© IPC, 20131 CDGCHRONO KEF Phase 1Phase 3Phase 4Phase 2 Impl level 2 Impl level 1 Impl level 4 Impl level 3 Impl level 5 BRU AMS CPH OSL HEL ARN MAD LIS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Reverse a Journal Find an existing journal and reverse it in either: A original period B a different period.
Advertisements

Part II: Requests North Central Texas College Libraries Sometimes the material that you need is available (that is, not checked out), but is housed in.
Help File For User Creation Click the “Course” button for Creating/Add User.
Presented by © 2014 – ipc.be pages MRD POD USER GUIDE Production mode IPC 42 July 2014 MRD.
Discovery to Delivery: enabling an unmediated resource discovery and delivery service in a collaborative context Cathie Jilovsky & Michael Robinson.
USER GUIDE PRODUCTION MODE VERSION (VERSION February 2013) 1.
Remittance Advices (RAs) will now be in a PDF format, referred to as WebRAs. Providers will be automatically switched from paper RAs to WebRAs. Providers.
© IPC, 2008 Meeting Mark Ellis / IPC, Brussels, 02 nd September Future of Mail by Air Initiative; accurate EDI.
How to Submit a Matching Gifts Application.
Pg.0 e-Procurement Pilot Programme c Office of the Government Chief Information Officer Environmental Protection Department Immigration Department.
Uploading a Turnitin Assignment Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences.
Course Registration Registration Procedures. Log-in through Intranet Portal.
UNC E-Commerce Registration and Order Flow Dave Liloia PerkinElmer June 2007.
Oracle Method | Group Delivery Together. Free your energies New Supplier Registration.
HFC Registry Guidance on How to Register.
PRESENTATION BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES CALL CENTRE WWW.CIPRO.GOV.ZA Adv Werner Johnson 1 October 2002.
AQS Web Quick Reference Guide Changing Raw Data Values Using Maintenance 1. From Main Menu, click Maintenance, Sample Values, Raw Data 2. Enter monitor.
EMIS-R REVIEW FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING NWOCA Calendar Year-end Meeting December, 2009.
Moon Phases.
Online Access to Student Information System. OASIS Timeline August 2009 – teachers and staff are trained and login information is shared with parents.
© IPC, 2008 IPC Initiative of Future of Mail by Air – Executive Meeting 4 th March Current CARDIT-RESDIT (M18-M20); in context Post-Post EDI Origin.
IPC Mail Registration Device
Printing the Receiver What this tutorial covers—and doesn’t 1. WebSMARTT: Print a Receiver 2.Count the actual quantities & write them on the form 3.Label.
Voting with SOSA/OVRD SOSA/OVRD. Login and Information Screens After login, the SOSA Voting Information screen displays The Database drop-down allows.
Copyright 2013 GHSP | A JSJ Company 2 Supply Chain Portal - Creating an ASN Discover, Align, Deliver. Worry Free. GHSP.
PearsonAccess April 14, PearsonAccess – Agenda Order Tracking Additional Orders Student Data Upload (SDU) files New Student Wizard Online Testing.
Shropshire ladies league registration co.uk/
This is a short presentation to explain how and why to login to the CIM website as a member. Benefits are: Access to myCIM (private member area, contains.
CUSTOMER ORDERING QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE Oct 2015.
How to view the online lectures Open your web browser Go to Go to the upper right hand corner and click on log in.
HOW TO REQUEST ARTICLES FROM OTHER LIBRARIES IN SOUTH AFRICA Antoinette Lourens March 2005.
AEP ONCOR TNMP TDSP AMS Data Practices Summary TDSP_AMS Data Practices Summary.ppt CenterPoint.
HOW TO REGISTER WITH OBC WORLDWIDE. Managed Forex Trading PLEASE ASK YOUR INVITER TO GIVE YOU HIS affiliate LINK TO REGISTER
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Texas Assessment Management System STAAR Student Test Warnings and Suspect.
Online Work Permit Application Instruction Date: 2016/03/01 International Office, Feng Chia University.
American Diploma Project Administrative Site Training.
SRM Manual 1/11 SRM Manual - Shipping Status. SRM Manual 2/11 1.Shipping Status (Materials for lot mgmt) - S/N create by PO - S/N Update 2. Shipping Status.
American Diploma Project Administrative Site Training New Jersey.
How to ‘Deal’ with Researching Student Billing And Payment Problems Track: Finance & Business Session: 5017 Pam Nowak Senior Developer, Datatel Jeff Roderick.
American Diploma Project Administrative Site Training.
Compatible with the latest browsers; Chrome, Safari, Firefox, Opera and Internet Explorer 9 and above.
Create a PO-Based Invoice
QUESTRA HOLDINGS ACCOUNT REGISTRATION
Post Office Basic Content (Low Graders) Vocabulary
Auvesta Affiliate Validation
IPC Mail Registration Device
ETSU Student Walkthrough
Patient Access Forgotten user ID
You must know the 5-digit synonym for the course to use the
Go to
Well Come to ShopOnn …… A new Era in Online Shopping…..
TicketOS Help Guide Process Orders for Shipment
Student Test Warnings and Suspect Students
SNMS Supplier Network Management System
HFC Registry Guidance on How to Register.
How to view the online lectures
Instructions for WesleyWeb
How to retrieve CORs from any NeT program in CDX
go on Online at or Fill in the Paper Registration Form
Vendor Portal Registration Procedures
Delete a Public Holiday – Holiday Calendar
Additional Example 2: Graphing Ordered Pairs Graph and label each point on a coordinate grid. A. L (3, 5) Start at (0, 0)
SCHOOL OF ART + ART HISTORY SELF REGISTRATION
Connect McGraw Hill Set Up
This session will be recorded for learning purposes
Helping the industry investigate and reduce Mailmark Missorts
Manual for 1) Homepage Registration 2) Symposium Registration 3) Abstract Submission May by Byung Woo Han.
Registration Stand By Me
Registration and Abstract Upload
Presentation transcript:

© IPC, CDGCHRONO KEF Phase 1Phase 3Phase 4Phase 2 Impl level 2 Impl level 1 Impl level 4 Impl level 3 Impl level 5 BRU AMS CPH OSL HEL ARN MAD LIS FRA ATH Other: MRD- Implementation phasing BUD **Please click on each cell for more detailed information about the implementation level and its different phases** LIN VIECDG MXP LAX SFO

© IPC, Implementation level 1 < 50% handler registration < 80% MRD label recording by Post Simultaneous processing mostly on several workstations Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level, 0% receptacle level. <50% unit delivery registration 0-10% receptacle level Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 1 Partial MRD registration by handlers Not 100% handlers use the MRD No scan of MRD label by Post, or No possible link of MRD label with receptacle id’s in Postal system IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines) IPC CANNOT report:  POD data in CAPE to sending posts at receptacle level Back to grid

© IPC, Implementation level 1 Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 2 ~ 50%-80% handler registration ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post Mostly batch processing Simultaneous processing on several workstations at times Good quality of data for delivery time Not reliable receptacle level information Quantity: 50-80% unit delivery information 10-60% receptacles delivered Partial MRD registration by handlers Not 100% handlers use the MRD No scan of MRD label by Post, or No possible link of MRD label with receptacle id’s in Postal system IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines) IPC CANNOT report:  POD data in CAPE to sending posts at receptacle level Back to grid

© IPC, Implementation level 1 Partial MRD registration by handlers Not 100% handlers use the MRD No scan of MRD label by Post, or No possible link of MRD label with receptacle id’s in Postal system IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines) IPC CANNOT report:  POD data in CAPE to sending posts at receptacle level Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 3 ~ 80%-98% handler registration ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post Production mode based data transmission Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level 100% reliable receptacle level data Quantity: 80-98% delivery registration 65-95%receptacle level Back to grid

© IPC, Implementation level 2 < 50% handler registration < 80% MRD label recording by Post Simultaneous processing mostly on several workstations Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level, 0% receptacle level. <50% unit delivery registration 0-10% receptacle level Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 1 Partial MRD registration by handlers Not 100% handlers use the MRD Post scans MRD labels Post sends RESCON from MRD label scan to IPC Post does not comply with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines) IPC CAN partially report:  POD data receptacle level only when IPC data checks ok IPC CANNOT report:  POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level Back to grid

© IPC, Implementation level 2 Partial MRD registration by handlers Not 100% handlers use the MRD Post scans MRD labels Post sends RESCON from MRD label scan to IPC Post does not comply with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines) IPC CAN partially report:  POD data receptacle level only when IPC data checks ok IPC CANNOT report:  POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 2 ~ 50%-80% handler registration ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post Mostly batch processing Simultaneous processing on several workstations at times Good quality of data for delivery time Not reliable receptacle level information Quantity: 50-80% unit delivery information 10-60% receptacles delivered Back to grid

© IPC, Implementation level 2 Partial MRD registration by handlers Not 100% handlers use the MRD Post scans MRD labels Post sends RESCON from MRD label scan to IPC Post does not comply with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines) IPC CAN partially report:  POD data receptacle level only when IPC data checks ok IPC CANNOT report:  POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 3 ~ 80%-98% handler registration ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post Production mode based data transmission Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level 100% reliable receptacle level data Quantity: 80-98% delivery registration 65-95%receptacle level Back to grid

© IPC, Implementation level 3 < 50% handler registration < 80% MRD label recording by Post Simultaneous processing mostly on several workstations Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level, 0% receptacle level. <50% unit delivery registration 0-10% receptacle level Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 1 Full MRD registration by 100% of handlers Post scans MRD labels Post sends RESCON from MRD label scan to IPC Post does not comply with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines) IPC CAN partially report:  POD data receptacle level only when IPC data checks ok  POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level Back to grid

© IPC, Implementation level 3 Full MRD registration by 100% of handlers Post scans MRD labels Post sends RESCON from MRD label scan to IPC Post does not comply with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines) IPC CAN partially report:  POD data receptacle level only when IPC data checks ok  POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level Operations Expected quality/quantity of data ~ 50%-80% handler registration ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post Mostly batch processing Simultaneous processing on several workstations at times Good quality of data for delivery time Not reliable receptacle level information Quantity: 50-80% unit delivery information 10-60% receptacles delivered Phase 2 Back to grid

© IPC, Implementation level 3 Full MRD registration by 100% of handlers Post scans MRD labels Post sends RESCON from MRD label scan to IPC Post does not comply with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines) IPC CAN partially report:  POD data receptacle level only when IPC data checks ok  POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 3 ~ 80%-98% handler registration ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post Production mode based data transmission Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level 100% reliable receptacle level data Quantity: 80-98% delivery registration 65-95%receptacle level Back to grid

© IPC, Implementation level 4 < 50% handler registration < 80% MRD label recording by Post Simultaneous processing mostly on several workstations Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level, 0% receptacle level. <50% unit delivery registration 0-10% receptacle level Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 1 Partial MRD registration by handlers Not 100% handlers use the MRD Post scans ALL MRD labels Post complies with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines)  Receptacle ID POD where receptacles are registered  Receptacle POD data in CAPE are 100% correct IPC CANNOT report:  POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level where deliveries are not registered by handlers Back to grid

© IPC, Implementation level 4 Partial MRD registration by handlers Not 100% handlers use the MRD Post scans ALL MRD labels Post complies with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines)  Receptacle ID POD where receptacles are registered  Receptacle POD data in CAPE are 100% correct IPC CANNOT report:  POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level where deliveries are not registered by handlers Operations Expected quality/quantity of data ~ 50%-80% handler registration ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post Mostly batch processing Simultaneous processing on several workstations at times Good quality of data for delivery time Not reliable receptacle level information Quantity: 50-80% unit delivery information 10-60% receptacles delivered Phase 2 Back to grid

© IPC, Implementation level 4 Partial MRD registration by handlers Not 100% handlers use the MRD Post scans ALL MRD labels Post complies with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines)  Receptacle ID POD where receptacles are registered  Receptacle POD data in CAPE are 100% correct IPC CANNOT report:  POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level where deliveries are not registered by handlers Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 3 ~ 80%-98% handler registration ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post Production mode based data transmission Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level 100% reliable receptacle level data Quantity: 80-98% delivery registration 65-95%receptacle level Back to grid

© IPC, Implementation level 4 Partial MRD registration by handlers Not 100% handlers use the MRD Post scans ALL MRD labels Post complies with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines)  Receptacle ID POD where receptacles are registered  Receptacle POD data in CAPE are 100% correct IPC CANNOT report:  POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level where deliveries are not registered by handlers Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 4 ~ 100% handler registration ~100% MRD label recording by Post Production mode based data transmission ~ 100% quality at unit and receptacle level Quantity: ~ 100% unit and receptacle level data Back to grid

© IPC, Implementation level 5 100% MRD use by handlers Post scans ALL MRD labels Post complies with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines)  Receptacle POD data in CAPE are 100% correct  Full POD at receptacle level availability for posts and airlines IPC CANNOT report:  Potential missing registrations because of operational process failures Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 3 ~ 80%-98% handler registration ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post Production mode based data transmission Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level 100% reliable receptacle level data Quantity: 80-98% delivery registration 65-95%receptacle level Back to grid

© IPC, Implementation level 5 100% MRD use by handlers Post scans ALL MRD labels Post complies with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines)  Receptacle POD data in CAPE are 100% correct  Full POD at receptacle level availability for posts and airlines IPC CANNOT report:  Potential missing registrations because of operational process failures Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 4 ~ 100% handler registration ~100% MRD label recording by Post Production mode based data transmission ~ 100% quality at unit and receptacle level Quantity: ~ 100% unit and receptacle level data Back to grid