intraocular lens
MI60 INTRAOCULAR LENSES – OUR EXPERIENCE
The authors have no financial interest
Microincision Cataract Surgery with a Scleral Approach
Comparison of vision with an accommodating IOL versus a multifocal IOL
Aspheric IOLs Comparative Study of Acri.Smart 46S*
Nathalie M. Guibord,MD Geisinger Medical Center
INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANT System Description and Diagram (task 2)
성모병원 안센터 CHANGES IN ASTIGMATISM RELATIVE TO IOL HAPTIC INSERTION AXIS IN WITH-THE-RULE AND AGAINST-THE-RULE ASTIGMATISM PATIENTS Hyun Seung Kim, M.D.
Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
Authors have no financial interests
Kellan Tetraflex KH3500 Accommodative IOLs vs. Acri
Z deformity of an acommodative IOL
Long term PCO preventive effect of capsular bending ring
Five-Year Experience With Routine Use of Healon5 in Cataract Surgery
SPINNING THE WHEEL- STABILITY OF COMMONLY USED IOL IN-THE-BAG
Presentation transcript:

Intraocular lenses for small incision surgery Roberto Bellucci MD Ophthalmic Unit, Hospital and University of Verona, Italy Simonetta Morselli MD Ophthalmic Unit, Hospital of Bassano del Grappa, Italy Financial Interest: E (Bausch & Lomb)

Requirements for MICS lenses Thinness To allow sub-2mm implantation Resistance to folding / implantation Stiffness To maintain centration, refraction Square edge To reduce PCO Easy removal

Designing sub-2mm IOLs Single-piece acrylic Thinner optics Refractive index Asphericity Optic size Special haptic design First attempt: The Thinoptx lens

The Acri.Smart solution Hydrophilic core, hydrophobic surfaces Plate haptic, standard thickness Full 6 mm optic No square edge at haptic/optic junction

The Acri.Smart results The Acri.Smart IOL provided good results in clinical studies, demonstrating that MICS IOL are excellent platforms for special optic design Alió JL, Schimchak P, Montés-Micó R, Galal A. Retinal image quality after microincision intraocular lens implantation J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31:1557-1560 Alió JL, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Vianello A, Galal A Visual outcome of microincision cataract surgery with implantation of an Acri.Smart lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31:1549-1556 Kurz S, Krummenauer F, Thieme H, Dick HB Contrast sensitivity after implantation of a spherical versus an aspherical intraocular lens in biaxial microincision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 393-400

The Acri.Smart family Spherical Acri.Smart 46S Hyperaspheric Acri.Smart 36A Neutral Aspheric Acri.Smart 46LC Toric Acri.Comfort 646TLC Multifocal Acri.Lisa 366D Multifocal Toric Acri.Lisa 466TD

The Akreos MI60 MICS IOL Material Optic Optic Body and Total length 26% hydrophilic acrylic UV blocker Refractive index 1.458 (hydrated) Optic Biconvex Aspheric anterior and posterior Optic Body and Total length 6.2x11.0 mm from 10.0 to 15.0 dpt 6.0x10.7 mm from 15.5 to 22.0 dpt 5.6x10.5 mm from 22.5 to 30.0 dpt Haptics One-piece 10° average angulation

Design features Bag-related size Four-piece haptics Angled haptics Progressive haptic resistance No hole haptic Square edge

Centration and Stability The four-loop design allows precise centration within the capsular bag, even with loose or damaged zonules STABILITY is ensured by angulation and by four-piece haptic design that counteracts vitreous pressure

Various designs, however… Plate haptic Closed-loop haptic Accommodating Large haptic holes may prevent IOL exchange Weak haptics will favour optic movement Plate haptic require intact capsular bags

Conclusion Microincision lenses are not reduced versions of standard lenses They are a new type of IOL, with specific design features They are a good option for refractive cataract surgery They are perfect platforms for special optic designs

A look at the near future Small incision lenses will increase popularity Cross-linking of the material will further increase stiffness and stability Studies on pseudoaccommodation will continue Greetings from Verona Italy