Updated January 2013. “There’s an enormous brain drain being lost in our country. Children under 5 are not being empowered to reach their potential and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Champlain Valley Head Start Child Outcomes Assessment in Champlain Valley Head Start.
Advertisements

Introduction to the Environment Rating Scales
Desired Results Developmental Profile - school readiness© A Project of the California department of education, child development division.
Slide 1 Comparison of Young Children’s Development by Child and Family Characteristics Tulsa County Results February 2014.
Early Child Development in Richmond Clyde Hertzman, MD Human Early Learning Partnership University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Understanding the Early Years Action Planning Session Thursday, May 22, 2008 Delta Brunswick Hotel Saint John, NB.
EDI Neighbourhood Data EDI Results & 2011 Neighbourhood Demographics.
Best Start Conference January Peel Health Great Beginnings Initiative  In 1999, McCain and Mustard’s Early Years Study documented the importance.
Learning Supports Division Alberta Early Child Development (ECD) Mapping Project Presentation to the Lethbridge Symposium on Innovative Approaches to Pre-School.
[Insert your presentation title here.]. ASCD: A Worldwide Community of Educators.
Nine states were awarded a Race to the Top - Early Learning Challenge Grant: California, Delaware, MARYLAND, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina,
Results from the Middle Years Development Instrument (MDI)
LINC Advisory Committee September 10, Group Breakout Session 1.Reflecting on the presentation, what state or district policies from other states.
Campaign Overview and Update Great Rivers Conference February 17, 2015.
This research was supported by: U.S. Department of Education (U411B110098) and private-sector matched funds from 20 funders and foundations The Human Capital.
Kindergarten Entry Assessment as the fulcrum of the birth-to-3rd grade continuum May 2012 as the fulcrum of the birth-to-3rd grade continuum May 2012.
Presenters: Donna Morrison and Laurie Lafortune Alberta Understanding the Early Years Conference: October, 2008.
Preschool California STAFF DATE PRESENTATION Transitional Kindergarten.
Understanding The Early Years Niagara College ECE Program  October 2007 Glory Ressler, B.A., Dip. GIT Coordinator, Understanding the Early Years Niagara.
A Population Health Approach to Early Childhood Development APHA 2014 Lisa Stanley, DrPH (310) Neal.
This PowerPoint was developed by ECMap to be used as a framework by coalitions and communities in presenting their community profile results.
Human Early Learning Partnership (HELP) Provincial ECD Mapping Project Early Development Instrument (EDI) Implementation in BC School Districts Teacher.
Community Input Discussions: Measuring the Progress of Young Children in Massachusetts August 2009.
Creating knowledge to help children thrive Clyde Thank you for everything.
United Way of Greater Toledo - Framework for Education Priority community issue: Education – Prepare children to enter and graduate from school.
National Head Start Association Leadership Institute January 29, 2009 Presentation by Joan Lombardi, Ph.D. Early Childhood Development: At the dawn of.
1 UEY Red Deer Preliminary Results Research Forum: December 1, 2009 The School Readiness of Red Deer’s Kindergarten Children: A Preliminary Report on the.
Monitoring community progress on School Readiness : The Early Development Instrument World Bank, May 2008.
1 The Early Childhood Development Association of PEI Understanding the Early Years Prince Edward Island Profile.
COMMUNITY KNOWLEDGE: Readiness to Learn in Niagara GLORY RESSLER Coordinator Understanding the Early Years TIFFANY GARTNER Data Analysis Coordinator Ontario.
Understanding The Early Years and The Community Action Plan Michelle Ward,Executive Director - Kids First Association Lisa MacRae, Public Health Nurse.
Early Childhood Development (ECD) Scales: Overview & Lessons Learned Dr. Ghazala Rafique Aga Khan University Pakistan Regional Consultative Meetings on.
A Guide to NAEYC Accreditation
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Slide 1. slide 2 slide 3 Risk to Ready begins with the Early Development Instrument Developed in Canada in 1998 and expanding across US since 2009 through.
Reload images Reload Images Understanding the AEDI results Blue Mountains LGA – Key Stakeholders 16 September 2013.
1 NNIP EARLY CHILDHOOD SESSION November 13 th, 2008 Baltimore, MD.
Children Entering School Ready to Learn The Maryland School Readiness Report what the school readiness data mean for Maryland’s children.
Measuring School Readiness : The Early Development Instrument Washington, DC, 17 February 2005 Magdalena Janus, Ph.D.
Minnesota’s School Readiness Study 1 Developmental Assessment at Kindergarten Entrance.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
Using the Early Development Instrument to Support School Readiness NURTURING NEW ROOTS Supporting the Newcomer Family 6 th Ontario Professional Development.
+ Third Party Evaluation – Interim Report Presentation for Early Childhood Advisory Council December 19, 2013.
Summary of EDI SK Results Algoma 2004/05 & 2005/06 Sept 25th 2007 Algoma-Manitoulin Ontario Early Years.
Getting Ready Opportunities for Progress on Early Childhood Education Presented by: Elizabeth Burke Bryant Rhode Island KIDS COUNT May 1, 2009.
Implementation of Interventions to Promote Young Children’s Social and Behavioral Outcomes.
1 Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment. Common Core Pre-K Standards Mounting evidence supports that a child’s earliest years, from birth to age eight,
Early Development Instrument The. A teacher completed instrument which measures children’s development - Offord Centre for Child Studies.
Lincoln Community Learning Centers A system of partnerships that work together to support children, youth, families and neighborhoods. CLC.
Kindergarten Entry Assessment (KEA): Getting It Right For All Children Kathleen Hebbeler, SRI International Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center.
Early Development Index (EDI). What is the Early Development Index?  Teacher-completed checklist on children’s development measured in the spring of.
Implementing CDC’s School Guidelines: Challenges And Opportunities Joy Larson Utah Department of Health Tobacco Prevention & Control Program.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Minnesota's Approach to Comprehensive Assessment Megan E. Cox, Ph.D. Principal Leadership Academy January 11, 2016 Minnesota’s Approach to Comprehensive.
Wisconsin Early Model Learning Standards: A Framework for our Program
1 Oregon Commission on Children & Families System of 36 local commissions and Governor appointed State Commission – including seven agencies Community.
Louisiana Migrant Education Program Parent Advisory Council ** PAC **
An Evaluation of the Effect of Early Childhood Education on the Mental and Physical Health of Children Ages 0-5 in Geneva, New York ABSTRACTRESULTS AND.
Children Entering School Ready to Learn The Maryland School Readiness Report what the school readiness data mean for Maryland’s children.
Sociocultural Influences Related to Language, Cognition, and Social Emotional Developmental Relationships Presenters: Kimberly Sharkins & Dr. James Ernest.
Prepared for the Office of Head Start by ICF International School Readiness Goals: Using Data to Support Child Outcomes.
USING DATA TO INSPIRE PROGRAMMATIC CHANGE EARLY DEVELOPMENT INDEX (EDI) & DRDP/ASSESSMENTS.
Transformational Leadership Group of Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools Performance of Disadvantaged Youth November 23, 2010 Brenda Steele, Co-Chair.
Our Children Our Communities Our Future Australian Early Development Census (AEDC) Prepared by Gail Clark, WA AEDC Coordinator.
II Inter-American Symposium: Policies and Strategies for the Child’s Successful Transition to Socialization and School Valparaiso, Chile May 27-29, 2009.
Our Children, Our Community, Our Change
Presentation to NNIP September 14, 2016 Rebekah Dorman, PhD.
Chapter 5 Early Identification and Intervention
Using Data To Learn About Our Young Children: Mapping Early Development Instrument (EDI) Results in Miami-Dade County. Zafreen Jaffery, Ed.D.
Community Input Discussions:
Presentation transcript:

Updated January 2013

“There’s an enormous brain drain being lost in our country. Children under 5 are not being empowered to reach their potential and it’s a huge loss to children, their parents, their community, and our society” --Neal Halfon, M.D., Director, UCLA Center for Healthier Children, Families & Communities “Young children are our last chance at prevention” --Nina Sazer O’Donnell, Vice President, Education, United Way Worldwide 2

Project overview Data--Early Development Instrument implementation Complete EDI in all schools in partner districts in 3 years (2011-3)—approximately 5,000 children Move EDI outside Tulsa area (2012-3) Action--Using results for system improvement Community response in selected neighborhoods ( ) School-based responses 3

The Early Development Instrument Developed in Canada in 1998 and expanding across US since 2009 Population-based (results for neighborhoods and schools but not individual children) Teacher-administered (no child involvement or use of class time) Kindergarten level (first comprehensive and comparable assessment under grade 3) Multi-domain (not just “academics”) Evaluations show high reliability, moderate validity, good predictive validity 4

RESULTS 5

EDI Tulsa Overall Results 3,100 children EDI DomainAll TulsaDefinitions Developmentally “Very Ready” 408 (14%)75 th percentile or higher on 4 or more of the 5 domains Developmentally Vulnerable on 2 or More Domains 600 (20%)10 th percentile or lower on 2 or more of the 5 domains Multiple Challenge Index 236 (8%)“Not ready” on 9 or more of the 15 sub-domains Most are included in “Developmentally Vulnerable” 6

EDI Sub-domains with High Vulnerability EDI DomainAll Tulsa Vulnerable Key sub-domain issues Physical Health and Well-Being 20% 14% not physically ready for school 18% not physically independent 32% not ready in motor skills Social Competence 15% 18% not ready in approaches to learning 14% not ready in responsibility and respect Emotional Maturity 18% 32% not ready in prosocial/helping 26% not ready in hyperactive and inattentive behavior 21% not ready in aggressive behavior Language and Cognitive Skills (school-based) 12% 20% not ready in interest in literacy/numeracy Communication Skills and general knowledge 9% (no sub-domains) 7

TULSA SUBGROUP RESULTS (2011 results only, approximately 1,500 children) 8

Whether Attended Any Pre-K 9 * Indicates significantly different from children who did not attend pre-K

Whether Enrolled in CAP Age 4 10 *Indicates results differ significantly from children who were not in CAP at age 4. Children in CAP at 4 are also significantly less likely to have multiple challenges.

% Vulnerable by Preschool 11

% Developmentally Vulnerable by Domain—CAP Status 12

EDI Maps 13

EDI Maps Show results by where children live, not where they go to school Maps that are not included in this presentation also show domain vulnerability, socioeconomic status, community assets identified by CAP. 14

% vulnerable on 2+ domains by neighborhood, central Tulsa 15

% Vulnerable, Physical Health and Well- Being 16

Next Steps 17

Continue EDIs In Tulsa Complete 3 rd year EDIs (January-March) Review results (November) 3 years combined Can compare with other areas in state for first time Outside Tulsa Expanding in north and southeast Oklahoma this school year Expecting to expand further in

Using EDI results to change systems Community continues response (CAP) Share results with school boards, city leadership, business and community groups Use results in ongoing neighborhood efforts (Kendall-Whittier and Eugene Field) School-based presentations and discussions Identifying community partners Identifying local areas for response School response (districts) Review school-level and neighborhood-level results with faculty, parents, neighborhood groups and determine next steps (with CAP assistance if desired) 19

For more information Paul Shinn, Public Policy Analyst, CAP (918) Caleb Gayle, Advocacy and Outreach Specialist, CAP (918) TECCS national site (fact sheets, sample documents, evaluations, local community efforts, etc.)